Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Fundamental Problems With Model Editing: How Should Rational Belief Revision Work in LLMs?

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2406.19354.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2406.19354 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 4 of 4 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00

measured 4 of 4 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T12:00:21.101953Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-07-04T13:09:51.085990Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved0
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation e7102adb-215a-44ff-9edd-25b726a8ca7c · inbound

COMPKE: Complex Question Answering under Knowledge Editing cites this paper.

COMPKE: Complex Question Answering under Knowledge Editing Fundamental Problems With Model Editing: How Should Rational Belief Revision Work in LLMs?

Reference 24

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T12:00:21.101953Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a51c7a79-4f09-4896-865d-ec09d087ecdd · inbound

The Table Says Otherwise: Testing LLMs with Counterfactual Relational Data cites this paper.

The Table Says Otherwise: Testing LLMs with Counterfactual Relational Data Fundamental Problems With Model Editing: How Should Rational Belief Revision Work in LLMs?

Reference 9

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T12:49:52.055086Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

Observation 1acc4343-248a-45f9-9545-f1d49a060cd7 · inbound

Radical AI Interpretability cites this paper.

Radical AI Interpretability Fundamental Problems With Model Editing: How Should Rational Belief Revision Work in LLMs?

Reference 104

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T13:09:51.087405Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

Observation 86572e59-51f5-40f3-a96f-c80925d7e6dd · inbound

PASTA: A Paraphrasing And Self-Training Approach for Knowledge Updating in LLMs cites this paper.

PASTA: A Paraphrasing And Self-Training Approach for Knowledge Updating in LLMs Fundamental Problems With Model Editing: How Should Rational Belief Revision Work in LLMs?

Reference 9

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-30T09:44:37.494531Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.