Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 55 references

This paper claims that independent epoch-of-reionization observations—quasar damping wings and dark-pixel constraints—recover the same low optical depth to reionization that CMB polarization data imply, so excluding large-scale polarization

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 17:11 UTC pith:IGJWSUH4

load-bearing objection The paper's core claim holds: EoR data independently recover a moderate tau, so polarization systematics alone can't explain the DESI preference; main caveat is the model's untested high-z tail. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26373 v1 pith:IGJWSUH4 submitted 2026-07-29 astro-ph.CO

No way ouτ: Epoch of Reionization Observations Do not Support Large Values of the Optical Depth to Reionization

classification astro-ph.CO PACS 98.80.-k98.70.Vc95.36.+x
keywords cosmic reionizationoptical depth to reionizationdynamical dark energyCMB polarizationquasar damping wingsdark pixel constraintsGompertzian reionization modelcosmological parameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper confronts a proposed escape route for the standard cosmological model. Recent analyses of galaxy clustering combined with the cosmic microwave background find a preference for dynamical dark energy, and some have wondered whether a systematic in large-scale CMB polarization data could be responsible, since dropping those data weakens the preference and raises the inferred optical depth to reionization. The authors show this route is closed: when the reionization history is described by a physically motivated asymmetric curve and independent probes of the neutral hydrogen fraction (quasar damping wings and dark-pixel limits) are added, the optical depth returns to 0.067 +/- 0.011 even without the polarization data, matching analyses that include it. The preference for dynamical dark energy then survives at about the 2-sigma level. The conclusion is that a polarization systematic alone cannot reconcile the data with the standard model.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the optical depth to reionization can be pinned down by astrophysical probes of the hydrogen fraction, independently of CMB polarization. Combining a Gompertzian reionization model — an asymmetric sigmoid that matches simulation expectations, with the optical depth treated as a derived parameter — with quasar damping-wing and dark-pixel measurements, the authors obtain tau_reio = 0.077 ± 0.011 in the standard cosmological model and tau_reio = 0.067 ± 0.011 when the dark-energy equation of state is allowed to vary with time. The latter value agrees with cosmological analyses that do include large-scale CMB polarization. The authors argue that because independent

What carries the argument

The central piece is the Gompertzian reionization model, an asymmetric sigmoid for the neutral hydrogen fraction xHI(a) = exp(-exp(P5(ã))), where P5 is a fifth-degree polynomial in log(ã) with fixed coefficients calibrated against reionization simulations and two free parameters (a pivot and a tilt). Replacing the usual hyperbolic-tangent reionization shape, this model is implemented directly in the Boltzmann solver and makes the optical depth a derived quantity. It anchors the low-redshift end of reionization with actual observations while the high-redshift contribution, which dominates the optical-depth integral, is governed by the calibrated asymmetric shape. That combination determines h

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion stands on the Gompertzian reionization shape, whose coefficients were fixed using simulations that assume the standard cosmological model; if real reionization at z > 8 is more extended than this shape allows, the derived optical depth would rise and the proposed escape route would reopen.

What would settle it

A high-redshift reionization measurement that shows substantial ionization before z ~ 10 — e.g., a 21-cm global-signal detection or a galaxy luminosity function implying an early start — would push the inferred tau above 0.08 and contradict the low value reported here. A more direct test is to recalibrate the Gompertzian coefficients on simulations with dynamical dark energy and check whether tau moves by more than the stated uncertainty.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Dropping large-scale CMB polarization no longer permits a high optical depth; the EoR data independently reproduce tau ~ 0.067 in a dynamical-dark-energy cosmology.
  • The reported preference for dynamical dark energy does not rely on the large-scale polarization data; it remains at greater than about 2 sigma without them.
  • The earlier relaxation of the tension to below 2 sigma came from the combination of a tanh reionization model and a prior peaked at tau = 0.09, which conflicts with reionization observations.
  • The same analysis removes the apparent preference for a negative sum of neutrino masses, with a 95% upper limit of 0.219 eV.
  • If the authors are right, explaining away the dark-energy preference would require not one but several independent epoch-of-reionization measurements to be systematically wrong in a coordinated way.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The load-bearing part of the argument is the Gompertzian shape's fixed high-redshift tail, which is calibrated on simulations and extrapolated where no data currently exist; a future 21-cm detection of early reionization would be a direct test of that tail.
  • The same setup could be turned into a forecast: with upcoming 21-cm and next-generation infrared-survey data, reconstructing the reionization history might reach the precision needed to independently confirm tau at the 0.01 level, making the optical depth a standard probe of early-universe physics.
  • If the dark-energy preference is real, the plausible resolutions are new physics (e.g., early or interacting dark energy) or unrecognized systematics in the galaxy-clustering data, rather than the CMB polarization channel.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper performs a joint Bayesian analysis of CMB data excluding large-scale polarization, BAO data, and a selected set of Epoch of Reionization (EoR) constraints (quasar damping wings and dark pixels), using a Gompertzian reionization model. The authors derive tau_reio = 0.077 +/- 0.011 in LambdaCDM and tau_reio = 0.067 +/- 0.011 in w0waCDM, and report a preference for dynamical dark energy at the >=~2 sigma level. They conclude that astrophysical probes of reionization independently recover the optical depth inferred from large-scale CMB polarization, implying that potential polarization systematics alone cannot explain the DESI-vs-LambdaCDM tension.

Significance. If the result is robust, the paper provides a valuable cross-check on the origin of the dynamical dark energy preference. It demonstrates that a physically motivated reionization model combined with independent EoR data can reproduce tau_reio ~ 0.06 without using large-scale CMB polarization, thereby strengthening the case that the DESI preference is not driven by low-ell polarization systematics. The work also usefully contrasts the Gompertzian model with the tanh prescription and with the broader EoR compilations used in [8,9]. Strengths include the self-consistent implementation of the Gompertzian model in CLASS, the use of tau_reio as a derived parameter with no informative prior, and the public availability of the code. The conclusions, however, depend on the assumed Gompertzian functional form and on a subjective selection of 'robust' EoR data; these dependencies need to be quantified before the central claim is fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2 / Appendix A, Eq. (a3)] The Gompertzian polynomial coefficients c_m are fixed to values calibrated on simulations that assume LambdaCDM (Sec. 2), yet no uncertainty in these coefficients is propagated into tau_reio. The included EoR data constrain only z~5.5-7, while the tau integrand weights high redshifts; thus the high-redshift tail of x_HI is an extrapolation of this self-cited functional form. The statement in Sec. 4 that adding high-z constraints is 'unlikely to increase tau significantly' is not a quantitative test. Please marginalize over the coefficients or compare with a flexible early-ionization component (e.g., a free x_e at z>10) to show that tau_reio=0.067 and its uncertainty are robust to the assumed shape.
  2. [Sec. 3, data selection] The choice to restrict EoR constraints to quasar damping wings and dark pixels is central to the derived tau_reio. Refs. [8,9], using broader compilations, find tau_reio ~ 0.05. The paper justifies the selection by 'robustness', but the criteria are qualitative. To support the claim that EoR data 'independently recover' the polarization-based optical depth, please quantify the sensitivity of tau_reio to the inclusion of excluded data (e.g., galaxy damping wings, Ly-alpha luminosity functions) and to the selection threshold. Without this, the difference from [8,9] may be due to data selection rather than the reionization model.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (5)-(6) and Delta chi^2] The paper claims a >=~2 sigma preference for w0waCDM, but the reported Delta chi^2 = -4.6 for two additional parameters corresponds to p ~ 0.10 (about 1.6 sigma for a 2-dof test). The inferred w0 = -0.42 +/- 0.25 and wa = -1.74 +/- 0.77 are also extreme. Please specify the exact statistical criterion used (profile likelihood, AIC, or contour exclusion) and reconcile it with the modest Delta chi^2. This is important because the conclusion that polarization systematics cannot resolve the tension relies on the strength of this preference.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 1] Typo: 'thse' should be 'these' in the sentence about generic reconstructions.
  2. [Sec. 5] Typo: 'insufficient' (with a ligature) should be 'insufficient'.
  3. [Table 1 / Sec. 2] The model names LambdaG, LambdaG*, w0waT, etc., are used before being fully defined; consider a short glossary near Table 1.
  4. [Figure 1 and Figure 3] The shaded regions are 1 sigma confidence intervals, but the text does not specify whether these are pointwise credible intervals or joint bands. Please clarify, as this affects interpretation of agreement with overplotted data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No definitional circularity: tau is a derived output from external EoR data; the self-cited Gompertzian coefficients are a provenance caveat, not a reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: adopt the Gompertzian x_HI model with fixed coefficients c (Eq. a3), fit its free parameters alpha and beta to high-l CMB (excluding low-l EE polarization), low-l TT, lensing, BAO, QSO damping-wing and dark-pixel x_HI data, then compute tau_reio as an integral over the resulting history. Each link is externally anchored: the QSO DW and dark-pixel data are independent of low-l CMB polarization, and tau is not a fitted input but a derived posterior. The agreement with ACT DR6 is therefore not enforced by construction; excluding low-l EE removes the dataset that most directly measures tau. The only self-citation load is the Gompertzian shape and polynomial coefficients, taken from same-group prior work [23,15] and calibrated on simulations that assume LambdaCDM. This is a provenance or robustness concern, not a circular reduction: the coefficients are fixed before the fit, were not calibrated to the reported tau values, and the EoR data can and do discriminate against the tanh alternative. No equation equates the predicted tau to an input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The high-redshift extrapolation caveat is legitimate but is extrapolation, not circularity. The persistence of the w0wa preference is a consistency statement using DESI BAO as input, not a first-principles prediction. Overall, no significant circularity; the low score reflects only the self-citation provenance of the model rather than any logical reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The reported tau values are derived parameters of an MCMC fit that passes through a single functional form, x_HI = exp(-exp[P5(a_tilde)]), with coefficients fixed in the authors' prior work. The high-redshift part of that curve, which carries most weight in the tau integral, is constrained by simulations rather than by the data in the fit. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Gompertzian polynomial coefficients c_m (m=0..5) = {0, 1, 0.1252, 0.03533, 0.002203, 0.000007483} (Eq. a3)
    Coefficients of the 5th-degree polynomial P5(a_tilde) defining the neutral-hydrogen history; 'calibrated using simulations' in the same group's prior work [15]. These fitted constants shape every derived tau in the paper.
  • Gompertzian pivot alpha and tilt beta = not quoted in text
    The two free shape parameters of the Gompertzian model, varied in the MCMC; their priors and posteriors are not reported, so the quoted tau uncertainty includes unspecified prior choices.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The Gompertzian model with fixed coefficients reproduces the true reionization history of the Universe, not only simulations.
    All tau values derive from Eqs. (a1)-(a4). The coefficients were calibrated to reionization simulations in the authors' own prior work [15,23]; the paper provides no out-of-sample validation of the high-redshift extrapolation, where the tau integrand has the most weight.
  • domain assumption Simulation-calibrated coefficients obtained under LambdaCDM remain valid inside w0waCDM.
    Section 2 acknowledges the calibration simulations assume LambdaCDM and argues the effect is small because reionization occurs in the matter-dominated era; no quantitative test is given.
  • domain assumption The QSO damping-wing and dark-pixel likelihoods (from [15,23], [40]) are correct, and the selected data are unbiased tracers of the neutral fraction.
    The EoR likelihood implementation is not shown. The selection of these data as 'the most robust' (Section 2), excluding galaxy damping-wing and Ly-alpha luminosity-function constraints used by [8,9], drives tau from ~0.05 to 0.067-0.077.
  • standard math CMB lensing breaks the As - e^{-2 tau} degeneracy as assumed.
    The lensing constraint sigma_8 Omega_m^0.25 (Section 3) is central to the tau posterior shape; this is a standard, externally verified cosmological relation.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 11242 in / 22874 out tokens · 255227 ms · 2026-08-01T17:11:03.734449+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent cosmological analyses combining high-redshift cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements with low-redshift baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data have reported a preference for dynamical dark energy, with the cosmological constant scenario ($\Lambda$CDM) disfavored at the $\sim 3\sigma$ level. These analyses, however, typically rely on large-scale CMB polarization measurements to constrain the optical depth to reionization $\tau_{\rm reio}\sim 0.06$, raising the question of whether potential systematics in this dataset could influence the inferred cosmological preference. Excluding large-scale polarization data substantially weakens the tension with $\Lambda$CDM to the $\lesssim 2\sigma$ level, nevertheless at a price of increasing $\tau_{\rm reio}$ significantly to $\sim 0.09$. Here, we use a physically motivated Gompertzian reionization framework to perform a self-consistent Bayesian analysis combining CMB (excluding large-scale polarization data), BAO, and independent measurements of the neutral hydrogen fraction evolution from quasar damping wing observations and dark pixel constraints. We derive $\tau_{\rm reio} = 0.067 \pm 0.011$, in good agreement with cosmological analyses that would include large-scale CMB polarization data, while the inferred reionization history is consistent with multiple observational constraints. Our analysis recovers a preference for dynamical dark energy at the $\gtrapprox2\sigma$ level. These results demonstrate that astrophysical probes of reionization independently recover the optical depth required by CMB polarization measurements, suggesting that potential systematics in large-scale polarization alone are unlikely to fully explain the emerging preference for dynamical dark energy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Into the Gompverse: A robust Gompertzian reionization model for CMB analyses

    Into the Gompverse: A robust Gompertzian reionization model for CMB analyses. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.13423 , archivePrefix =. 2604.13423 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Five parameters are all you need (in CDM). arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.13680 , archivePrefix =. 2405.13680 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Neural network emulation of reionization to constrain new physics with early- and late-time probes. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/j92y-wbtn , archivePrefix =. 2503.11261 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    Planck intermediate results. XLVII. Planck constraints on reionization history. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628897 , archivePrefix =. 1605.03507 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    A new parameterization of the reionisation history. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526543 , archivePrefix =. 1509.02785 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Parametrizing the Reionization History with the Redshift Midpoint, Duration, and Asymmetry. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aabff0 , archivePrefix =. 1804.00672 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Addressing Tensions in CDM Cosmology by an Increase in the Optical Depth to Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/6r54-8lv4 , archivePrefix =. 2504.16932 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Turning a negative neutrino mass into a positive optical depth. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/6vd2-rbfn , archivePrefix =. 2504.21813 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Uniting the Observed Dynamical Dark Energy Preference with the Discrepancies in _ m and H _ 0 across Cosmological Probes. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc4da , archivePrefix =. 2412.04430 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14738 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 , archivePrefix =. 1907.12875 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and CDM parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14452 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/w9pk-xsk7 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14744 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological preference for a negative neutrino mass. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083507 , archivePrefix =. 2407.07878 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06205 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    SRoll2: an improved mapmaking approach to reduce large-scale systematic effects in the Planck High Frequency Instrument legacy maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834882 , archivePrefix =. 1901.11386 , primaryClass =

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    SRoll3: A neural network approach to reduce large-scale systematic effects in the Planck High-Frequency Instrument maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040152 , archivePrefix =. 2012.09702 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Reionization optical depth determination from Planck HFI data with ten percent accuracy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936630 , archivePrefix =. 1908.09856 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Cosmological constraints from a joint DESI DR1 Full-Shape and DR2 BAO. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.18761 , archivePrefix =. 2602.18761 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    Cosmological constraints from the DESI DR1 Bispectrum Full-Shape and DR2 BAO

    Cosmological constraints from the DESI DR1 Bispectrum Full-Shape and DR2 BAO. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.23936 , archivePrefix =. 2606.23936 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Introducing the THESAN project: radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the epoch of reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3710 , archivePrefix =. 2110.00584 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    21CMFAST: a fast, seminumerical simulation of the high-redshift 21-cm signal. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17731.x , archivePrefix =. 1003.3878 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    The Sherwood-Relics simulations: overview and impact of patchy reionization and pressure smoothing on the intergalactic medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3761 , archivePrefix =. 2207.13098 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Introducing the Lumina project: large-volume radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of the epochs of hydrogen and helium reionization. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.15310 , archivePrefix =. 2605.15310 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Raising the reionization optical depth with inflationary CMB features. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.20795 , archivePrefix =. 2606.20795 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Fireworks at Cosmic Dawn: relieving BAO-CMB tensions with the Pop III.1 Flash. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.19459 , archivePrefix =. 2606.19459 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac882b , archivePrefix =. 2205.10939 , primaryClass =

  28. [28]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A Detailed Description of the CamSpec Likelihood Pipeline and a Reanalysis of the Planck High Frequency Maps. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1910.00483 , archivePrefix =. 1910.00483 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06 , archivePrefix =. 2304.05202 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 , archivePrefix =. 2206.07773 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Updated dark pixel fraction constraints on reionization's end from the Lyman-series forests of XQR - 30. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1862 , archivePrefix =. 2510.25829 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    IGM damping wing constraints on reionization from covariance reconstruction of two z 7 QSOs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac825 , archivePrefix =. 2112.04091 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    IGM damping wing constraints on the tail end of reionization from the enlarged XQR-30 sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1080 , archivePrefix =. 2404.12585 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Damping wings in the Lyman- forest: A model-independent measurement of the neutral fraction at 5.4 < z < 6.1. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450798 , archivePrefix =. 2405.12273 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Chronicling the Reionization History at 6 z 7 with Emergent Quasar Damping Wings. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4888 , archivePrefix =. 2401.10328 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Rapid late-time reionization: constraints and cosmological implications. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.21069 , archivePrefix =. 2508.21069 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A New Constraint on the Optical Depth from the Reionization History Independent of CMB Large-Scale E-Mode Polarization. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.09644 , archivePrefix =. 2601.09644 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    The Impact of Cosmic Variance on Inferences of Global Neutral Fraction Derived from Ly Luminosity Functions during Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd179 , archivePrefix =. 2305.04949 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Cobaya: code for Bayesian analysis of hierarchical physical models. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 , archivePrefix =. 2005.05290 , primaryClass =

  40. [40]

    Part II: Approximation schemes

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/034 , archivePrefix =. 1104.2933 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833886 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06210 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Model-independent evidence in favour of an end to reionization by z 6. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2449 , archivePrefix =. 1411.5375 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Signatures of inhomogeneous dark matter annihilation on 21-cm. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/69jk-m5xg , archivePrefix =. 2312.17499 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    The effects of dark matter annihilation and dark matter-baryon velocity offsets at Cosmic Dawn. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/081 , archivePrefix =. 2411.10626 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    CMB limits on decaying dark matter beyond the ionization threshold. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123529 , archivePrefix =. 2408.13305 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Effects of primordial black holes on IGM history. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/060 , archivePrefix =. 2510.00246 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational ionization by Schwarzschild primordial black holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/4p67-rxhp , archivePrefix =. 2601.05935 , primaryClass =

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of the Lyman-alpha Luminosity Function during Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1104 , archivePrefix =. 2101.01205 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Census of Ly Emission from 600 Galaxies at z = 5-14: Evolution of the Ly Luminosity Function and a Late Sharp Cosmic Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adc690 , archivePrefix =. 2501.05834 , primaryClass =

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on the z 6 - 13 intergalactic medium from JWST spectroscopy of Lyman-alpha damping wings in galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553820 , archivePrefix =. 2501.11702 , primaryClass =

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Probing the Cosmic Reionization History with JWST: Gunn-Peterson and Ly Damping Wing Absorption at 4.5 < z < 13. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae232b , archivePrefix =. 2504.04683 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Reionization and the Hubble constant: correlations in the Cosmic Microwave Background. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/082 , archivePrefix =. 2503.05691 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic tensions indirectly correlate with reionization optical depth. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/14tf-4nk2 , archivePrefix =. 2509.09678 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =

    NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations. Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)216 , archivePrefix =. 2410.05380 , primaryClass =

  55. [55]

    On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies

    XXIV. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. In a letter to Francis Baily, Esq. FRS &c , author=. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London , number=. 1825 , publisher=