pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17348 · v2 · pith:IQCTPAPOnew · submitted 2026-04-19 · 🧮 math-ph · math.MP

Soliton-like solutions of the Camassa--Holm equation with variable coefficients and a small dispersion

Yuliia Samoilenko , Valerii Samoilenko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 18:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.MP
keywords Camassa-Holm equationvariable coefficientssoliton-like solutionspeakon-like solutionsasymptotic expansionssmall dispersionone-phase solutionstwo-phase solutions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Asymptotic expansions construct soliton- and peakon-like solutions to arbitrary accuracy for the variable-coefficient Camassa-Holm equation with small dispersion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops asymptotic solutions for the Camassa-Holm equation with variable coefficients and small dispersion that behave like solitons or peakons. Each solution is written as a regular background plus a singular component whose leading term is chosen to keep higher-order corrections solvable. In the one-phase case this choice permits construction of solutions to any order in the small parameter, and the authors prove theorems on the resulting accuracy. The same approach extends to two-phase interactions, with explicit examples supplied for both. A reader would care because these approximations supply practical models for nonlinear waves in inhomogeneous settings where exact closed-form solutions are unknown.

Core claim

The vcCH equation with small dispersion supports soliton-like and peakon-like asymptotic solutions expressed as a sum of a regular background and a singular component. In the one-phase case the leading singular term is determined such that higher-order singular corrections are solvable in suitable functional spaces, permitting asymptotic solutions of arbitrary accuracy. Theorems establish the asymptotic accuracy of these constructions, and explicit examples are given for both one- and two-phase cases.

What carries the argument

The main singular term, defined as the leading peakon or soliton profile, chosen so that the resulting correction equations remain solvable at every order in the small parameter.

If this is right

  • Asymptotic solutions of arbitrary accuracy in the small parameter can be built for the one-phase case.
  • Higher-order singular corrections are solvable in appropriate functional spaces.
  • Explicit approximate solutions exist for nontrivial examples, with graphs confirming the profiles.
  • The same singular-expansion procedure applies to two-phase soliton- and peakon-like interactions.
  • Theorems guarantee that the constructed expansions are asymptotically accurate.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could supply high-quality initial data or benchmark cases for numerical schemes that simulate waves in media with slowly varying coefficients.
  • Analogous singular expansions might be tried on other peakon equations with variable coefficients, such as the Degasperis-Procesi or Novikov equations.
  • Direct substitution of the asymptotic form into the equation and tracking of the residual as the dispersion parameter vanishes would provide an independent check of the accuracy theorems.

Load-bearing premise

The precise shape of the leading singular term is chosen so that the correction equations stay solvable at each successive order.

What would settle it

A numerical integration of the vcCH equation showing that the difference between the constructed asymptotic solution and the true solution fails to shrink as the dispersion parameter tends to zero would disprove the accuracy claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17348 by Valerii Samoilenko, Yuliia Samoilenko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The graph of function (48). Relation (27) yields the differential equation satisfied by the function v1(t, τ ): ( φ ′ − v0 ) ∂ 3v1 ∂τ 3 + (1 − φ ′ ) ∂v1 ∂τ + ∂ ∂τ (v0 v1 ) − 2 ∂ ∂τ  ∂v0 ∂τ ∂v1 ∂τ  − ∂ 3v0 ∂τ 3 v1 = F1 with F1 = (1 + φ 2 ) φ ′ ∂v0 ∂τ . By virtue of condition (25) the phase function φ = φ(t) has to satisfy an inequality 1 < φ′ (t) < 3 2 . In this case, when constructing the first singular … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The main term u0(x, t) + v0(t, τ) as ε = 0.5 (at the left) and ε = 0.1 (at the right). 3. Two-phase soliton-like solutions The CH equation is known to possess multi-phase soliton solutions that asymptotically split into one-phase soliton components at infinity. It is natural 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The first term ε (u1(x, t) + v1(t, τ)) as ε = 0.5 (at the left) and ε = 0.1 (at the right). to consider the problem of the asymptotic soliton-like solutions for the vcCH equation that exhibit properties analogous to those of the multi-phase soliton solutions of the original CH equation. In this paper, we focus on the construction of asymptotic two-phase soliton￾like solutions. As in the one-phase case, the… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The first asymptotic approximation Y1(x, t, τ) as ε = 1 (at the left) and ε = 0.5 (at the right). term of the asymptotics, which itself satisfies a third-order nonlinear partial differential equation. Notably, this result – the construction of the main singular term – represents a significant achievement, since it is precisely this term that plays a decisive role in capturing the soliton characteristics of… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The main approximation Y0(x, t, τ) as ε = 1 (at the left) and ε = 0.5 (at the right). in different functional spaces that reflect the specific features of peakon solu￾tions. This choice is essential, as it guarantees the characteristic properties of asymptotic peakon-like solutions: the terms forming the singular part of the asymptotics belong to appropriately selected functional spaces, ensuring the corre… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The main term Y0(x, t, τ) = u0(x, t) + V0(x, t, τ) as ε = 1 (at the left) and ε = 0.5 (at the right). 5. Two-phase peakon-like solutions Taking into account the integrability nature of the Camassa–Holm equation possessing multi-phase peakon solutions, it is natural to consider the problem of constructing asymptotic two-phase peakon-like solutions to the vcCH equation (7). Such a solution is sought in the f… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The first term ε(u1(x, t) + V1(x, t, τ)) as ε = 1 (at the left) and ε = 0.5 (at the right). (13), and (51). As in the problems considered above, the key difficulty lies in determining the singular part of the asymptotics, since it is precisely this part that reflects the qualitative properties of the solution, and its construction re￾quires finding particular solutions of certain partial differential equat… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The asymptotic solution Y1(x, t, τ) as ε = 1 (at the left) and ε = 0.5 (at the right). 5.1. Main definitions and concepts Let G ± 2 be a space of continuous functions f = f(x, t, τ1, τ2) ∈ C ∞(R × [0; T] × R × R), for which there exist functions f + 1 = f + 1 (x, t, τ2), f − 1 = f − 1 (x, t, τ2), f + 2 = f + 2 (x, t, τ1), f − 2 = f − 2 (x, t, τ1) ∈ G±, such that for all non-negative integers n, p, q, α, β … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The main term Y0(x, t, τ) = u0(x, t) + V0(x, t, τ) as ε = 1 (at the left) and ε = 0.5 (at the right). 44 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The paper deals with the Camassa--Holm equation with variable coefficients (vcCH equation) that is a direct generalization of the well known Camassa--Holm equation. We focus on the mathematical description of particular solutions of the vcCH equation with a small dispersion that exhibit properties analogous to those of classical soliton and peakon solutions, and consider the construction of soliton- and peakon-like solutions in the form of asymptotic expansions, including both one-phase and two-phase cases. The solution is expressed as the sum of a regular background common to all soliton- and peakon-like solutions and a singular component that captures their distinctive features, with the precise definition of the main singular term playing a central role. In the one-phase case, this term is determined, and the solvability of higher-order singular corrections is established in suitable functional spaces, enabling the construction of asymptotic solutions to arbitrary accuracy in a small parameter. The study also addresses the construction of two-phase soliton- and peakon-like solutions. Theorems on the asymptotic accuracy of the constructed asymptotic solutions have been proved. Each of the considered cases is illustrated by nontrivial examples for which, in accordance with the obtained general results, approximate solutions are derived in explicit form and their graphs are presented.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs asymptotic expansions for soliton- and peakon-like solutions of the variable-coefficient Camassa-Holm (vcCH) equation with small dispersion. Solutions are written as a regular background plus a singular component whose leading term is determined in the one-phase case; solvability of higher-order singular corrections is established in suitable functional spaces, enabling asymptotic solutions of arbitrary accuracy in the small parameter. Theorems on asymptotic accuracy are proved for both one-phase and two-phase cases, which are illustrated by explicit examples with graphs.

Significance. If the functional-analytic arguments close and the small-dispersion assumption is used consistently, the work supplies a systematic procedure for building high-order approximate solutions to a variable-coefficient generalization of the Camassa-Holm equation. The ability to reach arbitrary order and the explicit examples constitute concrete strengths that could aid modeling of waves in inhomogeneous media.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and the statement of the main one-phase theorem: the leading singular term is said to be 'determined' and to play a central role because it renders the linearized correction operators solvable at every order. The manuscript does not derive this profile from a leading-order balance, modulation equations, or conservation laws intrinsic to the vcCH equation; if the term is instead fixed by the solvability requirement, the accuracy theorems apply only to this tuned family rather than to general soliton-like solutions of the equation.
minor comments (3)
  1. The functional spaces in which solvability of corrections is proved should be stated explicitly (e.g., weighted Sobolev spaces with precise norms) rather than left as 'suitable functional spaces'.
  2. In the two-phase construction, clarify how the interaction between the two singular components is handled at leading order and whether the same solvability mechanism extends without additional tuning.
  3. The examples would be strengthened by including a quantitative comparison (e.g., L^2 or pointwise error) between the asymptotic approximation and a numerical solution of the vcCH equation for at least one nontrivial case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and the statement of the main one-phase theorem: the leading singular term is said to be 'determined' and to play a central role because it renders the linearized correction operators solvable at every order. The manuscript does not derive this profile from a leading-order balance, modulation equations, or conservation laws intrinsic to the vcCH equation; if the term is instead fixed by the solvability requirement, the accuracy theorems apply only to this tuned family rather than to general soliton-like solutions of the equation.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the justification of the leading singular term. In the construction, this term is obtained by substituting the asymptotic ansatz into the vcCH equation and imposing the leading-order balance in the singular component, which yields a profile that reduces to the standard peakon when coefficients are constant. The solvability conditions at higher orders then follow from this choice. Nevertheless, we agree that the current presentation could make this derivation more explicit. We will revise the abstract and the statement of the one-phase theorem to include a dedicated leading-order analysis that derives the profile directly from the equation, thereby clarifying that the accuracy results apply to the natural class of soliton-like solutions admitting such expansions rather than to an arbitrarily tuned family. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: asymptotic construction uses standard leading-order balance and functional analysis

full rationale

The paper constructs asymptotic expansions for soliton- and peakon-like solutions of the variable-coefficient Camassa-Holm equation by separating a regular background from a singular component. The leading singular term is fixed by the leading-order balance in the small-dispersion limit, after which higher-order corrections are shown to be solvable in appropriate spaces. This is the standard procedure in singular perturbation theory for nonlinear PDEs; the solvability statements are consequences of the choice of leading profile rather than definitions that presuppose the final result. No step reduces the claimed accuracy theorems to a self-referential fit or to a self-citation chain whose content is unverified outside the paper. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks of asymptotic analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central constructions rest on the small-dispersion assumption and on the solvability of linear correction equations in chosen function spaces; no free parameters are fitted to data, and no new physical entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The leading singular term can be chosen so that all higher-order correction equations remain solvable in appropriate function spaces.
    Abstract states that this definition plays a central role and that solvability is established.
  • standard math Standard results from functional analysis and asymptotic analysis for singular perturbations apply to the vcCH equation.
    Implicit in the claim that theorems on asymptotic accuracy are proved.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5761 in / 1427 out tokens · 37611 ms · 2026-05-19T18:23:02.433181+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Camassa and D

    R. Camassa and D. Holm. An integrable shallow water equation with peaked soliton.Phys. Rev. Lett., 71(11):1661–1664, 1993. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1661

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1661 1993

  2. [2]

    Lundmark and J

    H. Lundmark and J. Szmigielski. A view of the peakon world through the lens of approximation theory.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 440: 133446, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2022.133446. 47

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physd.2022.133446 2022

  3. [3]

    Lundmark and B

    H. Lundmark and B. Shuaib. Ghostpeakons and characteristic curves for theCamassa–Holm, Degasperis–ProcesiandNovikovequations.Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications (SIGMA), 15:51,

    work page

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.3842/SIGMA.2019.017

    work page doi:10.3842/sigma.2019.017 2019

  5. [5]

    Fuchssteiner and A

    B. Fuchssteiner and A. S. Fokas. Symplectic structures, their Bäcklund transformations and hereditary symmetries.Physica D: Nonlinear Phe- nomena, 4(1):47–66, 1981/1982. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(81)90004-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0167-2789(81)90004-x 1981

  6. [6]

    V. Busuioc. On second grade fluids with vanishing viscosity.Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Series I, Mathematics, 328(12):1241– 1246, 1999. doi: 10.1016/S0764-4442(99)80447-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0764-4442(99)80447-9 1999

  7. [7]

    H. Y. Dai. Model equations for nonlinear dispersive waves in a com- pressible Mooney–Rivlin rode.Acta Mechanica, 127:193–207, 1998. doi: 10.1007/BF01170373

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01170373 1998

  8. [8]

    S. Chen, C. Foias, D. D. Holm, E. Olson, E. S. Titi, and S. Wynne. A connection between the Camassa–Holm equations and turbulent flows in channels and pipes.Physics of Fluids, 11:2343–2353, 1999. doi: 10.1063/1.870096

    work page doi:10.1063/1.870096 1999

  9. [9]

    Constantin and J

    A. Constantin and J. Escher. Wave breaking for nonlinear nonlo- cal shallow water equations.Acta Math., 181(2):229–243, 1998. doi: 10.1007/BF02392586

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02392586 1998

  10. [10]

    Constantin and D

    A. Constantin and D. Lannes. The hydrodynamical relevance of the Camassa–Holm and Degasperis-Processi equations.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 192:165–186, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s00205-008-0128-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-008-0128-2 2009

  11. [11]

    Brandolese

    L. Brandolese. Local-in-space criteria for blowup in shallow water and dispersive rod equations.Comm. Math. Phys., 330(1):401–414, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s00220-014-1958-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-014-1958-4 2014

  12. [12]

    M. S. Alber and Yu. N. Fedorov. Wave solutions of evolution equa- tions and Hamiltonian flows on nonlinear subvarieties of generalized Jaco- bians.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen, 33(47):8409–8425, 2000. doi: 10.1088/0305- 4470/33/47/307

    work page doi:10.1088/0305- 2000

  13. [13]

    Sl(3, r) representation for invariance transformations in five-dimensional gravity

    F. Cooper and H. Shepard. Solitons in the Camassa–Holm shallow wa- ter equation.Phys. Lett. A, 194(4):246–250, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0375- 9601(94)91246-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0375- 1994

  14. [14]

    P. J. Olver and P. Roseanau. Tri–Hamiltonian duality between solitons and solitary–wave solutions having compact support.Phys. Rev. E, 53(2): 1900–1906, 1996. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.1900

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.53.1900 1900

  15. [15]

    R. Danchin. A note on well–posedness for Camassa—Holm equation. J. Differential Equations, 192(2):429–444, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0022- 0396(03)00096-2. 48

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022- 2003

  16. [16]

    Constantin

    A. Constantin. On the Cauchy problem for the periodic Camassa- Holm equation.J. Differential Equations, 141(2):218–235, 1997. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1997.3333

    work page doi:10.1006/jdeq.1997.3333 1997

  17. [17]

    Ketchen Jr

    A. Constantin and W. A. Strauss. Stability of peakons.Commun. Pure and Appl. Math., 53(5):603–610, 2000. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097- 0312(200005)53:5<603::aid-cpa3>3.0.co;2-l

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1097- 2000

  18. [18]

    Constantin

    A. Constantin. Existence of permanent and breaking waves for a shallow water equation: a geometric approach.Annales de l’institut Fourier, 50(2): 321–362, 2000. doi: 10.5802/aif.1757

    work page doi:10.5802/aif.1757 2000

  19. [19]

    Constantin

    A. Constantin. On the scattering problem for the camassa-holm equation.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 457(2008):953–970, 2001. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2000.0701

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2000.0701 2008

  20. [20]

    Constantin, V

    A. Constantin, V. S. Gerdjikov, and R. I. Ivanov. Inverse scattering trans- form for the Camassa–Holm equation.Inverse Problems, 22(6):2197–2207,

    work page

  21. [21]

    doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/6/017

    work page doi:10.1088/0266-5611/22/6/017

  22. [22]

    Bressan and A

    A. Bressan and A. Constantin. Global conservative solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation.Arch Rational Mech Anal, 183(2):215–239, 2007. doi: 10.1007/s00205-006-0010-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-006-0010-z 2007

  23. [23]

    Bressan and A

    A. Bressan and A. Constantin. Global dissipative solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation.Analysis and Applications, 05(1):1–27, 2007. doi: 10.1142/S0219530507000857

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219530507000857 2007

  24. [24]

    R. S. Johnson. On solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 459(2035):1687–1708, 2003. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2002.1078

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2002.1078 2035

  25. [25]

    Yishen Li and Jin E. Zhang. The multiple–soliton solution of the Camassa– Holm equation.Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Serie A, 460(2049):2617–2627,

    work page 2049

  26. [26]

    doi: 10.1098/rspa.2004.1331

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2004.1331 2004

  27. [27]

    A. Minakov. Asymptotics of step–like solutions for the Camassa–Holm equation.J. Differential Equations, 261(11):6055–6098, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.08.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2016.08.028 2016

  28. [28]

    Boutet de Monvel, I

    A. Boutet de Monvel, I. Karpenko, and D. Shepelsky. Riemann–Hilbert ap- proach for the Camassa–Holm equation with nonzero boundary conditions. J. Math. Ph., 61(3):031504, 2020. doi: 10.1063/1.5139519

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5139519 2020

  29. [29]

    J. Schiff. Zero curvature formulations of dual hierarchies.J. Math. Phys., 37(4):1928–1938, 1996. doi: 10.1063/1.531486

    work page doi:10.1063/1.531486 1928

  30. [30]

    J. Schiff. The Camassa–Holm equation: a loop group approach.Phys- ica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 121(1–2):24–43, 1998. doi: 10.1016/S0167- 2789(98)00099-2. 49

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167- 1998

  31. [31]

    Z. Qiao. The Camassa–Holm hierarchy,N–dimensional integrable systems, and algebro-geometric solution on a symplectic submanifolds.Commun. Math. Phys., 239(1–2):309–341, 2003. doi: 10.1007/s00220-003-0880-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0880-y 2003

  32. [32]

    Parker and Y

    A. Parker and Y. Matsuno. The peakon limits of soliton solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 75(12):124001, 2006. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.75.124001

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.75.124001 2006

  33. [33]

    Holden and X

    H. Holden and X. Raynaud. Global conservative multipeakon solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation.J. Hyperb. Differential Equations, 4(1): 39–64, 2007. doi: 10.1142/S0219891607001045

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219891607001045 2007

  34. [34]

    S. C. Anco and E. Recio. A general family of multi–peakon equations and their properties.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 52 (2):125203, 2019. doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/ab03dd

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab03dd 2019

  35. [35]

    Artebrant and H

    R. Artebrant and H. J. Schroll. Numerical simulation of Camassa–Holm peakons by adaptive upwinding.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 56(5): 695–711, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2005.06.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2005.06.002 2006

  36. [36]

    A. Parker. Wave dynamics for peaked solitons of the Camassa–Holm equation.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 35(2):220–237, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2007.07.049

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2007.07.049 2008

  37. [37]

    G. M. Coclite, K. H. Karlsen, and N. H. Risebro. A convergent finite difference scheme for the Camassa–Holm equation with generalH1 initial data.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 46(3):1554–1579, 2008. doi: 10.1137/060673242

    work page doi:10.1137/060673242 2008

  38. [38]

    B. F. Feng, K. Maruno, and Y. Ohta. A self–adaptive moving mesh method for the Camassa–Holm equation.J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235(1):229–243,

    work page

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2010.05.044

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cam.2010.05.044 2010

  40. [40]

    J. Lenells. Traveling wave solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation.J. Dif- ferential Equations, 217(2):393–430, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2004.09.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2004.09.007 2005

  41. [41]

    Kalisch and J

    H. Kalisch and J. Lenells. Numerical study of traveling–wave solutions for the Camassa–Holm equation.Chaos, Solitons&Fractals, 25(2):207–298,

    work page

  42. [42]

    doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.11.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2004.11.024 2004

  43. [43]

    Degasperis and M

    A. Degasperis and M. Procesi. Asymptotic integrability. In Symmetry and perturbation theory (Rome, 1998), pages 23–

    work page 1998

  44. [44]

    ISBN 981-02-4166-6

    World Scientific Publishing Co, River Edge, NJ, 1999. ISBN 981-02-4166-6. doi: 10.1142/9789812833037. URL https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812833037

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812833037 1999

  45. [45]

    V. S. Novikov. Generalizations of the Camassa–Holm equation.J.Phys. A: Math. Theor., 42(34):342002, 2009. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/42/34/342002. 50

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/34/342002 2009

  46. [46]

    ThesmalldispersionlimitoftheKorteweg– de Vries equation

    P.D.LaxandC.D.Levermore. ThesmalldispersionlimitoftheKorteweg– de Vries equation. I.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 36(3):253–290, 1983. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160360302

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.3160360302 1983

  47. [47]

    ThesmalldispersionlimitoftheKorteweg– de Vries equation

    P.D.LaxandC.D.Levermore. ThesmalldispersionlimitoftheKorteweg– de Vries equation. II.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 36(5):571–593, 1983. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160360503

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.3160360503 1983

  48. [48]

    ThesmalldispersionlimitoftheKorteweg– de Vries equation

    P.D.LaxandC.D.Levermore. ThesmalldispersionlimitoftheKorteweg– de Vries equation. III.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 36(6):809–829, 1983. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160360606

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.3160360606 1983

  49. [49]

    Venakides

    S. Venakides. The Korteweg–de Vries equation with small dispersion: higher order Lax–Levermore theory.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 43(3):335– 361, 1990. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160430303

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.3160430303 1990

  50. [50]

    R. M. Miura and M. D. Kruskal. Application of nonlinear WKB–method to the Korteweg–de Vries equation.SIAM Appl. Math., 26(2):376–395, 1974. doi: 10.1137/0126036

    work page doi:10.1137/0126036 1974

  51. [51]

    Abenda, T

    S. Abenda, T. Grava, and C. Klein. Numerical solution of the small dis- persion limit of the Camassa–Holm and Whitham equations and multiscale expansions.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 70(8):2797–2821, 2010. doi: 10.1137/090770278

    work page doi:10.1137/090770278 2010

  52. [52]

    Vaneeva and S

    O. Vaneeva and S. Poˆ sta. Equivalence groupoid of a class of variable co- efficient Korteweg–de Vries equations.J. Math. Ph., 58(10):101504, 2017. doi: 10.1063/1.5004973

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5004973 2017

  53. [53]

    In: Journal of Physics: Conference Se- ries

    O. Vaneeva, R. Popovych, and C. Sophocleous. Group analysis of Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equations with time dependent coefficients.Jour- nal of Physics: Conference Series, 621(1):012016, 2015. doi: 10.1088/1742- 6596/621/1/012016

    work page doi:10.1088/1742- 2015

  54. [55]

    V. H. Samoylenko and Yu. I. Samoylenko. Asymptotic soliton–like solu- tions to the singularly perturbed Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation with variable coefficients.J. Math. Ph., 60(1):011501–011513, 2019. doi: 10.1063/1.5085291

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5085291 2019

  55. [56]

    Samoilenko, Yu

    V. Samoilenko, Yu. Samoilenko, and E. Zappale. Asymptotic step–like solutions of the singularly perturbed Burgers equation.Physics of Fluids, 35(6):067106, 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0150685. 51

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0150685 2023

  56. [57]

    Samoilenko, L

    Yu. Samoilenko, L. Brandolese, and V. Samoilenko. Soliton–like solutions of the modified Camassa–Holm equation with variable coefficients.Chaos, Solitons&Fractals, 192(3):115944, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115944

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115944 2025

  57. [58]

    Fritz John.Partial differential equations, volume 1 ofAppl. Math. Sci. Springer-Verlag, New York, fourth edition, 1991. ISBN 0-387-90609-6. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4809-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4809-9 1991

  58. [59]

    L. C. Evans.Partial Differential Equations, volume 19 ofGraduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2010. doi: 10.1090/gsm/019

    work page doi:10.1090/gsm/019 2010

  59. [60]

    V. P. Maslov and G. A. Omel’yanov.Geometric Asymptotics for PDE, I. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001

    work page 2001

  60. [61]

    Hörmander.The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III

    L. Hörmander.The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III. Pseudodifferential Operators. Springer, Berlin, 2007

    work page 2007

  61. [62]

    V. V. Grushin. Pseudodifferential operators onRn with bounded symbols. Funct Anal Its Appl, 4(3):202–212, 1970. doi: 10.1007/BF01075240

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01075240 1970

  62. [63]

    V. V. Grushin. On a class of elliptic pseudodifferential operators degen- erating on a submanifold.Math USSR Sb, 13(2):155–185, 1971. doi: 10.1070/SM1971v013n02ABEH001033

    work page doi:10.1070/sm1971v013n02abeh001033 1971

  63. [64]

    S. I. Lyashko, V. H. Samoilenko, Yu. I. Samoilenko, I. V. Gapyak, and M. S. Orlova. Asymptotic stepwise solutions of the Korteweg–de Vries equation with a singular perturbation and their accuracy.Math. Modeling and Computing, 8(3):410–421, 2021. doi: 10.23939/mmc2021.03.410

    work page doi:10.23939/mmc2021.03.410 2021

  64. [65]

    V. H. Samoilenko and Yu. I. Samoilenko. Asymptotic two–phase solitonlike solutions of the singularly perturbed Korteweg–de Vries equation with vari- able coefficients.Ukr. Math. J., 60(3):449–461, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s11253- 008-0067-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11253- 2008

  65. [66]

    V. H. Samoilenko and Yu. I. Samoilenko. Asymptoticm–phase soliton– type solutions of a singularly perturbed Korteweg–de Vries equation with variable coefficients.Ukr. Math. J., 64(7):1109–1127, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s11253-012-0702-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11253-012-0702-5 2012

  66. [67]

    V. H. Samoilenko and Yu. I. Samoilenko. Asymptoticm–phase soliton– type solutions of a singularly perturbed Korteweg–de Vries equation with variable coefficients. II.Ukr. Math. J., 64(8):1241–1259, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s11253-013-0713-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11253-013-0713-x 2013

  67. [68]

    O. O. Vaneeva, R. O. Popovych, and C. Sophocleous. Extended group analysisofvariablecoefficientreaction–diffusionequationswithexponential nonlinearities.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 396(1): 225–242, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.084. 52

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.084 2012