Quantum computation with longlived Rydberg-Landau atoms featuring suppressed ionization by the Magnetic Cage

Amirhossein Momtaheni; Mohammadsadegh Khazali

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantum computation with longlived Rydberg-Landau atoms featuring suppressed ionization by the Magnetic Cage

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a 2.5 T magnetic field, Rydberg atoms become millisecond-lived 'rLandau' qubits whose transverse motion is frozen into Landau levels and shielded from ionization.

desk verdict A genuinely useful first pass at Rydberg-Landau qubit properties, but the magnetic-cage ionization claim is not derived and likely wrong; the lifetime numbers are conditional on an unvalidated separability ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00575 v1 pith:IIUWMWMR submitted 2025-05-31 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Amirhossein Momtaheni , Mohammadsadegh Khazali This is my paper

classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph

keywords Rydberg-LandaustatesmagneticcageLandauquantizationcircularRydbergionizationsuppressionneutral-atomquantumcomputinginteractionslifetimeenhancement

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces Rydberg-Landau (rLandau) states: highly excited electron orbits of an atom placed in a strong (2.5 T) magnetic field, with the wavefunction frozen into Landau levels in the plane perpendicular to the field while retaining a long, Coulomb-like extension along the field axis. The authors argue that these states combine the long lifetimes and strong interactions needed for Rydberg-based quantum computing with a protection mechanism they call the magnetic cage: transverse magnetic confinement suppresses laser-induced ionization, so stronger excitation lasers can be used without destroying the atom. They derive selection rules, compute spontaneous and blackbody-limited lifetimes, and identify rLandau circular states whose spontaneous decay is forbidden, giving effective lifetimes of hundreds of milliseconds at cryogenic temperatures compared with roughly a millisecond for an ordinary high-$n$ Rydberg state. If correct, this would allow high-fidelity, deeper quantum circuits in neutral-atom processors using fewer lasers than Coulombic circular-state excitation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the separable rLandau wavefunction $\Psi(\rho,\phi,z)=f_{N_z,P}(z)\,Q_{N_\ell,M}(\rho,\phi)$, where $Q_{N_\ell,M}$ is a Landau-level eigenstate built from cyclotron and guiding-center ladder operators and $f_{N_z,P}$ solves a one-dimensional Schrodinger equation with the effective axial potential $V(z)\approx -e^2/[4\pi\epsilon_0(|z|+d)]$. This object carries the whole argument: the transverse Landau factor decides which states can be reached by laser excitation through selection rules on $M$ and $N_\ell$, the axial factor sets the long tail that suppresses overlap with low-lying Coulomb states, and the combination feeds every computed dipole moment, decay rate, blackbody rate, and interaction coefficient.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to solve the full three-dimensional Hamiltonian of Eq. (2) on a grid or in a large oscillator basis for $N_z\simeq100$, $N_\ell=0$, $M=0$ at 2.5 T and compare the resulting energy levels, transition dipoles to $6P$, and decay rates with the separable-ansatz values; significant mixing would invalidate the predicted lifetimes. Experimentally, the magnetic-cage claim could be falsified by measuring the ionization yield of $^{87}\mathrm{Rb}$ excited through the 420 nm/1010 nm two-photon path with $B=2.5\,\mathrm{T}$ versus $B=0$: if the photoionization rate under an intense pulse does not drop substantially, the suppression mechanism is not doing the work claimed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that putting a highly excited alkaline atom in a $\sim2.5\,\mathrm{T}$ field makes the electron's transverse motion collapse into Landau oscillator states $Q_{N_\ell,M}(\rho,\phi)$ while its axial motion obeys an effective one-dimensional Coulomb equation, so the full state $\Psi=f_{N_z,P}(z)\,Q_{N_\ell,M}(\rho,\phi)$ is a genuine long-lived atomic level rather than a resonance. From this factorization the authors derive dipole selection rules, compute lifetimes, and show that the $N_\ell=0$ manifold cannot decay by circularly polarized emission to lower Landau levels and that $M\neq0$ states have negligible overlap with the ionic core; the resulting lifetimes reach roughly 20 ms at 70 K and exceed 200 ms at 2 K, with the $|N_z=0,N_\ell=0,M\rangle$ circular-type states having no spontaneous decay channel at all. They further show these states interact strongly through resonant dipole-dipole couplings, including a $275\,\mathrm{MHz}\,\mu\mathrm{m}^3$ $C_3$ channel for the $M=1$ pair and a $1.1\,\mathrm{GHz}\,\mu\mathrm{m}^3$ channel for $M=3$, supporting fast gates, and they argue that Landau quantization removes continuum final states, suppressing ionization by a magnetic-cage effect.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that at 2.5 T the electron's wavefunction factorizes cleanly into a frozen transverse Landau part and an independent axial part governed by a one-dimensional Coulomb-like potential, so the genuine three-dimensional coupling between these motions can be neglected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the rLandau picture is right, neutral-atom processors can run deeper circuits because qubit coherence would last tens to hundreds of milliseconds, against roughly a millisecond for an ordinary high-$n$ Rydberg state.
Resonant rLandau interactions in the $10^2$–$10^3\,\mathrm{MHz}\,\mu\mathrm{m}^3$ range keep two-qubit gate times short at micrometer separations, and the computed 510 MHz shift at 2 $\mu$m is compatible with fast entangling gates.
A 100 W infrared laser focused to a micrometer waist would give a 6P-to-rLandau Rabi frequency near $2\pi\times1\,\mathrm{GHz}$, and the magnetic cage would let experiments use such intense light without ionizing the atom.
The rLandau circular states $|N_z=0,N_\ell=0,M\rangle$ would provide effectively infinite spontaneous lifetimes with a simpler coherent preparation path than Coulombic circular states, making them useful as storage qubits.
If ionization suppression holds, off-resonant Rydberg dressing can use higher laser power and larger detunings without losing atoms, improving the interaction-to-loss ratio.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension is a full three-dimensional diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in Eq. (2), which would reveal whether the separable ansatz misses channel mixing near the continuum and would place error bars on the predicted lifetimes and interaction strengths.
A related implication is that the magnetic-cage suppression could be smaller than the paper's density-of-states argument suggests, because the integrated number of continuum Landau states is conserved; an ionization measurement with the field on and off is the clean way to settle this.
If the rLandau circular states are as robust as claimed, they could serve as microwave-coupled quantum memory qubits, with the $C_3\propto M$ scaling acting as a tunable interaction knob.
The same transverse-confinement idea might transfer to other strongly driven systems, such as excitons or surface electrons, where a magnetic or synthetic field could protect against ionization while preserving strong interactions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things worth knowing. First, the paper is the first systematic treatment I know of that takes quasi-Landau states in strong magnetic fields and works out the quantum-computing-relevant properties: dipole selection rules, lifetimes, and interaction coefficients for 87Rb. The derivations are self-contained, the quantum defects are numerical outputs rather than fits, and the selection rules and interaction scalings are laid out clearly. That part is real. Second, the abstract's headline claim—that the magnetic cage suppresses ionization under intense lasers—is not derived and, as stated, is probably wrong.

The magnetic-cage section argues that Landau quantization reduces the density of final states in Fermi's golden rule. That is incorrect: transverse quantization rearranges the same states into subbands, each with a one-dimensional continuum along the field axis, and the integrated density of states is conserved. A uniform B field provides no axial barrier. No photoionization matrix element is computed anywhere. So the suppression claim, which motivates the high-intensity Rabi estimate and the whole 'cage' language, is asserted rather than shown. I agree with the stress-test note on this point.

The separability ansatz is the next soft spot. All the dipole moments, lifetimes, and interaction strengths are computed from Ψ = f(z)Q(ρ,φ), with the axial potential approximated by a shifted Coulomb form. There is no check against a non-separable calculation or against the existing quasi-Landau spectroscopy of Garton–Tomkins and others. The numbers in Table III are therefore conditional on a model whose quantitative accuracy is untested.

The ultra-long-lived |Nz=0,Nℓ=0,M⟩ states are a third problem. The proposed step 3 in Fig. 3c would require transitions on the order of tens of electron volts; no wavelengths are given. Worse, the 'ground state' of the 1D model sits near −Ry/δ² ≈ −38 eV, which is not the real 3D ground state (that is the hydrogenic 1s). The infinite lifetime is a property of the model, not of a real atom.

The citation list is heavy on the senior author's own papers, but those references are background, not load-bearing; I do not think that is the issue.

Who is this for? A specialist in Rydberg-based quantum computing could use the selection rules and interaction scalings as a starting point for a more careful calculation. The paper deserves a serious referee, but the referee should tell the authors to substantiate or remove the magnetic-cage claim, validate the separability ansatz, and confront the excitation-energy gap.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces 'Rydberg-Landau' (rLandau) states of alkali atoms in a 2.5 T magnetic field, modeled as a product of a Landau-level transverse wavefunction Q_{Nℓ,M}(ρ,φ) and a one-dimensional axial wavefunction f_{Nz}(z) in a shifted Coulomb potential. On this basis it derives dipole selection rules, transition dipoles, spontaneous and blackbody decay rates, and dipolar/van der Waals interaction coefficients, and it proposes multi-photon excitation schemes. The headline claim is that the magnetic field acts as a 'cage' that suppresses ionization, allowing intense laser driving. The manuscript presents a great deal of detailed numerical output, but the two central claims—the magnetic-cage ionization suppression and the infinite-lifetime circular states—are not supported by the calculations as presented.

Significance. The paper is potentially significant if the rLandau states exist as described: it would give a path to long-lived, strongly interacting circular-type states with simpler excitation than Coulombic circular states, and the explicit selection rules and interaction coefficients would be useful. Credit is due for the detailed implementation: the 1D axial solver, the tables of potential shifts and quantum defects, the derived dipole selection rules, and the estimates of C3 and C6 coefficients are concrete and falsifiable. However, the significance is heavily conditional. The Fermi-golden-rule suppression mechanism is not derived, the separable ansatz is used outside its stated regime, and the ultra-long-lived states have an overlooked dipole decay channel. These are load-bearing for the advertised advantages, so I cannot recommend acceptance.

major comments (3)

[MAGNETIC CAGE] The claim that Landau quantization suppresses ionization is not quantitatively established and, as stated, is incorrect. In a uniform magnetic field each Landau level carries a degeneracy eB/h per unit area plus a one-dimensional continuum along k_z; summing over subbands recovers the zero-field three-dimensional density of states, so there are not 'fewer states accessible per energy interval.' The quadratic potential confines only the transverse motion and provides no axial barrier, so an electron can still escape along B. The paper computes no photoionization matrix elements or rates, and the golden-rule expression in this section omits the degeneracy factor and the axial continuum. The abstract's central claim of a 'magnetic confinement mechanism that prevents ionization' therefore has no support from the presented calculation.
[Rydberg-Landau Wavefunction, Eqs. (7)-(9)] The separable ansatz Ψ=f(z)Q_{Nℓ,M} with effective potential V(z)≈-e²/[4πε0(|z|+d)] is justified only when the axial extension is much larger than the transverse spread, and Table I is introduced with the restriction 'For large Nz.' Yet the same approximation is used for the |Nz=0,Nℓ=0,M⟩ states that underlie the ultra-long-lived and circular-state claims in Table III. For Nz=0 the axial wavefunction is a deep 1D Coulomb ground state with extent of order a few a0, whereas r_c≈307 a0 at 2.5 T; the premise of the approximation is violated. No comparison with a non-separable solution or with existing diamagnetic-spectrum experiments is given, so the quantitative lifetimes and interactions derived from this ansatz are not validated in the regime where they are most needed.
[Ultra-long-lived Rydberg-Landau states; Table III] The statement that circular states |Nz=0,Nℓ=0,M⟩ 'lack any dipole-allowed decay paths' is inconsistent with the paper's own selection rules. Table II and Eq. (16) show that a σ- photon can drive |Nz,P,Nℓ=0,M⟩ → |Nz,P,Nℓ=0,M-1⟩. Since the axial potential shift d in Table I depends on M, the axial wavefunctions for different M are not orthogonal, and the matrix element is of order √M r_c. Whether this channel is energetically allowed depends on the M-dependent axial energies, which the paper does not compute; it simply asserts the channel is absent. The infinite-lifetime entries in Table III for M=0 are trivial (it is the lowest state), and the M>0 'circular' states require an explicit calculation of this σ- decay channel before the ultra-long-lived claim can be accepted.

minor comments (5)

[Introduction] The criterion n^4B≫1 is dimensionally inconsistent; it should be expressed as a dimensionless ratio (for example, n^4 B/B_c with a stated critical field).
[Fig. 1] The text refers to 'Fig. 1d' when discussing the doughnut-shaped distribution, but the figure contains only panels (a)-(c).
[Experimental realization / Fig. 3] The laser wavelengths are given as 420 nm and 1010 nm in the text but 421 nm and 1004 nm in Fig. 3; these should be reconciled.
[MAGNETIC CAGE] The golden-rule expression W=Σ|⟨f|σ±|i⟩|²δ(Ef-Ei-ℏω) is dimensionally incomplete; it is missing factors of 2π/ℏ and, more importantly, the sum over final states should include the Landau degeneracy and the axial continuum.
[Lifetime of Rydberg-Landau states] The Einstein A coefficient in Eq. (18) is written without specifying the unit system; in SI it requires a factor 1/(4πε0) (or an explicit statement that Gaussian units are used).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: rLandau wavefunctions, dipoles, lifetimes, and interactions are derived self-consistently from the stated Schrödinger equation; the only by-construction element is the ground-state no-decay statement.

self definitional [ULTRA-LONG-LIVED RYDBERG-LANDAU STATES, final paragraph; Table III row |0,0,0>]
"Finally, rLandau circular states (CS) |Nz = 0, Nℓ = 0, M⟩ feature ultra-long lifetimes as they represent the energetic ground state of both Coulombic and Landau energies, completely precluding spontaneous emission."

The infinite lifetime reported for |0,0,0> is not an emergent radiative calculation but a restatement of the definition of 'ground state': with no lower-energy states, the Einstein-A sum in Eq. (19) is empty by construction. Thus 'ultra-long-lived' here follows from the energy ordering chosen, not from the dynamical model. This is a mild tautology and is not load-bearing for the main rLandau results (e.g., |100,0,0> lifetimes and interactions).

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained: it starts from the stated Hamiltonian (Eq. 1), adopts the separable rLandau ansatz, solves the axial Schrödinger equation numerically via the Numerov method, and then evaluates transition dipoles, selection rules, spontaneous-emission rates, blackbody depopulation, and interaction coefficients from those wavefunctions. The quantum defects and potential shifts in Table I are fitted to the continuity conditions at z=0, not to the lifetime or interaction results, so no fitted input is renamed as a prediction. The many self-citations appear in the introduction or as references for standard Rydberg dressing and gate schemes; none of them carries the derivation of the rLandau wavefunctions or lifetimes. The only by-construction element is the infinite lifetime of the global ground state |0,0,0>, which follows immediately from the absence of lower-energy states. Separately, the Magnetic Cage ionization-suppression claim is a physics-correctness risk: the paper quotes Fermi's Golden Rule but does not evaluate W, and the assertion that Landau quantization reduces the density of final states is not established and conflicts with the conserved integrated density of states. That concern is substantive but it is an error of support, not a circular reduction of a prediction to an input. Overall, the quantitative rLandau results are not circularly derived.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on a separable wavefunction model with state-dependent shifts and defects, plus a qualitative ionization-suppression premise that is not quantitatively supported. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)

Magnetic field B = 2.5 T
Chosen as the operating point; all energies, wavefunctions, and lifetimes depend on it; no optimization or experimental reference.
Potential shift d for each Landau state = 0.104 to 508 a0 (Table I)
Introduced to regularize the 1D Coulomb potential V(z) = -e^2/[4*pi*epsilon_0*(|z|+d)]; per-state values are numerical outputs of the model and directly affect the axial wavefunctions.
Quantum defects delta_even and delta_odd = 0.03 to 0.96 (Table I)
Set by continuity of f(z) and f'(z) at z=0; they determine the axial energy levels and thus all transition frequencies and dipoles.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The full 3D wavefunction factorizes as Psi(rho,phi,z) = f(z) Q_{N_l,M}(rho,phi)
Invoked in section 'Rydberg-Landau W avefunction' before Eq. (7); all subsequent dipole, lifetime, and interaction calculations use this separable Ansatz.
domain assumption For large N_z the effective axial potential is a shifted Coulomb potential V(z) approximately -e^2/[4*pi*epsilon_0*(|z|+d)]
Used after Eq. (9) to justify the 1D Coulomb solution with quantum defects; the shift d is state-dependent.
domain assumption Spin and spin-orbit coupling are negligible when n^4 B >> 1
Stated in the second paragraph of 'Rydberg-Landau W avefunction'; justifies dropping S and L.S from Eq. (1).
ad hoc to paper Landau quantization reduces the density of final states in Fermi's golden rule, suppressing ionization
This is the central ionization-suppression premise in the 'MAGNETIC CAGE' section; no quantitative density-of-states calculation is provided, and the integrated density of states in a magnetic field is actually conserved.
domain assumption The magnetic quantum number M remains a good quantum number and the parity of rLandau states is (-1)^(P+M)
Used in 'SELECTION RULES' for dipole transitions; assumes cylindrical symmetry is unbroken by the excitation lasers or lattice.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum computation with longlived Rydberg-Landau atoms featuring suppressed ionization by the Magnetic Cage." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IIUWMWMR

@misc{pith2026250600575,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum computation with longlived Rydberg-Landau atoms featuring suppressed ionization by the Magnetic Cage},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IIUWMWMR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00575}
}

read the original abstract

Atomic processing units require robust entanglement between individual qubits, typically achieved via excitation to highly interacting Rydberg states. However, short Rydberg lifetimes and ionization risks limit the quantum volume score of the atomic processing units. Inspired by Landau resonances in alkaline atoms, we introduce Rydberg-Landau (rLandau) states created under a strong magnetic field (2.5 Tesla). These states exhibit significantly extended lifetimes and a magnetic confinement mechanism that prevents ionization, even under intense laser fields. We analyze their wavefunctions, excitation dynamics, dipole transition rules, lifetimes, and interactions, identifying states optimal for high-fidelity quantum operations. This approach simplifies the coherent excitation of long-lived, strongly interacting rLandau circular states akin to Coulombic counterparts, enabling deeper and more complex quantum algorithms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00575 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** a illustrates the magnitude of the transition dipole moment d NzNℓM 6P = ⟨Nz, Nℓ, M|rq|6P⟩ as a function of the quantum numbers Nz. The transition dipole scaling can be understood by examining the spatial overlap between the 6P state and the rLandau wavefunctions, both along and perpendicular to the magnetic field direction, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** a, the state |Nz = 100, Nℓ = 0, M = 1⟩ is populated via a three-photon excitation pathway involving offresonant intermediate states, namely the 6P level and |Nz = 100, Nℓ = 1, M = 0⟩. Accessing higher M states requires careful tuning of the excitation frequencies. For instance, Fig. 3b depicts a scheme designed to excite the state |Nℓ = 0, M = 3⟩, showcasing the flexibility of this method in engineering target mag… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: b. Without a magnetic field, ionization involves transitions into a continuous band of free-electron states. Introducing a strong magnetic field alters this scenario, quantizing transverse electron motion into discrete Landau levels spaced by ℏωc. Consequently, elec…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Quasi-Contact Forces with Resonant Range Control in Rydberg Atoms
physics.atom-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A resonantly driven Rydberg ladder can create a narrow, tunable interaction peak at a chosen interatomic distance.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Saffman, T

M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313–2363 (2010)

work page 2010
[2]

Bluvstein et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58–65 (2024)

D. Bluvstein et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58–65 (2024)

work page 2024
[3]

Khazali, Ultratight confinement of atoms in a Rydberg-empowered optical lattice, Quantum 9, 1585 (2025)

M. Khazali, Ultratight confinement of atoms in a Rydberg-empowered optical lattice, Quantum 9, 1585 (2025)

work page 2025
[4]

Khazali, Universal terminal for cloud quantum com- puting, Sci

M. Khazali, Universal terminal for cloud quantum com- puting, Sci. Rep. 14, 15412 (2024)

2024
[5]

Khazali and W

M. Khazali and W. Lechner, Scalable quantum proces- sors empowered by the Fermi scattering of Rydberg elec- trons, Commun. Phys. 6, 57 (2023)

2023
[6]

Khazali, All-optical quantum information processing via a single-step Rydberg blockade gate, Opt

M. Khazali, All-optical quantum information processing via a single-step Rydberg blockade gate, Opt. Express 31, 13970–13980 (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

Khazali, Discrete-time quantum walk and Floquet topological insulators via distance-selective Rydberg in- teraction, Quantum 6, 664 (2022)

M. Khazali, Discrete-time quantum walk and Floquet topological insulators via distance-selective Rydberg in- teraction, Quantum 6, 664 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Khazali, Quantum information and computation with Rydberg atoms, Int

M. Khazali, Quantum information and computation with Rydberg atoms, Int. J. At. Phys.10, 19 (2021); M. Khazali, K. Heshami, and C. Simon, Photon-photon gate via the interaction between two collective Rydberg excitations, J. Phys. B50, 215301 (2017)

work page 2021

Show all 45 references

[9]

Khazali and K

M. Khazali and K. Mølmer, Fast multi-qubit gates via adiabatic evolution in dark state manifolds of Rydberg atoms and superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021054 (2020)

2020
[10]

Khazali, C

M. Khazali, C. Murray, and T. Pohl, Polariton exchange interactions in multichannel optical networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 113605 (2019)

2019
[11]

Khazali, K

M. Khazali, K. Heshami, and C. Simon, Photon-photon gate via the interaction between two collective Rydberg excitations, Phys. Rev. A91, 030301(R) (2015)

2015
[12]

Weimer et al., A Rydberg quantum simulator, Nat

H. Weimer et al., A Rydberg quantum simulator, Nat. Phys. 6, 382–388 (2010)

2010
[13]

I. I. Beterov, I. I. Ryabtsev, D. B. Tretyakov, and V. M. Entin, Phys. Rev. A79, 052504 (2009)

2009
[14]

5𝑆!/#,1/2 1004𝑛𝑚 (𝜋) 421𝑛𝑚 (𝜋) M=0M=1M=49M=50 M=50 M=50 40𝑚𝑚 (𝜎$) |

and highly complex gate operations between the de- localized logical degrees of freedom [15]. Addressing this challenge necessitates the engineering of new atomic or- bitals that significantly enhance the coherence over the entangling process in atomic units. One promising app...

2025 arXiv
[15]

Gidney and M

C. Gidney and M. Eker ˚ a, How to factor 2048-bit RSA in- tegers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits, Quantum 5, 433 (2021)

2021
[16]

A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A86, 032324 (2012)

2012
[17]

T. L. Nguyen et al., Towards quantum simulation with circular Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. X8, 011032 (2018)

2018
[18]

Signoles et al., Coherent transfer between low-angular- momentum and circular Rydberg states, Phys

A. Signoles et al., Coherent transfer between low-angular- momentum and circular Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 253603 (2017)

2017
[19]

Cardman and G

R. Cardman and G. Raithel, Circularizing Rydberg atoms with time-dependent optical traps, Phys. Rev. A 101, 013434 (2020)

2020
[20]

Khazali, Fast multicomponent cat-state generation under resonant or strong-dressing Rydberg-Kerr interac- tion, Phys

M. Khazali, Fast multicomponent cat-state generation under resonant or strong-dressing Rydberg-Kerr interac- tion, Phys. Rev. A109, 053716 (2024)

2024
[21]

Khazali, Progress towards macroscopic spin and me- chanical superposition via Rydberg interaction, Phys

M. Khazali, Progress towards macroscopic spin and me- chanical superposition via Rydberg interaction, Phys. 12 Rev. A 98, 043836 (2018)

2018
[22]

Khazali, H

M. Khazali, H. W. Lau, A. Humeniuk, and C. Simon, Large energy superpositions via Rydberg dressing, Phys. Rev. A 94, 023408 (2016)

2016
[23]

Khazali, Rydberg noisy-dressing and applications in making soliton molecules and droplet quasi-crystals, Phys

M. Khazali, Rydberg noisy-dressing and applications in making soliton molecules and droplet quasi-crystals, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L032033 (2021)

2021
[24]

Z. Shi, M. Khazali, L. Qin, Y. Zhou, and Y. Zhong, Pat- tern formations and their active manipulation in a Ryd- berg noisy-dressed Bose–Einstein condensate, Opt. Lett. 49, 6517–6520 (2024)

2024
[25]

W. R. S. Garton and F. S. Tomkins, Diamagnetic Zeeman effect and magnetic configuration mixing in long spectral series of Ba I, Astrophys. J. 158, 839 (1969)

1969
[26]

R. J. Fonck, D. H. Tracy, D. C. Wright, and F. S. Tomkins, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 1366 (1978)

1978
[27]

R. J. Fonck, F. L. Roesler, D. H. Tracy, and F. S. Tomkins, Phys. Rev. A21, 861 (1980)

1980
[28]

N. P. Economou, R. R. Freeman, and P. F. Liao, Phys. Rev. A 18, 2506 (1978)

1978
[29]

J. C. Gay, D. Delande, and F. Biraben, J. Phys. B 13, L729 (1980)

1980
[30]

J. C. Castro, M. L. Zimmerman, R. G. Hulet, D. Klepp- ner, and R. R. Freeman,Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 1780 (1980)

1980
[31]

L. K. Haines and D. H. Roberts, One-dimensional hydro- gen atom, Am. J. Phys.37, 1145 (1969)

1969
[32]

David Tong, Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect, arXiv:1606.06687 (2016)

2016 arXiv
[33]

Daniel Arovas, Lecture Notes on Quantum Hall Effect (2024)

2024
[34]

Phys. Rev. A109, 022818 (2024)

2024
[35]

J. Bai, J. Fan, L. Hao, N. L. Spong, Y. Jiao, and J. Zhao, Measurement of the near field distribution of a microwave horn using a resonant atomic probe, Appl. Sci. 9, 4895 (2019)

2019
[36]

S. R. Cohen and J. D. Thompson, Quantum computing with circular Rydberg atoms, arXiv:2103.12744 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[37]

W. D. Coles, J. C. Fakan, and J. C. Laurence, Supercon- ducting magnetic bottle for plasma physics experiments, NASA, Report No. 3595 (1966)

1966
[38]

Mucke et al., Performance of a short magnetic bot- tle electron spectrometer, Rev

M. Mucke et al., Performance of a short magnetic bot- tle electron spectrometer, Rev. Sci. Instrum.83, 063106 (2012)

2012
[39]

L. I. Schiff and H. Snyder, Theory of the quadratic Zee- man effect, Phys. Rev. 55, 59 (1939)

1939
[40]

T. F. Gallagher, Rydberg atoms, in Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics(Springer In- ternational Publishing, 1994), pp. 231–240

1994
[41]

L. K. Haines and D. H. Roberts, One-dimensional hydro- gen atom, Am. J. Phys.37, 1145–1154 (1969)

1969
[42]

Gouhier et al., Low intensity noise high-power tunable fiber-based laser around 1007 nm, J

B. Gouhier et al., Low intensity noise high-power tunable fiber-based laser around 1007 nm, J. Lightwave Technol. 37, 3539–3543 (2019)

2019
[43]

Gouhier et al., Low-noise single-frequency 50 W fiber laser operating at 1013 nm, Laser Phys

B. Gouhier et al., Low-noise single-frequency 50 W fiber laser operating at 1013 nm, Laser Phys. Lett.16, 045103 (2019)

2019
[44]

IPG Photonics, High-power CW fiber amplifiers, https://www.ipgphotonics.com/products/lasers/ specialized-lasers/cw-amplifiers (accessed 30 Apr. 2025)

2025
[45]

Alber and P

G. Alber and P. Zoller, Laser excitation of electronic wave packets in Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rep. 199, 231– 280 (1991)

1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Saffman, T

M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313–2363 (2010)

work page 2010

[2] [2]

Bluvstein et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58–65 (2024)

D. Bluvstein et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58–65 (2024)

work page 2024

[3] [3]

Khazali, Ultratight confinement of atoms in a Rydberg-empowered optical lattice, Quantum 9, 1585 (2025)

M. Khazali, Ultratight confinement of atoms in a Rydberg-empowered optical lattice, Quantum 9, 1585 (2025)

work page 2025

[4] [4]

Khazali, Universal terminal for cloud quantum com- puting, Sci

M. Khazali, Universal terminal for cloud quantum com- puting, Sci. Rep. 14, 15412 (2024)

2024

[5] [5]

Khazali and W

M. Khazali and W. Lechner, Scalable quantum proces- sors empowered by the Fermi scattering of Rydberg elec- trons, Commun. Phys. 6, 57 (2023)

2023

[6] [6]

Khazali, All-optical quantum information processing via a single-step Rydberg blockade gate, Opt

M. Khazali, All-optical quantum information processing via a single-step Rydberg blockade gate, Opt. Express 31, 13970–13980 (2023)

work page 2023

[7] [7]

Khazali, Discrete-time quantum walk and Floquet topological insulators via distance-selective Rydberg in- teraction, Quantum 6, 664 (2022)

M. Khazali, Discrete-time quantum walk and Floquet topological insulators via distance-selective Rydberg in- teraction, Quantum 6, 664 (2022)

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Khazali, Quantum information and computation with Rydberg atoms, Int

M. Khazali, Quantum information and computation with Rydberg atoms, Int. J. At. Phys.10, 19 (2021); M. Khazali, K. Heshami, and C. Simon, Photon-photon gate via the interaction between two collective Rydberg excitations, J. Phys. B50, 215301 (2017)

work page 2021