Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Certified Graph Unlearning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.09140 v2 pith:IPULJSUG submitted 2022-06-18 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords unlearninggraphcertifieddatagnnswhenaccuracyaddress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Graph-structured data is ubiquitous in practice and often processed using graph neural networks (GNNs). With the adoption of recent laws ensuring the ``right to be forgotten'', the problem of graph data removal has become of significant importance. To address the problem, we introduce the first known framework for \emph{certified graph unlearning} of GNNs. In contrast to standard machine unlearning, new analytical and heuristic unlearning challenges arise when dealing with complex graph data. First, three different types of unlearning requests need to be considered, including node feature, edge and node unlearning. Second, to establish provable performance guarantees, one needs to address challenges associated with feature mixing during propagation. The underlying analysis is illustrated on the example of simple graph convolutions (SGC) and their generalized PageRank (GPR) extensions, thereby laying the theoretical foundation for certified unlearning of GNNs. Our empirical studies on six benchmark datasets demonstrate excellent performance-complexity trade-offs when compared to complete retraining methods and approaches that do not leverage graph information. For example, when unlearning $20\%$ of the nodes on the Cora dataset, our approach suffers only a $0.1\%$ loss in test accuracy while offering a $4$-fold speed-up compared to complete retraining. Our scheme also outperforms unlearning methods that do not leverage graph information with a $12\%$ increase in test accuracy for a comparable time complexity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Model Collapse Is Not a Bug but a Feature in Machine Unlearning for LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new method, Partial Model Collapse, iteratively fine-tunes an LLM on its own self-generated responses to conditionally collapse its output distribution on forget queries, removing private answers without the true la...

  2. Certified Unlearning for Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Noisy fine-tuning with gradient or model clipping on retained data provably removes the influence of forget data, with guarantees that need no smoothness or convexity assumptions.

  3. A Comprehensive Data-centric Overview of Federated Graph Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A data-centric taxonomy for Federated Graph Learning that classifies 79 studies by data characteristics and data utilization, plus a discussion of integration with pre-trained large models.

Pith tools