REVIEW 1 cited by
Comment on 'How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads'
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The "anomalous" values of C. Ferrie and J. Combes in Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 120404 (2014) say nothing about quantum - or even classical - physics. They are not analogues of the weak values that emerge when we describe the quantum world via an initial state evolving forwards in time and a final state evolving backwards in time, and couple this world weakly to realistic measuring devices.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
What meter interference can tell us about the statistics of weak measurements
The post-selected meter distribution decomposes into a Bayesian update and a negative diffusion term; a cosine meter can expose the intrinsic Ozawa-Hall uncertainty directly.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.