REVIEW 2 cited by
A New Wave in Robotics: Survey on Recent mmWave Radar Applications in Robotics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We survey the current state of millimeterwave (mmWave) radar applications in robotics with a focus on unique capabilities, and discuss future opportunities based on the state of the art. Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) mmWave radars operating in the 76--81GHz range are an appealing alternative to lidars, cameras and other sensors operating in the near visual spectrum. Radar has been made more widely available in new packaging classes, more convenient for robotics and its longer wavelengths have the ability to bypass visual clutter such as fog, dust, and smoke. We begin by covering radar principles as they relate to robotics. We then review the relevant new research across a broad spectrum of robotics applications beginning with motion estimation, localization, and mapping. We then cover object detection and classification, and then close with an analysis of current datasets and calibration techniques that provide entry points into radar research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
HeRCULES: Heterogeneous Radar Dataset in Complex Urban Environment for Multi-session Radar SLAM
The paper introduces the first public dataset combining 4D radar, spinning radar, and FMCW LiDAR, with repeated traversals and per-sensor ground truth for SLAM and place recognition.
-
AF-RLIO: Adaptive Fusion of Radar-LiDAR-Inertial Information for Robust Odometry in Challenging Environments
AF-RLIO adaptively switches between LiDAR-inertial and radar-inertial odometry based on a feature-ratio degradation detector and uses chi-square GPS outlier weighting, showing lower APE in tunnels and smoke than the t...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.