Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improving CAT Tools in the Translation Workflow: New Approaches and Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.06140 v1 pith:IOBWQFLT submitted 2019-08-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords translationcatalogonlinepost-editingtoolsapproachesexistingsuggestions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper describes strategies to improve an existing web-based computer-aided translation (CAT) tool entitled CATaLog Online. CATaLog Online provides a post-editing environment with simple yet helpful project management tools. It offers translation suggestions from translation memories (TM), machine translation (MT), and automatic post-editing (APE) and records detailed logs of post-editing activities. To test the new approaches proposed in this paper, we carried out a user study on an English--German translation task using CATaLog Online. User feedback revealed that the users preferred using CATaLog Online over existing CAT tools in some respects, especially by selecting the output of the MT system and taking advantage of the color scheme for TM suggestions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools