REVIEW 2 cited by
LeanReasoner: Boosting Complex Logical Reasoning with Lean
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with complex logical reasoning due to logical inconsistencies and the inherent difficulty of such reasoning. We use Lean, a theorem proving framework, to address these challenges. By formalizing logical reasoning problems into theorems within Lean, we can solve them by proving or disproving the corresponding theorems. This method reduces the risk of logical inconsistencies with the help of Lean's symbolic solver. It also enhances our ability to treat complex reasoning tasks by using Lean's extensive library of theorem proofs. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the FOLIO dataset and achieves performance near this level on ProofWriter. Notably, these results were accomplished by fine-tuning on fewer than 100 in-domain samples for each dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Probabilistic Circuits for Knowledge Graph Completion with Reduced Rule Sets
A probabilistic-circuit model over rule subsets lets knowledge graph completion use 70-96% fewer rules while retaining about 91% of full-rule-set accuracy.
-
LeanTree: Accelerating White-Box Proof Search with Factorized States in Lean 4
White-box proof search with factorized Lean 4 goals reaches 18.4% on MiniF2F with Llemma-7B, outperforming black-box generation at 9.6%.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.