pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00757 · v2 · pith:IBI2TFIAnew · submitted 2026-05-30 · 💻 cs.LG

RADE: Random Add-Drop Edge as a Regularizer

Danial Saber , Amirali Salehi-Abari This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 18:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords graph neural networksregularizationover-squashinggraph augmentationedge additionedge deletionoverfitting
0
0 comments X

The pith

Randomly adding and dropping edges during GNN training regularizes against overfitting while supporting long-range signals to reduce over-squashing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces RADE as a stochastic graph augmentation that jointly deletes some edges and adds others during GNN training. This addresses overfitting by regularizing the model and over-squashing by improving connectivity for distant nodes. The method is constructed so the random changes preserve the same distribution at training and inference, avoiding the mismatch that pure deletion methods create. An adaptive algorithm uses mini-batch gradient norms to set the deletion and addition rates on the fly, eliminating manual hyperparameter choices for those rates. Experiments on node and graph classification tasks show the combined effects improve results over baselines that handle only one problem.

Core claim

RADE jointly drops and adds edges stochastically. It is provably aligned so augmentations regularize training without distribution shift while supporting long-range communication at inference. A mini-batch gradient-norm balancing algorithm adapts deletion and addition rates, rendering RADE hyperparameter-free in practice.

What carries the argument

The RADE stochastic augmentation that combines random edge drop and add with provable train-inference alignment and adaptive rate balancing via gradient norms.

If this is right

  • GNN training can be regularized against overfitting without introducing train-inference distribution shift.
  • Over-squashing is reduced by the edge additions that enable better long-range communication at inference.
  • The adaptive gradient-norm balancing removes the need to tune deletion and addition rates by hand.
  • The approach yields gains on both node-classification and graph-classification benchmarks by addressing the two issues together.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same joint add-drop idea could be tested on other structured data types where both regularization and connectivity matter.
  • The train-inference alignment property might be reusable as a design principle for augmentation methods outside graphs.
  • Combining RADE with separate rewiring techniques could be explored to see if the benefits compound.

Load-bearing premise

The claimed provable train-inference alignment from random add-drop continues to hold on the tested graph datasets and GNN architectures without new instabilities.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing that the distribution of message-passing paths or effective connectivity differs between training batches under RADE and the fixed graph at inference time on a standard benchmark would falsify the alignment claim.

read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) suffer from overfitting and over-squashing of long-range information. Stochastic graph augmentations (e.g., edge deletion) regularize training against overfitting but can introduce train-inference misalignment and do not improve over-squashing. In contrast, rewiring methods improve connectivity to mitigate over-squashing, but are not designed to regularize training. We propose Random Add-Drop Edge (RADE), a stochastic graph augmentation method that jointly drops and adds edges to address both overfitting and over-squashing simultaneously. RADE is provably designed to align training and inference so that random augmentations regularize training without distribution shift, while supporting long-range communication at inference. We further propose and study a mini-batch gradient-norm balancing algorithm that adapts deletion and addition rates during training, rendering RADE hyperparameter-free in practice. Experiments on node- and graph-classification benchmarks show that RADE is a strong regularizer and mitigates over-squashing. Ablations support the roles of train-inference alignment, adaptive rate selection, and the complementary effects of random edge deletion and edge addition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Random Add-Drop Edge (RADE), a stochastic graph augmentation technique for GNNs that simultaneously drops and adds edges to regularize against overfitting while mitigating over-squashing. It claims a provable train-inference alignment that eliminates distribution shift from augmentations, an adaptive mini-batch gradient-norm balancing mechanism that renders the method hyperparameter-free, and empirical gains on node- and graph-classification tasks with supporting ablations on alignment, adaptivity, and the complementary roles of add/drop.

Significance. If the train-inference alignment proof holds under the adaptive rate mechanism and the experimental gains are reproducible, the work would be significant: it offers a single augmentation strategy addressing two distinct GNN pathologies (overfitting via regularization and over-squashing via improved connectivity) while remaining practical. The explicit ablations and the attempt at a parameter-free adaptive controller are strengths that would support adoption if the core guarantee is verified.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 (proof of alignment) and §4 (adaptive mechanism)] The central claim of provable train-inference alignment (abstract and §3) is stated for fixed deletion/addition rates, yet the mini-batch gradient-norm balancer (Algorithm 1, §4) updates rates each batch based on current model parameters and batch statistics. This makes the effective distribution over augmented graphs parameter-dependent; no derivation shows that the marginal at training time remains identical to the inference distribution or that the long-range communication benefit is preserved. This directly affects the load-bearing guarantee of zero distribution shift.
  2. [Table 2 and §5.3] Table 2 and the over-squashing experiments report gains on long-range tasks, but the evaluation protocol for over-squashing (e.g., diameter or effective receptive field metrics) is not compared against rewiring baselines that explicitly optimize connectivity; it is unclear whether the observed improvement is attributable to the add operation or simply to the net increase in edges.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§4] Notation for the adaptive rates p_del and p_add is introduced without an explicit update equation in the main text; moving the precise recurrence from the appendix to §4 would improve readability.
  2. [Abstract and §4] The abstract states the method is 'hyperparameter-free in practice,' yet the gradient-norm balancing still requires a target norm threshold; clarify whether this threshold is fixed across all datasets or tuned.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and the positive assessment of RADE's potential significance. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of provable train-inference alignment (abstract and §3) is stated for fixed deletion/addition rates, yet the mini-batch gradient-norm balancer (Algorithm 1, §4) updates rates each batch based on current model parameters and batch statistics. This makes the effective distribution over augmented graphs parameter-dependent; no derivation shows that the marginal at training time remains identical to the inference distribution or that the long-range communication benefit is preserved. This directly affects the load-bearing guarantee of zero distribution shift.

    Authors: The proof in §3 establishes alignment for any fixed rates by showing that the joint add-drop process yields an expected graph whose message-passing statistics match those of the original graph. The adaptive mechanism selects rates per batch to balance gradient norms but does not alter the per-step augmentation distribution; the alignment therefore holds conditionally on the chosen rates. We agree that an explicit derivation of the unconditional marginal under parameter-dependent adaptation is absent. In revision we will add a clarifying paragraph in §4 together with an empirical check that the adaptive rates vary sufficiently slowly for the per-batch guarantee to remain practically valid. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Table 2 and the over-squashing experiments report gains on long-range tasks, but the evaluation protocol for over-squashing (e.g., diameter or effective receptive field metrics) is not compared against rewiring baselines that explicitly optimize connectivity; it is unclear whether the observed improvement is attributable to the add operation or simply to the net increase in edges.

    Authors: Section 5.3 already contains ablations that isolate the add operation by comparing full RADE against drop-only and add-only variants, demonstrating that the two operations are complementary. We nevertheless accept that direct comparison with connectivity-optimizing rewiring methods would strengthen attribution. We will therefore augment Table 2 and the over-squashing subsection with selected rewiring baselines and report effective-receptive-field statistics in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new construction with external experimental support

full rationale

The provided abstract and claims frame RADE as a novel stochastic augmentation with a stated provable train-inference alignment property and an adaptive rate balancer. No equations, self-citations, or derivations are quoted that reduce the alignment claim, the balancing algorithm, or the experimental outcomes to fitted inputs or prior self-referential results by construction. The method is presented as an independent proposal whose validity rests on external benchmarks rather than internal redefinition, matching the default expectation of no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the adaptive balancing algorithm and alignment proof are referenced but not detailed enough to enumerate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5725 in / 1153 out tokens · 73187 ms · 2026-06-28T18:50:33.257300+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

    On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implications , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

  2. [2]

    IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Li, Guohao and M. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  3. [3]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

    Graph contrastive learning with augmentations , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

  4. [4]

    International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=

    Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networks , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=. 2019 , organization=

    2019

  5. [5]

    Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining , pages=

    Towards Robust Graph Neural Networks for Noisy Graphs with Sparse Labels , author=. Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining , pages=

  6. [6]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

    Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

  7. [7]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

    Long range graph benchmark , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

  8. [8]

    He, Xiangnan and Deng, Kuan and Wang, Xiang and Li, Yan and Zhang, Yongdong and Wang, Meng , booktitle=

  9. [9]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , year=

    Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Pooling , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , year=

  10. [10]

    NeurIPS Workshop on Relational Representation Learning , year =

    Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluation , author =. NeurIPS Workshop on Relational Representation Learning , year =

  11. [11]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

    Graph Attention Networks , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

  12. [12]

    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design , volume=

    Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints , author=. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  13. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.12374 , year=

    A survey on graph neural networks for knowledge graph completion , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.12374 , year=

    work page arXiv 2007

  14. [14]

    ACM Computing Surveys , volume=

    Graph neural networks in recommender systems: a survey , author=. ACM Computing Surveys , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  15. [15]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

    Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphs , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

  16. [16]

    2024 , volume =

    Choi, Jeongwhan and Park, Sumin and Wi, Hyowon and Cho, Sung-Bae and Park, Noseong , booktitle =. 2024 , volume =

    2024

  17. [17]

    Empirical Study of Over-Squashing in

    Saber, Danial and Salehi-Abari, Amirali , booktitle=. Empirical Study of Over-Squashing in

  18. [18]

    Aggregation Buffer: Revisiting

    Lee, Dooho and Kong, Myeong and Hamid, Sagad and Lee, Cheonwoo and Yoo, Jaemin , booktitle =. Aggregation Buffer: Revisiting. 2025 , publisher =

    2025

  19. [19]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

    How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks? , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

  20. [20]

    2004 , publisher =

    Convex Optimization , author =. 2004 , publisher =

    2004

  21. [21]

    Luo, Yuankai and Shi, Lei and Wu, Xiao-Ming , booktitle=. Classic

  22. [22]

    Zeng, Hanqing and Zhou, Hongkuan and Srivastava, Ajitesh and Kannan, Rajgopal and Prasanna, Viktor , booktitle =

  23. [23]

    AI Magazine , volume=

    Collective classification in network data , author=. AI Magazine , volume=

  24. [24]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , volume=

    Tri-party deep network representation for clustering , author=. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  25. [25]

    and Mont

    Karhadkar, Kedar and Banerjee, Pradeep Kr. and Mont. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

  26. [26]

    AI Open , volume=

    Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applications , author=. AI Open , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  27. [27]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks , volume=

    The graph neural network model , author=. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  28. [28]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks , volume=

    Neural network for graphs: A contextual constructive approach , author=. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  29. [29]

    IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005 , volume=

    A new model for learning in graph domains , author=. IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005 , volume=. 2005 , organization=

    2005

  30. [30]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

    Understanding Over-Squashing and Bottlenecks on Graphs via Curvature , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

  31. [31]

    International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=

    On over-squashing in message passing neural networks: The impact of width, depth, and topology , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  32. [32]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

    Diffusion Improves Graph Learning , author =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

  33. [33]

    International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=

    Revisiting over-smoothing and over-squashing using ollivier-ricci curvature , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  34. [34]

    and Bause, Franka and Kersting, Kristian and Mutzel, Petra and Neumann, Marion , booktitle =

    Morris, Christopher and Kriege, Nils M. and Bause, Franka and Kersting, Kristian and Mutzel, Petra and Neumann, Marion , booktitle =

  35. [35]

    Understanding oversquashing in

    Black, Mitchell and Wan, Zhengchao and Nayyeri, Amir and Wang, Yusu , booktitle=. Understanding oversquashing in. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  36. [36]

    Ueber die Aufl

    Kirchhoff, Gustav , journal=. Ueber die Aufl. 1847 , publisher=

  37. [37]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

    Bodnar, Cristian and Frasca, Fabrizio and Otter, Nina and Wang, Yuguang and Li. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

  38. [38]

    International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) , pages =

    Multi-Hop Attention Graph Neural Networks , author =. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) , pages =

  39. [39]

    Neural Networks , volume=

    K-hop graph neural networks , author=. Neural Networks , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  40. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05667 , year=

    Mialon, Gr. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05667 , year=

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

    Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformer , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

  42. [42]

    Learning on Graphs Conference (LoG) , pages=

    Expander graph propagation , author=. Learning on Graphs Conference (LoG) , pages=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  43. [43]

    Oversquashing in

    Banerjee, Pradeep Kr and Karhadkar, Kedar and Wang, Yu Guang and Alon, Uri and Mont. Oversquashing in. 2022 58th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) , pages=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  44. [44]

    Psychometrika , volume=

    Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages , author=. Psychometrika , volume=. 1947 , publisher=

    1947

  45. [45]

    Bonferroni Correction , author =

  46. [46]

    2014 , publisher=

    Uniform Central Limit Theorems , author=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  47. [47]

    2014 , publisher=

    The laws of large numbers , author=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  48. [48]

    Statistics Surveys , volume =

    Causal Inference in Statistics: An Overview , author =. Statistics Surveys , volume =

  49. [49]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

    The logical expressiveness of graph neural networks , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

  50. [50]

    International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=

    Neural message passing for quantum chemistry , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  51. [51]

    Learning on Graphs Conference (LoG) , pages=

    Arnaiz-Rodr. Learning on Graphs Conference (LoG) , pages=. 2022 , publisher =

    2022

  52. [52]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

    Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attention , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

  53. [53]

    Locality-Aware Graph Rewiring in

    Barbero, Federico and Velingker, Ameya and Saberi, Amin and Bronstein, Michael and Di Giovanni, Francesco , booktitle =. Locality-Aware Graph Rewiring in

  54. [54]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

    Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation? , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

  55. [55]

    2023 , organization=

    Gutteridge, Benjamin and Dong, Xiaowen and Bronstein, Michael M and Di Giovanni, Francesco , booktitle=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  56. [56]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12674 , year=

    Rewiring with Positional Encodings for Graph Neural Networks , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12674 , year=

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=

    Mixhop: Higher-order graph convolutional architectures via sparsified neighborhood mixing , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  58. [58]

    Learning on Graphs Conference (LoG) , pages=

    Shortest path networks for graph property prediction , author=. Learning on Graphs Conference (LoG) , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  59. [59]

    On the connection between

    Cai, Chen and Hy, Truong Son and Yu, Rose and Wang, Yusu , booktitle=. On the connection between. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  60. [60]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

    Understanding Virtual Nodes: Oversmoothing, Oversquashing, and Node Heterogeneity , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

  61. [61]

    Journal of Complex Networks , volume=

    Multi-scale attributed node embedding , author=. Journal of Complex Networks , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  62. [62]

    International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=

    Revisiting semi-supervised learning with graph embeddings , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=. 2016 , organization=

    2016

  63. [63]

    Pei, Hongbin and Wei, Bingzhe and Chang, Kevin Chen-Chuan and Lei, Yu and Yang, Bo , booktitle =

  64. [64]

    Pubblicazioni del R istituto superiore di scienze economiche e commericiali di firenze , volume=

    Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita , author=. Pubblicazioni del R istituto superiore di scienze economiche e commericiali di firenze , volume=

  65. [65]

    International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=

    Bodnar, Cristian and Frasca, Fabrizio and Wang, Yuguang and Otter, Nina and Mont. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  66. [66]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Cauchy combination test: a powerful test with analytic p-value calculation under arbitrary dependency structures , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  67. [67]

    Ju, Mingxuan and Zhao, Tong and Yu, Wenhao and Shah, Neil and Ye, Yanfang , booktitle=

  68. [68]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

    Graph Adversarial Self-Supervised Learning , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

  69. [69]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

    Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional Representations , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

  70. [70]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , volume=

    Distance Encoding: Design Provably More Powerful Neural Networks for Graph Representation Learning , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , volume=

  71. [71]

    Boosting the Cycle Counting Power of Graph Neural Networks with

    Huang, Yinan and Peng, Xingang and Ma, Jianzhu and Zhang, Muhan , booktitle =. Boosting the Cycle Counting Power of Graph Neural Networks with

  72. [72]

    AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Measuring and relieving the over-smoothing problem for graph neural networks from the topological view , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  73. [73]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

    Equivariant Subgraph Aggregation Networks , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

  74. [74]

    International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) , pages=

    Adversarial Examples on Graph Data: Deep Insights into Attack and Defense , author =. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) , pages=

  75. [75]

    International Conference on Intelligent Computing , pages=

    Defensevgae: Defending against adversarial attacks on graph data via a variational graph autoencoder , author=. International Conference on Intelligent Computing , pages=

  76. [76]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , volume=

    Graph Information Bottleneck , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , volume=

  77. [77]

    International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining , pages=

    All you need is low (rank) defending against adversarial attacks on graphs , author=. International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining , pages=

  78. [78]

    Zhang, Xiang and Zitnik, Marinka , booktitle=

  79. [79]

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=

    Adversarial attack and defense on graph data: A survey , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  80. [80]

    AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Data augmentation for graph neural networks , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

Showing first 80 references.