Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Data Coverage for Detecting Representation Bias in Image Datasets: A Crowdsourcing Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.13868 v1 pith:IEDO6B3I submitted 2023-06-24 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords coveragedataalgorithmrepresentationbiascoredatasetsdetecting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing machine learning models have proven to fail when it comes to their performance for minority groups, mainly due to biases in data. In particular, datasets, especially social data, are often not representative of minorities. In this paper, we consider the problem of representation bias identification on image datasets without explicit attribute values. Using the notion of data coverage for detecting a lack of representation, we develop multiple crowdsourcing approaches. Our core approach, at a high level, is a divide and conquer algorithm that applies a search space pruning strategy to efficiently identify if a dataset misses proper coverage for a given group. We provide a different theoretical analysis of our algorithm, including a tight upper bound on its performance which guarantees its near-optimality. Using this algorithm as the core, we propose multiple heuristics to reduce the coverage detection cost across different cases with multiple intersectional/non-intersectional groups. We demonstrate how the pre-trained predictors are not reliable and hence not sufficient for detecting representation bias in the data. Finally, we adjust our core algorithm to utilize existing models for predicting image group(s) to minimize the coverage identification cost. We conduct extensive experiments, including live experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk to validate our problem and evaluate our algorithms' performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explanatory Debiasing: Involving Domain Experts in the Data Generation Process to Mitigate Representation Bias in AI Systems

    cs.HC 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Involving domain experts in AI data generation can reduce representation bias while maintaining or slightly improving model accuracy, according to a 35-participant healthcare user study.

Pith tools