Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Investigating vector-like leptons decaying into an electron and missing transverse energy in e$^{+}$ e$^{-}$ collisions with $\sqrt{s} = 500$ GeV at the ILC

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Simulated ILC data at 500 GeV with 1000 fb^-1 would exclude vector-like leptons up to about 100-180 GeV for small mass splittings, and across the whole studied range for a 100 GeV splitting, at a Yukawa coupling of 0.1.

desk verdict A plausible ILC sensitivity projection for lepton portal dark matter; the narrow-splitting exclusion is believable, though the missing DeltaM=5 plots and systematics need attention. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08143 v1 pith:ISPR77AP submitted 2024-11-12 hep-ex hep-ph

Y.Mahmoud , J.Kawamura , M.T. Hussein , H.Abdallah , S.Elgammal This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-exhep-ph
keywords energyvector-likecollisionsdarkleptonleptonsmassmatter
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Dark matter is invisible to detectors, but if it is produced inside a collider it can be inferred from missing transverse energy. In this model, a new heavy fermion called a vector-like lepton is produced in pairs from electron-positron collisions. Each vector-like lepton decays into a normal electron and a dark matter particle that flies away unseen, leaving a final state of two electrons plus missing energy. The authors generated such events with the WHIZARD event generator, showered them with PYTHIA, and sent them through a fast simulation of the proposed ILD detector at the International Linear Collider.

Against this signal they simulated the main Standard Model backgrounds: electron-positron pairs, W and Z boson pairs, and top quark pairs. After selecting events with two isolated electrons and large missing energy, they used the missing energy spectrum as the discriminating variable and computed expected 95% confidence limits with the CLs method. For a small mass difference of 5 GeV between the lepton and the dark matter, the projected exclusion covers masses below 100 GeV. For 10 GeV splitting, the limit rises to 180 GeV, and for a 100 GeV splitting the entire studied mass range up to 240 GeV is excluded.

Because the LHC cannot easily see this signal when the dark matter and the mediator are nearly degenerate, the paper argues that the ILC would be uniquely valuable. The results depend on the assumptions that the simulated backgrounds are complete and that the fast detector simulation is accurate.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Section 5 and the abstract state that with 1000 fb^-1 at sqrt(s)=500 GeV and lambda_L=0.1, the ILC would exclude vector-like lepton masses below 100 GeV for DeltaM=5 GeV, below 180 GeV for DeltaM=10 GeV, and the entire studied mass range for DeltaM=100 GeV, while the LHC cannot effectively probe DeltaM<=80 GeV. If true, the ILC is a uniquely powerful probe of quasi-degenerate lepton portal dark matter.

Load-bearing premise

The projected limits rest on the assumption that the Delphes fast simulation with the ILD card reproduces ILC detector response well enough for the soft electrons and missing energy in the DeltaM=5 GeV signal, and that Table 1's background list (Drell-Yan, WW, ZZ, tt) is complete. If a missing background or a degraded low-energy electron acceptance shifts the EmissT shape, the quoted mass exclusions could change materially.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a fast-simulation study of vector-like lepton (L) pair production at the ILC with sqrt(s)=500 GeV and 1000 fb^-1 in the lepton portal dark matter model, where the dark matter is a scalar chi and the L decays to an electron and chi. Signal and background samples are generated with WHIZARD, PYTHIA6, and Delphes with the ILD card. A cut-based event selection followed by a shape-based CLs analysis on missing transverse energy yields 95% CL expected exclusion limits on the vector-like lepton mass for mass splittings DeltaM=5, 10, and 100 GeV at Yukawa coupling lambda_L=0.1. The paper claims the ILC can exclude M_L below 100 GeV for DeltaM=5, below 180 GeV for DeltaM=10, and the entire studied mass range for DeltaM=100, thereby probing the quasi-degenerate region that the LHC cannot access.

Significance. If correct, the result would establish a unique role for the ILC in probing compressed lepton-portal dark matter scenarios, complementing LHC searches. The paper has strengths: the simulation chain is described with generator versions, the beam polarization and beamstrahlung are included, and the CLs procedure is cited. However, the analysis omits systematic uncertainties, presents an incomplete background list, and does not report signal efficiencies, so the projected limits cannot currently be taken at face value.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Table 2, Fig. 6a] The manuscript does not report signal acceptance or event yields after the final selection for any mass point. For the DeltaM=5 scenario, the electron from L->e chi has p* < 5 GeV in the L rest frame, and for M_L around 200 GeV the maximum lab-frame pT (from the boost of the L) is about 9.9 GeV, so the pT^e > 10 GeV cut of Table 2 removes essentially the entire signal; the paper never shows a DeltaM=5 kinematic distribution (Fig. 5 only covers DeltaM=10, 20, 100, and 199 at M_L=200). Since the DeltaM=5 exclusion in Fig. 6a is a central claim, the authors must provide the signal efficiency as a function of M_L and demonstrate that the exclusion is not driven by an empty or tiny signal template.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Table 1] The background simulation omits several processes that can yield two electrons plus large missing transverse energy at e+e- colliders: single-W production e+e- -> e nu W with W->e nu, radiative Bhabha scattering with the photon lost in the beam pipe, and two-photon processes. These backgrounds must be included or their neglect justified quantitatively, since they can contribute in the same EmissT region and affect the limit.
  3. [Sec. 5] No systematic uncertainties are incorporated in the limit-setting procedure. At 1000 fb^-1 the statistical uncertainties are small, so the 95% CL exclusion boundaries will be sensitive to background normalization uncertainties and detector response uncertainties such as energy scale and resolution. The authors should include nuisance parameters in the CLs calculation or, at a minimum, discuss the expected impact on the mass reach.
  4. [Sec. 5, Ref. [30]] The claim that the LHC cannot effectively probe DeltaM <= 80 GeV is based on Ref. [30], which is coauthored by one of the present authors. This comparison should be cross-checked against up-to-date LHC searches, for example the CMS and ATLAS vector-like lepton searches, to assess the uniqueness claim independently rather than relying on a self-referential paper.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1 vs Sec. 3.2] The two subsections report different WHIZARD versions (3.1.4 in Sec. 3.1 and 3.4.1 in Sec. 3.2); this is likely a typo and should be corrected.
  2. [References] The references contain several formatting errors: [5] and [6] are not correctly formatted, [15] exhibits a unicode issue, and [49] contains a stray 'PIG' in the title.
  3. [Sec. 4 and captions of Figs. 3 and 5] The captions of Figures 3 and 5 refer to 'the pre-selection cuts listed in table 2' but the figures are placed at the end of Section 4; consider clarifying which selection stage each figure corresponds to.
  4. [Table 2] In Table 2, the pre-selection and final selection columns are identical for the first three rows, which makes it difficult to see which cuts are applied at which stage; consider listing only the added final-selection cuts.
Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All free parameters are benchmark choices from the model of Ref. [30]; none are fitted to produce the limit. The paper introduces no new entities. The key unverified inputs are the completeness and fidelity of the simulated backgrounds and detector response.

free parameters (4)
  • Vector-like lepton mass M_L = 50 to 240 GeV (scanned)
    Model parameter scanned to produce the exclusion limit curve; not fitted to data.
  • Dark matter mass M_chi = M_L minus DeltaM for DeltaM=5, 10, 100 GeV
    Set from benchmark mass splittings chosen by the authors; determines signal kinematics.
  • Portal Yukawa coupling lambda_L = 0.1 for limits, 1.0 for cross-section comparison
    Chosen by hand; the paper calls lambda_L=0.1 the conservative case and does not scan it.
  • Mass splitting DeltaM = 5, 10, 100 GeV
    Benchmark scenarios selected by the authors to represent degenerate, semi-degenerate, and wide splittings.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The lepton portal DM model of Ref. [30], with scalar DM, vector-like doublet lepton L, unit branching ratio L to e chi, and no flavor mixing
    Used in Sec. 2 (Eq. 2.1); the model is taken from prior work by one of the authors and is not re-derived or tested.
  • domain assumption The SM backgrounds listed in Table 1 (DY, WW, ZZ, tt) are the dominant and complete set
    Sec. 3.2 lists only these processes; single W/Z, e-gamma, and gamma-gamma channels are not simulated, so any significant missing background changes the limits.
  • domain assumption Delphes with the ILD card faithfully approximates the ILC detector response
    All selection efficiencies and EmissT resolutions come from this fast simulation (Sec. 3.1); no comparison with a full Geant4 simulation is shown.
  • domain assumption The asymptotic approximation for the CLs statistic is valid in all EmissT bins
    Adopted from Ref. [55] without validation at low event counts; the high-EmissT tail may have very small expected yields.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating vector-like leptons decaying into an electron and missing transverse energy in e$^{+}$ e$^{-}$ collisions with $\sqrt{s} = 500$ GeV at the ILC." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ISPR77AP

@misc{pith2026241108143,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating vector-like leptons decaying into an electron and missing transverse energy in e$^+$ e$^-$ collisions with $\sqrts = 500$ GeV at the ILC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ISPR77AP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08143}
}
abstract

This analysis focuses on probing the lepton portal dark matter using Monte Carlo simulated samples from electron-positron collisions at the International Linear Collider (ILC) of 500 GeV center of mass energy with an integrated luminosity of 1000 fb$^{-1}$. The study examines a benchmark scenario where the dark matter is a scalar particle produced as a daughter particle of the vector-like lepton. The signal topology consists of missing transverse energy and dilepton. If no new physics is discovered,the study sets 95\% confidence level exclusion limits on the mass of vector-like leptons.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [30]

    Junichiro Kawamura, Shohei Okawa, Yuji Omura, Current status and muon g-2 explanation of lepton portal dark matter, JHEP 08 (2020) 042

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 [arXiv:1502.01589] [iNSPIRE-HEP]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. A&A 641, A6 (2020) arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  4. [3]

    2015, no

    Lage, C and Farrar, G, The bullet cluster is not a cosmological anomaly, JCAP, vol. 2015, no. 2, 038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/038

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/038 2015

  5. [4]

    Bertone, Gianfranco and Hooper, Dan and Si, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279-390 [arXiv:hep-ph/0404175] [iNSPIRE-HEP]

    arXiv 2005

  6. [5]

    CMS Collaboration, Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment - 2024, DOI: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13778

    arXiv 2024

  7. [6]

    Haley Jo seph, Searches for Dark Matter with the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC, 2023, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2846383

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    and Turner, Michael S., On the relic, cosmic abundance of stable, weakly interacting massive particles, Phys

    Scherrer, Robert J. and Turner, Michael S., On the relic, cosmic abundance of stable, weakly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 1585 [iNSPIRE-HEP]

    work page 1986

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Leptophilic Effective WIMPs,

    S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, “Leptophilic Effective WIMPs,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) no.1, 015011 [arXiv:1402.7358 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Lepton Portal Dark Matter,

    Y. Bai and J. Berger, “Lepton Portal Dark Matter,” JHEP08 (2014), 153 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)153 [arXiv:1402.6696 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Extra vectorlike matter and the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in low-energy supersymmetry

    S. P. Martin, “Extra vectorlike matter and the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in low-energy supersymmetry”, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 035004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.035004, arXiv:0910.2732

    2010 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Minimal vectorlike model in supersymmetric unification

    S. Zheng, “Minimal vectorlike model in supersymmetric unification”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 273, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7843-8, arXiv:1904.1014

    2020

  5. [12]

    Higgs mass and muon anomalous magnetic moment in supersymmetric models with vectorlike matters

    M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto, and N. Yokozaki, “Higgs mass and muon anomalous magnetic moment in supersymmetric models with vectorlike matters”, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 075017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.075017, arXiv:1108.3071

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    E6 inspired supersymmetric models with exact custodial symmetry

    R. Nevzorov, “E6 inspired supersymmetric models with exact custodial symmetry”, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015029,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.015029, arXiv:1205.5967

    2013 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Light vector-like fermions in a minimal SU(5) setup

    I. Dorˇsner, S. Fajfer, and I. Musta´c, “Light vector-like fermions in a minimal SU(5) setup”, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 115004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.115004,arXiv:1401.6870

    2014 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Searching for signatures of E6

    A. Joglekar and J. L. Rosner, “Searching for signatures of E6”, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017)015026, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.015026, arXiv:1607.06900

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bounds on the fermion-bulk masses in models with universal extra dimensions

    G.-Y. Huang, K. Kong, and S. C. Park, “Bounds on the fermion-bulk masses in models with universal extra dimensions”, JHEP 06 (2012) 099, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2012)099, arXiv:1204.0522

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    A vector-like fourth generation with a discrete – 12 – symmetry from Split-UED

    K. Kong, S. C. Park, and T. G. Rizzo, “A vector-like fourth generation with a discrete – 12 – symmetry from Split-UED”, JHEP 07 (2010) 059, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2010)059, arXiv:1004.4635

    2010 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Dark matter and vectorlike leptons from gauged lepton number

    P. Schwaller, T. M. P. Tait, and R. Vega-Morales, “Dark matter and vectorlike leptons from gauged lepton number”, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.035001, arXiv:1305.1108

    2013 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Vectorlike leptons as the tip of the dark matter iceberg

    J. Halverson, N. Orlofsky, and A. Pierce, “Vectorlike leptons as the tip of the dark matter iceberg”, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.015002, arXiv:1403.1592

    2014 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dark matter and collider studies in the left-right symmetric model with vectorlike leptons

    S. Bahrami et al., “Dark matter and collider studies in the left-right symmetric model with vectorlike leptons”, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 095024, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.095024, arXiv:1612.06334

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Mini review on vector-like leptonic dark matter, neutrino mass, and collider signatures

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, N. Sahoo, and N. Sahu, “Mini review on vector-like leptonic dark matter, neutrino mass, and collider signatures”, Front. Phys. 7 (2019) 80, doi:10.3389/fphy.2019.00080, arXiv:1812.06505

    2019

  15. [23]

    Vector-like leptons: Higgs decays and collider phenomenology

    A. Falkowski, D. M. Straub, and A. Vicente, “Vector-like leptons: Higgs decays and collider phenomenology”, JHEP 05 (2014) 092, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)092, arXiv:1312.5329

    2014 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Common origin for neutrino anarchy and charged hierarchies

    K. Agashe, T. Okui, and R. Sundrum, “Common origin for neutrino anarchy and charged hierarchies”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 101801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.101801, arXiv:0810.1277

    2009 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Leptons in composite MFV

    M. Redi, “Leptons in composite MFV”, JHEP 09 (2013) 060, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)060, arXiv:1306.1525

    2013 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Explanation of the muon g-2 anomaly with vectorlike leptons and its implications for Higgs decays

    R. Derm´ıˇsek and A. Raval, “Explanation of the muon g-2 anomaly with vectorlike leptons and its implications for Higgs decays”, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 013017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.013017, arXiv:1305.3522

    2013 arXiv

  19. [27]

    gµ − 2 from vector-like leptons in warped space

    E. Megıas, M. Quir´os, and L. Salas, “gµ − 2 from vector-like leptons in warped space”, JHEP 05 (2017) 016, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)016, arXiv:1701.05072

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Complete vectorlike fourth family and new U(1)′ for muon anomalies

    J. Kawamura, S. Raby, and A. Trautner, “Complete vectorlike fourth family and new U(1)′ for muon anomalies”, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 055030, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.055030, arXiv:1906.11297

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Model building from asymptotic safety with Higgs and flavor portals

    G. Hiller, C. Hormigos-Feliu, D. F. Litim, and T. Steudtner, “Model building from asymptotic safety with Higgs and flavor portals”, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 095023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.095023, arXiv:2008.08606

    2020 arXiv

  22. [31]

    W boson mass and muon g-2 in a lepton portal dark matter model,

    J. Kawamura, S. Okawa and Y. Omura, “W boson mass and muon g-2 in a lepton portal dark matter model,” Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) no.1, 015005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.015005 [arXiv:2204.07022 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Search for vector-like leptons in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for vector-like leptons in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 052003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.052003, arXiv:1905.10853

    2019 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Inclusive nonresonant multilepton probes of new phenomena at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Inclusive nonresonant multilepton probes of new phenomena at√s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 112007, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.112007, arXiv:2202.08676. – 13 –

    2022 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Search for pair-produced vector-like leptons in final states with third-generation leptons and at least three b quark jets in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for pair-produced vector-like leptons in final states with third-generation leptons and at least three b quark jets in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 137713, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137713, arXiv:2208.09700

    2023

  26. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for electroweak production of vector-like leptons in multiple tau and b-jets final states inpp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2024-008,2024 https://cds.cern.ch/record/2904563

    2024

  27. [36]

    Current status on pair-produced muon-philic vectorlike leptons in multilepton channels at the LHC,

    J. Kawamura and S. Shin, “Current status on pair-produced muon-philic vectorlike leptons in multilepton channels at the LHC,” JHEP11 (2023), 025 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)025 [arXiv:2308.07814 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Agapov et

    I. Agapov et. al., Future Circular Lepton Collider FCC-ee: Overview and Status. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.08310

    doi arXiv

  29. [38]

    Aicheler et.al., The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - Project Implementation Plan, DOI: https://e-publishing.cern.ch/index.php/CYRM/issue/view/68

    M. Aicheler et.al., The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - Project Implementation Plan, DOI: https://e-publishing.cern.ch/index.php/CYRM/issue/view/68

  30. [39]

    J. Brau, Y. Okada, N.Walker, arXiv:0712.1950 [physics.acc-ph]

    1950 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Djouadi et al, arXiv:0709.1893 [hep-ph]

    A. Djouadi et al, arXiv:0709.1893 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  32. [41]

    Phinney, N

    N. Phinney, N. Toge, N. Walker, arXiv:0712.2361 [physics.acc-ph]

    arXiv

  33. [42]

    Behnke et al., ArXiv e-prints (2007) arXiv:0712.2356 [physics.ins-det]

    T. Behnke et al., ArXiv e-prints (2007) arXiv:0712.2356 [physics.ins-det]

    2007 arXiv

  34. [43]

    W mass in a model with vectorlike leptons and U(1)’,

    J. Kawamura and S. Raby, “W mass in a model with vectorlike leptons and U(1)’,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.3, 035009 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.035009 [arXiv:2205.10480 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [44]

    High-precision measurement of theW boson mass with the CDF II detector,

    T. Aaltonen et al. [CDF], “High-precision measurement of theW boson mass with the CDF II detector,” Science 376 (2022) no.6589, 170-176 doi:10.1126/science.abk1781

    2022 doi

  36. [45]

    WHIZARD—simulating multi-particle processes at LHC and ILC

    Wolfgang Kilian, Thorsten Ohl, and Jurgen Reuter. WHIZARD—simulating multi-particle processes at LHC and ILC. The European Physical Journal C, 71(9), Sep 2011

    2011

  37. [46]

    T. Ohl. O’Mega & WHIZARD: Monte Carlo event generator generation for future colliders. DOI:10.1063/1.1394396

    doi

  38. [47]

    Schulte, Beam-beam simulations with Guinea-Pig, eConf C 980914, 127 (1998)

    D. Schulte, Beam-beam simulations with Guinea-Pig, eConf C 980914, 127 (1998)

    1998

  39. [48]

    Schulte, Beam-beam simulations with GUINEA-PIG, CERN-PS-99-014-LP

    D. Schulte, Beam-beam simulations with GUINEA-PIG, CERN-PS-99-014-LP

  40. [49]

    Schulte, M

    D. Schulte, M. Alabau, P. Bambade, O. Dadoun, G. Le Meur, C. Rimbault and F. Touze, GUINEA PIG++ : An Upgraded Version of the Linear Collider Beam Beam Interaction Simulation Code GUINEA PIG, Conf. Proc. C 070625, 2728 (2007)

    2007

  41. [50]

    Sjostrand, S

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual [arXiv:hep-ph/0603175]

    arXiv

  42. [51]

    de Favereau, C

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lema^ıtre, A. Mertens, M.Selvaggi, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic col- lider experiment, JHEP 1402 (2014)

    2014

  43. [52]

    Ferro, Cristina, B-tagging in CMS, EPJ Web of Conferences 28 12055 (2012), DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20122812055

    2012

  44. [53]

    A. L. Read, Presentation of search results: the CLs technique, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part.Phys. 28 (2002) 2693,doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

    2002 doi

  45. [54]

    T. Junk, Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, – 14 – Detectors and Associated Equipment,Volume 434, Issues 2–3, 1999, Pages 435-443, ISSN 0168-9002...

    1999 doi

  46. [55]

    Cowan et al., Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur

    G. Cowan et al., Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011), p. 1554, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0, arXiv: 1007.1727 [physics.data-an], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2501. – 15 –

    2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.