Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A User's Guide to Calibrating Robotics Simulators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.08985 v1 pith:ITDIFY2M submitted 2020-11-17 cs.LG cs.RO

classification cs.LGcs.RO
keywords algorithmsanalysisdifferentmodelsrealroboticssim-to-realsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Simulators are a critical component of modern robotics research. Strategies for both perception and decision making can be studied in simulation first before deployed to real world systems, saving on time and costs. Despite significant progress on the development of sim-to-real algorithms, the analysis of different methods is still conducted in an ad-hoc manner, without a consistent set of tests and metrics for comparison. This paper fills this gap and proposes a set of benchmarks and a framework for the study of various algorithms aimed to transfer models and policies learnt in simulation to the real world. We conduct experiments on a wide range of well known simulated environments to characterize and offer insights into the performance of different algorithms. Our analysis can be useful for practitioners working in this area and can help make informed choices about the behavior and main properties of sim-to-real algorithms. We open-source the benchmark, training data, and trained models, which can be found at https://github.com/NVlabs/sim-parameter-estimation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GAUGE: A Measurement-Grounded Benchmark for Physical Fidelity in Simulation Engines and Video World Models

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new real-world-grounded benchmark shows that physics engines and video world models each fail differently, with video models often fitting the shape of a physical law while recovering wrong parameters.

Pith tools