Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Concise, Machine-discovered Proofs of G\"odel's Two Incompleteness Theorems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.02576 v1 pith:ILX6SUKZ submitted 2020-05-06 cs.LO cs.AIcs.SC

classification cs.LOcs.AIcs.SC
keywords matrincompletenessproofsreasoningtheoremsautomatedmetalogicodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

There is an increasing interest in applying recent advances in AI to automated reasoning, as it may provide useful heuristics in reasoning over formalisms in first-order, second-order, or even meta-logics. To facilitate this research, we present MATR, a new framework for automated theorem proving explicitly designed to easily adapt to unusual logics or integrate new reasoning processes. MATR is formalism-agnostic, highly modular, and programmer-friendly. We explain the high-level design of MATR as well as some details of its implementation. To demonstrate MATR's utility, we then describe a formalized metalogic suitable for proofs of G\"odel's Incompleteness Theorems, and report on our progress using our metalogic in MATR to semi-autonomously generate proofs of both the First and Second Incompleteness Theorems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools