Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Evolution of the inner accretion flow and the white-dwarf spin pulse during the 2023 outburst in GK Persei

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read During GK Persei's 2023 outburst, the white dwarf's 351.3-second X-ray spin pulse was produced by spin-phase-dependent photoelectric absorption of the accretion column by the curtain, not by intrinsic variability of the column.

desk verdict A solid, useful observational paper on the 2023 GK Per outburst, but the curtain-absorption interpretation of the pulse rests on a model comparison the paper does not actually report. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.21313 v1 pith:IQI6SPMK submitted 2025-04-30 astro-ph.HE

Mariko Kimura , Takayuki Hayashi , Yuuki Wada , Wataru Iwakiri , Shigeyuki Sako , Martina Veresvarska , Simone Scaringi , Noel Castro-Segura
show 3 more authors
Christian Knigge Keith C. Gendreau Zaven Arzoumanian
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords cataclysmicvariablestarsdwarfnovaeDQHerculisintermediatepolarsX-raysourcesstellaraccretiondiskscurtainwhite-dwarfspinpulse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the 351.3-second X-ray spin pulse of the white dwarf in GK Persei, seen throughout the 2023 outburst, is produced by photoelectric absorption of the accretion column by the surrounding accreting gas, the accretion curtain, rather than by the column intrinsically brightening and fading. The evidence comes from phase-resolved X-ray spectra: at off-pulse phase the continuum from the accretion column drops sharply while the fitted absorbing column rises, and the other spectral components—the soft blackbody from the irradiated white-dwarf surface and the keV emission lines—hardly change. This absorption picture also explains why the pulse deepens and its energy dependence weakens as the optical brightness and accretion rate rise. If the claim is correct, the pulse depth becomes a direct, quantitative probe of the geometry and density of the inner accretion flow during outbursts, with implications for how matter is channeled onto magnetic white dwarfs.

What carries the argument

The central object is the accretion curtain: the magnetically channeled gas flow from the truncated disk onto the white dwarf, modeled as a partial photoelectric absorber (the pwab component in XSPEC) whose column density along the line of sight changes with the white dwarf's 351.3-second spin phase. Phase-resolved fits of on-pulse and off-pulse spectra, using a fixed intrinsic power-law continuum, measure this phase-dependent column; the constancy of the blackbody and line components across phase isolates the column as the only varying absorber, carrying the argument that the pulse is an absorption effect.

What would settle it

Compare the fully deabsorbed accretion-column flux between on-pulse and off-pulse phases by removing the best-fit partial-covering column: if the model is right, the intrinsic fluxes should match. If the intrinsic flux still differs significantly after deabsorption, or if the 6.4 keV iron line and the continuum drop together without an absorption-edge increase at off-pulse phase, the pulse is not caused by curtain absorption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that during the 2023 outburst of GK Persei the 351.3-second X-ray spin pulse of the white dwarf is produced by spin-phase-dependent photoelectric absorption: at the off-pulse phase the partial-covering absorbing column rises to about $10.7\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ while the intrinsic multi-temperature bremsstrahlung spectrum of the accretion column remains essentially unchanged. The blackbody component from the irradiated white-dwarf surface and the keV-scale emission lines vary little between on- and off-pulse phases, so the pulse is not intrinsic to the column's emission. The same absorption picture accounts for the observed correlations: as the optical brightness and inferred mass accretion rate rise, the curtain column grows, the observed column flux drops, the pulse amplitude increases, and the energy dependence of the pulse below 8 keV weakens. At the outburst end, the emergence of a double-peaked high-energy pulse and the near energy-independence above 10 keV are attributed to a receding inner disk edge that exposes the second pole, and to electron scattering or geometric visibility, respectively.

Load-bearing premise

The off-pulse dimming is interpreted as extra photoelectric absorption of an otherwise unchanged accretion-column spectrum; if the dimming were instead caused by the white dwarf or disk hiding the column, or by the column itself emitting less at that phase, the curtain-absorption conclusion fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In brighter states, the pulse amplitude at >2 keV grows while the observed accretion-column flux drops, so the two can be used together to track the curtain column density and hence the mass accretion rate.
  • Pulse profile shape and the low-energy pulse peak lag are tied to the twisted geometry of the accretion column and curtain, meaning pulse timing and phase lags carry structural information about the inner disk edge.
  • The pulse is weak in the 1-2 keV band until mid-outburst because the line-emitting region outside the curtain dilutes the modulation; the pulse appears in that band once the line flux fades.
  • At the end of the outburst, the double-peaked high-energy pulse indicates that the inner disk edge expanded and the second magnetic pole became visible, providing a geometric probe of the inner radius.
  • The outburst itself is an inside-out disk-instability event with a stagnation phase, consistent with the disk-instability model applied to magnetically truncated disks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the curtain-absorption interpretation is right, the spin pulse amplitude can serve as a close-to-real-time gauge of the mass accretion rate onto the white dwarf, since the curtain column density tracks the accretion rate; this would make intermediate polars in outburst useful clocks for disk-instability dynamics.
  • A direct way to separate absorption from occultation observationally is to track the iron K$\alpha$ fluorescence line and the photoelectric absorption edge across spin phase: an absorption origin predicts the edge depth and the line-to-continuum ratio change together, whereas occultation would dim the continuum and line together without an edge change.
  • The same phase-resolved spectral decomposition could be applied to the 2018 outburst data of GK Persei and to other intermediate polars with dwarf-nova outbursts to test whether the pulse-depth versus accretion-rate scaling found here is a general property of the accretion-curtain mechanism rather than specific to this outburst.
  • The claim that the ~5700 s optical quasi-periodicity comes from an irradiated vertically thick structure rotating at its Keplerian radius predicts that the period should stay constant across the outburst; a future long-cadence optical campaign during an outburst could check that directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. Using simultaneous NICER and NuSTAR X-ray observations, optical photometry from Tomo-e Gozen, and AAVSO archive data, the authors study the 2023 outburst of the intermediate polar GK Per. They decompose the X-ray spectrum into a soft blackbody, a set of emission lines, and a multi-temperature bremsstrahlung (accretion-column) component, and track the evolution of these components over the outburst. They detect the 351.3-s white-dwarf spin pulse in X-rays, find that its amplitude and energy dependence evolve with optical brightness, and interpret the pulse as primarily due to spin-phase-dependent photoelectric absorption of the accretion column by the accretion curtain. They also detect a ~5700-s optical QPO and propose an origin linked to an irradiated vertically thick structure near the disk edge, and interpret the outburst light curve as an inside-out disk-instability outburst.

Significance. The observational dataset is rich and the paper covers a broad range of phenomena: spectral evolution, spin-pulse evolution, QPOs, and the outburst mechanism. If the central interpretation holds, it would strengthen the accretion-curtain model for GK Per and demonstrate how pulse properties respond to changes in mass accretion rate. The paper explicitly reports the spectral model, shows the data and fits, and connects the pulse evolution to the spectral evolution. However, the central claim concerning the curtain-absorption origin of the spin pulse is not yet supported by a fully quantitative statistical analysis: the phase-resolved spectral fit parameters and model-comparison statistics are not reported. The paper would be strengthened by providing those details and by clarifying the role of alternative mechanisms at high energies.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.5 / Figure 10] The paper states that the column density of the absorber was much higher in the off-pulse phase than in the on-pulse phase, but it does not quote the phase-resolved best-fit values of NH,max, the covering fraction, the power-law normalization, or their confidence intervals, nor any Δχ² between the on- and off-pulse fits. Because the 0.3–8 keV band with Γ fixed at 1.48 leaves NH,max and the power-law normalization partially degenerate, the conclusion in Section 4.3 requires a statistical comparison against an alternative model in which only the power-law normalization changes or the column is held fixed. Please provide these numbers, or explicitly restrict the claim to a qualitative statement.
  2. [Section 3.5 / Figure 8] The pulse amplitudes are quoted (for example, 'consistently lower than 20%' at <1 keV and 'highest around the outburst maximum') without formal uncertainties. The claimed energy dependence and its evolution (weaker energy dependence when the system is brighter) are central to the curtain-density interpretation; without amplitude errors, the significance of this evolution cannot be evaluated. Add error bars or confidence intervals for the pulse amplitudes in each energy band and time zone.
  3. [Sections 3.3 and 3.5] Fixing the photon index at Γ=1.48 for all time zones and for both pulse phases may bias the inferred pwab column density if the intrinsic spectrum varies. The authors should either free Γ in the phase-resolved fits and quote its best-fit value and error, or explicitly test and report that the difference in NH,max between on-pulse and off-pulse fits survives when Γ is allowed to vary.
  4. [Section 4.3 / Figure 9] The NuSTAR pulse in the 3–50 keV band shows almost no energy dependence, which the paper attributes to electron scattering or a geometrical change in the visible area of the accretion column. This means photoelectric absorption cannot be the sole, or even the dominant, cause of the pulse at high energies. To make the headline claim in the abstract and Section 4.3 more precise, the paper should quantify the relative contributions of absorption, scattering, and geometry, or explicitly limit the curtain-absorption interpretation to below ~8 keV.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.5] The phrase 'while the the BB and line fluxes' contains a duplicated article.
  2. [Section 3.5] The definition of time zone T4 as 'BJD 2459900–2460000' appears to be a typo; from the context it should be BJD 2459990–2460000.
  3. [Section 3.4] The significance of the PDM detections (351.32 s and 5699 s) should be quantified with false-alarm probabilities (for example, via bootstrap or Monte Carlo), not only the θ statistic.
  4. [Section 4.2] The phrase '/greaterorsimilar10 keV' is a LaTeX error; it should read '≳10 keV'.
  5. [Section 3.2 / Figure 3] The cross-calibration factor of 0.98 between the NuSTAR and NICER normalizations is mentioned in the Figure 3 caption but should also be stated in the text of Section 3.2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the 351.3-s pulse is an independently detected periodicity, and the curtain-absorption interpretation is a model inference from phase-resolved spectral fits, not a restatement of the model inputs.

full rationale

The paper is an observational study, not a derivation that dresses its inputs as predictions. The spin pulse is detected independently by period searches (PDM) on NICER and NuSTAR light curves (Section 3.4), and the on-pulse/off-pulse spectral modeling (Section 3.5) is a fit to data. The central claim in Section 4.3 — that the pulse is caused by spin-phase-dependent photoelectric absorption of the accretion column — is an interpretation of the fitted result that the power-law flux drops while the blackbody and line fluxes do not change and the partial-covering column density is higher off-pulse. This is not circular: the model does not define the conclusion, and the authors even acknowledge alternative mechanisms (electron scattering and geometric visibility changes, Section 4.3) for the energy-independent NuSTAR pulse. The possible degeneracy between column density and power-law normalization in the 0.3–8 keV band is a model-selection or statistical-robustness concern, not a circularity, because the paper does not claim to have predicted the pulse from the absorption model. Self-citations to Kimura et al. (2018), Hayashi et al. (2018), and Wada et al. (2018) are contextual prior results or parameter-free physical inputs, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' own prior work. The accretion-curtain model itself is attributed to external earlier work (Rosen et al. 1988; Hellier et al. 1991). I therefore find no circular step requiring a nonzero score.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central interpretive claims rest on standard models (accretion curtain, disk instability) and on spectral decomposition with several fitted or fixed parameters. Free parameters are mainly X-ray spectral normalizations and absorptions; no new physical entities are introduced. The QPO interpretation uses a literature formula for the stream impact radius and is explicitly speculative.

free parameters (8)
  • Interstellar hydrogen column NH (Tbabs) = 1.6e21 cm^-2
    Tied across eight NICER spectra and fixed for all subsequent fits; affects all component fluxes.
  • Partial-covering column densities NH,min and NH,max (pwab) = 0.34e22 and 10.7e22 cm^-2
    Fit to the simultaneous NICER+NuSTAR spectrum in Section 3.2; the off-pulse absorption inference rests on this component.
  • Power-law photon index = 1.48
    Fixed in time-resolved spectral fits from the simultaneous NICER+NuSTAR vmcflow-equivalent slope; changes would alter inferred PL fluxes in the 2-8 keV band.
  • Blackbody temperature and normalization = 83 eV, L_BB = 0.56 (scaled)
    Fit in Section 3.2; drives the <1 keV component interpretation.
  • vmcflow maximum temperature and oxygen abundance = 54.1 keV, Z_O = 0.48
    Fit to the broadband spectrum; used to estimate Mdot and to tie abundances in later fits.
  • Iron and nickel abundances = 0.105 and 0.1 solar
    Adopted from Zemko et al. 2017 and fixed; not re-fit here.
  • Spin period for epoch folding = 351.32 s
    Measured with PDM, then fixed when constructing phase-averaged pulse profiles in Section 3.5.
  • LOWESS smoother span f = 0.1-0.2 for PDM, 0.2-1.0 for CCF
    Choice of trend removal can affect period and CCF results; no explicit sensitivity grid is reported.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The accretion-curtain model: spin-phase-dependent photoelectric absorption by gas from the disk produces the X-ray pulse.
    Invoked in Section 1 and Section 4.3; the central interpretation presupposes this mechanism rather than deriving it.
  • domain assumption The disk-instability model applies to GK Per's dwarf-nova outbursts despite the magnetically truncated inner disk.
    Used in Section 4.5, citing Hameury and Lasota 2017; assumes thermal-viscous instability drives the observed outburst.
  • domain assumption System parameters from the literature: M1 = 1.03 Msun, i = 67 deg, d = 434 pc, q = 0.38.
    Used for luminosity, radii, and geometry in Sections 3.2 and 4.4; adopted from Alvarez-Hernandez et al. 2021 and Gaia DR3.
  • domain assumption The spectral decomposition into blackbody, Gaussian lines, and cooling-flow/power-law components maps one-to-one onto the WD surface, line emitter, and accretion column.
    Assumed in Sections 3.2 and 3.3; component fluxes are model-dependent because line and continuum normalizations are correlated.
  • domain assumption Abundances and reflection geometry from prior work can be fixed without biasing the time evolution.
    Fe/Ni abundances from Zemko et al. 2017, Omega/2pi = 1, and cos i = 0.39 are fixed in the fits; if these are wrong, absolute fluxes shift.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evolution of the inner accretion flow and the white-dwarf spin pulse during the 2023 outburst in GK Persei." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IQI6SPMK

@misc{pith2026250421313,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evolution of the inner accretion flow and the white-dwarf spin pulse during the 2023 outburst in GK Persei},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IQI6SPMK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.21313}
}
abstract

We present our X-ray and optical observations performed by NICER, NuSTAR, and Tomo-e Gozen during the 2023 outburst in the intermediate polar GK Persei. The X-ray spectrum consisted of three components: blackbody emission of several tens of eVs from the irradiated white-dwarf surface, a source possibly including several emission lines around 1 keV, and multi-temperature bremsstrahlung emission from the accretion column. The 351.3-s white-dwarf spin pulse was detected in X-rays, and the observable X-ray flux from the column drastically decreased at the off-pulse phase, which suggests that the absorption of the column by the accreting gas called the curtain was the major cause of the pulse. As the system became brighter in optical, the column became fainter, the pulse amplitude became higher, and the energy dependence of pulses became weaker at $<$8~keV. These phenomena could be explained by the column's more pronounced absorption by the denser curtain as mass accretion rates increased. The blackbody and line fluxes rapidly decreased at the optical decline, which suggests the expansion of the innermost disk edge with decreasing accretion rates. The electron scattering or the column geometry may be associated with almost no energy dependence of high-energy pulses. The irradiated vertically-thick structure at the disk may generate optical QPOs with a period of $\sim$5700 s.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.21313 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overall optical V -band light curves and B −V color evolution during outbursts in GK Per. The data were provided by the AAVSO. The upper panel shows light curves during the 2015, 2018, and 2023 outbursts. The lower panel shows B − V color evolution during the 2018 and 2023 outbursts. The triangle, rectangle, and circle represent the data of the 2015, 2018, 2023 outbursts, respectively. The optical light curve and th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall optical V -band light curves (top panel), NICER X-ray light curves in the 0.3–8 keV (middle panel), 0.3–1 keV, 1–2 keV, and 2–8 keV bands (bottom panel) during the 2023 outburst in GK Per. In the bottom panel, the white circle, black rectangle, and blue triangle represent 0.3–1 keV, 1–2 keV, and 2–8 keV light curves. The data are averaged per day. The orange and purple lines indicate the time of simultaneous… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Broad-band X-ray spectrum of GK Per on BJD 2459998 (2023 Feburuary 22), overlaid with the best-fit spectral model of Tbabs*(bbody + gaussian + pwab*(reflect*vmcflow + gaussian)). The green crosses represent the NICER data. The purple and dark purple crosses represent the NuSTAR FPMA and FPMB data, respectively. The dot, dashed, and dot￾dashed lines represent the best-fit model components of blackbody, cooling-flow, … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: X-ray spectra of GK Per during the 2023 outburst, which are overlaid with the best-fit spectral model of Tbabs*(gaussian + gaussian + bbody + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + pwab*(reflect*powerlaw + gaussian + gaussian + gau…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An enlarged figure around 1 keV in a linear energy axis for the spectrum in S1. 6. We also extracted the unabsorbed flux of these components by removing the pwab model (see the fifth panel of the same figure). The blackbody component was dominant at <1 keV. The total f…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Optical light curves (top panel), X-ray fluxes of the best-fit model components in the 0.3–1 keV, 1–2 keV, 2–5 keV, and 5–8 keV bands (second, third, fourth, and fifth panels), and the flux ratio of neon, magnesium, iron, and silicon emission lines to the sum of the po…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: PDM results for the NICER 0.3–8 keV light curve (left panel), for the NuSTAR 3–10 keV light curve (middle panel) and for optical V -band light curve (right panel) during the 2023 outburst in GK Per. Upper and lower panels represent Θ-diagrams of our PDM analyses and ph…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Phase-averaged profiles of WD spin pulses during the 2023 outburst in GK Per in T1, T2, T3, and T4 in four energy bands. The T0 value is given in each panel. The 1–2 keV, 2–5 keV, and 5–8 keV profiles are shifted vertically for visibility. These offset values are given…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Phase-averaged profiles of WD spin pulses at the end of the 2023 outburst in GK Per in three energy bands. The 10–20 keV and 20–50 keV profiles are shifted vertically for visibility. These offset values are given in this plot. section 3.4. The smoother span ranged betw…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: X-ray spectra at the on-pulse and off-pulse phases of GK Per during the 2023 outburst, which are overlaid with the best-fit spectral model of Tbabs*(gaussian + gaussian + bbody + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + gaussian + pwab*(reflec…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: X-ray and optical simultaneously observed light curves taken by NICER and Tomo-e Gozen on 2023 February 21. The green and orange dots represent the NICER and Tomo-e Gozen light curves, respectively. We also plot the Tomo-e Gozen light curve of the neighbor star USNO A…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: CCFs between the NICER and Tomo-e Gozen light curves of GK Per on 2023 February 21. The positive lag indicates the delay of optical variations to X-ray ones. The data in the left and right panels correspond to the light variations in the left and right panels of [PIT…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Schematic figure of the face-on view of the twisted geometry of the AC and the curtain during the 2023 outburst in GK Per. The inner disk edge rotates counterclockwise. The irradiated WD surface is asymmetric to the center of the AC. The pulse profile was not symmetri…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When will T Coronae Borealis next erupt as a nova? Constraints from recurrence, orbital phase, and accretion-state evolution

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    T CrB's next eruption is not uniquely predictable; conditional scenarios point to a possible 2026 December eruption if the current decline mimics 1946, or a lower limit near 2029 May if the recent high state left an a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Aller, L. H. 1959, PASP, 71, 324, doi: 10.1086/127390 ´Alvarez-Hern´ andez, A., Torres, M. A. P., Rodr ´ ıguez-Gil,P., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 5805, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2547

    work page doi:10.1086/127390 1959

  2. [2]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    1996

  3. [3]

    K., Shaw, R

    Blackburn, J. K., Shaw, R. A., Payne, H. E., Hayes, J. J. E., & Heasarc. 1999, FTOOLS: A general package of software to manipulate FITS files, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:9912.002

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    2024, astropy/photutils: 2.0.2, 2.0.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13989456

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2024, astropy/photutils: 2.0.2, 2.0.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13989456

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.13989456 2024

  5. [5]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 953, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab516

    Bruch, A. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 953, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab516

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab516 2021

  6. [6]

    Cleveland, W. S. 1979, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 74, 829

    work page 1979

  7. [7]

    1974, ApJ, 187, 497, doi: 10.1086/152659

    Cruddace, R., Paresce, F., Bowyer, S., & Lampton, M. 1974, ApJ, 187, 497, doi: 10.1086/152659

    work page doi:10.1086/152659 1974

  8. [8]

    U., Mineshige, S., & Nucita, A

    Dobrotka, A., Ness, J. U., Mineshige, S., & Nucita, A. A. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1183, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx513

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx513 2017

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    A., & Hellier, C

    Evans, P. A., & Hellier, C. 2007, ApJ, 663, 1277, doi: 10.1086/518552

    2007 doi

  2. [10]

    Fernie, J. D. 1989, PASP, 101, 225 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    1989 doi

  3. [11]

    S., Durant, M., et al

    Gandhi, P., Dhillon, V. S., Durant, M., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2166 X-ray and optical observations of the 2023 outburst in GK Per 19

    2010

  4. [12]

    C., Arzoumanian, Z., Adkins, P

    Gendreau, K. C., Arzoumanian, Z., Adkins, P. W., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder, T. Takahashi, & M. Bautz, 9905...

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    M., Sion, E

    Godon, P., Shara, M. M., Sion, E. M., & Zurek, D. 2017, ApJ, 850, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9616

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Hale, G. E. 1901, ApJ, 13, 173

    1901

  7. [15]

    2002, in 261, The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, ed

    Hameury, J.-M. 2002, in 261, The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, ed. B. T. G¨ ansicke, K. Beuermann, & K. Reinsch, 377

    2002

  8. [16]

    M., & Lasota, J

    Hameury, J. M., & Lasota, J. P. 2017, A&A, 602, A102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730760

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    A., Craig, W

    Harrison, F. A., Craig, W. W., Christensen, F. E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    2014, MNRAS, 441, 3718

    Hayashi, T., & Ishida, M. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 3718

    2014

  11. [19]

    2011, PASJ, 63, S739, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.sp3.S739

    Shionome, T. 2011, PASJ, 63, S739, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.sp3.S739

    2011 doi

  12. [20]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 1810, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2766

    Hayashi, T., Kitaguchi, T., & Ishida, M. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1810, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2766

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    Hellier, C., Cropper, M., & Mason, K. O. 1991, MNRAS, 248, 233

    1991

  14. [22]

    Hellier, C., Harmer, S., & Beardmore, A. P. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 710

    2004

  15. [23]

    Hellier, C., Mukai, K., & Beardmore, A. P. 1997, MNRAS, 292, 397

    1997

  16. [24]

    A., Templeton, M., Terrell, D., et al

    Henden, A. A., Templeton, M., Terrell, D., et al. 2016, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2336

    2016

  17. [25]

    2002, A&A, 381, L41

    Ishioka, R., Uemura, M., Matsumoto, K., et al. 2002, A&A, 381, L41

    2002

  18. [26]

    C., & Mineshige, S

    Kim, S.-W., Wheeler, J. C., & Mineshige, S. 1992, ApJ, 384, 269

    1992

  19. [27]

    2018, 70, 78, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy073

    Kimura, M., Kato, T., Maehara, H., et al. 2018, 70, 78, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy073

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    R., Ricketts, M

    King, A. R., Ricketts, M. J., & Warwick, R. S. 1979, MNRAS, 187, 77

    1979

  21. [29]

    2011, 194, 28

    Knigge, C., Baraffe, I., & Patterson, J. 2011, 194, 28

    2011

  22. [30]

    Kunze, S., Speith, R., & Hessman, F. V. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 499

    2001

  23. [31]

    J., et al

    Landi, R., Bassani, L., Dean, A. J., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 630, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14086.x

    2009

  24. [32]

    Lubow, S. H. 1989, ApJ, 340, 1064, doi: 10.1086/167458

    1989 doi

  25. [33]

    1981, A&A, 104, L10

    Meyer, F., & Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 1981, A&A, 104, L10

    1981

  26. [34]

    1983, PASJ, 35, 377 —

    Mineshige, S., & Osaki, Y. 1983, PASJ, 35, 377 —. 1985, PASJ, 37, 1

    1983

  27. [35]

    D., & Roche, P

    Morales-Rueda, L., Still, M. D., & Roche, P. 1999, MNRAS, 306, 753

    1999

  28. [36]

    R., Kahn, S

    Mukai, K., Kinkhabwala, A., Peterson, J. R., Kahn, S. M., & Paerels, F. 2003, ApJL, 586, L77

    2003

  29. [37]

    2015, ApJL, 807, L30, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/807/2/L30

    Mukai, K., Rana, V., Bernardini, F., & de Martino, D. 2015, ApJL, 807, L30, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/807/2/L30

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    1972, ApJ, 175, 417, doi: 10.1086/151568

    Nauenberg, M. 1972, ApJ, 175, 417, doi: 10.1086/151568

    1972 doi

  31. [39]

    2002, PASJ, 54, 987

    Nogami, D., Kato, T., & Baba, H. 2002, PASJ, 54, 987

    2002

  32. [40]

    Patterson, J., & Raymond, J. C. 1985, ApJ, 292, 535

    1985

  33. [41]

    2024, MNRAS, 529, 1463, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae650

    Pei, S., Orio, M., & Zhang, X. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 1463, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae650

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    Pickering, E. C. 1901, ApJ, 13, 170

    1901

  35. [43]

    2003, A&A, 404, 301

    Ritter, H., & Kolb, U. 2003, A&A, 404, 301

    2003

  36. [44]

    R., Mason, K

    Rosen, S. R., Mason, K. O., & Cordova, F. A. 1988, MNRAS, 231, 549

    1988

  37. [45]

    2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Sako, S., Ohsawa, R., Takahashi, H., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10702, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, ed. C. J

    2018

  38. [46]

    Simard, & H

    Evans, L. Simard, & H. Takami, 107020J, doi: 10.1117/12.2310049

    doi

  39. [47]

    Stellingwerf, R. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 953

    1978

  40. [48]

    V., & Werner, K

    Suleimanov, V., Doroshenko, V., Ducci, L., Zhukov, G. V., & Werner, K. 2016, A&A, 591, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628301

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    2022, PASJ, 74, 460, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac007

    Tampo, Y., Nogami, D., Kato, T., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 460, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac007

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    2018, PASJ, 70, 109, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy111

    Tsujimoto, M., Morihana, K., Hayashi, T., & Kitaguchi, T. 2018, PASJ, 70, 109, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy111

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    U., & Schmitt, J

    Vrielmann, S., Ness, J. U., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2005, A&A, 439, 287, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053017

    2005 doi

  44. [52]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 1564, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2880

    Wada, Y., Yuasa, T., Nakazawa, K., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1564, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2880

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars

    Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars

    1995

  46. [54]

    Warner, B., & Woudt, P. A. 2002, in 261, The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, ed. B. T. G¨ ansicke, K. Beuermann, & K. Reinsch, 406

    2002

  47. [55]

    G., King, A

    Watson, M. G., King, A. R., & Osborne, J. 1985, MNRAS, 212, 917

    1985

  48. [56]

    2016, MNRAS, 459, 779, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw734

    Yuasa, T., Hayashi, T., & Ishida, M. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 779, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw734

    2016 doi

  49. [57]

    Zemko, P., Orio, M., Luna, G. J. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 476, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx851

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.