Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards Improving Document Understanding: An Exploration on Text-Grounding via MLLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.13194 v2 pith:IGVHLU2T submitted 2023-11-22 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords text-richtexttext-groundingdocumentimagesmllmsmodelunderstanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the field of document understanding, significant advances have been made in the fine-tuning of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with instruction-following data. Nevertheless, the potential of text-grounding capability within text-rich scenarios remains underexplored. In this paper, we present a text-grounding document understanding model, termed TGDoc, which addresses this deficiency by enhancing MLLMs with the ability to discern the spatial positioning of text within images. Empirical evidence suggests that text-grounding improves the model's interpretation of textual content, thereby elevating its proficiency in comprehending text-rich images. Specifically, we compile a dataset containing 99K PowerPoint presentations sourced from the internet. We formulate instruction tuning tasks including text detection, recognition, and spotting to facilitate the cohesive alignment between the visual encoder and large language model. Moreover, we curate a collection of text-rich images and prompt the text-only GPT-4 to generate 12K high-quality conversations, featuring textual locations within text-rich scenarios. By integrating text location data into the instructions, TGDoc is adept at discerning text locations during the visual question process. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple text-rich benchmarks, validating the effectiveness of our method.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hierarchical Evidence-Driven Reasoning for Long Document Understanding

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hierarchical multimodal RAG pipeline with GRPO-trained multi-page evidence verification and memory-guided iteration improves long-document QA accuracy by ~8% over prior open-source baselines.

  2. DocOCR-Eval: A Correction-Based Framework for OCR Tool Selection Without Ground Truth

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    OCR tools can be ranked without ground-truth labels by measuring how much a multimodal LLM must correct each tool's output.

  3. Docopilot: Improving Multimodal Models for Document-Level Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new academic-paper dataset and a retrieval-free fine-tuned InternVL2 model improve multi-page document QA accuracy and latency on several benchmarks.

  4. DRISHTIKON: Visual Grounding at Multiple Granularities in Documents

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A combined OCR, LLM, and fuzzy-matching pipeline locates answer spans in document images at block, line, word, and point granularity, with line-level grounding F1 of 69.10 on a new 70-document benchmark.

Pith tools