Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 107 references

Neutrino flavor-wave transport: Numerical tests and theoretical challenges

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spectral degeneracies break the quasistatic approximation that neutrino flavor-wave transport depends on.

desk verdict First slow-driving tests of flavor-wave transport show quasistaticity breaks down at exceptional points, but an inconsistency between Eq. (29) and Algorithm 1 needs checking before the central claim holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02984 v2 pith:IFUWH6YV submitted 2026-08-04 hep-ph astro-ph.HE

Anson Kost , Lucas Johns , Huaiyu Duan This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HE
keywords neutrinoflavorwavesflavor-wavetransportquasistaticapproximationexceptionalpointsfastinstabilityquantumkineticequationsturbulencemiscidynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Flavor-wave transport treats small-scale neutrino flavor ripples as quasiparticles whose energies and growth rates are set by a slowly evolving mean background, offering a shortcut around intractable quantum kinetic simulations of supernovae and neutron star mergers. This paper presents the first numerical tests of that transport under slow astrophysical-style driving, using periodic-box models with two or three momentum beams into which neutrinos are slowly injected. The quasilinear approximation, which drops nonlinear wave-wave coupling, has mixed success: it captures the mean flavor evolution in some cases, but errors accumulate because the neglected couplings redistribute wave power across wave vectors. The quasistatic approximation, which assumes no transitions between flavor-wave levels, fails at wave vectors where the spectrum becomes degenerate at exceptional points, and the paper argues this failure is generic when a neutrino medium is driven through marginal stability.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Fourier-space flavor-wave Hamiltonian $H_n$, a non-Hermitian matrix acting on the wave function $\Psi_n$ that collects the spatial Fourier modes of the polarization vectors at each momentum. Its eigenvectors and eigenvalues give the flavor-wave energy levels $\Omega_R$ and growth or decay rates $\Omega_I$, and the transformed equation $i\partial_t \Phi_n = \Omega_n \Phi_n + S_n^{-1}N_n - i S_n^{-1}(\partial_t S_n)\Phi_n$ splits evolution into phase and instability dynamics, nonlinear wave-wave coupling, and driving-induced level transitions. The quasilinear approximation sets $N_n=0$; the quasistatic approximation drops the last term. The mechanism that undermines quasistaticity is the exceptional point, where two eigenvalues and their eigenvectors coalesce, so the eigenbasis decomposition itself breaks down and near-degenerate modes undergo amplified transitions under slow driving. Parallel transport is defined by setting the diagonal of $S_n^{-1}(\partial_t S_n)$ to zero and is assumed throughout.

What would settle it

Run the same slow-injection two- and three-beam simulations with an increasing number of momentum bins, for example 10, 50, and 200, and measure whether the hybrid quasistatic solution's error decreases toward the exact quantum kinetic result as the grid approaches the continuum; if the error vanishes with enough bins, the claim that spectral degeneracies generically break quasistaticity would be an artifact of discretization rather than a property of flavor-wave transport.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central finding is stated in Sec. VI: 'Spectral degeneracies cause a breakdown of the validity of the QS approximation because they amplify mode transitions due to finite rates of driving.' In the two-beam and three-beam simulations, the quasilinear solution reproduces mean polarizations $\langle P_q^z\rangle$ reasonably early on but deviates as flavor-wave turbulence redistributes the Fourier spectra $|P_k|$; the agreement improves when the calculation is re-seeded with exact data, which the authors flag as exaggerating the match. A hybrid method that applies the quasistatic approximation only where the minimum eigenvalue gap exceeds a threshold $C$ grows less accurate as $C$ is lowered, because exceptional points and small energy gaps generate significant nonadiabatic transitions. The paper also reports that transverse components of the mean polarizations, which spontaneously break rotational symmetry in flavor space, can render stable backgrounds unstable, though no such effect was seen in the main evolutions. Consequently, flavor-wave transport will either need a tractable approximation for nonquasistatic level transitions or an alternative formulation that avoids exceptional points.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical evidence comes from periodic-box models with only two or three discrete momentum bins, and the paper acknowledges that the continuum limit of infinitely many momentum bins might behave fundamentally differently and resolve the degeneracy-amplified nonquasistatic transitions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quasistatic flavor-wave transport is unreliable for wave vectors whose spectra pass through degeneracies, which occurs generically in media driven near marginal stability.
  • Flavor-wave transport will require either a tractable approximation for nonquasistatic transitions or a reformulation that avoids exceptional points altogether.
  • The quasilinear approximation may need to be replaced by flavor-wave kinetics, which retains resonant wave-wave interactions treated as collisionlike processes.
  • Hybrid schemes that selectively apply the quasistatic approximation based on a minimum eigenvalue gap become less accurate as the threshold is lowered, so the approximation cannot simply be applied more aggressively.
  • The continuum limit with infinitely many momentum bins is an open question; if it behaves differently, the failure of quasistaticity may be tied to momentum discretization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same exceptional-point obstruction should affect any non-Hermitian quasiparticle transport scheme that assumes adiabatic following of a slowly varying background, so tests in simpler non-Hermitian toy models could isolate when a Landau-Zener-like transition formula exists.
  • Beyond the paper: one could test whether the finite-rate transition probability through a flavor-wave exceptional point obeys a scaling law in the driving rate; if such a law exists, it could be folded into transport as an effective transition rate.
  • Beyond the paper: because the paper finds new instabilities when mean transverse polarizations break rotational symmetry, flavor-wave transport codes that assume $\langle P_q\rangle\parallel z$ may need to track transverse mean components even when they are small.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first numerical tests of flavor-wave (flavomon) transport under slow astrophysical driving, using periodic-box QKE simulations with two or three discrete momentum beams as the exact ground truth. It tests the quasilinear (QL) approximation, which neglects nonlinear wave-wave coupling, and the quasistatic (QS) approximation, which neglects transitions driven by finite rates of change of the flavor-wave eigensystem. The central numerical finding is that the QS approximation degrades as the quasistaticity threshold C in Eq. (28) is lowered, with degradation attributed to spectral degeneracies and exceptional points that amplify nonadiabatic mode transitions. The paper also develops flavor-wave parallel transport, discusses the heuristic basis of the QS approximation, and examines instabilities that appear when the mean polarizations have transverse components.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper is an important and timely negative result: the QS approximation, which is essential to current formulations of flavor-wave transport, becomes unreliable precisely in the marginally stable, slowly driven regimes expected in supernovae and neutron star mergers. The work also makes a useful conceptual distinction between quasistaticity and adiabaticity and identifies exceptional points as a transport-relevant feature of non-Hermitian flavor-wave eigensystems. Strengths include benchmarking against the exact QKE (an external ground truth), a falsifiable numerical trend (worse agreement as C is lowered), and the use of an open-source code base. However, the central mechanism is not cleanly isolated as presented because of an inconsistency between the hybrid method's defining equation and its pseudocode, and because the eigenbasis conversion used in the QS branch may be numerically ill-conditioned near the very degeneracies under study. These issues are fixable but require verification.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. IV, Figs. 2-4] The hybrid method converts between Psi_n and Phi_n through S_n and S_n^-1 for every mode, including QS modes whose eigenvalue gaps are just above the threshold C. Near an exceptional point S_n is singular, and for small but nonzero gaps the condition number of S_n grows; the reconstructed Psi_n can then contain large numerical errors even if the evolution of Phi_n is physically correct. Lowering C from 0.05 to 0.03 (Fig. 2) or from 0.13 to 0.06 (Fig. 3) admits modes with smaller gaps into the QS branch, so the observed degradation could in part be a numerical artifact of eigenbasis conversion rather than the omitted i S^-1 (partial_t S_n) Phi_n term. Because the paper's central conclusion is that degeneracies amplify physical nonadiabatic transitions, the authors should report the condition number of S_n (or an equivalent measure) for the QS-evolved modes and demonstrate that the degradation persists with time-step refinement and with a scheme that avoids the eigenbasis conversion for the borderline modes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II D, after Eq. (24)] The sentence requiring |Omega_{n,i} - Omega_{n,j}| >> 1/T says the eigenvalues are 'significantly nondegenerate,' which is correct, but two sentences later the text says the requirement is that the eigenvalues are 'significantly degenerate'; the latter should read 'significantly nondegenerate' or 'well separated.'
  2. [Figs. 2-3] The comparisons between the hybrid method and the exact QKE are described qualitatively ('appreciably worse,' 'quite good'). Adding a quantitative error metric, such as the time-integrated L2 difference in the mean polarizations or in the Fourier spectra, would make the threshold dependence of the degradation more precise and easier to compare across the two test cases.
  3. [Sec. VI, first paragraph] The caveat that the continuum limit with an infinite number of momentum bins 'might behave fundamentally differently' is important and should be carried into the abstract and the concluding statements, because the abstract currently states the degeneracy problem without this qualification, and the numerical evidence is limited to two- and three-beam discrete models.
  4. [Sec. IV, Eq. (28)] The threshold C is compared with instantaneous eigenvalue separations, but the nonadiabatic transition amplitude also depends on the matrix elements of S_n^-1 partial_t S_n and on the rate of change of the Hamiltonian. The heuristic criterion is understandable and the paper references Ref. [104], but a brief remark that C is a proxy rather than a rigorous adiabaticity condition would help readers interpret the threshold scans.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the approximations are benchmarked against exact QKE solutions, and the self-cited framework is the object under test rather than the evidence for its own validity.

full rationale

The paper's central numerical tests compare the QL and QS approximations with direct solutions of the Fourier-space QKEs using the externally maintained NuGas code, so the benchmark is an independent ground truth rather than an output of the flavor-wave transport framework. The approximate evolution equations (Eqs. 16, 26, 29) are obtained by explicit truncations of the exact eigenbasis equation (Eq. 15), not by fitting; no parameter is tuned to make the approximate curves match. The frequent self-citations (Refs. 72-75, 96) supply the theoretical vocabulary and prior formalism being tested, and are not used to rule out alternatives or to generate the benchmark data. The conclusion that spectral degeneracies break quasistaticity is consistent with the derivation of the QS approximation itself (the 1/T suppression in Eq. 25 fails when splittings are small), and the numerical experiments quantify that failure in specific slowly driven models; this is a validation of the approximation's stated applicability condition, not a fitted prediction. The two-beam restart from simulation data is explicitly acknowledged as exaggerating agreement, and the discrete-momentum limitation is stated in Sec. VI. One correctness caveat, which does not affect the circularity verdict: the text says the QS hybrid retains the nonlinear term S^{-1}N_n (Eq. 29), but Algorithm 1's QS branch updates Φ_n with only -iΩ_nΦ_nΔt; if the implementation follows the algorithm, the Sec. IV degradation with smaller C could reflect QL errors rather than purely nonquasistatic transitions.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its central demonstration rests on exact QKE simulations as benchmark and on a small set of hand-chosen test parameters (injection rate, QS threshold, fluctuation seed). The principal domain assumptions are the quasiparticle picture and the slow-driving postulate, both inherited from prior work and explicitly flagged.

free parameters (4)
  • Injection amplitude ζ = 1 (two-beam), -3/2 (three-beam)
    Chosen by hand to define the slow-injection test cases; not fitted to data. Sets the rate of neutrino injection into the specified beam.
  • Quasistatic criterion threshold C = 0.05 and 0.03 (two-beam); 0.13 and 0.06 (three-beam)
    Hand-chosen thresholds for the mode-splitting criterion Eq. (28). The central conclusion is robust to the value: smaller C (more aggressive QS) worsens agreement.
  • Initial subgrid fluctuation seed = 10^-6
    Initial amplitude of all nonzero Fourier modes P_{q,n}; chosen small to seed instabilities. The final spectra depend on this seed, but the qualitative QS failure does not.
  • Injection duration and final time = Injection over µt in [0,2400], final time µt=3000
    Chosen simulation timescales for the slow-driving scenario; no physical content beyond defining the test.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Collisionless QKE in the fast limit (Eq. 1) is the exact dynamics to be approximated.
    The paper omits antineutrinos, collisions, neutrino masses and matter potentials, focusing on fast flavor conversion. This is the standard starting point in the field.
  • domain assumption Flavor waves are quasiparticles whose properties are set by the local mean background.
    Adopted from Refs. [72-75]; the numerical tests benchmark approximations built on this picture.
  • domain assumption Flavor-wave eigensystems vary slowly on the astrophysical scale (slow driving).
    Explicitly stated as a postulate in footnote 3: 'That flavor-wave eigensystems vary slowly is a postulate, and not an entirely obvious one.'
  • ad hoc to paper The quasistatic criterion min_{i≠j}|Ω_{n,i}-Ω_{n,j}| > C (Eq. 28) identifies wave vectors where the QS approximation is valid.
    A simple threshold introduced for the hybrid method; the authors note a more rigorous criterion from Ref. [104] could be used but would not change the conclusion.
  • ad hoc to paper n=0 mean polarizations can be approximated as exactly along ±z in the hybrid calculations.
    The paper sets the zero-mode vectors to ±z, approximating small transverse fluctuations as zero, and argues this does not affect results (Sec. IV).
  • domain assumption Periodic-box, discrete-momentum-beam models represent the physics of astrophysical neutrino media.
    This is the standard test-bed approach, but the continuum limit is acknowledged as possibly different (Sec. VI).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutrino flavor-wave transport: Numerical tests and theoretical challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IFUWH6YV

@misc{pith2026260802984,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutrino flavor-wave transport: Numerical tests and theoretical challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IFUWH6YV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02984}
}
read the original abstract

Neutrino quantum kinetics is computationally intractable in the neutrino-dense arenas of core-collapse supernovae and neutron star mergers. Flavor-wave (or flavomon) transport is an emerging approach to this problem in which small-scale flavor inhomogeneities are treated as quasiparticles with properties determined by the local mean background. We present the first numerical calculations of flavor-wave transport under slow driving. Our results show some quantitative successes but also underscore the theoretical challenges that need to be overcome. Two issues are particularly concerning. (1) Nonlinear wave-wave coupling may be important. (2) Degeneracies and small energy gaps are responsible for significant nonadiabatic transitions. Future work will need to address these points if flavor-wave transport is to be viable in settings of astrophysical interest. Other topics examined include flavor-wave parallel transport and flavor-space symmetry breaking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02984 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparison between simulation (exact QKE, solid curves) and theory (QL approximation, dashed curves) in the two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison of simulation (exact QKE) and theory (hybrid method selectively applying the QS approximation) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Real and imaginary parts of eigenvalues Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The imaginary parts of the eigenvalues Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 17 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    M. C. Volpe, Neutrinos from dense environments: Fla- vor mechanisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new directions, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 025004 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Johns, S

    L. Johns, S. Richers, and M.-R. Wu, Neutrino oscilla- tions in core-collapse supernovae and neutron star merg- ers, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nat

    I. Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nat. Rev. Phys.7, 285 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    R. F. Sawyer, Neutrino cloud instabilities just above the neutrino sphere of a supernova, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 081101 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Wu, Y.-Z

    M.-R. Wu, Y.-Z. Qian, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, T. Fischer, and L. Huther, Effects of neutrino oscillations on nucle- osynthesis and neutrino signals for an 18M J supernova model, Phys. Rev. D91, 065016 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Wu and I

    M.-R. Wu and I. Tamborra, Fast neutrino conversions: Ubiquitous in compact binary merger remnants, Phys. Rev. D95, 103007 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    M.-R. Wu, I. Tamborra, O. Just, and H.-T. Janka, Imprints of neutrino-pair flavor conversions on nucle- osynthesis in ejecta from neutron-star merger remnants, Phys. Rev. D96, 123015 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Abbar, H

    S. Abbar, H. Duan, K. Sumiyoshi, T. Takiwaki, and M. C. Volpe, On the occurrence of fast neutrino fla- vor conversions in multidimensional supernova models, Phys. Rev. D100, 043004 (2019)

    2019

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Delfan Azari, S

    M. Delfan Azari, S. Yamada, T. Morinaga, W. Iwakami, H. Okawa, H. Nagakura, and K. Sumiyoshi, Linear anal- ysis of fast-pairwise collective neutrino oscillations in core-collapse supernovae based on the results of boltz- mann simulations, Phys. Rev. D99, 103011 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Morinaga, H

    T. Morinaga, H. Nagakura, C. Kato, and S. Yamada, Fast neutrino-flavor conversion in the preshock region of core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 012046 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Xiong, A

    Z. Xiong, A. Sieverding, M. Sen, and Y.-Z. Qian, Poten- tial impact of fast flavor oscillations on neutrino-driven winds and their nucleosynthesis, Astrophys. J.900, 144 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Ko, M.-K

    H. Ko, M.-K. Cheoun, E. Ha, M. Kusakabe, T. Hayakawa, H. Sasaki, T. Kajino, M.-a. Hashimoto, M. Ono, M. D. Usang, S. Chiba, K. Nakamura, A. Tol- stov, K. Nomoto, T. Kawano, and G. J. Mathews, Neu- trino process in core-collapse supernovae with neutrino self-interaction and msw...

    2020

  5. [13]

    George, M.-R

    M. George, M.-R. Wu, I. Tamborra, R. Ardevol- Pulpillo, and H.-T. Janka, Fast neutrino flavor conver- sion, ejecta properties, and nucleosynthesis in newly- formed hypermassive remnants of neutron-star mergers, Phys. Rev. D102, 103015 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Abbar, F

    S. Abbar, F. Capozzi, R. Glas, H.-T. Janka, and I. Tam- borra, On the characteristics of fast neutrino flavor in- stabilities in three-dimensional core-collapse supernova models, Phys. Rev. D103, 063033 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Johns and H

    L. Johns and H. Nagakura, Fast flavor instabilities and the search for neutrino angular crossings, Phys. Rev. D 103, 123012 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Nagakura, A

    H. Nagakura, A. Burrows, L. Johns, and G. M. Fuller, Where, when, and why: Occurrence of fast-pairwise collective neutrino oscillation in three-dimensional core- collapse supernova models, Phys. Rev. D104, 083025 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Li and D

    X. Li and D. M. Siegel, Neutrino fast flavor conversions in neutron-star postmerger accretion disks, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 251101 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    O. Just, S. Abbar, M.-R. Wu, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, and F. Capozzi, Fast neutrino conversion in hydrody- namic simulations of neutrino-cooled accretion disks, Phys. Rev. D105, 083024 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Fern´ andez, S

    R. Fern´ andez, S. Richers, N. Mulyk, and S. Fahlman, Fast flavor instability in hypermassive neutron star disk outflows, Phys. Rev. D106, 103003 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Fujimoto and H

    S.-i. Fujimoto and H. Nagakura, Explosive nucleosyn- thesis with fast neutrino-flavour conversion in core- collapse supernovae, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.519, 2623 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Xiong, L

    Z. Xiong, L. Johns, M.-R. Wu, and H. Duan, Collisional flavor instability in dense neutrino gases, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083002 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast neutrino flavor conversions can help and hinder neutrino-driven explosions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 061401 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast neutrino flavor conversion in core- collapse supernovae: A parametric study in 1D mod- els, Phys. Rev. D107, 103034 (2023), arXiv:2301.11938 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, K. Naka- mura, and K. Kotake, Gravitational-wave signatures of nonstandard neutrino properties in collapsing stellar cores, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 021201 (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    Akaho, J

    R. Akaho, J. Liu, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, and S. Ya- mada, Collisional and fast neutrino flavor instabilities in two-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulation with boltzmann neutrino transport, Phys. Rev. D109, 023012 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. Liu, H. Nagakura, R. Akaho, A. Ito, M. Zaizen, S. Fu- rusawa, and S. Yamada, Muon-induced collisional flavor instability in core-collapse supernova, Phys. Rev. D110, 043039 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Mukhopadhyay, J

    P. Mukhopadhyay, J. Miller, and G. C. McLaughlin, The time evolution of fast flavor crossings in postmerger disks around a black hole remnant, Astrophys. J.974, 110 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Y. Qiu, D. Radice, S. Richers, and M. Bhattacharyya, Neutrino flavor transformation in neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 091401 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Wang and A

    T. Wang and A. Burrows, The effect of the fast-flavor in- stability on core-collapse supernova models, Astrophys. J.986, 153 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    K. A. Lund, P. Mukhopadhyay, J. M. Miller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Angle-dependent in situ fast flavor trans- formations in post-neutron-star-merger disks, Astro- phys. J. Lett.985, L9 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    K. Mori, T. Takiwaki, K. Kotake, and S. Horiuchi, Three-dimensional core-collapse supernova models with phenomenological treatment of neutrino flavor conver- sions, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.77, L9 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    V. A. Kosteleck` y and S. Samuel, Neutrino oscillations 14 in the early universe with an inverted neutrino-mass hi- erarchy, Phys. Lett. B318, 127 (1993)

    1993

  25. [33]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, and Y.-Z. Qian, Collective neu- trino flavor transformation in supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 74, 123004 (2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    Dasgupta and A

    B. Dasgupta and A. Mirizzi, Temporal instability en- ables neutrino flavor conversions deep inside super- novae, Phys. Rev. D92, 125030 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Neutrino quantum kinet- ics in a core-collapse supernova, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.09, 021, arXiv:2406.09504 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Theory of neutrino slow flavor evolution. part i. homogeneous medium, J. High Energy Phys.2025(4), 146

    2025

  29. [37]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Theory of neutrino slow flavor evolution. part ii. space-time evolution of linear instabilities, J. High Energy Phys.2025(6), 146

    2025

  30. [38]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, H.-T. Janka, and G. G. Raffelt, Neutrino-mass-driven instabilities as the earliest flavor conversion in supernovae, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 231003 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Johns, Collisional Flavor Instabilities of Super- nova Neutrinos, Phys

    L. Johns, Collisional Flavor Instabilities of Super- nova Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 191001 (2023), arXiv:2104.11369 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Johns and Z

    L. Johns and Z. Xiong, Collisional instabilities of neu- trinos and their interplay with fast flavor conversion in compact objects, Phys. Rev. D106, 103029 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Xiong, M.-R

    Z. Xiong, M.-R. Wu, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, T. Fischer, M. George, C.-Y. Lin, and L. Johns, Evolution of col- lisional neutrino flavor instabilities in spherically sym- metric supernova models, Phys. Rev. D107, 083016 (2023), arXiv:2210.08254 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Xiong, L

    Z. Xiong, L. Johns, M.-R. Wu, and H. Duan, Collisional flavor instability in dense neutrino gases, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083002 (2023), arXiv:2212.03750 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    J. Liu, M. Zaizen, and S. Yamada, Systematic study of the resonancelike structure in the collisional flavor in- stability of neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D107, 123011 (2023), arXiv:2302.06263 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    J. Liu, H. Nagakura, R. Akaho, A. Ito, M. Zaizen, and S. Yamada, Universality of the neutrino collisional fla- vor instability in core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D108, 123024 (2023), arXiv:2310.05050 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Akaho, J

    R. Akaho, J. Liu, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, and S. Ya- mada, Collisional and fast neutrino flavor instabilities in two-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulation with Boltzmann neutrino transport, Phys. Rev. D109, 023012 (2024), arXiv:2311.11272 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Do neutrinos become flavor unstable due to collisions with matter in the supernova decoupling region?, Phys. Rev. D109, 103011 (2024), arXiv:2307.10366 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    C. Kato, H. Nagakura, and L. Johns, Collisional flavor swap with neutrino self-interactions, Phys. Rev. D109, 103009 (2024), arXiv:2309.02619 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Froustey, S

    J. Froustey, S. Richers, E. Grohs, S. D. Flynn, F. Fou- cart, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Neutrino fast flavor oscillations with moments: Linear stability analy- sis and application to neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D109, 043046 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    T. Wang, H. Nagakura, L. Johns, and A. Burrows, Ef- fect of the collisional flavor instability on core-collapse supernova models, Phys. Rev. D112, 063039 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, and Y.-Z. Qian, Collective neu- trino oscillations, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 569 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    Chakraborty, R

    S. Chakraborty, R. Hansen, I. Izaguirre, and G. Raffelt, Collective neutrino flavor conversion: Recent develop- ments, Nucl. Phys. B908, 366 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Tamborra and S

    I. Tamborra and S. Shalgar, New developments in fla- vor evolution of a dense neutrino gas, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71(2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Johns, H

    L. Johns, H. Nagakura, G. M. Fuller, and A. Burrows, Fast oscillations, collisionless relaxation, and spurious evolution of supernova neutrino flavor, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103017 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Neutrino decoupling is al- tered by flavor conversion, Phys. Rev. D108, 043006 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Shalgar, On the length scale of collective neutrino oscillations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06422 (2024)

    S. Shalgar, On the length scale of collective neutrino oscillations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06422 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Nagakura, M

    H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, J. Liu, and L. Johns, Reso- lution requirements for numerical modeling of neutrino quantum kinetics, Phys. Rev. D111, 043028 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    Myers, T

    M. Myers, T. Cooper, M. Warren, J. Kneller, G. McLaughlin, S. Richers, E. Grohs, and C. Fr¨ ohlich, Neutrino flavor mixing with moments, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123036 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Grohs, S

    E. Grohs, S. Richers, S. M. Couch, F. Foucart, J. P. Kneller, and G. McLaughlin, Neutrino fast flavor insta- bility in three dimensions for a neutron star merger, Phys. Lett. B846, 138210 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Grohs, S

    E. Grohs, S. Richers, S. M. Couch, F. Foucart, J. Froustey, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaugh- lin, Two-moment Neutrino Flavor Transformation with Applications to the Fast Flavor Instability in Neu- tron Star Mergers, Astrophys. J.963, 11 (2024), arXiv:2309.00972 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Froustey, S

    J. Froustey, S. Richers, E. Grohs, S. D. Flynn, F. Fou- cart, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Neutrino fast flavor oscillations with moments: Linear stability analy- sis and application to neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D109, 043046 (2024), arXiv:2311.11968 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. P. Kneller, J. Froustey, E. B. Grohs, F. Foucart, G. C. McLaughlin, and S. Richers, Quantum closures for neutrino moment transport, Phys. Rev. D111, 063046 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Froustey, J

    J. Froustey, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Quan- tum maximum entropy closure for small flavor coher- ence, Phys. Rev. D111, 063022 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Grohs, S

    E. Grohs, S. Richers, J. Froustey, F. Foucart, J. P. Kneller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Advection algorithms for quantum neutrino moment transport, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083018 (2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    Xiong, M.-R

    Z. Xiong, M.-R. Wu, M. George, and C.-Y. Lin, Robust integration of fast flavor conversions in classical neutrino transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 051003 (2025)

    2025

  57. [65]

    Nagakura, L

    H. Nagakura, L. Johns, and M. Zaizen, Bhatnagar- gross-krook subgrid model for neutrino quantum kinet- ics, Phys. Rev. D109, 083013 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Zaizen and H

    M. Zaizen and H. Nagakura, Simple method for deter- mining asymptotic states of fast neutrino-flavor conver- sion, Phys. Rev. D107, 103022 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Zaizen, Spectral diversity in collisional neutrino- flavor conversion: Flavor equipartition or swap, Phys

    M. Zaizen, Spectral diversity in collisional neutrino- flavor conversion: Flavor equipartition or swap, Phys. Rev. D111, 103029 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    Padilla-Gay, H.-H

    I. Padilla-Gay, H.-H. Chen, S. Abbar, M.-R. Wu, and Z. Xiong, Flavor equilibration of supernova neutrinos: 15 Exploring the dynamics of slow modes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043039 (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    Froustey, Predicting the outcome of collisional neu- trino flavor conversion, Phys

    J. Froustey, Predicting the outcome of collisional neu- trino flavor conversion, Phys. Rev. D112, 023029 (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    J. Liu, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, L. Johns, and S. Ya- mada, Asymptotic states of fast neutrino-flavor conver- sions in the three-flavor framework, Phys. Rev. D111, 123004 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    Urquilla and L

    E. Urquilla and L. Johns, Testing common approxima- tions of neutrino fast flavor conversion, Phys. Rev. D 113, 103013 (2026)

    2026

  64. [72]

    Johns, Subgrid modeling of neutrino oscillations in astrophysics, Phys

    L. Johns, Subgrid modeling of neutrino oscillations in astrophysics, Phys. Rev. D112, 043024 (2025)

    2025

  65. [73]

    Johns, Thermodynamics of oscillating neutrinos, Phys

    L. Johns, Thermodynamics of oscillating neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D112, 063032 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    A. Kost, L. Johns, and H. Duan, Once-in-a-lifetime en- counter models for neutrino media. ii. quasisteady states and miscidynamic flavor evolution, Phys. Rev. D112, 103004 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    Johns and A

    L. Johns and A. Kost, Local-equilibrium theory of neutrino oscillations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03271 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  68. [76]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Fast Flavor Conver- sions at the Edge of Instability in a Two-Beam Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 221004 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Collective flavor conversions are interactions of neutrinos with quantized flavor waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211003 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    D. F. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Flavomon ray tracing in matter gradients, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.18689 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  71. [79]

    D. F. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Quasi-linear theory of fast flavor instabilities in homogeneous environments, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28854 (2026)

    2026

  72. [80]

    Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys

    L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys. Rev. D17, 2369 (1978)

    1978

  73. [81]

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov, Resonance enhance- ment of oscillations in matter and solar neutrino spec- troscopy, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.42, 913 (1985)

    1985

  74. [82]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Sim- ulation of coherent nonlinear neutrino flavor transfor- mation in the supernova environment: Correlated neu- trino trajectories, Phys. Rev. D74, 105014 (2006)

    2006

  75. [83]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Co- herent development of neutrino flavor in the supernova environment, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 241101 (2006)

    2006

  76. [84]

    G. G. Raffelt and A. Y. Smirnov, Self-induced spectral splits in supernova neutrino fluxes, Phys. Rev. D76, 081301 (2007)

    2007

  77. [85]

    G. G. Raffelt and A. Y. Smirnov, Adiabaticity and spec- tral splits in collective neutrino transformations, Phys. Rev. D76, 125008 (2007)

    2007

  78. [86]

    A. Kost, L. Johns, and H. Duan, Once-in-a-lifetime en- counter models for neutrino media: From coherent oscil- lations to flavor equilibration, Phys. Rev. D109, 103037 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    Johns and S

    L. Johns and S. Rodriguez, Collisional flavor pendula and neutrino quantum thermodynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10340 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Hannestad, G

    S. Hannestad, G. G. Raffelt, G. Sigl, and Y. Y. Wong, Self-induced conversion in dense neutrino gases: Pendu- lum in flavor space, Phys. Rev. D74, 105010 (2006)

    2006

  81. [89]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Analysis of collective neutrino flavor transformation in supernovae, Phys. Rev. D75, 125005 (2007)

    2007

  82. [90]

    Johns and G

    L. Johns and G. M. Fuller, Strange mechanics of the neutrino flavor pendulum, Phys. Rev. D97, 023020 (2018)

    2018

  83. [91]

    Johns, H

    L. Johns, H. Nagakura, G. M. Fuller, and A. Burrows, Neutrino oscillations in supernovae: Angular moments and fast instabilities, Phys. Rev. D101, 043009 (2020)

    2020

  84. [92]

    Padilla-Gay, I

    I. Padilla-Gay, I. Tamborra, and G. G. Raffelt, Neutrino flavor pendulum reloaded: The case of fast pairwise con- version, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 121102 (2022)

    2022

  85. [93]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Slow and fast col- lective neutrino oscillations: Invariants and reciprocity, Phys. Rev. D107, 043024 (2023)

    2023

  86. [94]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. Dighe, and G. Raffelt, Linearized flavor- stability analysis of dense neutrino streams, Phys. Rev. D84, 053013 (2011)

    2011

  87. [95]

    Izaguirre, G

    I. Izaguirre, G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast pairwise conversion of supernova neutrinos: A dispersion relation approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 021101 (2017)

    2017

  88. [96]

    J. Liu, L. Johns, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, and S. Ya- mada, Dynamical equilibria of fast neutrino flavor con- version, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.26418 (2025)

    2025

  89. [97]

    Morinaga, Fast neutrino flavor instability and neu- trino flavor lepton number crossings, Phys

    T. Morinaga, Fast neutrino flavor instability and neu- trino flavor lepton number crossings, Phys. Rev. D105, L101301 (2022)

    2022

  90. [98]

    Mirizzi, G

    A. Mirizzi, G. Mangano, and N. Saviano, Self-induced flavor instabilities of a dense neutrino stream in a two- dimensional model, Phys. Rev. D92, 021702 (2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    Dattoli, R

    G. Dattoli, R. Mignani, and A. Torre, Geometrical phase in the cyclic evolution of non-hermitian systems, J. Phys. A23, 5795 (1990)

    1990

  92. [100]

    Mehri-Dehnavi and A

    H. Mehri-Dehnavi and A. Mostafazadeh, Geometric phase for non-hermitian hamiltonians and its holonomy interpretation, J. Math. Phys.49, 082105 (2008)

    2008

  93. [101]

    He, X.-Q

    X.-G. He, X.-Q. Li, B. H. J. McKellar, and Y. Zhang, Berry phase in neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D72, 053012 (2005)

    2005

  94. [102]

    Johns and G

    L. Johns and G. M. Fuller, Geometric phases in neutrino oscillations with nonlinear refraction, Phys. Rev. D95, 043003 (2017)

    2017

  95. [103]

    Johns, Geometric and majorana phases in neutrino oscillations, Phys

    L. Johns, Geometric and majorana phases in neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D105, 033002 (2022)

    2022

  96. [104]

    Ib´ a˜ nez and J

    S. Ib´ a˜ nez and J. G. Muga, Adiabaticity condition for non-hermitian hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A89, 033403 (2014)

    2014

  97. [105]

    J. Liu, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, L. Johns, R. Akaho, and S. Yamada, Quasisteady evolution of fast neutrino- flavor conversions, Phys. Rev. D111, 023051 (2025)

    2025

  98. [106]

    Richers, H

    S. Richers, H. Duan, M.-R. Wu, S. Bhattacharyya, M. Zaizen, M. George, C.-Y. Lin, and Z. Xiong, Code comparison for fast flavor instability simulations, Phys. Rev. D106, 043011 (2022), arXiv:2205.06282 [astro- ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  99. [107]

    G. G. Raffelt and G. Sigl, Self-induced decoherence in dense neutrino gases, Phys. Rev. D75, 083002 (2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.