Inference Suboptimality in Variational Autoencoders
read the original abstract
Amortized inference allows latent-variable models trained via variational learning to scale to large datasets. The quality of approximate inference is determined by two factors: a) the capacity of the variational distribution to match the true posterior and b) the ability of the recognition network to produce good variational parameters for each datapoint. We examine approximate inference in variational autoencoders in terms of these factors. We find that divergence from the true posterior is often due to imperfect recognition networks, rather than the limited complexity of the approximating distribution. We show that this is due partly to the generator learning to accommodate the choice of approximation. Furthermore, we show that the parameters used to increase the expressiveness of the approximation play a role in generalizing inference rather than simply improving the complexity of the approximation.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Tessellations of Semi-Discrete Flow Matching
Semi-discrete Flow Matching produces terminal assignment regions that are topologically simple (open, simply connected, homeomorphic to the ball under assumption) yet geometrically distinct from optimal transport Lagu...
-
Bayesian Neural Networks: An Introduction and Survey
A survey introducing Bayesian Neural Networks and comparing approximate inference methods to enable uncertainty quantification in neural network predictions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.