Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 7 cited by

First constraints on the coherent elastic scattering of reactor antineutrinos off xenon nuclei

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The RED-100 liquid-xenon detector, 19 m from a 3.1 GW reactor core, finds no excess of xenon nuclear recoils and sets the first reactor-antineutrino CEνNS constraint on xenon at 60–90 times the Standard Model.

desk verdict Genuine first — reactor-antineutrino CEνNS on xenon — but the quoted limits rest on a questionable multi-histogram chi-square procedure. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18641 v1 pith:IEAV2KN5 submitted 2024-11-25 hep-ex

D.Yu. Akimov , I.S. Alexandrov , V.A. Belov , A.I. Bolozdynya , A.V. Etenko , A.V. Galavanov , Yu.V. Gusakov , A.V. Khromov
show 13 more authors
A.M. Konovalov V.N. Kornoukhov A.G. Kovalenko E.S. Kozlova A.V. Kumpan A.V. Lukyashin A.V. Pinchuk O.E. Razuvaeva D.G. Rudik A.V. Shakirov G.E. Simakov V.V. Sosnovstsev A.A. Vasin
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex
keywords coherentelasticneutrino-nucleusscatteringreactorantineutrinosliquidxenondetectortwo-phaseemissionCEνNSupperlimitnuclearrecoilsingle-electronbackgroundneutrinoexperiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to establish whether reactor antineutrinos coherently scatter off xenon nuclei, a Standard Model process never before constrained with a xenon target at a nuclear reactor. It reports the first such constraint: comparing 331 kg·days of reactor-on exposure with 106 kg·days of reactor-off exposure at the Kalinin Nuclear Power Plant yields no statistically significant excess. The resulting 90% C.L. upper limit on the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) amplitude is 60–90 times the Standard Model prediction, depending on which reactor antineutrino spectrum model is assumed. The result matters because it extends CEνNS searches to the heaviest target nucleus used at a reactor and because the null measurement limits any new physics that would enhance the cross section.

What carries the argument

The analysis carries the argument through a simultaneous fit of three residual histograms—corrected energy, cluster duration, and reconstructed radius squared—formed by subtracting reactor-off counts, scaled by live time, from reactor-on counts, with the CEνNS amplitude $A$ relative to the Standard Model as the only floated parameter. Signal predictions are built by converting reactor antineutrino spectra from four models into nuclear recoil spectra, then simulating liquid-xenon response, electron drift and extraction, and electroluminescence detection, ending in a predicted distribution in detected photoelectrons. Cuts are optimized on reactor-off data and simulated CEνNS events; a pair of neural networks suppresses the single-electron coincidence background, and the region of interest is restricted to clusters of 4–7 ionization electrons within a 140 mm radius.

What would settle it

If a reader binned the same raw data by reactor thermal power and found the reactor-on minus reactor-off rate in the 4–7 electron region of interest increasing with power faster than the predicted Standard Model CEνNS rate, the paper's conclusion that the residual is consistent with zero would be contradicted, since such a power-correlated slope cannot come from the assumed stable background.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that the observed reactor-on minus reactor-off count rate in the RED-100 signal region is consistent with zero, and therefore the first experimental constraint on coherent elastic scattering of reactor antineutrinos off xenon nuclei is a 90% C.L. upper limit of 60–90 times the Standard Model CEνNS prediction, depending on the assumed reactor antineutrino spectrum model. The best-fit CEνNS amplitude does not contradict the Standard Model within statistical uncertainty, and the evaluated limits are slightly larger than the median expected limits from the Asimov sensitivity study. This is the first CEνNS result for a xenon target at a nuclear reactor, and the paper interprets the null result as limited by a combination of a relatively high energy threshold, a higher-than-expected background dominated by correlated single-electron emission, and a moderate exposure time.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the reactor-off background, scaled by live time, is exactly what the reactor-on background would be in the signal region, so any excess is attributable to antineutrinos.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The null result rules out, at 90% C.L., any CEνNS enhancement larger than 60–90 times the Standard Model for reactor antineutrinos on xenon, depending on the assumed spectrum model.
  • An extrapolation to a full year of operation at the same reactor predicts a 90% C.L. limit of about 15–20 times the Standard Model, still insufficient for a CEνNS detection claim.
  • The sensitivity depends strongly on the high-energy tail of the antineutrino spectrum above 8 MeV, so improved spectrum measurements would translate directly into stronger CEνNS constraints.
  • The dominant background, correlated spontaneous single-electron emission after large energy depositions, must be understood before a xenon-based reactor CEνNS observation becomes feasible.
  • Switching the active medium from xenon to argon is considered as a path toward observation, pending tests of the spontaneous single-electron emission rate in argon.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reactor-off background scaling were replaced by a reactor-power-binned live measurement, the same data could set a limit more robust against slow ambient-drift systematics, which the paper only argues indirectly through separate monitoring runs.
  • The spread in limits across the four antineutrino spectrum models suggests that reporting the limit as a function of the assumed flux above 8 MeV would make the result more portable to future spectrum measurements.
  • Because the post-cut background appears dominated by spatially correlated single-electron emission, a pulse-position correlation analysis or a trigger that rejects such correlations could improve sensitivity without additional exposure.
  • The 60–90 times Standard Model limit could be reinterpreted as bounds on nonstandard neutrino interactions or light mediators, but only after the spectrum-model and charge-yield systematics are folded in; the paper stops short of that step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first constraints on coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) off xenon nuclei using the RED-100 two-phase xenon detector at the Kalinin Nuclear Power Plant. With 331 kg·days of reactor-ON and 106 kg·days of reactor-OFF data, the collaboration finds no significant excess and derives 90% C.L. upper limits on the CEνNS amplitude between 61 and 94 times the Standard Model prediction, depending on the reactor antineutrino spectrum model. The analysis is based on a profile-likelihood fit of three residual histograms (energy, duration, radius squared) after ON-OFF subtraction, with signal predictions from NEST v2.4.0 and four antineutrino spectrum models.

Significance. If the quoted limits are statistically valid, this is an important first result: it extends reactor CEνNS searches to a heavy noble-gas target (xenon) and demonstrates the feasibility of a 100-kg-scale two-phase detector at a reactor site. The paper is careful to compare several antineutrino spectrum models and to quantify the impact of charge-yield and electron-extraction systematics. The main weakness is the statistical treatment of the three correlated histograms, which may over-constrain the limits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section V, statistical analysis] The simultaneous fit of the three residual histograms (corrected energy, duration, radius squared) treats these projections as independent, but they are derived from the same event sample and are thus statistically correlated. Summing their χ² contributions as if they were independent overcounts the information and the quoted ∆χ²=2.71 threshold, taken from the Asimov dataset, is not a calibrated 90% C.L. for this composite likelihood. The authors should either perform the fit in the full three-dimensional space, include the bin-to-bin covariances between histograms, or provide a Monte Carlo coverage calibration; without this, the numerical limits in Table I may be artificially tight.
  2. [Section V, background subtraction] The analysis assumes that the reactor-OFF background, scaled by live time, represents the reactor-ON background in the ROI. The paper states that stability is supported by additional monitoring detectors and cites ref. [51], but no quantitative stability test is shown here. Since a reactor-correlated background component would bias the residual, a brief quantitative summary of the stability results (e.g., rate versus time in the ROI for ON and OFF periods) should be included.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'allows to put constraints' should be rephrased, e.g., 'allows us to place constraints'.
  2. [Figure 3] The duration axis label appears as '/uni00B5s' in the text; it should be typeset as 'µs'.
  3. [Section VII] The discussion of the energy threshold could note more explicitly that the 110-PE threshold corresponds to the 4-electron cut and that the trigger-efficiency instability from temperature variations is the reason the expected lower threshold was not achieved.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the RED-100 limit fits an amplitude against externally built CEνNS templates; self-citations supply calibrations, not the result.

full rationale

RED-100's claimed constraint is a standard amplitude fit, not a self-derived prediction. The CEνNS signal template is built from external reactor antineutrino spectra (KI, SM2018, Daya Bay, INR), the NEST v2.4.0 charge-yield model, and separately calibrated detector quantities (electron lifetime 874±17 us, EEE 32.8±2.8%, SE waveforms and light response functions from ref. [49]). The parameter A is the fitted quantity; the 90% limit is read from a profile-χ² scan of A. Nothing in the derivation defines A in terms of the observed residual or vice versa. The sentence 'By definition, the values in these residuals coincide with those from scaled CEνNS histograms' describes the Asimov sensitivity construction, where the residual is intentionally set equal to the signal; it is not an empirical prediction and does not feed back into the measured limit. Self-citations such as [42], [49], and [51] supply detector calibrations and background monitoring; they are real measurements with external content, not restatements of the CEνNS limit. The background-stability premise for ON−OFF subtraction is load-bearing but is cited to the separate background study [51], and any shortfall in that justification is a systematic or statistical risk, not a circular derivation. The skeptic's worry that the three residual histograms are correlated projections and that Δχ²=2.71 is uncalibrated concerns the coverage of the statistical procedure; even if correct, it would make the limit overconfident, but it would not make the predicted signal equivalent to the fitted data.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The limit is obtained by folding an external CEνNS model through a detailed simulation of the detector. No new particles or interactions are introduced. The dominant intellectual inputs are the reactor antineutrino spectra and the NEST charge yield model, both taken from outside this work.

free parameters (1)
  • A (CEνNS signal amplitude relative to Standard Model) = best-fit consistent with zero; 90% C.L. upper limit 60-90 times SM
    Only parameter varied in the χ2 fit to the residual ON-OFF histograms; its upper limit is the paper's main result.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard Model CEνNS differential cross-section and weak charge (Eqs. 1 and 2)
    Used to predict the signal shape and rate; accepted physics input from the literature.
  • domain assumption Reactor antineutrino energy spectrum models (KI, SM2018, Daya Bay, INR) bracket the true flux
    The signal prediction depends on the high-energy tail of the antineutrino spectrum; four external models are used, giving limits from 61 to 94 times SM.
  • domain assumption NEST v2.4.0 predicts nuclear recoil ionization yield in xenon down to 0.2 keV
    Section III.B uses NEST at 169 K, 1.29 bar, and 218 V/cm; Section VII shows the mean yield uncertainty shifts the limit from 27 to 135 times SM, indicating strong dependence on this model.
  • domain assumption Background count rate is stable between reactor ON and OFF periods
    Section V states the ON-OFF subtraction is justified only if background is stable; the authors reference monitoring detectors [51] but do not show a quantitative stability test.
  • domain assumption Trigger efficiency and detector response simulation accurately describe real events
    The cuts and efficiencies (98% for pulse shape cuts, neural network scores) are evaluated with a toy Monte Carlo and simulated events; errors in the simulation would bias the limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First constraints on the coherent elastic scattering of reactor antineutrinos off xenon nuclei." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IEAV2KN5

@misc{pith2026241118641,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First constraints on the coherent elastic scattering of reactor antineutrinos off xenon nuclei},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IEAV2KN5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18641}
}
abstract

RED-100 is a two-phase emission detector with an active volume containing 126~kg of liquid xenon. The detector was exposed to the antineutrino flux of about $1.4 \cdot 10^{13}~$cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ at a distance of 19~m from the 3.1~GW Kalinin Nuclear Power Plant (KNPP) reactor core. The comparison of data from 331~kg$\cdot$days with the reactor on and 106~kg$\cdot$days with the reactor off shows no statistically significant excess and allows to put constraints on coherent elastic interactions of antineutrinos with xenon nuclei.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18641 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The top-view scheme of the PMT arrays of RED [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Energy spectra of CE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dependence of the duration cut on the energy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Suppression of the background from reactor OFF data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Example of an event passing all cuts successfully. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Residual ON [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Profiles of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inelastic neutrino-nucleus scattering off $^{203/205}$Tl in terms of the nuclear recoil energy using a hybrid nuclear model

    nucl-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A hybrid shell-model/quasiparticle-phonon calculation predicts that inelastic neutrino scattering off 203/205Tl is several times larger at high neutrino energies than earlier shell-model-only estimates, and can rival ...

  2. Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino-nucleus scattering

    hep-ex 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    CONUS+ reports the first 3.7 sigma observation of coherent elastic antineutrino-nucleus scattering at a nuclear reactor, with 395 measured events versus 347 predicted.

  3. Prospect of the NUCLEUS Experiment at Chooz for Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and New Physics Searches

    hep-ex 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Assuming the low-energy background can be eliminated, a 7-gram NUCLEUS detector at Chooz is projected to see coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering at 4.7σ in one year and to set competitive bounds on new neutrino interactions.

  4. Testing lepton non-unitarity with the next generation of Germanium-based CE$\nu$NS reactor experiments

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A future 100-kg Germanium reactor CEνNS experiment could constrain lepton non-unitarity to 1−α11² ≈ 0.005 and, under low-scale seesaw assumptions, probe new-physics scales up to ~2.5 TeV.

  5. Reactor antineutrinos CE$\nu$NS on germanium: CONUS+ and TEXONO as a new gateway to SM and BSM physics

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CONUS+ and TEXONO reactor CEνNS data are consistent with the Standard Model and yield the most stringent limit on the electron neutrino millicharge through neutrino-electron scattering.

  6. Probing conventional and new physics at the ESS with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Projected ESS CEνNS measurements would improve current constraints on the weak mixing angle, nuclear neutron radii, and several new physics scenarios by large factors, and would lead in some unexplored mass ranges.

  7. Background characterization of the CONUS+ experimental location

    physics.ins-det 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The new CONUS+ site has a 30 times higher reactor-related neutron fluence but 26 times lower high-energy gamma background than CONUS, plus a dominant simulated cosmogenic neutron background above 20 MeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [51]

    D. Y. Akimov et al. (RED-100 Collaboration), Characterization of the ambient background in the RED-100 experiment location at Kalinin Nuclear Power Plant, Journal of Instrumentation 18 (12), P12002, arXiv:2311.00870 [physics.ins-det]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    D. Z. Freedman, Coherent effects of a weak neutral cur- rent, Phys. Rev. 9, 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1389 (1974)

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.1389 1974

  3. [2]

    V. B. Kopeliovich and L. L. Frankfurt, Isotopic and chiral structure of neutral current, JETP Lett. 19, 145 (1974)

    1974

  4. [3]

    Lindner, W

    M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and new Neutrino Interac- tions, J. High Energ. Phys. 03, 097, arXiv:1612.04150 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Erler and M

    J. Erler and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, The Weak mixing angle at low energies, Phys. Rev. D 72, 073003 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0409169

    arXiv 2005

  6. [5]

    R. H. Helm, Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Electrons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei, Phys. Rev. 104, 1466 (1956)

    1956

  7. [6]

    Klein and J

    S. Klein and J. Nystrand, Exclusive vector meson pro- duction in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 60, 014903 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9902259

    arXiv 1999

  8. [7]

    Akimov et al

    D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), Obser- vation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Science 357, 1123 (2017), arXiv:1708.01294 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 93 references
  1. [8]

    Akimov et al.(COHERENT Collaboration), The CO- HERENT Experimental Program, in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2204.04575 [hep-ex]

    D. Akimov et al.(COHERENT Collaboration), The CO- HERENT Experimental Program, in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2204.04575 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [9]

    I. M. Shoemaker and E. Welch, Sailing the CEνNS Seas of Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with the Coherent CAPTAIN Mills Experiment, (2021), arXiv:2103.08401 10 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Baxter et al., Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering at the European Spallation Source, J

    D. Baxter et al., Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering at the European Spallation Source, J. High Energ. Phys. 02, 123, arXiv:1911.00762 [physics.ins-det]

    1911 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Bonet et al

    H. Bonet et al. (CONUS Collaboration), Constraints on elastic neutrino nucleus scattering in the fully coherent regime from the CONUS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041804 (2021), arXiv:2011.00210 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Ackermann et al., Final CONUS results on coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering at the Brokdorf reac- tor, (2024), arXiv:2401.07684 [hep-ex]

    N. Ackermann et al., Final CONUS results on coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering at the Brokdorf reac- tor, (2024), arXiv:2401.07684 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Alekseev et al

    I. Alekseev et al. (νGeN Collaboration), First results of the νGeN experiment on coherent elastic neutrino- nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 106, L051101 (2022), arXiv:2205.04305 [nucl-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Colaresi et al

    J. Colaresi et al. , Measurement of Coherent Elas- tic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering from Reactor An- tineutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 211802 (2022), arXiv:2202.09672 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Aguilar-Arevalo et al

    A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CONNIE Collaboration), Search for coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at a nuclear reactor with CONNIE 2019 data, J. High En- erg. Phys. 05, 017, arXiv:2110.13033 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CONNIE Collaboration), Searches for CE νNS and Physics beyond the Stan- dard Model using Skipper-CCDs at CONNIE, (2024), arXiv:2403.15976 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    D. Y. Akimov et al. (RED-100 Collaboration), First ground-level laboratory test of the two-phase xenon emission detector RED-100, JINST 15 (02), P02020, arXiv:1910.06190 [physics.ins-det]

    1910 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Augier et al

    C. Augier et al. (Ricochet Collaboration), Fast neutron background characterization of the future Ricochet ex- periment at the ILL research nuclear reactor, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 20 (2023), arXiv:2208.01760 [astro-ph.IM]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Augier et al

    C. Augier et al. (Ricochet Collaboration), First demon- stration of 30 eVee ionization energy resolution with Ric- ochet germanium cryogenic bolometers, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 186 (2024), arXiv:2306.00166 [astro-ph.IM]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Sonay et al.(TEXONO Collaboration), Neutron back- ground measurements with a hybrid neutron detector at the Kuo-Sheng Reactor Neutrino Laboratory, Phys

    A. Sonay et al.(TEXONO Collaboration), Neutron back- ground measurements with a hybrid neutron detector at the Kuo-Sheng Reactor Neutrino Laboratory, Phys. Rev. C 98, 024602 (2018), arXiv:1803.09929 [nucl-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Karmakar et al

    S. Karmakar et al. (TEXONO Collaboration), Coher- ent Neutrino-Nucleus Elastic Scattering at Reactor with TEXONO Experiment, PoS T AUP2023, 226 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    Kluck et al

    H. Kluck et al. (Nucleus (ν − cleus) Collaboration), Nu- cleus: Searching for Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scatter- ing at Lowest Energies, J. Low Temp. Phys. 209, 936 (2022)

    2022

  16. [23]

    J. J. Choi et al.(NEON (νeON ) Collaboration), Explor- ing coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering using re- actor electron antineutrinos in the NEON experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 226 (2023), arXiv:2204.06318 [hep- ex]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Chaudhuri (MINER Collaboration), The Mitchell Institute Neutrino Experiment at Reactor (MINER), Springer Proc

    M. Chaudhuri (MINER Collaboration), The Mitchell Institute Neutrino Experiment at Reactor (MINER), Springer Proc. Phys. 277, 589 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    L. T. Yang, Y. F. Liang, and Q. Yue, RECODE program for reactor neutrino CEvNS detection with PPC Germa- nium detector, PoS T AUP2023, 296 (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    Alfonso-Pita et al

    E. Alfonso-Pita et al. (SBC Collaboration), Scintillating Bubble Chambers for Rare Event Searches, Universe 9, 346 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251802 (2021), arXiv:2109.03116 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023), arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Aprile et al.(XENON Collaboration), First Dark Mat- ter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys

    E. Aprile et al.(XENON Collaboration), First Dark Mat- ter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023), arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Ma et al

    W. Ma et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for So- lar B8 Neutrinos in the PandaX-4T Experiment Using Neutrino-Nucleus Coherent Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 021802 (2023), arXiv:2207.04883 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Akimov et al.(COHERENT Collaboration), Simulat- ing the neutrino flux from the Spallation Neutron Source for the COHERENT experiment, Phys

    D. Akimov et al.(COHERENT Collaboration), Simulat- ing the neutrino flux from the Spallation Neutron Source for the COHERENT experiment, Phys. Rev. D 106, 032003 (2022), arXiv:2109.11049 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Akimov et al.(COHERENT Collaboration), Measure- ment of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scatter- ing Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT, Phys

    D. Akimov et al.(COHERENT Collaboration), Measure- ment of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scatter- ing Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 081801 (2022), arXiv:2110.07730 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Akimov et al

    D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering on Argon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 012002 (2021), arXiv:2003.10630 [nucl-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Adamski et al

    S. Adamski et al. , First detection of coherent elas- tic neutrino-nucleus scattering on germanium, (2024), arXiv:2406.13806 [hep-ex]

    2024

  28. [35]

    Bo et al

    Z. Bo et al. (PandaX), First Measurement of So- lar 8B Neutrino Flux through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T, (2024), arXiv:2407.10892 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Aprile et al.(XENON), First Measurement of Solar 8B Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering with XENONnT, (2024), arXiv:2408.02877 [nucl- ex]

    E. Aprile et al.(XENON), First Measurement of Solar 8B Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering with XENONnT, (2024), arXiv:2408.02877 [nucl- ex]

    2024

  30. [37]

    Barranco, O

    J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda, and T. I. Rashba, Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei, J. High Energ. Phys. 12, 021, arXiv:hep-ph/0508299

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    Giunti and A

    C. Giunti and A. Studenikin, Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 531 (2015), arXiv:1403.6344 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [39]

    P. S. Barbeau et al., Towards coherent neutrino detection using low background micropattern gas detectors, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50, 1285 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0212034

    2003 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Hagmann and A

    C. Hagmann and A. Bernstein, Two-phase emission de- tector for measuring coherent neutrino-nucleus scatter- ing, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51, 2151 (2004), arXiv:nucl- ex/0411004

    2004

  34. [41]

    Bernstein et al., Colloquium : Neutrino detectors as tools for nuclear security, Rev

    A. Bernstein et al., Colloquium : Neutrino detectors as tools for nuclear security, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 011003 (2020), arXiv:1908.07113 [physics.soc-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [42]

    D. Y. Akimov et al. (RED-100 Collaboration), The RED-100 experiment, JINST 17 (11), T11011, arXiv:2209.15516 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  36. [43]

    B. A. Dolgoshein, V. N. Lebedenko, and B. U. Rodionov, New method of registration of ionizing-particle tracks in condensed matter, JETP Lett. 11, 513 (1970)

    1970

  37. [44]

    Bolozdynya et al., Emission detectors, IEEE Transac- tions on Nuclear Science 42, 565 (1995)

    A. Bolozdynya et al., Emission detectors, IEEE Transac- tions on Nuclear Science 42, 565 (1995)

    1995

  38. [45]

    Cai et al

    C. Cai et al. (RELICS Collaboration), Reactor neu- trino liquid xenon coherent elastic scattering experiment, 11 Phys. Rev. D 110, 072011 (2024), arXiv:2405.05554 [hep- ex]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Akimov et al

    D. Akimov et al. (RED-100 Collaboration), Using the Two-Phase Emission Detector RED-100 at NPP to Study Coherent Elastic Neutrinos Scattering off Nuclei, Physics 5, 492 (2023)

    2023

  40. [47]

    Akimov et al., Noise characteristics of low-background Hamamatsu R11410-20 photomultiplier tubes, Instrum

    D. Akimov et al., Noise characteristics of low-background Hamamatsu R11410-20 photomultiplier tubes, Instrum. Exp. Tech. 58, 406 (2015)

    2015

  41. [48]

    D. Y. Akimov et al. (RED-100 Collaboration), Charac- terization of the low-background Hamamatsu R11410- 20 cryogenic PMTs for the RED100 detector, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 675, 012022 (2016)

    2016

  42. [49]

    D. Y. Akimov et al. (RED-100 Collaboration), Calibra- tion and characterization of the RED-100 detector at the Kalinin Nuclear Power Plant, Journal of Instrumentation 19 (11), T11004, arXiv:2403.12645v3 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    V. I. Kopeikin, Flux and Spectrum of Reactor Antineu- trinos, Physics of Atomic Nuclei 75, 143–152 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    Alekseev et al

    I. Alekseev et al. (DANSS Collaboration), DANSS: De- tector of the reactor AntiNeutrino based on Solid Scin- tillator, Journal of Instrumentation 11 (11), P11011, arXiv:1606.02896 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    D. Y. Akimov et al.(RED-100 Collaboration), A Passive Shield for the RED-100 Neutrino Detector, Instrum. Exp. Tech. 64, 202 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    P. P. Naumov et al., The digital trigger system for the RED-100 detector, Phys.Atom.Nucl. 78, 1539 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    D. Y. Akimov et al. (RED-100 Collaboration), Observa- tion of delayed electron emission in a two-phase liquid xenon detector, JINST 11 (03), C03007

  48. [56]

    D. Y. Akimov et al. (RED-100 Collaboration), Electron Noise Generated by Cosmic Muons in the RED-100 Two- Phase Xenon Emission Detector, Instrum. Exp. Tech.66, 199 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Akerib et al

    D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Investigation of background electron emission in the LUX detector, Phys- ical Review D 102, 092004 (2020), arXiv:2004.07791

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Aprile et al.(XENON Collaboration), Emission of sin- gle and few electrons in XENON1T and limits on light dark matter, Physical Review D 106, 022001 (2022), arXiv:2112.12116

    E. Aprile et al.(XENON Collaboration), Emission of sin- gle and few electrons in XENON1T and limits on light dark matter, Physical Review D 106, 022001 (2022), arXiv:2112.12116

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    D. Y. Akimov et al.(RED-100 Collaboration), The RED- 100 two-phase emission detector, Instruments and Exper- imental Techniques 60, 175 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Szydagis et al., A Review of NEST Models, and Their Application to Improvement of Particle Identification in Liquid Xenon Experiments (2023), arXiv:2211.10726 [hep-ex]

    M. Szydagis et al., A Review of NEST Models, and Their Application to Improvement of Particle Identification in Liquid Xenon Experiments (2023), arXiv:2211.10726 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    T. A. Mueller et al., Improved predictions of reactor antineutrino spectra, Phys. Rev. C 83, 054615 (2011), arXiv:1101.2663 [hep-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Huber, Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors, Phys

    P. Huber, Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024617 (2012), arXiv:1106.0687 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  55. [63]

    V. I. Kopeikin, M. D. Skorokhvatov, and O. A. Titov, Reevaluating reactor antineutrino spectra with new mea- surements of the ratio between 235U and 239Pu β spec- tra, Phys. Rev. D 104, L071301 (2021), arXiv:2103.01684 [nucl-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [64]

    D. V. Popov and M. D. Skorokhvatov, Model for the Con- version of Beta Spectra from Fission Products of Ura- nium and Plutonium Isotopes into Antineutrino Spectra, Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters 20, 1 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    Estienne et al., Updated Summation Model: An Improved Agreement with the Daya Bay Antineutrino Fluxes, Phys

    M. Estienne et al., Updated Summation Model: An Improved Agreement with the Daya Bay Antineutrino Fluxes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 022502 (2019), Supplemen- tal Material, arXiv:1904.09358v1 [nucl-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    123.022502 , which provides the antineutrino energy spectra for 235,238U and 239,241P u, Extra Material: Table PDF

    See Supplemental Material for Summation Model 2018at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 123.022502 , which provides the antineutrino energy spectra for 235,238U and 239,241P u, Extra Material: Table PDF

    doi

  59. [67]

    S. G. Yoon et al.(RENO Collaboration), Measurement of reactor antineutrino flux and spectrum at RENO, Phys. Rev. D 104, L111301 (2021), arXiv:2010.14989v3 [hep- ex]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    104.L111301, for RENO 2021 Supplementary Data Release, Extra Material: Table TXT

    See Supplemental Material for the RENO at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD. 104.L111301, for RENO 2021 Supplementary Data Release, Extra Material: Table TXT

    2021 doi

  61. [69]

    F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Antineutrino energy spectrum unfolding based on the Daya Bay mea- surement and its applications, Chinese Physics C 45, 073001 (2021), arXiv:2102.04614 [hep-ex]

    2021

  62. [70]

    F. P. An et al.(Daya Bay Collaboration), First Measure- ment of High-Energy Reactor Antineutrinos at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 041801 (2022), arXiv:2203.06686 [hep-ex]

    2022

  63. [71]

    A. P. Vlasenko et al., Antineutrino Spectra of 235,238U and 239,241Pu Taken from the Double Chooz Experiment, Physics of Atomic Nuclei 87, 1178–1188 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    de Kerret et al

    H. de Kerret et al. (Double Chooz), Double Chooz θ13 measurement via total neutron capture detection, Nature Phys. 16, 558 (2020), arXiv:1901.09445 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Our work was performed using resources of NRNU MEPhI high-performance computing center

    The authors are grateful to the director of the Institute of Industrial Nuclear Technologies of MEPhI (IINT MEPhI) - Eduard Glagovsky and the manage- ment of the Institute of Nuclear Physics and Technolo- gies of MEPhI (INPT MEPhI), for their support. Our work was performed us...

  66. [74]

    V. I. Kopeikin, L. A. Mikaelyan, and V. V. Sinev, Reactor as a Source of Antineutrinos: Thermal Fission Energy, Physics of Atomic Nuclei 67, 1892 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0410100 [hep-ph]

    2004

  67. [75]

    V. I. Kopeikin, The Search for New Physics in Nonequi- librium Reactor-Antineutrino Energy Spectrum, Physics of Atomic Nuclei 66, 472 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0110030 [hep-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  68. [76]

    J. B. Albert et al. (EXO-200 Collaboration), Measure- ment of the Drift Velocity and Transverse Diffusion of Electrons in Liquid Xenon with the EXO-200 Detec- tor, Phys. Rev. C 95, 025502 (2017), arXiv:1609.04467 [physics.ins-det]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    B. Lenardo et al., Measurement of the ionization yield from nuclear recoils in liquid xenon between 0.3 – 6 kev with single-ionization-electron sensitivity (2019), arXiv:1908.00518 [physics.ins-det]

    2019 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Fukushima, Visual feature extraction by a multi- layered network of analog threshold elements, IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 5, 322 (1969)

    K. Fukushima, Visual feature extraction by a multi- layered network of analog threshold elements, IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 5, 322 (1969)

    1969

  71. [79]

    Njoya et al., Measurements of electron transport in liquid and gas Xenon using a laser-driven photo- cathode, Nucl

    O. Njoya et al., Measurements of electron transport in liquid and gas Xenon using a laser-driven photo- cathode, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 972, 163965 (2020), arXiv:1911.11580 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Goodfellow, Y

    I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learn- ing (MIT Press, 2016) http://www.deeplearningbook. org

    2016

  73. [81]

    O’Malley et al., Kerastuner, https://github.com/ keras-team/keras-tuner (2019)

    T. O’Malley et al., Kerastuner, https://github.com/ keras-team/keras-tuner (2019). 12

    2019

  74. [82]

    Hand and R

    D. Hand and R. Till, A simple generalisation of the area under the roc curve for multiple class classification prob- lems, Hand, The 45, 171 (2001)

    2001

  75. [83]

    Clevert, T

    D.-A. Clevert, T. Unterthiner, and S. Hochreiter, Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs), 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2-4, 2016, Conference Track Proceedings , Under Review ...

    2015 arXiv

  76. [84]

    T. Doke, A. Hitachi, J. Kikuchi, K. Masuda, H. Okada, and E. Shibamura, Absolute scintillation yields in liquid argon and xenon for various particles, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 41, 1538 (2002)

    2002

  77. [85]

    Cowan, K

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymp- totic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)], arXiv:1007.1727 [physics.data-an]

    2011 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Szydagis et al

    M. Szydagis et al. , Noble element simulation tech- nique benchmark plots (2024), https://nest.physics. ucdavis.edu [Accessed: September 2024]

    2024

  79. [87]

    E. M. Gushchin, A. A. Kruglov, and I. M. Obodovski, Emission of “hot” electrons from liquid and solid argon and xenon, JETP 55, 860 (1982)

    1982

  80. [88]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (04), 027, arXiv:1512.07501v2 [physics.ins-det]

    2016 arXiv

  81. [89]

    D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Improved Lim- its on Scattering of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles from Reanalysis of 2013 LUX Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 161301 (2016), arXiv:arXiv:1512.03506v3 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Akerib et al

    D. Akerib et al. (LUX collaboration), Signal yields, en- ergy resolution, and recombination fluctuations in liquid xenon, Physical Review D 95 (2016)

    2016

  83. [91]

    James, J

    R. James, J. Palmer, A. Kaboth, C. Ghag, and J. Aal- bers, Flamenest: explicit profile likelihoods with the no- ble element simulation technique, Journal of Instrumen- tation 17 (08), P08012

  84. [93]

    Qin and C

    J. Qin and C. Tunnell, Approximate differentiable like- lihoods for astroparticle physics experiments (2024), arXiv:2408.09057 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  85. [100]

    scaled OFF histograms

    PMTs B02, B04, and B06 (blue color) were operated at lower voltage (see text). B. Data collection CEνNS events produce very low energy depositions. For reactor antineutrinos and xenon targets, it is mostly below 1 keV, which results in only several ionization electrons. A sing...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.