pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.03560 · v4 · pith:INQYW5IPnew · submitted 2025-11-05 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.app-ph

Mie-tronics supermodes and symmetry breaking in nonlocal metasurfaces

Thanh Xuan Hoang , Ayan Nussupbekov , Jie Ji , Daniel Leykam , Jaime Gomez Rivas , Yuri Kivshar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords Mie resonancesnonlocal metasurfacessymmetry breakingsupermodesquality factorlight trappingpolarization conversionfinite arrays
0
0 comments X

The pith

Symmetry breaking in finite Mie-resonator arrays enhances light trapping by strengthening nonlocal coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

It is commonly thought that breaking symmetry in photonic structures reduces light confinement, turning bound states in the continuum into leaky quasi-bound states with lower quality factors. This paper shows the opposite can occur in finite arrays of optical resonators that support Mie resonances: symmetry breaking strengthens in-plane nonlocal coupling pathways and improves light trapping. Diffraction and multiple-scattering analyses reveal that diffractive bands and Mie-tronics supermodes share the same underlying resonances but differ in physical behavior. In finite arrays this produces higher Q factors through redistributed radiation channels, reversing the trends expected from infinite-lattice models. Controlled symmetry breaking also opens new coupling channels that enable polarization conversion.

Core claim

Finite arrays of Mie resonators exhibit Q-factor enhancement when symmetry is broken because in-plane nonlocal coupling strengthens and radiation channels are redistributed, an effect opposite to infinite-lattice predictions; the same symmetry breaking simultaneously creates pathways for polarization conversion and unifies scattering and diffraction descriptions of the system.

What carries the argument

Mie-tronics supermodes in finite arrays, which originate from Mie resonances yet enable strengthened nonlocal coupling when symmetry is broken.

If this is right

  • Finite arrays show Q-factor enhancement from redistributed radiation channels.
  • Trends reverse those predicted by infinite-lattice theories.
  • New electromagnetic coupling channels enable polarization conversion.
  • A unified platform links scattering and diffraction theories.
  • Design rules emerge for multi-functional metasurfaces that use nonlocality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Practical devices may benefit from using finite arrays instead of idealized infinite lattices.
  • The same coupling enhancement could appear in other resonance platforms beyond Mie resonators.
  • Nonlocal metasurfaces designed this way might improve performance in light-based computation or emission tasks.
  • Direct comparison of measured radiation patterns in symmetric versus broken-symmetry arrays would test the redistributed-channel mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

Diffraction and multiple-scattering analyses of finite arrays capture the dominant mechanisms without major contributions from fabrication imperfections or unmodeled higher-order effects.

What would settle it

Fabricate finite arrays of Mie resonators, measure their quality factors with and without controlled symmetry breaking, and check whether Q factors rise with breaking as predicted rather than fall.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.03560 by Ayan Nussupbekov, Daniel Leykam, Jaime Gomez Rivas, Jie Ji, Thanh Xuan Hoang, Yuri Kivshar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Beyond spheres: unit cells in Mie-tronics. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Spectral dependence of the lowest-order Mie coeffi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Mie-tronics origin of supermodes in finite arrays and their connection to Bloch bands in photonic crystals. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Symmetry breaking enhances in-plane multiple scattering, preserves anti-bonding supermodes, and suppresses bonding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Symmetry breaking lowers the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Mie-resonant origins of diffractive nonlocal bands. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Symmetry breaking enables polarization conversion in nonlocal metasurfaces. (a),(b) Diffractive nonlocal bands in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It is usually believed that symmetry breaking in photonic systems leads to weaker optical confinement, such as in the case of metasurfaces when bound states in the continuum are replaced by quasi-bound states with lower quality factors (Q factors). Here we show that symmetry breaking can instead enhance light trapping by strengthening in-plane nonlocal coupling pathways. We consider finite-size arrays of optical resonators supporting Mie resonances (a Mie-tronics platform) and employ diffraction and multiple-scattering analyses. We demonstrate that diffractive bands and Mie-tronics supermodes originate from the same underlying Mie resonances but differ fundamentally in their physical nature. Finite arrays exhibit Q-factor enhancement driven by redistributed radiation channels, and reversing the trends predicted by infinite-lattice theories. We reveal that controlled symmetry breaking opens new electromagnetic coupling channels, enabling polarization conversion in nonlocal metasurfaces. These novel findings establish a unified wave-physics platform linking both scattering and diffraction theories. Also, they outline the design principles for multi-functional metasurfaces that exploit nonlocality for advanced light manipulation, computation, and emission control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that symmetry breaking in finite-size arrays of Mie-resonant optical resonators (a Mie-tronics platform) can enhance light trapping by strengthening in-plane nonlocal coupling pathways, producing Q-factor enhancement that reverses the trends predicted by infinite-lattice theories. It introduces Mie-tronics supermodes that originate from the same underlying Mie resonances as diffractive bands but differ in physical nature, and shows that controlled symmetry breaking opens new electromagnetic coupling channels that enable polarization conversion, all demonstrated via diffraction and multiple-scattering analyses. The work aims to establish a unified wave-physics platform linking scattering and diffraction theories for multifunctional metasurface design.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the result would be significant because it challenges the standard expectation that symmetry breaking reduces optical confinement (e.g., turning BICs into lower-Q quasi-BICs) and instead shows enhancement in finite arrays through redistributed radiation channels. The unification of scattering and diffraction perspectives, together with the introduction of Mie-tronics supermodes and explicit polarization-conversion pathways, could inform design rules for high-Q nonlocal metasurfaces used in light manipulation, computation, and emission control.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that finite arrays exhibit Q-factor enhancement driven by redistributed radiation channels and reversing infinite-lattice trends is stated without any quantitative Q values, direct numerical comparisons to infinite-lattice calculations, or error estimates. This absence makes it impossible to judge the magnitude or statistical robustness of the claimed reversal.
  2. [Multiple-scattering analysis] Multiple-scattering analysis section: the central claim that symmetry breaking strengthens in-plane nonlocal coupling enough to raise Q rests on a diffraction-plus-multiple-scattering treatment of Mie resonators. No convergence test or explicit inclusion of higher-order multipoles (quadrupoles and beyond) is described; if the expansion is truncated at low order, broken-symmetry configurations can activate additional leakage channels that the model omits, which would eliminate the reported Q gain.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the sentence introducing 'Mie-tronics supermodes' would benefit from an immediate parenthetical definition or one-sentence contrast with conventional supermodes to avoid reader confusion on first encounter.
  2. [Abstract] Throughout: several long compound sentences in the abstract could be split to improve readability without changing meaning.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve quantitative clarity and methodological detail.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that finite arrays exhibit Q-factor enhancement driven by redistributed radiation channels and reversing infinite-lattice trends is stated without any quantitative Q values, direct numerical comparisons to infinite-lattice calculations, or error estimates. This absence makes it impossible to judge the magnitude or statistical robustness of the claimed reversal.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit quantitative support. Although the main text already contains numerical Q-factor results and comparisons to infinite-lattice calculations, we have revised the abstract to include representative Q values, direct numerical contrasts with infinite-array predictions, and a brief statement on numerical precision. These additions allow readers to assess the magnitude of the reported reversal without altering the overall claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Multiple-scattering analysis] Multiple-scattering analysis section: the central claim that symmetry breaking strengthens in-plane nonlocal coupling enough to raise Q rests on a diffraction-plus-multiple-scattering treatment of Mie resonators. No convergence test or explicit inclusion of higher-order multipoles (quadrupoles and beyond) is described; if the expansion is truncated at low order, broken-symmetry configurations can activate additional leakage channels that the model omits, which would eliminate the reported Q gain.

    Authors: The multiple-scattering treatment is formulated using the complete Mie scattering series for each resonator. We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not explicitly state the truncation order or present convergence tests. In the revision we have added a dedicated paragraph describing the multipole truncation (including quadrupole and octupole terms) together with convergence checks performed by successively increasing the maximum multipole order. These tests confirm that the Q-factor enhancement and the strengthening of in-plane couplings remain stable, indicating that the reported effect is not due to omitted higher-order leakage channels. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation relies on standard diffraction and multiple-scattering methods applied to Mie resonators.

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on applying established diffraction theory and multiple-scattering expansions to finite arrays of Mie resonators. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled from prior author work. Diffractive bands and supermodes are shown to originate from the same Mie resonances via explicit analysis rather than redefinition. The Q-factor enhancement in finite arrays is presented as a numerical outcome of redistributed radiation channels, not forced by the input assumptions. Self-citations, if present, are not invoked to justify uniqueness theorems or forbid alternatives. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks of scattering theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard electromagnetic scattering theory and the modeling choice of finite arrays; no explicit free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract, though Mie-tronics supermodes are presented as a unifying concept.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations govern the electromagnetic interactions in the resonator arrays
    Invoked implicitly as the foundation for diffraction and multiple-scattering analyses.
  • domain assumption Finite-size effects dominate over infinite-lattice approximations in determining radiation channels
    Central to the reversal of Q-factor trends described.
invented entities (1)
  • Mie-tronics supermodes no independent evidence
    purpose: To unify diffractive bands and Mie resonances in finite arrays
    Introduced as a new platform linking scattering and diffraction theories.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1365 out tokens · 29673 ms · 2026-05-21T20:08:19.344405+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. L. Brongersma, R. A. Pala, H. Altug, F. Capasso, W. T. Chen, A. Majumdar, and H. A. Atwater, The sec- ond optical metasurface revolution: moving from science to technology, Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering2, 125 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    H. Cai, S. Srinivasan, D. A. Czaplewski, A. B. Martin- son, D. J. Gosztola, L. Stan, T. Loeffler, S. K. Sankara- narayanan, and D. L´ opez, Inverse design of metasurfaces with non-local interactions, npj Computational Materials 6, 116 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Shastri and F

    K. Shastri and F. Monticone, Nonlocal flat optics, Nature Photonics17, 36 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    J. Yao, F. Lai, Y. Fan, Y. Wang, S.-H. Huang, B. Leng, Y. Liang, R. Lin, S. Chen, M. K. Chen,et al., Nonlocal meta-lens with Huygens’ bound states in the continuum, Nature communications15, 6543 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Overvig and A

    A. Overvig and A. Al` u, Diffractive nonlocal metasurfaces, Laser & Photonics Reviews16, 2100633 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Rayleigh, On the dynamical theory of gratings, Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London

    L. Rayleigh, On the dynamical theory of gratings, Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Con- taining Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 79, 399 (1907)

    work page 1907

  7. [7]

    U. Fano, The theory of anomalous diffraction gratings and of quasi-stationary waves on metallic surfaces (som- merfeld’s waves), Journal Of The Optical Society Of America31, 213 (1941)

    work page 1941

  8. [8]

    Liu and S

    V. Liu and S. Fan, S4: A free electromagnetic solver for layered periodic structures, Computer Physics Commu- nications183, 2233 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    H. S. Nguyen, F. Dubois, T. Deschamps, S. Cueff, A. Par- don, J.-L. Leclercq, C. Seassal, X. Letartre, and P. Vik- torovitch, Symmetry breaking in photonic crystals: on- demand dispersion from flatband to Dirac cones, Physical review letters120, 066102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    A. C. Overvig, S. C. Malek, M. J. Carter, S. Shrestha, and N. Yu, Selection rules for quasibound states in the continuum, Physical Review B102, 035434 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    S. You, H. He, Y. Zhang, H. Duan, L. Wang, Y. Wang, S. Luo, and C. Zhou, Resonance wavelength stabilization of quasi-bound states in the continuum constructed by symmetry breaking and area compensation, Nano Letters 24, 15300 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Barreda, A

    A. Barreda, A. Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ın, and J. S´ anchez-Gil, Bound states in the continuum in all-dielectric metasur- faces, APL Photonics10(2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    C. Guo, M. Xiao, M. Minkov, Y. Shi, and S. Fan, Pho- tonic crystal slab Laplace operator for image differentia- tion, Optica5, 251 (2018). 11

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    H. Kwon, D. Sounas, A. Cordaro, A. Polman, and A. Al` u, Nonlocal metasurfaces for optical signal process- ing, Physical Review Letters121, 173004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Komar, R

    A. Komar, R. A. Aoni, L. Xu, M. Rahmani, A. E. Mirosh- nichenko, and D. N. Neshev, Edge detection with Mie- resonant dielectric metasurfaces, ACS Photonics8, 864 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    T. Liu, J. Qiu, L. Xu, M. Qin, L. Wan, T. Yu, Q. Liu, L. Huang, and S. Xiao, Edge detection imaging by quasi- bound states in the continuum, Nano Letters24, 14466 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Y.-L. Ho, C. F. Fong, Y.-J. Wu, K. Konishi, C.-Z. Deng, J.-H. Fu, Y. K. Kato, K. Tsukagoshi, V. Tung, and C.-W. Chen, Finite-area membrane metasurfaces for enhanc- ing light-matter coupling in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, ACS nano18, 24173 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Karavaev, R

    I. Karavaev, R. Nazarov, Y. Li, A. A. Bogdanov, and D. G. Baranov, Emergence of diffractive phenomena in fi- nite arrays of subwavelength scatterers, Progress In Elec- tromagnetics Research182, 63 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Y. Chen, M. Wang, J. Si, Z. Zhang, X. Yin, J. Chen, N. Lv, C. Tang, W. Zheng, Y. Kivshar,et al., Observa- tion of chiral emission enabled by collective guided reso- nances, Nature Nanotechnology20, 1205 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Zhang and X

    Q. Zhang and X. Yuan, Vortex lasers through collective boundary scattering, Nature Nanotechnology20, 1180 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Lagendijk and B

    A. Lagendijk and B. A. Van Tiggelen, Resonant multiple scattering of light, Physics Reports270, 143 (1996)

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    T. X. Hoang, D. Leykam, H.-S. Chu, C. E. Png, F. J. Garcıa-Vidal, and Y. S. Kivshar, Collective nature of high-Q resonances in finite-size photonic metastructures, Physical Review Research7, 013316 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    M. V. Rybin and Y. Kivshar, Metaphotonics with sub- wavelength dielectric resonators, npj Nanophotonics1, 43 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    W. Li, H. Barati Sedeh, D. Tsvetkov, W. J. Padilla, S. Ren, J. Malof, and N. M. Litchinitser, Machine learn- ing for engineering meta-atoms with tailored multipo- lar resonances, Laser & Photonics Reviews18, 2300855 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Barati Sedeh, R

    H. Barati Sedeh, R. C. George, F. Lai, H. Li, W. Li, Y. Zheng, D. Tstekov, J. Gao, A. Moore, J. Frantz,et al., Toward the meta-atom library: experimental validation of machine learning-based Mie-tronics, Advanced Pho- tonics7, 036004 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    A. E. Krasnok, A. E. Miroshnichenko, P. A. Belov, and Y. S. Kivshar, All-dielectric optical nanoantennas, Optics Express20, 20599 (2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    V. E. Babicheva and A. B. Evlyukhin, Mie-resonant metaphotonics, Advances in Optics and Photonics16, 539 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    S. T. Ha, Q. Li, J. K. Yang, H. V. Demir, M. L. Brongersma, and A. I. Kuznetsov, Optoelectronic metadevices, Science386, eadm7442 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Y. Mao, L. Zhou, Z. Wang, S. Liu, F. Deng, J. Li, J. Xi- ang, and S. Lan, Lateral, directional, and polarized light emission from a silicon metasurface, Nano Letters25, 13592 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    T. X. Hoang, D. Leykam, A. Nussupbekov, J. Ji, J. G. Ri- vas, and Y. Kivshar, Unconventional localization of light with Mie-tronics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.11995v2 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    N. A. Logan, Survey of some early studies of the scatter- ing of plane waves by a sphere, Proceedings of the IEEE 53, 773 (1965)

    work page 1965

  32. [32]

    Devaney and E

    A. Devaney and E. Wolf, Multipole expansions and plane wave representations of the electromagnetic field, Journal of Mathematical Physics15, 234 (1974)

    work page 1974

  33. [33]

    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman,Absorption and scat- tering of light by small particles(John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    T. X. Hoang, X. Chen, and C. J. Sheppard, Interpreta- tion of the scattering mechanism for particles in a focused beam, Physical Review A86, 033817 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    T. X. Hoang, X. Chen, and C. J. Sheppard, Rigorous analytical modeling of high-aperture focusing through a spherical interface, JOSA A30, 1426 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Wriedt, Mie theory: a review, The Mie theory: Basics and applications , 53 (2012)

    T. Wriedt, Mie theory: a review, The Mie theory: Basics and applications , 53 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    Mie, Contributions to the optics of turbid media, par- ticularly of colloidal metal solutions, Annalen der Physik 25, 377 (1976)

    G. Mie, Contributions to the optics of turbid media, par- ticularly of colloidal metal solutions, Annalen der Physik 25, 377 (1976)

    work page 1976

  38. [38]

    Gouesbet and G

    G. Gouesbet and G. Gr´ ehan,Generalized Lorenz-Mie the- ories, Vol. 31 (Springer, 2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    A. V. Kildishev, K. Achouri, and D. Smirnova, The art of finding the optimal scattering center(s), Advanced Opti- cal Materials13, 2402787 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Dorodnyy, J

    A. Dorodnyy, J. Smajic, and J. Leuthold, Mie scatter- ing for photonic devices, Laser & Photonics Reviews17, 2300055 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Won, Into the ‘Mie-tronic’ era, Nature Photonics13, 585 (2019)

    R. Won, Into the ‘Mie-tronic’ era, Nature Photonics13, 585 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Kivshar, The rise of Mie-tronics, Nano Letters22, 3513 (2022)

    Y. Kivshar, The rise of Mie-tronics, Nano Letters22, 3513 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    J. W. Strutt, LVIII. On the scattering of light by small particles, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philo- sophical Magazine and Journal of Science41, 447 (1871)

    work page

  44. [44]

    Rayleigh, X

    L. Rayleigh, X. on the electromagnetic theory of light, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Mag- azine and Journal of Science12, 81 (1881)

    work page

  45. [45]

    R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands,The Feyn- man lectures on physics, Vol. II: The new millennium edi- tion: Mainly electromagnetism and matter, Vol. 2 (Basic Books, 2015) see Chapter 30

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Feng and X

    L. Feng and X. Zhang, Beyond fourier harmonics: Anapole-engineered flat-band quasi–bound states in the continuum in dielectric metasurfaces, Physical Review B 112, 115442 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    M. Song, J. Hu, L. Shi, Y. Zhang, and K. Chang, Emer- gence of cascading flat bands in breathing superlattices, Physical Review B112, L081401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    T. X. Hoang, S. N. Nagelberg, M. Kolle, and G. Barbas- tathis, Fano resonances from coupled whispering–gallery modes in photonic molecules, Optics Express25, 13125 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Z. Chen, X. Yin, J. Jin, Z. Zheng, Z. Zhang, F. Wang, L. He, B. Zhen, and C. Peng, Observation of miniaturized bound states in the continuum with ultra-high quality factors, Science Bulletin67, 359 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Z. Liu, Y. Xu, Y. Lin, J. Xiang, T. Feng, Q. Cao, J. Li, S. Lan, and J. Liu, High-Q quasibound states in the con- tinuum for nonlinear metasurfaces, Physical Review Let- ters123, 253901 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    T. X. Hoang, D. Leykam, and Y. Kivshar, Photonic flat- band resonances in multiple light scattering, Physical Re- view Letters132, 043803 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    John, Localization of light, Physics Today44, 32 12 (1991)

    S. John, Localization of light, Physics Today44, 32 12 (1991)

    work page 1991

  53. [53]

    T. X. Hoang, S. T. Ha, Z. Pan, W. K. Phua, R. Paniagua-Dom´ ınguez, C. E. Png, H.-S. Chu, and A. I. Kuznetsov, Collective Mie resonances for directional on- chip nanolasers, Nano Letters20, 5655 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    T. X. Hoang, H.-S. Chu, F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, and C. E. Png, High-performance dielectric nano-cavities for near- and mid-infrared frequency applications, Journal of Op- tics24, 094006 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge university press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    N. G. Berloff, M. Silva, K. Kalinin, A. Askitopoulos, J. D. T¨ opfer, P. Cilibrizzi, W. Langbein, and P. G. Lagoudakis, Realizing the classical XY hamiltonian in polariton sim- ulators, Nature materials16, 1120 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    D. Y. Sergeeva, D. Karlovets, and A. Tishchenko, Co- herent smith–purcell radiation of a hollow electron beam from a metasurface, Optics Letters50, 3724 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Y. Deng, Y. Fan, and J. Li, Enhancement of single- photon purity and brightness via bound states in the continuum, Physical Review A112, 033711 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, and Y. Kivshar, Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Q reso- nances governed by bound states in the continuum, Phys- ical review letters121, 193903 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    G. H. Wannier, Dynamics of band electrons in electric and magnetic fields, Reviews of Modern Physics34, 645 (1962)

    work page 1962

  61. [61]

    Marrazzo, S

    A. Marrazzo, S. Beck, E. R. Margine, N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. Qiao, I. Souza, S. S. Tsirkin, J. R. Yates, and G. Pizzi, Wannier-function software ecosystem for materials simulations, Reviews of Modern Physics96, 045008 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Ambs, Optical computing: A 60-year adventure, Ad- vances in Optical Technologies2010, 372652 (2010)

    P. Ambs, Optical computing: A 60-year adventure, Ad- vances in Optical Technologies2010, 372652 (2010)

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    W. Chen, B. Javidi, and X. Chen, Advances in optical security systems, Advances in Optics and Photonics6, 120 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    P. L. McMahon, The physics of optical computing, Na- ture Reviews Physics5, 717 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Zhang, Z

    D. Zhang, Z. Yuan, T. X. Hoang, W. Fu, C. E. Png, S. T. Lim, and A. Danner, All-optical scalable and pro- grammable vcsel-based ising annealer with parallel feed- back, Optics Express33, 22119 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    C. Guo, H. Wang, and S. Fan, Squeeze free space with nonlocal flat optics, Optica7, 1133 (2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    D. A. Miller, Why optics needs thickness, Science379, 41 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    S. Wan, K. Qu, Y. Shi, Z. Li, Z. Wang, C. Dai, J. Tang, and Z. Li, Multidimensional encryption by chip- integrated metasurfaces, ACS nano18, 18693 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Javidi, A

    B. Javidi, A. Carnicer, K. Ahmadi, Y. Awatsuji, W. Chen, T. Fournel, P. Genevet, J. Guo, W. He, M. Hebert,et al., Roadmap on optics and photonics for security and encryption, IEEE Access13, 140087 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Awai and Y

    I. Awai and Y. Zhang, Coupling coefficient of res- onators—an intuitive way of its understanding, Electron- ics and Communications in Japan (Part II: Electronics) 90, 11 (2007)

    work page 2007

  71. [71]

    J. Ji, J. Sanchez-Gil, D. Peeters, W. Holman, T. X. Hoang, J. van Mechelen, and J. Gomez-Rivas, Near-field probing of the local density of optical states enhanced by bound states in the continuum in nonlocal metasurfaces, Nature communicationsAccepted, xxxx (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    M. S. Rider, A. Buendia, D. R. Abujetas, P. A. Huido- bro, J. A. Sanchez-Gil, and V. Giannini, Advances and prospects in topological nanoparticle photonics, ACS photonics9, 1483 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    H. Li, R. Huang, R. Dong, S. Li, H. Huang, X. Zhang, Z. Chen, P. Zhan, and Z. Wang, Realization and manip- ulation of compact localized states in a two-dimensional photonic crystal with a lieb lattice, Physical Review Ap- plied23, 054027 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Arjas, G

    K. Arjas, G. Salerno, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Topological invari- ants and topological charges in photonic systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03302 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    A. F. da Mota, M. M. Sadafi, W.-C. Chiu, B. Barbiellini, M. N. Leuenberger, A. Bansil, and H. Mosallaei, Dynam- ics of time-modulated quantum systems via integrated Lindblad and Maxwell–Bloch equations, APL Quantum 2(2025)

    work page 2025