pith. sign in

arxiv: 1604.01746 · v2 · pith:IF4HV6XTnew · submitted 2016-04-06 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn

Strengths and weaknesses of weak-strong cluster problems: A detailed overview of state-of-the-art classical heuristics vs quantum approaches

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nn
keywords quantumproblemsannealerannealingapproachesclusterd-wavegoogle
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

To date, a conclusive detection of quantum speedup remains elusive. Recently, a team by Google Inc.~[V.~S.~Denchev {\em et al}., Phys.~Rev.~X {\bf 6}, 031015 (2016)] proposed a weak-strong cluster model tailored to have tall and narrow energy barriers separating local minima, with the aim to highlight the value of finite-range tunneling. More precisely, results from quantum Monte Carlo simulations, as well as the D-Wave 2X quantum annealer scale considerably better than state-of-the-art simulated annealing simulations. Moreover, the D-Wave 2X quantum annealer is $\sim 10^8$ times faster than simulated annealing on conventional computer hardware for problems with approximately $10^3$ variables. Here, an overview of different sequential, nontailored, as well as specialized tailored algorithms on the Google instances is given. We show that the quantum speedup is limited to sequential approaches and study the typical complexity of the benchmark problems using insights from the study of spin glasses.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.