Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Momentum-Resolved Electronic Structure and Orbital Hybridization in the Layered Antiferromagnet CrPS$_4$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first momentum-resolved photoemission study of the layered antiferromagnetic semiconductor CrPS4, showing that its valence band is made of Cr 3d and S 3p states, and that weakly hybridized t2g orbitals carry the magne

desk verdict First ARPES benchmark for CrPS4 with a credible 300 K band structure; the 10 K magnetic-order comparison rests on a charging correction that is deferred to the SI and needs scrutiny before the 'no change across TN' claim is taken as established. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.17403 v1 pith:IGNDYOPR submitted 2025-11-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Lasse Sternemann , David Maximilian Janas , Eshan Banerjee , Richard Leven , Jonah Elias Nitschke , Marco Marino , Leon Becker , Ahmet Can Ademoğlu
show 3 more authors
Frithjof Anders Stefan Tappertzhofen Mirko Cinchetti
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords CrPS4angle-resolvedphotoemissionspectroscopyantiferromagneticsemiconductorbandstructureorbitalhybridizationDFT+Ut2g/egorbitalscharge-transfergap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first momentum-resolved photoemission (ARPES) study of the layered antiferromagnetic semiconductor CrPS4, both in its paramagnetic (300 K) and antiferromagnetic (10 K) phases. By combining the measurements with DFT+U calculations, the authors show that the valence band is built from Cr 3d and S 3p states and has a ligand-to-metal charge-transfer gap. The central result is an orbital-selective picture: weakly hybridized t2g orbitals stay localized and spin-polarized, sustaining the magnetic order, while strongly hybridized eg orbitals mix with S p states, relax dipole selection rules, and thereby explain the material's strong sub-gap optical absorption. This is the first experimental benchmark for band-structure calculations of CrPS4 and suggests that magnetic order barely changes the band dispersion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the orbital-selective hybridization between Cr 3d t2g/eg states and S 3p states, analyzed through DFT+U band structure, spin- and orbital-projected densities of states, and Wannier functions. Wannier functions provide direct spatial evidence: the dxy t2g orbital stays localized on Cr, while the dz2 eg orbital has substantial weight on S ligands. This dichotomy is what carries the argument: t2g localization explains magnetism, eg–S p mixing explains optical activity.

What would settle it

Measure the band structure at 10 K on a much thinner CrPS4 flake (a few monolayers, where charging is negligible) and compare the Y–Γ–Y dispersion with the 300 K data. If the dispersions differ by more than the experimental resolution (roughly 50 meV), the claim that magnetic ordering does not alter the band structure is wrong. A complementary test is to check whether the calibrated charging shift is identical at the zone center and at the Brillouin-zone boundary during the 10 K measurement; a non-rigid shift would directly invalidate the correction procedure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes, for the first time, the experimental electronic band structure of CrPS4 by momentum-resolved photoemission spectroscopy above and below the Néel temperature (38 K), and shows it agrees with DFT+U calculations. In the valence band, Cr 3d and S 3p states dominate, and the band gap has ligand-to-metal charge-transfer character. Within the Cr 3d manifold, the t2g orbitals undergo only weak hybridization with sulfur p states, remain fully spin-polarized and localized, and are the carriers of the local moments that give the A-type antiferromagnetic order. The eg orbitals, by contrast, hybridize strongly with S p orbitals, forming bonding-antibonding pairs separated by about

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that magnetic order leaves the band structure essentially unchanged rests on the assumption that the 2 eV charging-induced photoelectron energy shift at 10 K is a rigid, homogeneous shift that can be fully calibrated; if the shift varies across momentum or drifts in time, the 10 K band dispersions and the claimed similarity between paramagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases would be compromised.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • DFT+U with an effective Hubbard U of 2 eV is now experimentally benchmarked for the occupied valence band of CrPS4, making it a reliable starting point for future calculations of this material.
  • The ligand-to-metal charge-transfer character of the gap means that near-valence-band-maximum physics is as much about sulfur p states as about chromium d states, not a simple Mott-Hubbard picture.
  • The observed similarity of band dispersions at 300 K and 10 K indicates that the antiferromagnetic transition does not strongly reconstruct the one-electron bands, so paramagnetic-phase ARPES data can be compared with antiferromagnetic calculations.
  • The mechanism of eg–S p hybridization relaxing dipole selection rules provides a microscopic explanation for the strong sub-gap optical absorption near 1.6 and 1.8 eV in CrPS4.
  • The distinct hybridization characters of t2g and eg states open a route to separately probe magnetism and optical response via orbital-selective spectroscopies and doping experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the orbital-selective picture is correct, tuning the Cr–S hybridization (for example by pressure, strain, or chemical substitution on the sulfur site) should shift the optical d-d oscillator strength and the magnetic anisotropy in a correlated way, because both are governed by the same t2g/eg splitting.
  • The near-identical band structures above and below the Néel temperature suggest the 38 K transition is driven primarily by interlayer exchange rather than by a change in the intralayer one-electron bands; this could be tested by measuring a monolayer, where interlayer coupling is absent.
  • The main technical vulnerability is the charging correction: the 2 eV energy shift that accumulates over two hours at 10 K must be strictly rigid in momentum for the claimed para/antiferromagnetic similarity to hold; a momentum-dependent or time-dependent shift would mimic band distortion.
  • The sequence crystal field → Hund exchange/Coulomb U → hybridization provides a transferable template for understanding other layered magnetic semiconductors where t2g and eg orbitals couple differently to ligands.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) study of the layered antiferromagnet CrPS4, measured above (300 K) and below (10 K) the Néel temperature, complemented by DFT+U calculations. The authors compare experimental momentum maps and band dispersions with DFT+U (PBE+D3+U_eff=2 eV) and report good agreement. They further analyze orbital-resolved DFT+U results and Wannier functions to argue that Cr t2g orbitals are weakly hybridized with S 3p and sustain local magnetic moments, while eg orbitals hybridize strongly, which relaxes dipole selection rules and explains sub-gap d-d optical transitions. The main claims are (i) an experimental benchmark for DFT+U in CrPS4, (ii) no major band-structure change across the magnetic transition, and (iii) an orbital-selective hybridization picture connecting magnetism and optical response.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable experimental benchmark for CrPS4, a material of current interest for 2D antiferromagnetic spintronics and magneto-optics. The paper is careful in sample preparation and characterization (AFM thickness/roughness, Raman damage checks), uses C2/m symmetrization to reduce matrix-element effects, and makes raw data available in a repository. The Wannier-function analysis is a standard and appropriate tool for orbital character. However, the strength of the conclusions is currently limited: the 10 K comparison depends on a charging correction that is not documented in the main text, the experiment-theory agreement is presented only qualitatively, and the orbital-selective hybridization claims are theoretical projections rather than experimental observables. These issues are load-bearing for the stated conclusions, especially the magnetic-order insensitivity and the experimental validation of the AFM DFT+U band structure.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4 / Figure 4B and Supplementary S6] The conclusion that magnetic order leaves the band structure essentially unchanged rests entirely on the 10 K ARPES data. The text reports a cumulative charging shift of 2 eV over 2 h that is corrected using an analysis described only in Supplementary S6. A non-rigid shift (e.g., varying with momentum, energy, or time) would systematically distort the corrected dispersions and invalidate the para-/antiferromagnetic comparison. Please present the calibration evidence in the main text: time-dependent EDCs or curvature plots before and after correction, a test of rigid-shift behavior across the momentum field of view, and an estimate of the residual uncertainty. Until this is shown, the 10 K comparison and the justification for comparing 300 K ARPES with AFM DFT+U are not established.
  2. [§3, Figures 3B–C and 4] The 'excellent agreement' between ARPES and DFT+U is asserted from visual overlay of curvature plots and traced lines. The manuscript lacks a quantitative agreement metric, error bars on the experimental dispersion, or a residual analysis. This matters because U_eff is an adjustable parameter (2 eV, adopted from Ref. 23), and the Lorentzian broadening eta_arc is chosen to reproduce the experimental maps. Please add a quantitative comparison, e.g., the RMS deviation between traced experimental bands and DFT+U bands over a defined momentum range, or a spectral-function fitting with uncertainty propagation, so that the term 'benchmark' is supported rather than impressionistic.
  3. [§5, Figure 5] The orbital-resolved claims (weak t2g vs strong eg hybridization) are obtained from the same DFT+U calculation that is being benchmarked; the ARPES data are not orbital-resolved. The momentum-resolved spectral weight panels are theory projections, and the experimental comparison is only at the level of total intensity maps. Thus the statement that ARPES 'identifies' these hybridization regimes overstates the evidence. Please either (i) present experimental polarization- or photon-energy-dependent data that can distinguish orbital characters, or (ii) explicitly frame the t2g/eg assignment as a theoretical interpretation that is consistent with, but not uniquely determined by, the ARPES data. The same applies to the claim that eg–p hybridization 'relaxes dipole selection rules'; this is a plausible inference, not a demonstrated experimental result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] Typo: 'crystalllographic' should be 'crystallographic'.
  2. [General] Several instances of 'The data was acquired' should be 'The data were acquired' (e.g., Figures 3 and 4 captions).
  3. [§2, Figure 2B] The phrase 'spin-resolved and atomic orbital-projected DOS' refers to theoretical pDOS; please label explicitly as 'calculated' to avoid implying experimental spin resolution.
  4. [§2, Figure 2B text] There is a doubled period in '...with the Cr 3 d states..' and a possible missing space in '...states..' (just before 'The major contribution').
  5. [Methods / DFT+U] The choice of U_eff = 2 eV is taken from Ref. 23. A brief discussion of sensitivity to U_eff (e.g., test with U_eff = 1 or 3 eV on the reported band features) would strengthen the benchmark claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ARPES band structure is measured independently of DFT+U; the only fitted comparison parameter is a resolution-broadening kernel, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is an experimental ARPES study with DFT+U as a complementary theoretical framework. The core experimental result, the momentum-resolved valence band structure of CrPS4, is measured directly and independently of the DFT+U calculation; no band position, dispersion, or orbital character is fitted to the ARPES data. The only adjustable parameter in the theory-experiment comparison is the Lorentzian broadening eta_arc = 0.2 eV, described as 'chosen to reproduce the experimentally obtained maps, effectively approximating the combined lifetime, as well as instrumental and thermal broadening in a single parameter.' This acts as a resolution-smoothing kernel and cannot by construction impose the locations or dispersions of spectral features that are the basis of the claimed agreement. The Hubbard Ueff = 2 eV is likewise 'adopted from Susilo et al. 23,' an external prior study, not fitted to the present ARPES data; benchmarking a parameterized model against new independent data is not circular. The orbital hybridization analysis (weak t2g, strong eg) is explicitly a DFT+U result, not claimed to be derived from photoemission, so it is a theoretical interpretation rather than a prediction forced by the measurement. Self-citations (refs 9, 13, 34, 46) support ancillary statements about charging behavior or instrument description and are not load-bearing for the central benchmark claim. The 10 K charging correction is an experimental validity concern, not a circular reduction: even if the correction were imperfect, that would undermine the magnetic-order-insensitivity claim, but it would not make the 300 K band structure or the DFT+U comparison reduce to its own inputs. The paper's own limitation statement, 'To identify more nuanced changes in the band structure induced by magnetic ordering, further progress in the preparation of the strongly charging semiconductor... will be necessary,' confirms that the para/antiferromagnetic comparison is treated cautiously. Therefore no step in the claimed derivation chain is equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the paper's physical content is an experimental measurement plus an orbital decomposition within standard DFT+U. The main free choices are the Hubbard U and the display broadening used for theory-experiment comparison.

free parameters (2)
  • Ueff (Dudarev U-J) for Cr 3d = 2 eV
    Adopted from Susilo et al. (ref. 23) and used throughout the DFT+U calculation. It directly affects the Cr 3d localization, t2g/eg splitting, and hybridization, which are central to the paper's orbital interpretation.
  • Lorentzian broadening eta_arc for theoretical momentum maps = 0.2 eV
    The Methods state this value was 'chosen to reproduce the experimentally obtained maps'. It is a fitting parameter for the visual experiment-theory comparison, not for extracted physical quantities.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT+U (PBE+D3, Ueff=2 eV) provides an accurate description of CrPS4's band structure and orbital character.
    The orbital-selective hybridization claims are derived from this calculation, and the U value is not independently determined in this work.
  • domain assumption Out-of-plane dispersion is minimal, so kz=0 theoretical maps represent the ARPES data.
    Invoked in Methods: 'Assuming minimal out-of-plane dispersion, we utilized the WannierTools package to simulate theoretical 2D momentum maps at kz = 0.'
  • domain assumption Matrix-element effects that survive C2/m symmetrization are negligible for the experiment-theory comparison.
    The text says 'Excluding matrix element effects not compensated by the symmetrization procedure,' indicating this is a recognized but unquantified simplification.
  • domain assumption The 10 K charging-induced energy shift is a rigid, uniform energy shift that can be fully calibrated.
    The 10 K comparison and the conclusion of negligible magnetic-order-induced band changes depend on this correction (Methods / Supplementary S6).
  • domain assumption Maximally localized Wannier projection reliably separates t2g, eg, and S p orbital characters.
    The Wannier-function analysis is used to visualize hybridization and to assign spin-resolved orbital weights; its reliability is checked only against the original DFT+U band structure, not against an independent method.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Momentum-Resolved Electronic Structure and Orbital Hybridization in the Layered Antiferromagnet CrPS$_4$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IGNDYOPR

@misc{pith2026251117403,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Momentum-Resolved Electronic Structure and Orbital Hybridization in the Layered Antiferromagnet CrPS$_4$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IGNDYOPR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.17403}
}
abstract

Chromium thiophosphate (CrPS$_4$) is a layered two-dimensional antiferromagnetic semiconductor exhibiting intriguing spintronic and magneto-optical properties, yet its electronic band structure has remained experimentally uncharacterized. Here, we employ momentum-resolved photoemission spectroscopy above and below the N\'eel temperature, complemented by density functional theory with Hubbard U corrections (DFT+U), to reveal a valence band dominated by Cr $3d$ and S $3p$ states with a ligand-to-metal charge-transfer band gap. We identify weakly hybridized t$_{2g}$ orbitals responsible for magnetic ordering and strongly hybridized e$_{g}$ orbitals that relax dipole selection rules, enabling optically active orbital transitions. These findings establish a foundational understanding of CrPS$_4$'s electronic structure, providing a benchmark for theoretical models and informing future investigations into its orbital physics and potential device applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 306, 666– 669 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Dai, D. et al. Twist angle–dependent valley polarization switching in heterostructures. Sci. Adv. 10, eado1281 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Schmitt, D. et al. Formation of moiré interlayer excitons in space and time. Nature 608, 499– 503 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    S., Mishchenko, A., Carvalho, A

    Novoselov, K. S., Mishchenko, A., Carvalho, A. & Castro Neto, A. H. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science 353, aac9439 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    S., Mandrus, D

    Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J.-G. Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563, 47–52 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Ghiasi, T. S. et al. Electrical and thermal generation of spin currents by magnetic bilayer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 788–794 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    & Avsar, A

    Zhao, Z., Lin, Y. & Avsar, A. Novel spintronic effects in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures. npj 2D Mater Appl 9, 30 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Grubišić-Čabo, A. et al. Roadmap on quantum magnetic materials. 2D Mater. 12, 031501 (2025)

    2025

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Nitschke, J. E. et al. Valence band electronic structure of the van der Waals antiferromagnet FePS3. Materials Today Electronics 6, 100061 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature 546, 270–273 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Mertens, F. et al. Ultrafast Coherent THz Lattice Dynamics Coupled to Spins in the van der Waals Antiferromagnet FePS3. Advanced Materials 35, 2208355 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Qi, S. et al. Giant electrically tunable magnon transport anisotropy in a van der Waals antiferromagnetic insulator. Nat Commun 14, 2526 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Nitschke, J. E. et al. Tracing the ultrafast buildup and decay of d-d transitions in FePS3. Newton 1, 100019 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Chen, Y. et al. Twist-assisted all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junction in the atomic limit. Nature 632, 1045–1051 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Ramos, M. et al. Photoluminescence Enhancement by Band Alignment Engineering in MoS2 /FePS3 van der Waals Heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 33482–33490 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Budniak, A. K. et al. Exfoliated CrPS4 with Promising Photoconductivity. Small 16, 1905924 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    & Wen, Q

    Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Leng, X., Jing, Q. & Wen, Q. CrPS4 Nanoflakes as Stable Direct-Band-Gap 2D Materials for Ultrafast Pulse Laser Applications. Nanomaterials 13, 1128 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Pei, Q. L. et al. Spin dynamics, electronic, and thermal transport properties of two- dimensional CrPS4 single crystal. Journal of Applied Physics 119, 043902 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Son, J. et al. Air-Stable and Layer-Dependent Ferromagnetism in Atomically Thin van der Waals CrPS4. ACS Nano 15, 16904–16912 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Fąs, T. et al. Direct Optical Probing of the Magnetic Properties of the Layered Antiferromagnet CrPS4. Advanced Optical Materials 13, 2402948 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Lee, J. et al. Structural and Optical Properties of Single- and Few-Layer Magnetic Semiconductor CrPS4. ACS Nano 11, 10935–10944 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Kim, S. et al. Photoluminescence Path Bifurcations by Spin Flip in Two-Dimensional CrPS4. ACS Nano 16, 16385–16393 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Susilo, R. A. et al. Band gap crossover and insulator–metal transition in the compressed layered CrPS4. npj Quantum Mater. 5, 58 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Yang, J. et al. Layer-Dependent Giant Magnetoresistance in Two-Dimensional CrPS4 Magnetic Tunnel Junctions. Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 024011 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Li, W. et al. Ultrastrong Magnon–Magnon Coupling and Chirality Switching in Antiferromagnet CrPS4. Adv Funct Materials 33, 2303781 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Houmes, M. J. A. et al. Highly Anisotropic Mechanical Response of the Van der Waals Magnet CrPS4. Adv Funct Materials 34, 2310206 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Hou, D. et al. Extraordinary Magnetic Second Harmonic Generation in Monolayer CrPS4. Advanced Optical Materials 12, 2400943 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Wu, F. et al. Gate-Controlled Magnetotransport and Electrostatic Modulation of Magnetism in 2D Magnetic Semiconductor CrPS4. Advanced Materials 35, 2211653 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Hu, L. et al. Magnetic Order Induced Suppression of Photoluminescence in van der Waals Magnet CrPS4. Laser & Photonics Reviews 19, 2400862 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Zhuang, H. L. & Zhou, J. Density functional theory study of bulk and single-layer magnetic semiconductor CrPS4. Phys. Rev. B 94, 195307 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    & Wang, J

    Chen, Q., Ding, Q., Wang, Y., Xu, Y. & Wang, J. Electronic and Magnetic Properties of a Two- Dimensional Transition Metal Phosphorous Chalcogenide TMPS4. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 12075–12080 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Watson, M. D. et al. Giant exchange splitting in the electronic structure of A-type 2D antiferromagnet CrSBr. npj 2D Mater Appl 8, 54 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Grubišić‐Čabo, A. et al. In Situ Exfoliation Method of Large-Area 2D Materials. Advanced Science 10, 2301243 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Sternemann, L. et al. Fabrication of large-area 2D magnetic semiconductor films for low- temperature ARPES. 2D Mater. 12, 035008 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    & Ryu, S

    Kim, S., Lee, J., Lee, C. & Ryu, S. Polarized Raman Spectra and Complex Raman Tensors of Antiferromagnetic Semiconductor CrPS4. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 2691–2698 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Li, M. et al. Investigation on the Intrinsic Phonon Properties of CrPS4 : A Combined Raman Spectroscopy and First-Principles Calculations Study. ACS Omega 10, 31179–31186 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Bo, X. et al. Magnetic structure and exchange interactions of the van der Waals CrPS 4 monolayer under strain: A first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B 108, 024405 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Harms, N. C. et al. Metal Site Substitution and Role of the Dimer on Symmetry Breaking in FePS3 and CrPS4 under Pressure. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 4, 3246–3255 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    M., López-Alcalá, D., Rivero-Carracedo, G., Shumilin, A

    Ruiz, A. M., López-Alcalá, D., Rivero-Carracedo, G., Shumilin, A. & Baldoví, J. J. Controlling Magnetism in the 2D van der Waals Antiferromagnet CrPS$_4$ via Ion Intercalation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2510.12371 (2025)

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    Probing the Electronic Structure of Complex Systems by ARPES

    Damascelli, A. Probing the Electronic Structure of Complex Systems by ARPES. Physica Scripta T109, 61 (2004)

    2004

  33. [41]

    Zhang, P. et al. A precise method for visualizing dispersive features in image plots. Review of Scientific Instruments 82, 043712 (2011)

    2011

  34. [42]

    Pestka, B. et al. Identifying Band Structure Changes of FePS3 across the Antiferromagnetic Phase Transition. ACS Nano acsnano.4c12520 (2024) doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c12520

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    Pestka, B. et al. Probing the band structure of the strongly correlated antiferromagnet NiPS3 across its phase transition. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2507.14890 (2025)

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    Acharya, S. et al. A theory for colors of strongly correlated electronic systems. Nat Commun 14, 5565 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Acharya, S. et al. Real- and momentum-space description of the excitons in bulk and monolayer chromium tri-halides. npj 2D Mater Appl 6, 33 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Schiller, K. J. et al. Time-resolved momentum microscopy with fs-XUV photons at high repetition rates with flexible energy and time resolution. Sci Rep 15, 3611 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. Q UANTUM ESPRESSO toward the exascale. The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 154105 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  43. [51]

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994)

    1994

  44. [52]

    & Joubert, D

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999)

    1999

  45. [53]

    Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu

    Dal Corso, A. Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu. Computational Materials Science 95, 337–350 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    & Krieg, H

    Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. The Journal of Chemical Physics 132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  47. [55]

    & Voloshina, E

    Xu, S., Wu, Z., Dedkov, Y. & Voloshina, E. Adsorption of water on the pristine and defective semiconducting 2D CrPX3 monolayers (X: S, Se). J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 354001 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Jin, Y. et al. To the Stability of Janus Phases in Layered Trichalcogenide MPX3 Crystals: Insights from Experiments and Theory. J. Phys. Chem. C 126, 16061–16068 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    & Vanderbilt, D

    Marzari, N. & Vanderbilt, D. Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands. Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847–12865 (1997)

    1997

  50. [58]

    & Vanderbilt, D

    Souza, I., Marzari, N. & Vanderbilt, D. Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands. Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001)

    2001

  51. [59]

    Pizzi, G. et al. Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    & Soluyanov, A

    Wu, Q., Zhang, S., Song, H.-F., Troyer, M. & Soluyanov, A. A. WannierTools: An open-source software package for novel topological materials. Computer Physics Communications 224, 405–416 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.