Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A weak*-topological dichotomy with applications in operator theory

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1303.0020 v3 pith:IM2467QG submitted 2013-02-28 math.FA math.GN

A weak*-topological dichotomy with applications in operator theory

classification math.FA math.GN
keywords omegaspacebanachcompactidealboundedeitherhilbert-generated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Denote by $[0,\omega_1)$ the locally compact Hausdorff space consisting of all countable ordinals, equipped with the order topology, and let $C_0[0,\omega_1)$ be the Banach space of scalar-valued, continuous functions which are defined on $[0,\omega_1)$ and vanish eventually. We show that a weakly$^*$ compact subset of the dual space of $C_0[0,\omega_1)$ is either uniformly Eberlein compact, or it contains a homeomorphic copy of the ordinal interval $[0,\omega_1]$. Using this result, we deduce that a Banach space which is a quotient of $C_0[0,\omega_1)$ can either be embedded in a Hilbert-generated Banach space, or it is isomorphic to the direct sum of $C_0[0,\omega_1)$ and a subspace of a Hilbert-generated Banach space. Moreover, we obtain a list of eight equivalent conditions describing the Loy-Willis ideal, which is the unique maximal ideal of the Banach algebra of bounded, linear operators on $C_0[0,\omega_1)$. As a consequence, we find that this ideal has a bounded left approximate identity, thus resolving a problem left open by Loy and Willis, and we give new proofs, in some cases of stronger versions, of several known results about the Banach space $C_0[0,\omega_1)$ and the operators acting on it.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.