Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 46 references

Particle-in-Cell Simulations of Burning ICF Capsule Implosions

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A fully kinetic 1D simulation of a burning fusion capsule reproduces alpha knock-on neutrons, but large-angle scattering cannot explain the anomalously large neutron spectral shift seen at the National Ignition Facility.

desk verdict A well-verified 1D kinetic simulation that reproduces the AKN signal and credibly shows large-angle scattering alone cannot explain the NIF spectral shift; the FWHM-based temperature inference is a minor but checkable wrinkle. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02273 v1 pith:ILFVELDS submitted 2025-06-02 physics.plasm-ph physics.comp-ph

Johannes J. van de Wetering , Justin R. Angus , W. Farmer , V. Geyko , D. Ghosh , D. Grote , C. Weber , G. Zimmerman This is my paper
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.comp-ph PACS 52.65.Rr52.57.-j
keywords inertialconfinementfusionparticle-in-cellsimulationnuclearelasticscatteringalphaknock-onneutronsneutronspectralshiftsuprathermalionsPIC-MCC
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to settle whether kinetic effects in the burn stage of an inertial confinement fusion capsule can explain two experimental surprises at the National Ignition Facility: a D-T neutron spectrum shifted far beyond the Maxwellian hydrodynamic limit, and an alpha knock-on neutron tail in the 15.5-18 MeV range. Using the fully kinetic, exactly energy-conserving particle-in-cell code PICNIC in 1D spherical geometry, it reproduces the measured alpha knock-on neutron signal when large-angle Rutherford and nuclear elastic scattering are included. The same simulations never produce the anomalously large 50-60 keV spectral shift seen in experiment, even though the shift hovers just above the Maxwellian locus around stagnation. The paper concludes that large-angle scattering kinetics in 1D axisymmetric geometry cannot explain the anomalous shift, leaving mechanisms such as 2D self-generated magnetic fields and impurity kinetics as open candidates.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is PICNIC, an implicit, fully relativistic, exactly energy- and charge-conserving particle-in-cell Monte-Carlo collision (PIC-MCC) code used here in 1D spherical geometry. Its key modules are a moment-preserving Monte-Carlo collision method that conserves momentum and energy for weighted macroparticles, a Coulomb module that adds single large-angle Rutherford scattering with quantum corrections to the usual cumulative small-angle collisions, nuclear elastic scattering for alpha-D and alpha-T (plus D-T NES) using differential cross-section tables from the DRESS code and the ENDF/B-VIII library, and a fusion module with anisotropic D-D and D-T emission. The diagnostic that carries the spectral-shift conclusion is the measured relation between the D-T neutron spectral shift and spectral temperature, plotted against the Maxwellian locus and the isotropic upper limit: the simulated burn stays near or below the locus at bangtime, never entering the experimentally anomalous region.

What would settle it

Re-running the same 1D simulation with neutron scattering and the two 5He tritium-tritium channels switched on would settle the point: a resulting D-T spectral shift near 50-60 keV would show that the excluded physics, not large-angle charged-particle scattering, causes the anomaly, while no such shift would strengthen the paper's ruling-out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the conjunction of a positive and a negative result. On the positive side, a self-consistent PIC simulation of the full burn of NIF shot N210808, including cumulative small-angle Coulomb collisions, single large-angle Rutherford scattering, alpha-deuterium and alpha-tritium nuclear elastic scattering, and anisotropic D-D/D-T fusion, produces an alpha knock-on neutron spectrum in the 15.5-18 MeV range that matches NIF measurements, recovering this reaction-in-flight signal in a fully kinetic burning-plasma simulation. On the negative side, at no point during the simulated burn does the accumulated D-T primary spectral shift approach the experimentally reported anomalous shifts; the inclusion of large-angle scattering and anisotropic fusion does not change this. The paper therefore states that kinetic effects in 1D axisymmetric geometry with large-angle collisions are ruled out as the explanation for the anomalous shift, and it explicitly notes that 2D kinetic effects involving self-generated magnetic fields have not been ruled out.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the assumption that a one-dimensional spherical simulation started just before burn, using an existing radiation-hydrodynamics profile and a fully ionized, non-degenerate plasma, and ignoring neutron scattering, includes every mechanism that could shift the main neutron peak; the paper itself notes that two-dimensional magnetic-field effects are still untested.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 15.5-18 MeV alpha knock-on neutron tail can be reproduced self-consistently from large-angle Rutherford and nuclear elastic scattering of fusion alphas, supporting its use as a stopping-power and hotspot diagnostic.
  • Mechanisms based on 1D spherical kinetics with large-angle collisions are eliminated as explanations for the anomalous D-T spectral shift, redirecting the search toward 2D effects such as self-generated magnetic fields or impurity kinetics.
  • Because neutron scattering was deliberately neglected, the simulated spectra isolate at-birth reaction-in-flight and knock-on physics; including neutron knock-on would add the 18-30 MeV region and could introduce small heating corrections.
  • Yields and bangtime differ from the radiation-hydrodynamic baseline once alpha heating becomes strong, with PICNIC predicting a delayed bangtime and slightly higher yield, so kinetic treatment of the burn phase can change global burn metrics even without producing the anomalous shift.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the paper's caveat would be a 2D RZ simulation with the same N210808 initial profiles and self-generated magnetic fields enabled: reproducing the measured shift there would place the mechanism in 2D kinetics, while a null result would push the explanation toward impurities or altered initial conditions.
  • The successful AKN reproduction without tuning suggests the alpha-stopping model, including its degenerate-plasma corrections, is adequate for the burn region; a testable extension is predicting AKN shapes across a range of shots with different hotspot conditions.
  • The paper's neglect of neutron scattering and of the two 5He tritium-tritium channels is more than a numerical convenience: if neutron energy deposition measurably heats the fuel, including it could alter the burn trajectory enough to move the spectral shift, which the present simulations cannot address.
  • Since the anomalous shift lingers slightly above the Maxwellian locus early in the burn, a differential study of early-time versus bangtime spectra in high-yield shots could separate a genuine suprathermal signature from hydrodynamic Doppler broadening, a separation the accumulated spectra in this paper blur.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents PICNIC, an implicit, exactly energy-conserving particle-in-cell Monte-Carlo collision code, and applies it to 1D spherical simulations of the burn stage of NIF shot N210808. Three physics levels are compared: (i) cumulative Coulomb scattering with isotropic fusion; (ii) adding large-angle Rutherford and alpha-D/alpha-T nuclear elastic scattering (NES); (iii) further adding D-T NES and anisotropic D-D/D-T fusion. All runs include bremsstrahlung and inverse bremsstrahlung and are initialized at 150 ps before bangtime from 1D HYDRA profiles. The paper reports two main results: the simulated alpha knock-on neutron (AKN) spectrum in the 15.5-18 MeV range is consistent with NIF measurements, and the D-T primary neutron spectral shift never approaches the anomalous 50-60 keV shifts of Ref. [1], even with large-angle scattering included. The authors conclude that alpha-driven large-angle scattering in 1D spherical geometry cannot explain the spectral-shift anomaly.

Significance. The negative spectral-shift result, if correct, is a significant contribution because it narrows the space of kinetic explanations for the NIF anomaly and demonstrates that a fully kinetic simulation of the burn stage is feasible with good energy conservation. The paper's strengths include a parameter-free forward model using external cross sections and reactivities, verification of the fusion algorithm against the analytic Maxwellian locus and isotropic upper limit (Fig. 1), and quantitative energy-conservation monitoring (Fig. 3). The AKN reproduction is a useful qualitative benchmark. The main weakness is that the central negative claim currently rests on a T_s estimator that is inconsistent with the variance-based definition used to construct the comparison curves; this is an internal, fixable issue. The authors appropriately acknowledge the 2D self-generated magnetic-field caveat in the conclusion.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III.A and Sec. IV, Fig. 6] Equation (3) defines the spectral temperature through Var(E_n), and the verification in Fig. 1 uses the sample variance of the neutron energy distribution. In contrast, the bottom row of Fig. 6 obtains T_s from the FWHM of a Gaussian fit to the accumulated D-T peak via Var(E_n)=FWHM^2/(8 ln 2) (the caption incorrectly omits the square). The accumulated spectrum is a superposition of Doppler-shifted components from the hydrodynamic expansion, which the authors themselves state widens the spectrum; such a mixture is not guaranteed to be Gaussian. For a non-Gaussian distribution the FWHM-derived variance is not the variance appearing in Eq. (3), so the plotted points are not directly comparable to the Maxwellian locus or the isotropic upper limit. Because the central negative claim depends on the trajectory remaining "well below" that locus, this is a load-bearing inconsistency. Please recompute T_s from the sample variance of the accumulated neutron spectrum (as in Fig. 1) or quantitatively demonstrate that the FWHM-based estimate is an accurate proxy over the full time history.
  2. [Sec. V and Abstract] The conclusion states that the results "rule out kinetic effects in 1D axisymmetric geometry with large-angle collisions as an explanation for the anomalous shift," and the abstract states more generally that inclusion of large-angle scattering physics does not explain the shift. The simulation is 1D spherical, not 1D axisymmetric, and it does not include all large-angle collisions: neutron scattering is deliberately neglected (stated in Sec. IV), which removes n-D/n-T large-angle elastic scattering and the associated neutron knock-on production of suprathermal fuel ions. The results therefore constrain only alpha-driven large-angle Rutherford and nuclear elastic scattering in 1D spherical geometry. Please narrow the wording of the abstract and conclusion to match the actual scope, or explicitly argue why neutron scattering cannot affect the primary spectral shift. The authors' acknowledgment that 2D self-generated magnetic fields have not been ruled out is appropriate and should remain visible in the abstract.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 6 caption] The formula "Var(E_n) = FWHM/(8 ln 2)" is dimensionally incorrect; it should read "Var(E_n) = FWHM^2/(8 ln 2)."
  2. [Sec. V] The phrase "1D axisymmetric geometry" should be "1D spherical geometry," since axisymmetric usually refers to 2D RZ geometry.
  3. [Sec. IV, Fig. 6] The error bars in the bottom row of Fig. 6 are described only as due to low neutron macroparticle statistics; please state how they are computed and what confidence level they represent.
  4. [Sec. II.C] The cutoff angle theta_min = max(theta0, 20 degrees) is introduced without specifying whether the 20-degree value comes from Ref. [7] or is a new choice; please clarify.
  5. [Sec. IV, AKN comparison] The agreement with the experimental AKN spectrum [14] is described as "similar" and "consistent" but only qualitatively; a quantitative comparison, such as a normalized shape metric over 15.5-18 MeV, would strengthen the claim.
  6. [Sec. V, Ref. [45]] The paper contrasts its conclusion with a previous PIC study [45] but does not discuss why the two studies differ; a sentence explaining the likely source of the discrepancy would help readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central claims are forward simulation outputs benchmarked against external libraries, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a forward PIC-MCC simulation of the burn stage of NIF shot N210808, initialized from HYDRA profiles and using external cross-section libraries (Bosch-Hale, DRESS, ENDF/B-VIII) and published Coulomb-scattering methods. The two central claims are direct outputs: the AKN spectrum is compared qualitatively with experiments, and the D-T spectral-shift trajectory is compared with the known Maxwellian locus. No experimental spectral-shift or AKN datum is used as an input or fit parameter, so the negative conclusion does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The verification in Fig. 1 against the Ballabio and Crilly curves uses the sample variance independently and is a benchmark, not a fit. Self-citations to PICNIC method papers [16-19] describe the code and collision algorithms, but the present conclusions rest on the simulations and internal validation shown here, not on those citations as the sole evidence. The paper explicitly acknowledges open caveats, notably that 2D kinetic effects involving self-generated magnetic fields have not been ruled out, which is a stated limitation rather than a circular step. The FWHM-based spectral-temperature inference in Fig. 6 may not equal the variance-based definition in Eq. (3) for a non-Gaussian accumulated spectrum; that is a potential correctness or robustness concern, but it is not a circular reduction of the conclusion to an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on forward simulation with inputs from prior literature (cross sections, fusion reactivities). No new entities are introduced. The main hand-chosen parameters are the NES cutoff angle and the simulation start time; the main modeling axioms are the 1D spherical geometry, full ionization, non-degeneracy at start, accuracy of HYDRA profiles, neglect of neutron scattering and 5He channels, and reliability of the NES cross-section tables. These assumptions are stated explicitly, but the 1D geometry is the most consequential for the negative spectral-shift claim.

free parameters (2)
  • NES cutoff angle theta_min = max(theta0, 20 degrees)
    Chosen as per [7] to maintain positivity of the nuclear interference term; affects suprathermal ion production and hence the AKN spectrum. Not fitted to the target data but is an ad hoc modeling choice.
  • Simulation start time = 150 ps before bangtime
    Chosen so the plasma is hot enough to avoid degeneracy effects but early enough before significant alpha heating; a different start time would change alpha stopping and burn dynamics.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption 1D spherical symmetry is sufficient to model the spectral shift and AKN production in the burn stage.
    All simulations are 1D spherical; 2D self-generated magnetic fields and asymmetries are excluded. The negative spectral-shift conclusion is scoped to this geometry.
  • domain assumption The D/T plasma is fully ionized and non-degenerate at initialization.
    Stated in Section IV: 'We also assume that the D/T plasma at this stage is fully ionized in both the hotspot and the ice layer.' Degeneracy would reduce alpha stopping [42].
  • domain assumption Initial profiles from HYDRA are accurate.
    The simulation is initialized from 1D spherical HYDRA profiles of shot N210808; errors in these profiles propagate into the burn simulation.
  • domain assumption Neutron scattering can be neglected for the studied spectral features.
    Section IV: 'Neutron scattering is neglected in an effort to isolate the AKN signal'; this removes NKN and neutron heating, which could alter fuel temperature and thus the primary spectrum.
  • domain assumption The two 5He+n channels of T-T fusion are negligible at the relevant energies.
    Section II-D: contribution is small at ~10 keV bulk energies and only important above 100 keV [34].
  • domain assumption The NES differential cross sections from DRESS and ENDF/B-VIII are reliable.
    These tables are used to compute total/transport cross sections for alpha-D, alpha-T, and D-T NES; errors would affect the AKN and suprathermal populations.
  • domain assumption Radiation refraction is negligible in the burn simulation.
    Section II-B: 'For simplicity, we do not consider refraction of the rays.' This affects energy transport in the burn.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Particle-in-Cell Simulations of Burning ICF Capsule Implosions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ILFVELDS

@misc{pith2026250602273,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Particle-in-Cell Simulations of Burning ICF Capsule Implosions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ILFVELDS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02273}
}
read the original abstract

Anomalies observed in the neutron spectral shift of high-yield shots at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) suggest the presence of suprathermal ions, implying that kinetic effects play a significant role in burning inertial confinement fusion (ICF) plasmas. Furthermore, recent measurements of reaction-in-flight (RIF) neutrons offer a direct probe of the stopping power in the burning fuel region of high energy alpha particles and up-scattered fuel ions. We have developed the particle-in-cell code PICNIC, an exactly energy-conserving particle-in-cell Monte-Carlo collision (PIC-MCC) code to simulate the burn stage in ICF. We present results from 1D spherical simulations of NIF shot N210808. We find that the suprathermal ions generated by large-angle Rutherford and nuclear elastic scattering (NES) with fusion alphas produce an alpha knock-on neutron (AKN) signal consistent with experiments. We also find that the inclusion of large-angle scattering physics does not explain the anomalously large spectral shift observed in experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02273 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Verification of the neutron spectra generated by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Anisotropic neutron spectra (solid) and emission an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (Top) fusion energy production rate comparison be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The D–T anisotropy is only envisioned to influ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of deuterium density, temperature and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Top) total accumulated at-birth neutron spectra. The vertical red dashed lines indicate the D–D and D–T fusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Snapshots at bangtime of the energy spectra of all charged species in the fuel region for simulation (i) (left) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [45]

    Y. Xue, D. Wu, J. Zhang, Mechanisms behind the sur- prising observation of supra-thermal ions in NIF’s fusion burning plasmas, Science Bulletin 70 (2025) 359–364. Publisher: Elsevier

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    E. P. Hartouni, A. S. Moore, A. J. Crilly, B. D. Appelbe, P. A. Amendt, K. L. Baker, D. T. Casey, D. S. Clark, T. D¨ oppner, M. J. Eckart, Evidence for suprathermal ion distribution in burning plasmas, Nature Physics 19 (2023) 72–77. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group UK London

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    A. B. Zylstra, O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, A. L. Kritcher, J. E. Ralph, H. F. Robey, J. S. Ross, C. V. Young, K. L. Baker, D. T. Casey, Burning plasma achieved in inertial fusion, Nature 601 (2022) 542–548. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    A. B. Zylstra, A. L. Kritcher, O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, J. E. Ralph, D. T. Casey, A. Pak, O. L. Landen, B. Bachmann, K. L. Baker, L. Berzak Hop- kins, S. D. Bhandarkar, J. Biener, R. M. Bionta, N. W. Birge, T. Braun, T. M. Briggs, P. M. Celliers, H. Chen, C. Choate, D. S. Clark, L. Divol, T. D¨ oppner, D. Fittinghoff, M. J. Edwards, M. Gatu Johnso...

    work page 2022

  5. [4]

    Ryutov, Energetic ion population formed in close col- lision with fusion alpha-particles, Phys

    D. Ryutov, Energetic ion population formed in close col- lision with fusion alpha-particles, Phys. Scr. 45 (1992) 153

    work page 1992

  6. [5]

    Helander, M

    P. Helander, M. Lisak, D. D. Ryutov, Formation of hot ion populations in fusion plasmas by close collisions with fast particles, Plasma physics and controlled fusion 35 (1993) 363. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    work page 1993

  7. [6]

    R. K. Fisher, P. B. Parks, J. M. McChesney, M. N. Rosen- bluth, Fast alpha particle diagnostics using knock-on ion tails, Nucl. Fusion 34 (1994) 1291

    work page 1994

  8. [7]

    Ballabio, G

    L. Ballabio, G. Gorini, J. K¨ allne,α-particle knock-on signature in the neutron emission of DT plasmas, Phys. Rev. E 55 (1997) 3358–3368

    work page 1997

Show all 46 references
  1. [8]

    Knock-On

    J. K¨ allne, L. Ballabio, J. Frenje, S. Conroy, G. Ericsson, M. Tardocchi, E. Traneus, G. Gorini, Observation of the Alpha Particle “Knock-On” Neutron Emission from Magnetically Confined DT Fusion Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 1246–1249. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2000

  2. [9]

    A. A. Korotkov, A. Gondhalekar, R. J. Akers, Observa- tion of MeV energy deuterons produced by knock-on col- lisions between deuterium–tritium fusionα-particles and plasma fuel ions, Physics of Plasmas 7 (2000) 957–962

    2000

  3. [10]

    Matsuura, Y

    H. Matsuura, Y. Nakao, Effect of nuclear elastic scatter- ing on ion heating characteristics in deuterium-tritium thermonuclear plasmas, Physics of plasmas 13 (2006). Publisher: AIP Publishing

    2006

  4. [11]

    Matsuura, Y

    H. Matsuura, Y. Nakao, Distortion of bulk-ion distri- bution function due to nuclear elastic scattering and its effect on T(d,n)He4 reaction rate coefficient in neutral- beam-injected deuterium-tritium plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 14 (2007) 054504

    2007

  5. [12]

    F. S. Zaitsev, A. Gondhalekar, T. J. Johnson, S. E. Sharapov, D. S. Testa, I. I. Kurbet, J. E. contributors, Suprathermal deuterium ions produced by nuclear elas- tic scattering of ICRH driven He3 ions in JET plasmas, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 49 (2007) 1747

    2007

  6. [13]

    A. C. Hayes, G. Jungman, A. E. Schulz, M. Boswell, M. M. Fowler, G. Grim, A. Klein, R. S. Rundberg, J. B. Wilhelmy, D. Wilson, Reaction-in-flight neutrons as a test of stopping power in degenerate plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 22 (2015). Publisher: AIP Publishing

    2015

  7. [14]

    J. Jeet, B. D. Appelbe, A. J. Crilly, L. Divol, M. Eckart, K. D. Hahn, E. P. Hartouni, A. Hayes, S. Kerr, Y. Kim, Diagnosing up-scattered deuterium–tritium fusion neu- trons produced in burning plasmas at the National Igni- tion Facility, Review of Scientific Instruments 95 (2...

    2024

  8. [15]

    Gatu Johnson, D

    M. Gatu Johnson, D. Schlossberg, B. Appelbe, J. Ball, M. Bitter, D. T. Casey, A. Celora, L. Ceurvorst, H. Chen, S. Conroy, Learning from each other: Cross-cutting diag- nostic development activities between magnetic and iner- tial confinement fusion, Review of Scientific Instr...

    2024

  9. [16]

    J. R. Angus, W. Farmer, A. Friedman, D. Ghosh, D. Grote, D. Larson, A. Link, An implicit particle code with exact energy and charge conservation for electro- magnetic studies of dense plasmas, Journal of Computa- tional Physics 491 (2023) 112383. Publisher: Elsevier

    2023

  10. [17]

    J. R. Angus, W. Farmer, A. Friedman, V. Geyko, D. Ghosh, D. Grote, D. Larson, A. Link, An implicit particle code with exact energy and charge conservation for studies of dense plasmas in axisymmetric geometries, Journal of Computational Physics 519 (2024) 113427. Publisher: Elsevier

    2024

  11. [18]

    J. R. Angus, Y. Fu, V. Geyko, D. Grote, D. Lar- son, Moment-preserving Monte-Carlo Coulomb collision method for particle codes, Journal of Computational Physics (2025) 113927. Publisher: Elsevier

    2025

  12. [19]

    J. R. Angus, J. J. van de Wetering, A Binary Col- lision Method for Screened Coulomb Collisions in weakly and moderately coupled Plasmas, 2025. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14067. doi:doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.14067, arXiv:2504.14067 [physics]

    2025 doi arXiv

  13. [20]

    A. V. Bobylev, I. Potapenko, Monte Carlo methods and their analysis for Coulomb collisions in multicomponent plasmas, Journal of Computational Physics 246 (2013) 123–144. Publisher: Elsevier

    2013

  14. [21]

    A. E. Turrell, M. Sherlock, S. J. Rose, Self-consistent inclusion of classical large-angle Coulomb collisions in plasma Monte Carlo simulations, Journal of Computa- tional Physics 299 (2015) 144–155. Publisher: Elsevier

    2015

  15. [22]

    Lindhard, A

    J. Lindhard, A. H. Sørensen, Relativistic theory of stop- ping for heavy ions, Phys. Rev. A 53 (1996) 2443–2456

    1996

  16. [23]

    C.-K. Li, R. D. Petrasso, Fokker-Planck equation for moderately coupled plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3063–3066. 9

    1993

  17. [24]

    Lindl, O

    J. Lindl, O. Landen, J. Edwards, E. Moses, N. I. C. team, Review of the national ignition campaign 2009- 2012, Physics of Plasmas 21 (2014). Publisher: AIP Pub- lishing

    2014

  18. [25]

    B. L. Reichelt, R. D. Petrasso, C. Li, Effects of alpha- ion stopping on ignition and ignition criteria in inertial confinement fusion experiments, Physics of Plasmas 31 (2024). Publisher: AIP Publishing

    2024

  19. [26]

    M. J. Lavell, A. J. Kish, A. T. Sexton, E. S. Evans, I. Mo- hammad, S. Gomez-Ramirez, W. Scullin, M. Borscz, S. Pikuz, T. A. Mehlhorn, A kinetic study of fu- sion burn waves in compressed deuterium–tritium and proton–boron plasmas, Frontiers in Physics 12 (2024) 1440037. Publi...

    2024

  20. [27]

    S. M. Seltzer, M. J. Berger, Bremsstrahlung energy spec- tra from electrons with kinetic energy 1 keV–10 GeV in- cident on screened nuclei and orbital electrons of neutral atoms with Z= 1–100, Atomic data and nuclear data tables 35 (1986) 345–418. Publisher: Elsevier

    1986

  21. [28]

    Okhrimovskyy, A

    A. Okhrimovskyy, A. Bogaerts, R. Gijbels, Electron anisotropic scattering in gases: A formula for Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. E 65 (2002) 037402

    2002

  22. [29]

    Eriksson, S

    J. Eriksson, S. Conroy, E. A. Sund´ en, C. Hellesen, Cal- culating fusion neutron energy spectra from arbitrary re- actant distributions, Computer Physics Communications 199 (2016) 40–46. Publisher: Elsevier

    2016

  23. [30]

    D. A. Brown, M. B. Chadwick, R. Capote, A. C. Kahler, A. Trkov, M. W. Herman, A. A. Sonzogni, Y. Danon, A. D. Carlson, M. Dunn, ENDF/B-VIII. 0: the 8th major release of the nuclear reaction data library with CIELO-project cross sections, new standards and ther- mal scattering ...

    2018

  24. [31]

    Bosch, G

    H.-S. Bosch, G. M. Hale, Improved formulas for fusion cross-sections and thermal reactivities, Nuclear fusion 32 (1992) 611. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    1992

  25. [32]

    D. P. Higginson, A. Link, A. Schmidt, A pairwise nuclear fusion algorithm for weighted particle-in-cell plasma sim- ulations, Journal of Computational Physics 388 (2019) 439–453. Publisher: Elsevier

    2019

  26. [33]

    Lacina, J

    B. Lacina, J. Ingley, D. W. Dorn, Neutron-neutron inter- action in the T+ T reaction, Technical Report, Lawrence Radiation Lab., Univ. of California, Livermore, 1965. URL:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4559707

    1965

  27. [34]

    D. T. Casey, J. A. Frenje, M. Gatu Johnson, M. J.- E. Manuel, N. Sinenian, A. B. Zylstra, F. H. S´ eguin, C. K. Li, R. D. Petrasso, V. Y. Glebov, P. B. Radha, D. D. Meyerhofer, T. C. Sangster, D. P. McNabb, P. A. Amendt, R. N. Boyd, S. P. Hatchett, S. Quaglioni, J. R. Rygg, I....

    2012

  28. [35]

    Brysk, Fusion neutron energies and spectra, Plasma Physics 15 (1973) 611

    H. Brysk, Fusion neutron energies and spectra, Plasma Physics 15 (1973) 611. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    1973

  29. [36]

    A. J. Crilly, B. D. Appelbe, O. M. Mannion, W. Tai- tano, E. P. Hartouni, A. S. Moore, M. Gatu-Johnson, J. P. Chittenden, Constraints on ion velocity distribu- tions from fusion product spectroscopy, Nuclear Fusion 62 (2022) 126015. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2022

  30. [37]

    Ballabio, J

    L. Ballabio, J. K¨ allne, G. Gorini, Relativistic calculation of fusion product spectra for thermonuclear plasmas, Nu- clear fusion 38 (1998) 1723. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    1998

  31. [38]

    Azechi, M

    H. Azechi, M. D. Cable, R. O. Stapf, Review of secondary and tertiary reactions, and neutron scattering as diag- nostic techniques for inertial confinement fusion targets, Laser and Particle Beams 9 (1991) 119–134. Publisher: Cambridge University Press

    1991

  32. [39]

    Otuka, M

    N. Otuka, M. Drosg, Evaluation of the Absolute Angle- Dependent Differential Neutron Production Cross Sec- tions by the Reactions 3H (p, n) 3He, 1H (t, n) 3He, 2H (d, n) 3He, 3H (d, n) 4He, and 2H (t, n) 4He and of the Cross Sections of Their Time-Reversed Counter- parts up to...

  33. [40]

    A. L. Kritcher, C. V. Young, H. F. Robey, C. R. Weber, A. B. Zylstra, O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, J. E. Ralph, J. S. Ross, K. L. Baker, Design of inertial fusion implosions reaching the burning plasma regime, Nature Physics 18 (2022) 251–258. Publisher: Nature Publishing ...

    2022

  34. [41]

    A. L. Kritcher, A. B. Zylstra, C. R. Weber, O. A. Hurri- cane, D. A. Callahan, D. S. Clark, L. Divol, D. E. Hinkel, K. Humbird, O. Jones, J. D. Lindl, S. Maclaren, D. J. Strozzi, C. V. Young, A. Allen, B. Bachmann, K. L. Baker, T. Braun, G. Brunton, D. T. Casey, T. Chapman, C....

    2024

  35. [42]

    Maynard, C

    G. Maynard, C. Deutsch, Born random phase approxi- mation for ion stopping in an arbitrarily degenerate elec- tron fluid, Journal de Physique 46 (1985) 1113–1122. Publisher: Soci´ et´ e fran¸ caise de physique

    1985

  36. [43]

    Daughton, B

    W. Daughton, B. J. Albright, S. M. Finnegan, B. M. Haines, J. L. Kline, J. P. Sauppe, J. M. Smidt, Influ- ence of mass ablation on ignition and burn propagation in layered fusion capsules, Physics of Plasmas 30 (2023). Publisher: AIP Publishing

    2023

  37. [44]

    B. J. Albright, W. Daughton, B. M. Haines, N. M. Hoff- man, J. J. Kuczek, R. Lester, K. D. Meaney, J. P. Sauppe, Use of tritium-rich fuel to improve the yield of layered deuterium/tritium inertial fusion capsules, High Energy Density Physics 52 (2024) 101118. Publisher: Elsevier

    2024

  38. [2015]

    URL:https://www-nds.iaea.org/publications/ indc/indc-aus-0019/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.