Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Classical elliptic integrable systems from the moduli space of instantons

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single factorization identity for theta-transformed qq-characters reproduces the elliptic Calogero-Moser and Ruijsenaars-Schneider Lax matrices from instanton geometry.

desk verdict Proof-carrying review: the factorization theorem is genuinely proven, the Lax matrices come out cleanly, but the load-bearing exact linearity of χω is imported from [32] and needs referee verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00912 v1 pith:IDXTLFLQ submitted 2024-12-01 math-ph math.MP

Andrei Grekov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 14D2137J3581T1314H7070H06
keywords ellipticCalogero-MoserRuijsenaars-Schneiderqq-charactersinstantonmodulispaceaffineLaumonLaxmatrixequivariantcohomologyK-theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that the classical Lax matrix of the elliptic Calogero-Moser system is not an independent construction: it can be derived from the equivariant cohomology of the moduli space of instantons, through a single factorization identity for the so-called $\theta$-transform of qq-characters. In the classical limit the matrix of transformed characters splits as $D(x,z)=D_0(z)+xD_1(z)$, and the ratio $-U^{-1}D_0(z)D_1(z)^{-1}U$ reproduces the known $\theta$-function Lax matrix with the correct quasi-periodicity and residue. The analogous construction in equivariant K-theory gives the Lax matrix of the elliptic Ruijsenaars-Schneider model, and a determinant identity ties the spectral curve of these systems to the same gauge-theory observable. A sympathetic reader should care because this locates the origin of the classical integrable dynamics in the same equivariant geometry that computes instanton partition functions, and it supplies the Lax eigenvector from folded-instanton partition functions.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the matrix of qq-characters $\chi_\omega(x)$ in the $\epsilon_1\to0$ limit, assembled into $\hat{\chi}(x)$, along with the cyclic shift matrix $C_z$ and the diagonal matrices of coordinates $x_\omega$ and momenta $p_\omega$. The $\theta$-transform $\hat{D}(x,z)$ is an infinite product of shift operators (equation (155)); Theorem 4.1 states that this product equals a sum over integer shifts of $\hat{\chi}$, and Theorem 4.2 fixes its transformation under $(x,z)\mapsto(x+m,qz)$. The reason this produces a Lax matrix is that, in the classical limit, the individual factors depend on $x$ only through ratios $\hat{Y}(x-(n+1)m)/\hat{Y}(x-nm)$, and the qq-characters become linear in $x$ (or in $e^{-\beta x}$), so $\hat{D}$ splits into two pieces. The factorization of the coefficient $D_1(z)$ is a matrix Jacobi identity whose determinant is the elliptic $\theta$ function; this is the identity that converts the formal infinite product into the explicit $\theta$-function entries of the Lax matrix.

What would settle it

For $N=2$, use the explicit matrix (432) and the identity (170), and check the large-$x$ behavior under the limit-shape equations (127): if $\chi_\omega(x)-\theta(x+\epsilon-p_\omega)\prod_{l\ge1}(1-x_\omega/x_{\omega-l})$ has a nonzero term of order $x^0$ in the $\epsilon_1\to0$ limit, then $\hat{D}(x,z)$ is not linear in $x$ and the Lax formula (176) does not follow. A numerical evaluation of the limit-shape sum for $N=2$ to high instanton number would settle this.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery, on the paper's own terms, is Theorem 4.1: after setting $\epsilon_1=0$, the $\theta$-transform $\hat{D}(x,z)$ of the matrix of orbifolded qq-characters factorizes into an infinite ordered product of matrices built from $\hat{Y}$, $\hat{Q}$, $C_z$, and the shift $e^{\epsilon\partial_x}$. The factorization has a clean transformation law $X\hat{D}(x+m,qz)=-\hat{D}(x,z)X\hat{C}_{qz}$, and in the classical limit $\epsilon_1=\epsilon_2=0$ the operator becomes a section of a homomorphism bundle whose determinant is $\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}(-z)^n q^{n(n+1)/2}\chi(x+nm)$; setting this to zero is the spectral curve of the elliptic Calogero-Moser, elliptic Ruijsenaars-Schneider, and double-elliptic Dell systems. In the equivariant cohomology case the transformed matrix is linear in $x$, $\hat{D}(x,z)=D_0(z)+xD_1(z)$, and the paper proves that $-U^{-1}D_0(z)D_1(z)^{-1}U$ equals the standard explicit $\theta$-function Lax matrix (176). In K-theory the same product gives the elliptic Ruijsenaars-Schneider Lax matrix (191). The paper further claims that the eigenvector of the Lax matrix is given by the folded-instanton partition function, and that the factorization identity yields Bethe-type equations and spectral duality in the trigonometric and elliptic limits.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that in the $\epsilon_1\to0$ limit the functions $Y_\omega(x)$ and $\chi_\omega(x)$ are completely determined by the limit-shape equations (127) and by the large-$x$ form (132), with $p_\omega$ the conjugate momenta; if subleading corrections to the limit shape enter at order $x^0$, the decomposition $D(x,z)=D_0(z)+xD_1(z)$ and the Lax matrix read off from it would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The spectral curve of the elliptic Calogero-Moser system, $\det(x-L(z))=0$, becomes the vanishing of the scalar theta-transform $\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}(-z)^n q^{n(n+1)/2}\chi(x+nm)$, placing the classical curve inside the same gauge-theory correlation function that defines the quantum system.
  • The elliptic Ruijsenaars-Schneider model acquires a Lax matrix from the same construction in K-theory, so the relativistic generalization is not a separate classical story.
  • The Lax eigenvector is expressed through the folded-instanton partition function, and after Fourier transformation it solves the isomonodromic connection, linking spectral problems to instanton counting.
  • In the trigonometric limit the principal minors of the transformed matrix satisfy Bethe equations, which the paper interprets as a direct proof of one direction of quantum-classical duality with spin chains.
  • The equality of the finite determinant with an infinite-dimensional determinant built from the operators $L_\omega(x)$ gives a precise formulation of spectral duality for the elliptic systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the paper's load-bearing assumption would be to compute the first correction in $\epsilon_1$ to the limit-shape solution for $N=2$; if $\chi_\omega(x)$ acquires a constant-in-$x$ correction in the $\epsilon_1\to0$ limit, the linear split $D=D_0+xD_1$ would be modified and the Lax matrix read off from it would need correction.
  • The same theta-transform mechanism is likely to produce Lax matrices for quiver generalizations of instanton moduli spaces, so the classical dynamics of a wider family of many-body systems may be readable from the same factorization identity.
  • Because the factorization identity holds before the classical limit, it is a candidate seed for a quantum Lax or transfer-matrix formulation; the paper's forward-looking section names separation of variables for quantum elliptic Calogero-Moser as the target.
  • The paper leaves the rLL/Poisson structure of the spectral-dual spin chain unidentified, so the spectral duality it establishes is best read as a statement about determinants and spectral curves rather than a full equivalence of Poisson dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives classical Lax matrices for elliptic integrable many-body systems from the equivariant cohomology, K-theory, and elliptic cohomology of instanton moduli spaces. The main technical tool is a factorization identity (Theorem 4.1) for the theta-transform of the matrix of qq-characters in the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit. In the classical limit this identity is claimed to give a spectral curve and, from the affine-linear decomposition D(x,z)=D0(z)+xD1(z), the Krichever Lax matrix of the elliptic Calogero-Moser system, with analogous Ruijsenaars-Schneider and double-elliptic statements. The paper also presents a Lax eigenvector in terms of folded instantons and sketches applications to quantum-classical duality and spectral duality.

Significance. If the central factorization and the affine-linearity step are fully justified, the paper provides a compelling conceptual origin for Krichever's Lax matrix: the classical integrable system emerges directly from the equivariant cohomology of instanton moduli spaces. The combinatorial proof of Theorem 4.1 in Section 5 is a genuine strength and is independent of the later imported asymptotic inputs. The explicit checks and appendices, including the N=2 example and the matrix Jacobi identity, make the structure of the argument transparent. The main limitation is that several load-bearing analytic statements, especially formula (132) for the qq-character in the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit, are cited from earlier work rather than proved in this paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, eq. (132); §4.5, eq. (171)] The affine-linear splitting D(x,z)=D0(z)+xD1(z), which is the central step leading to the Lax matrices (174) and (176), rests entirely on the explicit form (132) of chi_omega(x). This formula is imported from [32] with the explanation that sending x to infinity and expanding up to the constant term in x gives the 'full expression'. However, regularity of chi_omega plus the asymptotic Y_omega(x)=x-p_omega+O(1/x) does not by itself determine the O(x^0) part of Y_omega; a regular subleading term in Y_omega would contribute to chi_omega at order x^0 without producing a pole. The paper should either prove (132) within the present framework or explicitly state it as an assumption inherited from [32], and it should identify which conclusions would fail if the O(x^0) part of Y_omega is not exactly as assumed.
  2. [§4.5, Theorem 4.5, eqs. (174)-(176)] Theorem 4.5 calls x_omega,p_omega 'canonical coordinates' for the elliptic Calogero-Moser system, but the paper does not establish the Poisson bracket {p_omega, ln x_omega}=1 for the variables appearing in the limit-shape equations (127)/(131); the identification is again cited from [32]. Since the final comparison with Krichever's matrix (176) has content only if p_omega are indeed the Calogero-Moser momenta, this identification should be either proved or explicitly declared a standing input, with the relevant equations from [32] reproduced or precisely referenced.
  3. [§4.5, eqs. (148), (155), (167), (183), (186)] The infinite products of noncommuting matrices appearing in the factorization identity and in the definition of D1(z) are used as ordinary matrix products and are inverted and determinant-evaluated, but no convergence or regularization is specified. For example, D1(z) in (183) is an infinite product with no small parameter guaranteeing convergence, yet its determinant (186) is evaluated by the scalar Jacobi identity. Because these objects define the Lax matrix (174), the paper should state precisely the formal or analytic setting in which these products and their inverses are defined, or adopt the ratio regularization of determinants as in Remark 2 throughout.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2, eq. (132)] The product over l=1 to infinity of (1-x_omega/x_{omega-l}) requires an explicit convention for x_{omega-l} when l>=omega, since the index omega-l is not obviously confined to Z_N; the quasiperiodicity convention x_{omega+N}=q x_omega should be stated immediately next to the product.
  2. [§4.5] The notation D4d is introduced in (171) after D(x,z) was used for all three cases; please define D4d explicitly and distinguish it from the general D(x,z) in (167).
  3. [§7, after eq. (318)] The conclusion v_i = u_i^{-1} from the diagonal part of the transformation property (303) and from E1(qz)=E1(z)-1 is stated very tersely; writing out this argument would improve the readability of the proof.
  4. [Abstract and Introduction] The paper is described as a 'review', but it contains new derivations and proofs, while many key inputs are cited from [32] and [61]; clarifying the intended status as a research summary with some new proofs would help the reader calibrate the scope.
  5. [§11, Remark 2] The 'ill-defined infinite factor' is acknowledged and a ratio formulation is proposed, but the main determinant identity (427) is still written with the unregularized factor; please state explicitly that the ratio version is the canonical, well-defined statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the factorization theorem is proved independently and the Lax-matrix derivation is benchmarked against Krichever's known matrix.

full rationale

The central identity, Theorem 4.1, is proved by an explicit combinatorial induction in Section 5 that matches the summands of the qq-character expansion with the expansion of the operator product; this proof is self-contained and does not presuppose the Lax-matrix result. The subsequent derivation of the Calogero-Moser Lax matrix in Section 7 uses only the quasi-periodicity and residue properties of the matrices D0(z) and D1(z), together with the standard expansion Y-hat(x) = x - P + O(1/x); it then verifies that the resulting matrix satisfies the defining quasi-periodicity and residue conditions and therefore coincides with Krichever's matrix. The trigonometric-limit and spectral-duality proofs are likewise carried out within the paper. The only externally imported ingredient is the explicit form of chi_omega(x) in equation (132), cited from the same group's earlier work [32]; this is a parameter-free statement whose stated assumptions (limit-shape equations and regularity) do not include the target Lax matrix, and the final result is checked against the known Krichever/Ruijsenaars-Schneider Lax matrices. Any concern about subleading corrections to the limit shape or to the asymptotic form of Y_omega is a question of mathematical rigor in an imported lemma rather than a circular reduction of the paper's derivation to its own outputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation adds no fitted numerical constants. The inputs are the standard equivariant parameters of gauge theory, the instanton counting parameter q, and the dynamical variables xomega and pomega. The load-bearing axioms are equivariant localization, the limit-shape approximation in the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit, the explicit qq-character formulas from [28] and [32], and the regularity and convergence assumptions on infinite products. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Equivariant localization formula (49)-(50) for averages over instanton moduli spaces.
    Standard method in Nekrasov calculus; used without proof throughout Section 3.
  • domain assumption The epsilon1 to 0 limit is dominated by a unique limit shape Lambda_infty; sums over Young diagrams reduce to evaluation at Lambda_infty (eqs. 66-68 and 127-129).
    Imported from [20] and [28]; it defines Yomega and chiomega and is essential for extracting the classical Lax matrix.
  • domain assumption The explicit expressions for qq-characters X(x) and Xomega(x) (eqs. 62 and 124) and their pole-free property are valid.
    Definitions 3 and 6; formulas cited from [28] and [32].
  • domain assumption The large-x behavior chiomega(x)=theta(x+epsilon-pomega) prod_l (1-xomega/xomega-l) (132), with pomega canonical momenta conjugate to ln xomega, holds.
    Used to get linearity of D(x,z) in x; attributed to [32], not reproven in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Infinite products over n in Z and shift operators in Theorems 4.1, 4.8, and Section 11 converge or can be regularized by taking ratios.
    No convergence analysis is given; spectral duality requires an ill-defined infinite factor (248) that cancels only in ratios (251).
  • domain assumption The Lax matrix of the elliptic Calogero-Moser system is uniquely fixed by quasi-periodicity (173) and the residue at z=1 equal to -m e tensor e^t.
    Used in Section 7 to identify the constructed matrix with Krichever's Lax matrix; the characterization is standard but not proven here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classical elliptic integrable systems from the moduli space of instantons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IDXTLFLQ

@misc{pith2026241200912,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classical elliptic integrable systems from the moduli space of instantons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IDXTLFLQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00912}
}
abstract

This paper is intended to serve as a review of a series of papers with Nikita Nekrasov, where we achieved several important results concerning the relation between the moduli space of instantons and classical integrable systems. We derive I. Krichever's Lax matrix for the elliptic Calogero-Moser system from the equivariant cohomology of the moduli space of instantons. This result also has K-theoretic and elliptic cohomology counterparts. Our methods rely upon the so-called $\theta$-transform of the $qq$-characters vev's, defined as integrals of certain classes in these cohomology theories. The key step is the non-commutative Jacobi-like product formula for them. We also obtained a natural answer for the eigenvector of the Lax matrix and the horizontal section for the associated isomonodromic connection in terms of the partition function of folded instantons. As an application of our formula, we demonstrate some progress towards the spectral duality of the many-body systems in question, as well as give a new look at the quantum-classical duality between their trigonometric version and the corresponding spin chains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spiralling branes, affine qq-characters and elliptic integrable systems

    hep-th 2024-12 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quantum toroidal algebra intertwiners reproduce Ruijsenaars-Schneider and Koroteev-Shakirov Hamiltonians, Shiraishi functions, and a new proof of the noncommutative Jacobi identity for affine qq-characters.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [32]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence V: BPZ and KZ equations from qq-chara cters, arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.11582 (2017)

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence V: BPZ and KZ equations from qq-chara cters, arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.11582 (2017)

    arXiv 2017

  2. [61]

    Grekov, N

    A. Grekov, N. Nekrasov, Applied BPS/CFT correspondence: Lax pairs and isomonodromy , to appear

    work page

  3. [38]

    Grekov, N

    A. Grekov, N. Nekrasov, Elliptic Calogero-Moser system, crossed and folded instant ons, and bilinear identities, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04571 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  4. [1]

    Nekrasov, Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting , Adv

    N. Nekrasov, Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7, no.5, 831-864 (2003) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2003.v7.n5.a4 [ arXiv:hep-th/0206161 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2003

  5. [2]

    Donagi and E

    R. Donagi and E. Witten, Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory and integrable systems , Nucl. Phys. B 460, 299-334 (1996) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00609-5 [ arXiv:hep-th/9510101 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1996

  6. [3]

    E. J. Martinec, Integrable structures in supersymmetric gauge and string th eory, Phys. Lett. B 367, 91-96 (1996) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01456-X [ arXiv:hep-th/9510204 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  7. [4]

    D’Hoker, D

    E. D’Hoker, D. Phong, Calogero-Moser systems in SU (N ) Seiberg-Witten theory, Nuclear Physics B 513.1-2 (1998): 405-444

    work page 1998

  8. [5]

    Nekrasov, S

    N. Nekrasov, S. Shatashvili, Quantization of integrable systems and four dimensional ga uge theories, XVIth International Congress On Mathematical Physics: 201 0

    work page

Show all 65 references
  1. [6]

    Krichever, Elliptic solutions of the KP equation and integrable system s of particles , Funct

    I. Krichever, Elliptic solutions of the KP equation and integrable system s of particles , Funct. Anal. Appl. , 14 (1980) pp. 282–290

    1980

  2. [7]

    Ruijsenaars, H

    S. Ruijsenaars, H. Schneider, A new class of integrable systems and its relation to soliton s, Annals of Physics 170.2 (1986): 370-405

    1986

  3. [8]

    Ruijsenaars, S. N. M. ”Complete integrability of relati vistic Calogero-Moser systems and elliptic function identities.” Communications in Mathematical Phy sics 110 (1987): 191-213

    1987

  4. [9]

    V. Fock, A. Gorsky, N. Nekrasov, V. Rubtsov, Duality in Integrable Systems and Gauge Theories , JHEP 0007 (2000) 028; arXiv:hep-th/9906235

    2000 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Braden, A

    H.W. Braden, A. Marshakov, A. Mironov, A. Morozov, Nucl . Phys. B 573 (2000) 553–572; hep-th/9906240. A. Mironov, A. Morozov, Physics Letters B 475 (2000) 71–76; arXiv:hep-th/9912088. A. Mironov, A. Morozov, arXiv:hep-th/0001168 A. Mironov, arXiv:hep-th/0011093. A. Gorsky, A. ...

    2000 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Braden, T

    H. Braden, T. Hollowood, The Curve of Compactified 6D Gauge Theories and Integrable Systems , JHEP 0312 (2003) 023; arXiv:hep-th/0311024

    2003 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Moore, N

    G. Moore, N. Nekrasov, S. Shatashvili, Integrating over Higgs branches , Communications in Math- ematical Physics 209 (2000): 97-121

    2000

  8. [13]

    Gorsky, N

    A. Gorsky, N. Nekrasov, Elliptic Calogero-Moser system from two-dimensional curre nt algebra , [arXiv:hep-th/9401021 [hep-th]]. 48

    arXiv

  9. [14]

    Alday, D

    L. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91, 167 (2010) [ arXiv:0906.3219 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Bullimore, H.-C

    M. Bullimore, H.-C. Kim, P. Koroteev, Defects and quantum Seiberg-Witten geometry , Journal of High Energy Physics 2015.5 (2015): 1-79

    2015

  11. [16]

    Grekov, A

    A. Grekov, A. Zotov, Characteristic determinant and Manakov triple for the doubl e elliptic integrable system, SciPost Physics 10.3 (2021): 055

    2021

  12. [17]

    Grekov, A

    A. Grekov, A. Zotov, On Cherednik and Nazarov-Sklyanin large N limit constructio n for integrable many-body systems with elliptic dependence on momenta , Journal of High Energy Physics 2021.12 (2021): 1-44

    2021

  13. [18]

    Nazarov, E

    M. Nazarov, E. Sklyanin, Cherednik operators and Ruijsenaars–Schneider model at infi nity, Inter- national Mathematics Research Notices 2019.8 (2019): 2266 -2294

    2019

  14. [19]

    Vasilyev, A

    M. Vasilyev, A. Zotov, On factorized Lax pairs for classical many-body integrable systems, Reviews in Mathematical Physics 31.06 (2019): 1930002

    2019

  15. [20]

    Nekrasov, A

    N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions, The Unity of Mathematics: In Honor of the Ninetieth Birthday of I. Gelfand. Boston, MA: Birkh¨ auser Boston, 2006. 525-596

    2006

  16. [21]

    N. Lee, N. Nekrasov, Quantum spin systems and supersymmetric gauge theories. Pa rt I , Journal of High Energy Physics 2021.3 (2021): 1-88

    2021

  17. [22]

    Langlands Program and Physics

    N. Nekrasov, On the BPS/CFT correspondence , Lecture at the University of Amsterdam string theory group seminar (Feb. 3, 2004), 2d CFT-type equations from 4d gauge theory , Lecture at the IAS conference “Langlands Program and Physics” (March 8-10, 20 04)

    2004

  18. [23]

    Jeong, N

    S. Jeong, N. Lee, N. Nekrasov, Intersecting defects in gauge theory, quantum spin chains, a nd Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations, Journal of High Energy Physics 2021.10 (2021): 1-84

    2021

  19. [24]

    Jeong, N

    S. Jeong, N. Lee, N. Nekrasov, ”Parallel surface defect s, Hecke operators, and quantum Hitchin system.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04656 (2023)

    2023

  20. [25]

    Jeong, N

    S. Jeong, N. Lee, N. Nekrasov, di-Langlands correspondence and extended observables , Journal of High Energy Physics 2024.6 (2024): 1-58

    2024

  21. [26]

    Jeong, N

    S. Jeong, N. Lee, Bispectral duality and separation of variables from surfac e defect transition , arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13889 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  22. [27]

    Nekrasov and V

    N. Nekrasov and V. Pestun, Seiberg-Witten Geometry of Four-Dimensional N = 2 Quiver Gauge Theories, SIGMA 19, 047 (2023) doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2023.047 [ arXiv:1211.2240 [hep-th]]. N. Nekrasov, V. Pestun, and S. Shatashvili, Quantum geometry and quiver gauge theories , Communi- ca...

    2023 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwinge r equations and qq- characters, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016.3 (2016): 1-70

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwinge r equations and qq- characters, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016.3 (2016): 1-70

    2016

  24. [29]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence II: Instantons at crossroads, moduli an d compactness theo- rem, arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.07272 (2016)

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence II: Instantons at crossroads, moduli an d compactness theo- rem, arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.07272 (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  25. [30]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT Correspondence III: Gauge Origami partition function an d qq-characters , Communications in Mathematical Physics 358 (2018): 863-89 4

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT Correspondence III: Gauge Origami partition function an d qq-characters , Communications in Mathematical Physics 358 (2018): 863-89 4

    2018

  26. [31]

    Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence IV: sigma models and defects in gauge t heory, Letters in Mathematical Physics 109.3 (2019): 579-622

    N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence IV: sigma models and defects in gauge t heory, Letters in Mathematical Physics 109.3 (2019): 579-622. 49

    2019

  27. [33]

    Nakajima, Lectures on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces , No

    H. Nakajima, Lectures on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces , No. 18. American Mathematical Soc., 1999

    1999

  28. [34]

    Negut ¸,Affine Laumon spaces and integrable systems , arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.1756 (2011)

    A. Negut ¸,Affine Laumon spaces and integrable systems , arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.1756 (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Negut ¸, Affine Laumon spaces and a conjecture of Kuznetsov , arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.01011 (2018)

    A. Negut ¸, Affine Laumon spaces and a conjecture of Kuznetsov , arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.01011 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Braverman, M

    A. Braverman, M. Finkelberg, D. Gaitsgory, Uhlenbeck spaces via affine Lie algebras , The unity of mathematics: In Honor of the Ninetieth Birthday of IM Gelfan d. Boston, MA: Birkh¨ auser Boston,

  31. [37]

    Finkelberg, L

    M. Finkelberg, L. Rybnikov, Quantization of Drinfeld Zastava in type A , arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.0676 (2010)

    2010 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Givental, B

    A. Givental, B. Kim, Quantum cohomology of flag manifolds and Toda lattices , Communications in mathematical physics 168.3 (1995): 609-641

    1995

  33. [40]

    Mukhin, V

    E. Mukhin, V. Tarasov, A. Varchenko, Gaudin Hamiltonians generate the Bethe algebra of a tensor power of the vector representation of gl(N ), St. Petersburg Mathematical Journal 22.3 (2011): 463-47 2

    2011

  34. [41]

    Alexandrov, et al

    A. Alexandrov, et al. The master T -operator for the Gaudin model and the KP hierarchy , Nuclear Physics B 883 (2014): 173-223

    2014

  35. [42]

    Alexandrov, et al

    A. Alexandrov, et al. Classical tau-function for quantum spin chains , Journal of High Energy Physics 2013.9 (2013): 1-66

    2013

  36. [43]

    Zabrodin, The master T -operator for vertex models with trigonometric R-matrices as a classical tau-function, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 174 (2013): 52-67

    A. Zabrodin, The master T -operator for vertex models with trigonometric R-matrices as a classical tau-function, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 174 (2013): 52-67

    2013

  37. [44]

    Gorsky, A

    A. Gorsky, A. Zabrodin, A. Zotov, Spectrum of quantum transfer matrices via classical many-b ody systems, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014.1 (2014): 1-28

    2014

  38. [45]

    Koroteev, S

    P. Koroteev, S. Shakirov, The quantum DELL system , Letters in Mathematical Physics 110.5 (2020): 969-999

    2020

  39. [46]

    Koroteev, A

    P. Koroteev, A. Zeitlin, The Zoo of Opers and Dualities , arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.08031 (2022)

    2022

  40. [47]

    Koroteev, D

    P. Koroteev, D. Sage, A. Zeitlin, ( SL (N ),q )(SL(N ),q )-Opers, the q-Langlands Correspondence, and Quantum/Classical Duality , Communications in Mathematical Physics 381 (2021): 641-6 72

    2021

  41. [48]

    Frenkel, et al

    E. Frenkel, et al. q-opers, QQ-systems, and Bethe Ansatz , Journal of the European Mathematical Society 26.1 (2023): 355-405

    2023

  42. [49]

    Beketov, et al

    M. Beketov, et al. Trigonometric version of quantum–classical duality in int egrable systems, Nuclear Physics B 903 (2016): 150-163

    2016

  43. [50]

    Nekrasov, S

    N. Nekrasov, S. Shatashvili, Quantum integrability and supersymmetric vacua , Progress of Theoret- ical Physics Supplement 177 (2009): 105-119

    2009

  44. [51]

    Nekrasov, E

    N. Nekrasov, E. Witten, The omega deformation, branes, integrability and Liouville t heory, Journal of High Energy Physics 2010.9 (2010): 1-83. 50

    2010

  45. [52]

    Nekrasov, A

    N. Nekrasov, A. Rosly, S. Shatashvili, Darboux coordinates, Yang-Yang functional, and gauge theo ry, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 181 (2014): 1206-123 4

    2014

  46. [53]

    Mironov et al

    A. Mironov et al. Spectral duality between Heisenberg chain and Gaudin model , Letters in Mathe- matical Physics 103 (2013): 299-329

    2013

  47. [54]

    Harnad, Dual isomonodromic deformations and moment maps to loop alg ebras, Communications in Mathematical Physics 166.2 (1994): 337-365

    J. Harnad, Dual isomonodromic deformations and moment maps to loop alg ebras, Communications in Mathematical Physics 166.2 (1994): 337-365

    1994

  48. [55]

    Bertola, B

    M. Bertola, B. Eynard, J. Harnad, Duality, Biorthogonal Polynomials and Multi-Matrix Model s, Communications in mathematical physics 229 (2002): 73-120

    2002

  49. [56]

    Gorsky, et al

    A. Gorsky, et al. A note on spectral curve for the periodic homogeneous XYZ -spin chain , arXiv preprint hep-th/9604078 (1996)

    1996 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Hasegawa, Ruijsenaars’ commuting difference operators as commuting t ransfer matrices , Com- munications in mathematical physics 187 (1997): 289-325

    K. Hasegawa, Ruijsenaars’ commuting difference operators as commuting t ransfer matrices , Com- munications in mathematical physics 187 (1997): 289-325

    1997

  51. [58]

    Levin, M

    A. Levin, M. Olshanetsky, A. Zotov, Hitchin systems–symplectic Hecke correspondence and two- dimensional version , Communications in mathematical physics 236 (2003): 93-13 3

    2003

  52. [59]

    Grekov, N

    A. Grekov, N. Nekrasov, Noncommutative Jacobi identity, and gauge theory , arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17144

    arXiv

  53. [60]

    Grekov, N

    A. Grekov, N. Nekrasov, Vershik-Kerov in higher spaces and times , to appear A. Grekov, N. Nekrasov, Elliptic version of the Vershik-Kerov formula , Funct. Anal. Appl. 58, no.2, 143-159 (2023) doi:10.1134/S0016266324020059 [ arXiv:2403.07168 [math-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Bayindirli, et al

    M. Bayindirli, et al. On R-matrix formulation of qq-characters, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02587 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Zenkevich, Spiralling branes and R-matrices, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16990 (2023)

    Y. Zenkevich, Spiralling branes and R-matrices, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16990 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Kontsevich, Y

    M. Kontsevich, Y. Soibelman, Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariant s and cluster transformations, arXiv preprint arXiv:0811.2435 (2008)

    2008 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Sklyanin, Separation of variables: new trends , Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 118 (1995): 35-60

    E. Sklyanin, Separation of variables: new trends , Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 118 (1995): 35-60. 51

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.