On the Nernst effect in fluctuating superconductors: Serbyn, Skvortsov, and Varlamov reply
classification
❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords
replysergeevsuperconductorsarxivbecauseclaimscommentcompletely
pith:IFZGUMJB Add to your LaTeX paper
What is a Pith Number?\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{IFZGUMJB}
Prints a linked pith:IFZGUMJB badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more
read the original abstract
This is an extended Reply to Comment by A. Sergeev, M.Y. Reizer, and V. Mitin [arXiv:0906.2389] on our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 067001 (2009)]. We explicitly demonstrate that all claims by Sergeev et al. are completely unfounded, because their underlying theoretical work contains multiple errors and inconsistencies. For this reason, there is no need to revise the existing theories of thermoelectric response in superconductors.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.