Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 82 references

A decade of CMB data still fits the six-parameter cosmic model, with only the Hubble tension unresolved.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 22:38 UTC pith:IQ3PAZKE

load-bearing objection A competent and clearly written update review with no new science; the status report is accurate, but fix Eq. (4)'s inverted exponent and the garbled kSZ sentence before quoting it. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15666 v1 pith:IQ3PAZKE submitted 2026-07-17 astro-ph.CO

Update on the Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background (2015-2025)

Martin Bucher (Laboratoire Astroparticules et Cosmologie (APC) , Universit\'e Paris Cit\'e/CNRS) This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmic microwave backgroundCMB power spectrumsix-parameter LambdaCDMtensor-to-scalar ratioB-mode polarizationcosmic varianceHubble tensionPlanck 2018
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review updates the state of cosmic microwave background observations over 2015–2025. It argues that the standard six-parameter flat ΛCDM cosmology, as fitted to the Planck 2018 temperature and polarization spectra, continues to account for all CMB measurements to near cosmic variance limits: the spectral index is measured at ns = 0.9652 ± 0.0042, no statistically significant primordial non-Gaussianity has appeared, and no new physics beyond the baseline model is needed. The only persistent discrepancy is the >5σ tension between CMB-derived and distance-ladder values of the Hubble constant, which the review treats as an open question rather than a refutation. On primordial B-modes, the decade's headline is a non-detection: the tensor-to-scalar ratio is bounded by r < 0.036, with the earlier BICEP2 'detection' now understood as polarized Galactic dust.

Core claim

The central claim is that the six-parameter concordance model—with parameters Ωb h², Ωc h², θMC, τ, As, ns—continues to provide an adequate description of all CMB temperature and polarization power spectra through the 2020s. Planck measured seven acoustic peaks and troughs to ℓ ≈ 2500; the EE and TE spectra independently agree with the TT-derived parameters; gravitational lensing is detected at 40σ in temperature; and searches for primordial B-modes have only strengthened the upper bound to r < 0.036. The review regards the absence of any statistically significant departure from this model, apart from the H0 tension, as the summary finding of the past decade.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the spherical-harmonic power-spectrum decomposition of the CMB sky into TT, TE, EE, and BB spectra, compared against the predictions of the six-parameter flat ΛCDM concordance model. The review uses the cosmic-variance-limited accuracy of the temperature and E-mode measurements (ℓ = 2 to ≈ 4000) to argue that the model has been tested to near its information limit, so the remaining discriminative power lies in B-modes and lensing.

Load-bearing premise

The review's conclusions rest on trusting the reported error bars and foreground subtractions of the space and ground collaborations; if those measurements are systematically wrong, the no-new-physics narrative collapses even though the review's own analysis is correct.

What would settle it

A Hubble constant measurement from a distance indicator entirely independent of the Cepheid ladder—for example, gravitational-wave standard sirens—that returns ≈ 73 km/s/Mpc with comparable precision would, together with the CMB value near 67 km/s/Mpc, settle the tension as real and falsify the six-parameter no-new-physics claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Future CMB experiments will extract little new information from temperature and E-mode spectra, which are already near the cosmic variance limit, and must concentrate on B-modes and lensing reconstruction.
  • The r < 0.036 upper bound, if sustained, rules out the simplest large-field inflationary models and gives future missions a concrete target for a first detection.
  • If the Hubble tension is a real effect rather than a systematic error, the six-parameter model will require an extension such as additional relativistic degrees of freedom or a time-varying dark energy.
  • The BICEP2 episode shows that any future B-mode detection claim must be accompanied by multifrequency measurements of the same sky region to separate polarized dust from a primordial signal.
  • Better CMB lensing data will sharpen constraints on the sum of neutrino masses and on the amplitude of matter fluctuations (σ8).

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review's own emphasis on calibration cautions that the Hubble tension may be resolved by improved low-ℓ polarization measurements rather than by new physics; a recalibration of the polarization angle could shift both τ and the inferred H0.
  • The same variance argument that makes temperature/E-mode measurements information-saturated implies that the next step in cosmology will come from mapping the B-mode sky at degree and sub-degree scales, where primordial and lensing signals separate by their angular power spectra.
  • The absence of a B-mode detection through 2025, combined with ns ≈ 0.965, already biases the allowed inflationary potential toward concave shapes; the paper does not say this, but the numbers it reports support that inference.
  • A broader reading of the foreground caution suggests that community consensus on r will require cross-frequency verification at the same sky patch, not just a single deep map; this could be tested by joint analyses that swap foreground priors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This invited review updates the author's 2015 chapter on CMB physics, covering progress over 2015–2025. It recaps the pre-2015 history (COBE, WMAP, Planck), the basic recombination and polarization theory, and then reports the current status: the six-parameter ΛCDM model fitted to Planck 2018 TT, TE, EE + lowE + lensing remains consistent with the data, with ns ≈ 0.965 and H0 = 67.37 ± 0.54 km/s/Mpc; temperature and E-mode spectra are close to the cosmic-variance limit; gravitational lensing B-modes are detected; and primordial B-modes remain undetected, with the tightest bound r < 0.036 (BICEP/Keck 2021). The review also discusses the >5σ H0 tension and future experiments (Simons Observatory, LiteBIRD, CMB-S4 status). It is a synthesis of published results rather than a new analysis.

Significance. If the quoted measurements are trustworthy, this is a useful and readable snapshot of the CMB field in 2025, suitable as a reference for non-specialists and for inclusion in an edited volume. Its strengths include a clear presentation of the concordance model, an explicit parameter table, a fair historical account of the BICEP2 retraction, and coverage of ACT and SPT results. The quantitative content is imported from the cited collaboration papers; the review does not independently rederive or verify those results, which is appropriate for a status report. The text itself flags the main fragility of the B-mode upper limit through its §6 account of foreground modeling failures, and it notes the unresolved Hubble tension without overclaiming a resolution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2, Eq. (4)] The stated cosmic-variance scaling is wrong. For a bin of width Δℓ centered at ℓ, the number of independent modes is N ∼ (2ℓ+1)Δℓ, so the fractional sample variance is ∼ [2/N]^{1/2} ∼ 1/sqrt(ℓ Δℓ) = (1/ℓ)(ℓ/Δℓ)^{1/2}. The manuscript gives (1/ℓ)(Δℓ/ℓ)^{1/2}, inverting the exponent. The special case Δℓ ∼ ℓ still gives 1/ℓ as in Eq. (5), but the general formula should be corrected.
  2. [§2, Table 1 and text] There is an internal inconsistency in the quoted scalar spectral index. The text reports n_s = 0.9649 ± 0.0042, while Table 1 lists n_s = 0.9652 ± 0.0042 for the same likelihood (Planck 2018 TT, TE, EE + lowE + lensing). The cited Planck paper gives 0.9649 ± 0.0042. This is a factual mismatch that should be fixed, since the table is presented as adapted from Ref. 55.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3] In the discussion of the kinetic Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect, the first reason says "the change in brightness temperature is smaller than the kSZ"; this should presumably read "smaller than the tSZ." As written it is self-referential and confusing.
  2. [§6] Typo: "Plank/BICEP2" should be "Planck/BICEP2."
  3. [§2] Typo: "inproperly estimated error budget" should be "improperly estimated." Also "mdoel" appears near the end of §2.
  4. [§4] The text says reionization occurred "around z_rec = 7.5," while Table 1 lists z_rec = 7.64 ± 0.74. The wording is not conflicting, but the table value is more precise and the two numbers could be harmonized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the review reports externally published CMB results and fits no model parameters of its own.

full rationale

This is a review chapter, not an original derivation. Its central claims — that six-parameter ΛCDM continues to fit the Planck 2018 CMB spectra, that non-Gaussianity remains consistent with zero, and that primordial B-modes are so far undetected with r < 0.036 — are imported from external collaboration papers (Planck Refs. 53/55/60/62/63; BICEP/Keck Ref. 18; ACT Refs. 7/8). The paper performs no parameter fits and makes no new predictions, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction circularity. The self-citations are limited to the author's earlier review articles and book (Refs. 19-21), used for presenting theory and reprinting pedagogical figures (Figs. 1, 4, 11); these are not load-bearing for the observational status claims. The discussion of the BICEP2 2014 false detection in §6 is explicitly a cautionary tale about foreground modeling, and the review's own reliance on the later BICEP/Keck 2021 limit is a matter of external data trust, not circular derivation: the review does not assert that limit on the basis of its own analysis. Correctness risk from imported foreground-sensitive bounds is a scientific-risk issue, not circularity. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review paper: nothing is fitted here and no new entities are postulated, but the status report is entirely inherited from the cited experimental literature. The ledger records the six Planck 2018 parameter values whose validity the narrative assumes, and the background assumptions (ΛCDM baseline, tensor-only B-modes at linear order, reliability of the cited measurements, standard recombination/reionization, statistical isotropy) the review relies on without argument.

free parameters (6)
  • Ωb h² (baryon density) = 0.02233 ± 0.00015
    Planck 2018 baseline parameter, imported from Ref. 55 (Table 1). The review's claim that the six-parameter model still fits rests on this value; not fitted by this paper.
  • Ωc h² (cold dark matter density) = 0.1198 ± 0.0012
    Planck 2018 baseline parameter imported from Ref. 55 (Table 1); assumed valid by the review's narrative.
  • 100 θMC (angular scale of sound horizon) = 1.04089 ± 0.00031
    Planck 2018 baseline parameter imported from Ref. 55 (Table 1); determines the acoustic peak positions the review discusses.
  • τ (reionization optical depth) = 0.0540 ± 0.0074
    Planck 2018 baseline parameter imported from Ref. 55 (Table 1); central to the low-ℓ polarization and reionization discussion in §4.
  • ln(10^10 As) (primordial amplitude) = 3.043 ± 0.014
    Planck 2018 baseline parameter imported from Ref. 55 (Table 1); assumed in all model-spectrum comparisons.
  • ns (scalar spectral index) = 0.9652 ± 0.0042
    Planck 2018 baseline parameter imported from Ref. 55 (Table 1); the review highlights the 8σ deviation from scale invariance as a key decade result.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Six-parameter ΛCDM with adiabatic, near-scale-invariant scalar perturbations is the correct baseline for interpreting CMB power spectra.
    The entire review measures 'agreement' against this model (Table 1, §2; Fig. 11). Alternatives (defects, open-universe models) are mentioned only as historically excluded.
  • domain assumption Primordial B-modes are generated only by tensor modes (or vectors) at linear order; scalar modes contribute to B only through lensing at quadratic order.
    §5 basis for identifying BB as the clean probe of inflation and for the delensing strategy. Assumes the standard E/B decomposition (Eq. 8).
  • domain assumption Cited experimental results — Planck 2018 likelihood, BICEP/Keck 2021, ACT DR6, SPT-3G — are correctly computed and their error bars are trustworthy.
    The review's status claims (r < 0.036, spectral-index tilt, lensing detections) are imported from Refs. 7, 8, 18, 55, 76. §6's BICEP2 story shows the risk in this assumption.
  • domain assumption Standard recombination and reionization history; Thomson scattering is the only relevant opacity for CMB photons.
    Used throughout §§1-4 (visibility function, polarization generation, reionization bump) without derivation.
  • domain assumption Statistical isotropy and Gaussianity of primordial fluctuations.
    The cosmic-variance discussion and the Cℓ estimator (Eqs. 1-7) assume both; the review does note that isotropy tests show only marginal anomalies (§2).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22420 in / 21403 out tokens · 186023 ms · 2026-08-01T22:38:56.854755+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We review the present status of observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background. This book chapter is an update to an earlier review "Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy" that appeared a decade ago in the compilation "One Hundred Years of General Relativity: From Genesis and Empirical Foundations to Gravitational Waves, Cosmology and Quantum Gravity." The earlier contribution summarized the state of the field then as well as the underlying cosmology and gravitational physics. This contribution reports on what new has occurred in the field during the intervening time 2015-2025. We also review future prospects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15666 by Martin Bucher (Laboratoire Astroparticules et Cosmologie (APC), Universit\'e Paris Cit\'e/CNRS).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Cosmological Recombination. As the universe expands and cools down, the ‘baryonic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The Microwave Sky as Seen by the COBE DMR Instrument. The three panels show the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: COBE DMR 31, 53 and 90 GHz Temperature Maps. [Credit: NASA COBE Science Team. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Summary of T, E, and B Anisotropy Power Spectra from Scalar and Tensor Modes. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Boomerang Acoustic Peak Observation. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Planck Single-Frequency Temperature Maps. The single-frequency temperature maps are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Planck Single-Frequency Polarization Maps. The linear polarization is described by two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Planck CMB-Only Map. Since each of the components contributing to the single-frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Planck 2018 Temperature Power Spectrum. Plotted is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Planck 2018 EE and TE Power Spectra. The top panel shows the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: CMB Theoretical Power Spectra Shape Dependencies. The top two panels show the de (S) (S) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The two curves almost coincide for r ≈ 10−2 as shown in the plot if one ig￾nores the so-called ‘reionization bump,’ which boosts the lowest (ℓ ≲ 7) multipoles. This enhancement provides a window for detecting primordial B modes using ob￾servations on very large angular scales. The other window for detecting primordial B modes lies on intermediate scales, around the so-called ‘recombination bump.’ As the pl… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 53 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    CMB-S4 Technology Book, First Edition,

    M. H. Abitbol et al., “CMB-S4 Technology Book, First Edition,” (191 pages) (astro- ph/1706.02464)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Neutrino Physics from the Cosmic Microwave Background and Large Scale Structure,

    K. Abazajian et al., “Neutrino Physics from the Cosmic Microwave Background and Large Scale Structure,” Astropart. Phys. 63 (2015) 66 (astro-ph/1309.5383)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves,

    K. Abazajian et al., “CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves,” Ap. J. 926 (2022) 54 (astro-ph/2008.12619)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    CMB-S4 Decadal Survey APC White Paper,

    K. Abazajian et al., “CMB-S4 Decadal Survey APC White Paper,” (arXiv:1908.01062)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  5. [5]

    CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan,

    K. Abazajian et al., “CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan,” (astro-ph/1907.04473)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  6. [6]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Mea- surement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and its Implications for Structure Growth,

    ACT Collaboration (F. J. Qu et al.), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Mea- surement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and its Implications for Structure Growth,” Ap. J. 962 (2024) 112 (astro-ph/2304.05202)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,

    ACT Collaboration (T. Louis et al.), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,” JCAP 11 (2025) 062 (arXiv:2503.14452)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models,

    ACT Collaboration (E. Calabrese et al.), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models,” JCAP 11 (2025) 063 (astro- ph/2503.14454)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Catalog of >4000 Sunyaev–Zel’dovich Galaxy Clusters,

    ACT Collaboration (M. Hilton et al.) “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Catalog of >4000 Sunyaev–Zel’dovich Galaxy Clusters,” Ap. J. Suppl. 253 (2021) 3 (astro- ph/2009.11043)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Detection of the pairwise kinematic Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect with SDSS DR15 galaxies,

    ACT Collaboration (V. Calafut et al.), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Detection of the pairwise kinematic Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect with SDSS DR15 galaxies,” Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 043502 (astro-ph/2101.08374)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    New Map Unveiled of Universe at Start of Time

    J. Bahcall, Remarks at the Wilkinson MAP press conference: 02/11/03: New York Times, (Feb. 11, 2003) Dennis Overbye “New Map Unveiled of Universe at Start of Time. ” https://www.sns.ias.edu/∼jnb/Papers/Popular/MAPremarks.html

    2003

  12. [12]

    SPT-3G: A Next-Generation Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Experiment on the South Pole Telescope,

    B. A. Benson et al., “SPT-3G: A Next-Generation Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Experiment on the South Pole Telescope,” Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9153 (2014) 91531P (astro-ph/1407.2973)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    A Flat Universe from High-Resolution Maps of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation,

    P. de Bernardis et al., “A Flat Universe from High-Resolution Maps of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation,” Nature 404 (2000) 955 (astro-ph/0004404) July 20, 2026 0:32 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE cmb_update 30 Martin Bucher

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    BICEP2 I: Detection of B-Mode Polar- ization at Degree Angular Scales,

    BICEP2 Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “BICEP2 I: Detection of B-Mode Polar- ization at Degree Angular Scales,” (arXiv:1403.3985v1) (2014) [Initial preprint version]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    Detection of B-Mode Polarization at De- gree Angular Scales by BICEP2,

    BICEP2 Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “Detection of B-Mode Polarization at De- gree Angular Scales by BICEP2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 241101 [Final published version]

    2014

  16. [16]

    Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data,

    BICEP2/Keck Collaboration and Planck Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 101301 (astro-ph/1502.00612)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Con- straints on Primordial Gravitational Waves Using Planck, WMAP, and New BI- CEP2/Keck Observations Through the 2015 Season,

    BICEP2 Collaboration and Keck Array Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “Con- straints on Primordial Gravitational Waves Using Planck, WMAP, and New BI- CEP2/Keck Observations Through the 2015 Season,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 221301 (astro-ph/1810.05216)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Improved Constraints on Pri- mordial Gravitational Waves Using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations Through the 2018 Observing Season,

    BICEP/Keck Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “Improved Constraints on Pri- mordial Gravitational Waves Using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations Through the 2018 Observing Season,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 151301 (astro- ph/2110.00483)

    arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Bucher, Mapping the Primordial Universe: Theory and Observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2026)

    M. Bucher, Mapping the Primordial Universe: Theory and Observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2026)

    2026

  20. [20]

    Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy,

    M. Bucher, “Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy,” in Wei-Tou Ni, Ed., One Hundred Years of General Relativity: From Genesis and Empirical Foun- dations to Gravitational Waves, Vol. 2, (Singapore: World Scientific, 2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy,

    M. Bucher, “Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2015) 1530004-303 (astro-ph/1501.04288)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    An Open Universe From Inflation,

    M. Bucher, A. S. Goldhaber and N. Turok, “An Open Universe From Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 3314 (hep-ph/9411206)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  23. [23]

    New Horizons in Cosmology with Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Microwave Background,

    J. Chluba et al., “New Horizons in Cosmology with Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Microwave Background,” Exper. Astron. 51 (2021) 1515 (astro-ph/1909.01593)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition,

    CMB-S4 Collaboration (Kevork N. Abazajian et al.), “CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition,” (2016) (204 pages) (astro-ph/1610.02743)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Structure in the COBE Differential Mi- crowave Radiometer First-Year Maps,

    COBE Collaboration (G. F. Smoot et al.), “Structure in the COBE Differential Mi- crowave Radiometer First-Year Maps,” Ap. J. Lett. 396 (1992) L1

    1992

  26. [26]

    The Cosmic Microwave Background Spec- trum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set,

    COBE Collaboration (D. J. Fixsen et al.), “The Cosmic Microwave Background Spec- trum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set,” Ap. J. 473 (1996) 576

    1996

  27. [27]

    Exploring Cosmic Origins with CORE: Gravitational Lensing of the CMB,

    CORE Collaboration (A. Challinor et al.), “Exploring Cosmic Origins with CORE: Gravitational Lensing of the CMB,” JCAP 04 (2018) 018 (astro-ph/1707.02259)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    In the Realm of the Hubble Tension: A Review of Solutions,

    E. Di Valentino et al., “In the Realm of the Hubble Tension: A Review of Solutions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021), 153001, (astro-ph/2103.01183)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing Observational Tensions in Cosmology With Systematics and Fundamental Physics,

    E. Di Valentino, J. L. Said and the CosmoVerse Network, “CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing Observational Tensions in Cosmology With Systematics and Fundamental Physics,” Physics of the Dark Universe 49 (2025) 101965 (astro-ph/2504.0166)

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    B-Mode Detection with an Extended Planck Mission,

    G. Efstathiou and S. Gratton, “ B-Mode Detection with an Extended Planck Mission,” JCAP 2009 (2009) 011

    2009

  31. [31]

    J. Errard, Towards a Detection of Primordial Cosmic Microwave Background B-Modes in the Presence of Instrumental, Astrophysical and Environmental Systematic Effects, Habilitation Thesis Université Paris Cité, 2024 (hal-05687563)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Improved Constraints on Cosmic Birefringence from the WMAP and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Data,

    J. R. Eskilt and E. Komatsu, “Improved Constraints on Cosmic Birefringence from the WMAP and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Data,” Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 063503 (astro-ph/2205.13962)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Toward an Understanding of Foreground Emission in the BICEP2 Region,

    R. Flauger, J. C. Hill and D. N. Spergel, “Toward an Understanding of Foreground Emission in the BICEP2 Region,” JCAP 1408 (2014) 039 (arXiv:1405.7351) July 20, 2026 0:32 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE cmb_update Physics of CMB (2015-2025) 31

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Creation of Open Universes from de Sitter Space,

    J. R. Gott, III, “Creation of Open Universes from de Sitter Space,” Nature 295 (1982) 304

    1982

  35. [35]

    MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy on Angular Scales of 10′-5◦,

    S. Hanany et al., “MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy on Angular Scales of 10′-5◦,” Ap. J. 545 (2000), L5

    2000

  36. [36]

    Band Power Spectra in the COBE DMR Four-Year Anisotropy Maps,

    G. Hinshaw et al., “Band Power Spectra in the COBE DMR Four-Year Anisotropy Maps,” Ap. J. 464 (1996) L17

    1996

  37. [37]

    Weak Lensing of the CMB: A Harmonic Approach,

    W. Hu, “Weak Lensing of the CMB: A Harmonic Approach,” Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 043007 (astro-ph/0001303)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  38. [38]

    Mass Reconstruction with Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization,

    W. Hu and T. Okamoto, “Mass Reconstruction with Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization,” Ap. J. 574 (2002) 566 (astro-ph/0111606)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  39. [39]

    The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): A Nulling Polarimeter for Cosmic Microwave Background Observations,

    A. Kogut, D. J. Fixsen et al., “The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): A Nulling Polarimeter for Cosmic Microwave Background Observations,” JCAP 07 (2011) 025 (arXiv:1105.2044)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  40. [40]

    Detection of Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background Using DASI,

    J. M. Kovac et al., “Detection of Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background Using DASI,” Nature 420 (2002) 772

    2002

  41. [41]

    Weak Gravitational Lensing of the CMB,

    A. Lewis and A. Challinor, “Weak Gravitational Lensing of the CMB,” Phys. Repts. 429 (2006) 1 (astro-ph/0601594)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  42. [42]

    Probing Primordial Gravitational Waves: Ali CMB Polarization Tele- scope,

    H. Li et al., “Probing Primordial Gravitational Waves: Ali CMB Polarization Tele- scope,” National Science Review, 6 (2019) 145 (arXiv:1710.03047)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Tibet’s Ali: A New Window to Detect the CMB Polarization,

    Y.-P. Li et al., “Tibet’s Ali: A New Window to Detect the CMB Polarization,” (arXiv:1709.09053)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Probing Cosmic Inflation with the Lite- BIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey,

    LiteBIRD Collaboration (E. Allys et al.), “Probing Cosmic Inflation with the Lite- BIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2023 (2023) 042F01 (astro-ph/2202.02773)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newtonian Gauges,

    C.-P. Ma and E. Bertschinger, “Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newtonian Gauges,” Ap. J. 455 (1995) 7

    1995

  46. [46]

    Mission Design of LiteBIRD,

    T. Matsumura et al., “Mission Design of LiteBIRD,” J. Low Temp. Phys. 176 (2014) 733 (astro-ph/1311.2847)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    A Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the CMB From ℓ = 100 to 400,

    A. D. Miller et al., “A Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the CMB From ℓ = 100 to 400,” Ap. J. 524 (1999) L1

    1999

  48. [48]

    A Measurement by BOOMERANG of Multiple Peaks in the Angular Power Spectrum of the Cosmic Microwave Background,

    C. B. Netterfield et al., “A Measurement by BOOMERANG of Multiple Peaks in the Angular Power Spectrum of the Cosmic Microwave Background,” Ap. J. 571 (2002) 604 (astro-ph/0104460)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Partridge, 3K: The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    B. Partridge, 3K: The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  50. [50]

    Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe,

    P. J. E. Peebles and J. T. Yu, “Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe,” Ap. J. 162 (1970) 815

    1970

  51. [51]

    P. J. E. Peebles, L. A. Page, Jr. and R. B. Partridge, Eds., Finding the Big Bang, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    2009

  52. [52]

    Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of Prod- ucts and Scientific Results,

    Planck Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of Prod- ucts and Scientific Results,” Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A1 (arXiv:1303.5062) and other Planck papers cited therein

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    Planck 2013 Results. XVI. Cosmological Parameters,

    Planck Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “Planck 2013 Results. XVI. Cosmological Parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A16

    2013

  54. [54]

    Planck Intermediate Results. XXX. The Angular Power Spectrum of Polarized Dust Emission at Intermediate and High Galactic Latitudes,

    Planck Collaboration (R. Adam et al.), “Planck Intermediate Results. XXX. The Angular Power Spectrum of Polarized Dust Emission at Intermediate and High Galactic Latitudes,” Astron. Astrophys. 586 (2016) A133 (arXiv:1409.5738)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters,

    Planck Collaboration (N. Aghanim et al.), “Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 (astro-ph/1807.06209)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Planck 2018 Results. VIII. Gravitational July 20, 2026 0:32 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE cmb_update 32 Martin Bucher Lensing,

    Planck Collaboration (N. Aghanim et al.), “Planck 2018 Results. VIII. Gravitational July 20, 2026 0:32 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE cmb_update 32 Martin Bucher Lensing,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A8 (astro-ph/1807.06210)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Planck 2013 Results. XXII. Constraints on Inflation,

    Planck Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “Planck 2013 Results. XXII. Constraints on Inflation,” Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A22 (astro-ph/1303.5082)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    Planck 2018 Results. X. Constraints on Inflation,

    Planck Collaboration (Y. Akrami et al.), “Planck 2018 Results. X. Constraints on Inflation,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 (astro-ph/1807.06211)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Planck 2015 Results. XVI. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB,

    Planck Collaboration (P.A.R. Ade et al.), “Planck 2015 Results. XVI. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB,” Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A16

    2015

  60. [60]

    Planck 2018 Results. I. Overview and the Cosmological Legacy of Planck,

    Planck Collaboration (Y. Akrami et al.), “Planck 2018 Results. I. Overview and the Cosmological Legacy of Planck,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A1 (astro- ph/1807.06205)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Planck 2018 Results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB,

    Planck Collaboration (Y. Akrami et al.), “Planck 2018 Results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A7

    2018

  62. [62]

    Planck 2013 Results. XXIV. Constraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianity,

    Planck Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “Planck 2013 Results. XXIV. Constraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianity,” Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014), A24

    2013

  63. [63]

    Planck 2018 Results. IX. Constraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianity,

    Planck Collaboration (Y. Akrami et al.), “Planck 2018 Results. IX. Constraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianity,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020), A9

    2018

  64. [64]

    A Measurement of the Degree Scale CMB B-Mode Angular Power Spectrum with POLARBEAR,

    Polarbear Collaboration (S. Adachi et al.), “A Measurement of the Degree Scale CMB B-Mode Angular Power Spectrum with POLARBEAR,” Ap. J. 897 (2020) 55 (astro- ph/1910.02608)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background B-Mode Polarization Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales with POLARBEAR,

    Polarbear Collaboration (P. A. R. Ade et al.), “A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background B-Mode Polarization Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales with POLARBEAR,” Ap. J. 794 (2014) 171 [Erratum: Ap. J. 848 (2017) 73] (astro- ph/1403.2369)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s −1Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team,

    A. G. Riess et al, “A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s −1Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team,” Ap. J. Lett. 934 (2022) L7

    2022

  67. [67]

    Perturbations of a Cosmological Model and Angular Variations of the Microwave Background,

    R. K. Sachs and A. M. Wolfe, “Perturbations of a Cosmological Model and Angular Variations of the Microwave Background,” Ap. J. 147 (1967) 73

    1967

  68. [68]

    The Design of the Ali CMB Polarization Telescope Receiver,

    M. Salatino, J. E. Austermann, K. L. Thompson, P. A.R. Ade et al. “The Design of the Ali CMB Polarization Telescope Receiver,” Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 11453 (2020) 114532A (astro-ph/2101.09608)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    The Simons Observatory: Sci- ence Goals and Forecasts,

    Simons Observatory Collaboration (Peter Ade et al.), “The Simons Observatory: Sci- ence Goals and Forecasts,” JCAP 02 (2019) 056 (astro-ph/1808.07445)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    Detection of Gravitational Lensing in the Cosmic Microwave Background,

    K. M. Smith, O. Zahn and O. Doré, “Detection of Gravitational Lensing in the Cosmic Microwave Background,” Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 043510 (arXiv:0705.3980)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  71. [71]

    SPT-3G D1: CMB Temperature and Polar- ization Power Spectra and Cosmology from 2019 and 2020 Observations of the SPT-3G Main Field,

    SPT Collaboration (E. Camphuis et al.), “SPT-3G D1: CMB Temperature and Polar- ization Power Spectra and Cosmology from 2019 and 2020 Observations of the SPT-3G Main Field,” Phys. Rev. D 113 (2026) 083504 (arXiv:2506.20707)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    Cosmology from CMB Lensing and Delensed EE Power Spectra Using 2019–2020 SPT-3G Polarization Data,

    SPT Collaboration (G. Fei et al.), “Cosmology from CMB Lensing and Delensed EE Power Spectra Using 2019–2020 SPT-3G Polarization Data,” Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 083534 (astro-ph/2411.06000)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Detection of B-Mode Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background with Data from the South Pole Telescope,

    SPTpol Collaboration (D. Hanson et al.), “Detection of B-Mode Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background with Data from the South Pole Telescope,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 141301 (astro-ph/1307.5830)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    The SPTpol Extended Cluster Survey,

    SPT and DES Collaborations (L. E. Bleem et al.), “The SPTpol Extended Cluster Survey,” Ap. J. Suppl. 247 (2020) 25 (astro-ph/1910.04121)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Recent Discoveries from the Cosmic Microwave Background: A Review of Recent Progress,

    S. Staggs, J. Dunkley and L. Page, “Recent Discoveries from the Cosmic Microwave Background: A Review of Recent Progress,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018) 044901

    2018

  76. [76]

    Planck Constraints on the Tensor-to-Scalar Ratio,

    M. Tristram et al., “Planck Constraints on the Tensor-to-Scalar Ratio,” Astron. As- trophys. 647 (2021) A128 (astro-ph/2010.01139) July 20, 2026 0:32 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE cmb_update Physics of CMB (2015-2025) 33

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters,

    WMAP Collaboration (D. N. Spergel et al.), “First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters,” Ap. J. Suppl. 148 (2003) 175

    2003

  78. [78]

    Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results,

    WMAP Collaboration (C. L. Bennett et al.), “Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results,” Ap. J. Suppl. 208 (2013) 20 (astro-ph/1212.5225)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  79. [79]

    Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Polarization Analysis,

    WMAP Collaboration (L. Page et al.), “Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Polarization Analysis,” Ap. J. Suppl. 170 (2007) 335 (astro-ph/0603450)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  80. [80]

    Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Implications for Cosmology,

    WMAP Collaboration (D. N. Spergel et al.), “Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Implications for Cosmology,” Ap. J. Suppl. 170 (2007) 377 (astro-ph/0603449)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

Showing first 80 references.