REVIEW 2 cited by
Some methods for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation in high-dimensions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
When devising a course of treatment for a patient, doctors often have little quantitative evidence on which to base their decisions, beyond their medical education and published clinical trials. Stanford Health Care alone has millions of electronic medical records (EMRs) that are only just recently being leveraged to inform better treatment recommendations. These data present a unique challenge because they are high-dimensional and observational. Our goal is to make personalized treatment recommendations based on the outcomes for past patients similar to a new patient. We propose and analyze three methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using observational data. Our methods perform well in simulations using a wide variety of treatment effect functions, and we present results of applying the two most promising methods to data from The SPRINT Data Analysis Challenge, from a large randomized trial of a treatment for high blood pressure.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Heterogeneous Causal Learning for Optimizing Aggregated Functions in User Growth
A softmax-weighted deep learning objective directly maximizes incremental value per incremental cost for user targeting, reportedly beating R-learner and Causal Forest by over 20% on an author-defined AUCC metric.
-
Deep Learning of Continuous and Structured Policies for Aggregated Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
A neural augmented Naive Bayes layer is proposed to rank subjects for treatments that combine continuous intensity and discrete assignment, but the causal estimator rests on an unjustified weighting identity.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.