The global estimate for regular axially-symmetric solutions to the Navier Stokes equations coupled with the heat conduction

Wies{\l}aw J. Grygierzec; Wojciech M. Zaj\k{a}czkowski

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 18 references

The global estimate for regular axially-symmetric solutions to the Navier Stokes equations coupled with the heat conduction

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that smooth axially-symmetric solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations coupled with heat conduction satisfy a global a priori bound on weighted vorticity, provided the swirl component's $L^d/L^\infty$ ratio stays bounded…

desk verdict A technically substantial conditional global estimate for axisymmetric NSE with heat conduction, but the headline theorem rests on an explicitly unproved non-degeneracy assumption that the provided motivation does not justify. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18302 v1 pith:ITKEUIR2 submitted 2025-01-30 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Wies{l}aw J. Grygierzec , Wojciech M. Zajączkowski This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35A0135B0135B6535Q3076D0376D05

keywords Navier-Stokesequationsheatconductionaxially-symmetricsolutionsglobalaprioriestimatecylindricaldomainweightedvorticitymodifiedstreamfunctionswirl

topics Navier-Stokes Regularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to prove a global a priori estimate for smooth axially-symmetric solutions of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations coupled with a heat-conduction equation in a finite cylinder, with the heat flux vanishing on the boundary. The estimate controls the weighted vorticity $X(t)=\|\Phi\|_{V(\Omega_t)}+\|\Gamma\|_{V(\Omega_t)}$, built from $\Phi=\omega_r/r$ and $\Gamma=\omega_\varphi/r$, by a function of the data and forcing alone. If the estimate holds, the same argument yields global $W^{4,2}_2$ bounds on velocity and temperature, so local regular solutions can be extended whenever the bound remains valid. The price is an explicit structural condition on the swirl: the ratio $|v_\varphi|_{d,\infty,\Omega_t}/|v_\varphi|_{\infty,\Omega_t}$ must stay at least a fixed positive constant $c_0$ for some $d\ge3$. The paper states plainly that this condition is motivated but not proved; the body of the work is the long estimate chain that closes only under it.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the reduced vorticity pair $(\Phi,\Gamma)=(\omega_r/r,\omega_\varphi/r)$ together with the modified stream function $\psi_1=\psi/r$. The vorticity equations for $\Phi$ and $\Gamma$ admit energy inequalities in which the only nonlinear term requiring control is the integral $\int_{\Omega_t}(v_\varphi/r)\Phi\Gamma$; this term is controlled by the Hardy interpolation inequality of Lemma 2.9, which uses the $L^d$-norm of $v_\varphi$ and produces a power of $\|\Phi\|_{V}$ strictly less than one. Elliptic estimates on $\psi_1$ turn control of $\Gamma$ into control of the velocity, and energy estimates for the swirl $u=rv_\varphi$ control the remaining derivatives. The final bootstrap closes because the total exponent, $3\varepsilon_0+2-\theta_0/2$, is smaller than 2, leaving an inequality of the form $X^2\le C(X^p+1)$ with $p<2$.

What would settle it

Track the two quantities $q(t)=|v_\varphi|_{d,\infty,\Omega_t}/|v_\varphi|_{\infty,\Omega_t}$ and $X(t)=\|\Phi\|_{V(\Omega_t)}+\|\Gamma\|_{V(\Omega_t)}$ for any smooth axially-symmetric solution with heat conduction in the cylinder. If a solution can be found, analytically or numerically, in which $q(t)$ tends to $0$ while $X(t)$ stays bounded away from a finite limit, the hypothesis of Theorem 1.1 fails and the claimed closing mechanism does not operate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: if $(v,\theta)$ is a smooth solution of (1.1)-(1.4), the constants $D_0,\dots,D_{12},B_1$ are finite, and the swirl ratio condition from Assumption 3 holds, then there is an increasing positive function $\varphi$ such that $X(t)\le\varphi(D_1,\dots,D_{12},B_1)$ for every $t$. From this bound, Theorem 1.3 derives global $W^{4,2}_2(\Omega_t)$ estimates for $v$ and $\theta$, completing the route from a local regular solution to a global one. The proof works by finding reductions of the nonlinearity: the quantities $\Phi=\omega_r/r$ and $\Gamma=\omega_\varphi/r$ satisfy equations whose energy estimates, combined with the maximum principle for the swirl $u=rv_\varphi$ and elliptic estimates for the modified stream function $\psi_1=\psi/r$, make the exponent on the right-hand side of the $X$-inequality strictly less than 2, so the bootstrap closes instead of running away.

Load-bearing premise

The entire estimate closes only under the assumption that the swirl component's $L^d$-in-time norm stays at least a fixed positive fraction of its $L^\infty$ norm for all time; the paper says explicitly that this condition is not proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the estimate is correct, any local regular solution of the coupled system can be extended in time as long as the weighted vorticity bound holds, ruling out blow-up in that regime.
The bound upgrades to global $W^{4,2}_2$ estimates for the velocity and temperature, so the solution and its derivatives up to fourth order are controlled by data and forcing.
The result applies to flows with nonzero swirl coupled to heat conduction, going beyond swirl-free axisymmetric settings by absorbing the swirl through the ratio condition and the maximum principle for $u=rv_\varphi$.
The estimates are a priori and quantitative: all constants are explicit functions of the data $D_0,\dots,D_{12},B_1$, so the theorem gives a concrete continuation criterion for numerical or analytic study.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the unproved ratio condition is the only real obstruction; if a future argument establishes it from the equations, the same chain would yield unconditional global regularity for this class of solutions.
Editorial inference: the Hölder-continuity motivation in Remark 1.2 produces a positive set where $|v_\varphi|$ is close to its maximum, but the measure of that set may shrink in time, so it does not deliver the uniform constant $c_0$ the theorem needs.
Editorial inference: the theorem suggests a testable continuation criterion — monitor $q(t)=|v_\varphi|_{d,\infty,\Omega_t}/|v_\varphi|_{\infty,\Omega_t}$ and the weighted vorticity $X(t)$; loss of the lower bound on $q$ is the only identified path to breakdown.
Editorial inference: one could search for a counterexample by constructing axisymmetric solutions with heat coupling in which $q(t)$ decays to zero while $X(t)$ grows; success would show the condition is not merely unproved but necessary.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Punchline: this is a technically substantial conditional global estimate for axisymmetric Navier-Stokes coupled with heat conduction, but the headline theorem rests on an explicitly unproved non-degeneracy assumption, and the provided motivation does not supply the uniform constant the proof needs. What is new: the coupled system (1.1)-(1.4) with these cylinder boundary conditions has not been treated before, and the paper extends the authors' Phi, Gamma and modified stream function program to that setting. The paper is honest: it explicitly states at the end of Section 6 that (6.20) is not proved. The lengthy bootstrap is a real technical effort, and the H2/H3 estimates for the modified stream function and the swirl estimates look plausible, so the paper deserves a serious referee. The central flaw: Theorem 1.1 closes only through Lemma 6.3, whose inequality (6.21) depends on condition (6.20), |v_phi|_{s,infinity}/|v_phi|_{infinity} >= c0 plus 1/|v_phi|_{infinity} <= c*. The paper admits (6.20) is not proved. The motivation in Remark 1.2 uses Holder continuity to get a positive superlevel set, but its measure can shrink without a uniform lower bound, so it does not guarantee a time-uniform c0. The stress-test note correctly observes that replacing (6.20) with the L-infinity bound introduces an extra X^{3*epsilon/4} factor and the closing exponent fails. Thus the result is conditional on an unproved hypothesis; it is not a complete proof. There are also many typos and small notational inconsistencies, e.g., d>3 versus d>=3 and garbled constant definitions, that a revision should clean up. Who this is for: specialists in axisymmetric Navier-Stokes regularity, particularly followers of the Zajaczkowski school, will find the conditional estimates and technical lemmas worth studying. The paper should be sent to peer review, but the authors must either prove (6.20) for some class of solutions or restate the main theorem explicitly as conditional on an open assumption. I would not cite it as a proven global regularity result in the next year, but I would engage with the conditional estimates.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies axially symmetric solutions of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations coupled to a heat equation in a bounded cylinder, with mixed boundary conditions. Its main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts a global a priori estimate for X(t)=‖Φ‖_{V(Ω_t)}+‖Γ‖_{V(Ω_t)} under the assumption that the ratio |v_φ|_{d,∞,Ω_t}/|v_φ|_{∞,Ω_t} stays bounded below by a positive constant c0 for d≥3. Theorem 1.3 then derives W^{4,2}_2 estimates and a criterion for continuing local regular solutions. The proof combines weighted elliptic estimates for the modified stream function, energy estimates for Φ and Γ, and estimates for the swirl u=rv_φ. The decisive closing step is Lemma 6.3, which uses the non-degeneracy condition (6.20). The paper explicitly notes that (6.20) is not proved.

Significance. If Theorem 1.1 were unconditional, it would represent a substantial advance in the regularity theory of axisymmetric heat-conducting flows, extending the authors' previous work on Navier-Stokes equations and providing global W^{4,2}_2 bounds from the weighted vorticity quantity X. The manuscript is technically rich: it contains careful weighted Hardy and interpolation arguments, elliptic estimates for ψ_1, maximum-principle estimates for θ and u, and a self-contained anisotropic regularity bootstrap in Section 7. However, the advertised estimate is not in terms of data alone: the constants c0 and c* in Assumption 3/(6.20) depend on the solution, and the justification offered in Remark 1.2 does not yield a uniform positive lower bound. The novelty is therefore conditional on an unverified hypothesis.

major comments (3)

[Section 6, Lemma 6.3, Eq. (6.20)] The global estimate closes only through (6.20), which the paper admits is unproved. In the final paragraph of Section 6 the authors write: "This is a motivation for (6.20). However, (6.20) is not proved." This is load-bearing: (6.21) defines D12 using c0, and D12 enters the right-hand side of (1.26) and (1.32). Moreover, the condition is not a removable artefact. If one instead estimates |v_φ|_{d,∞} ≤ |v_φ|_{∞} and uses Lemma 6.2, then (1.27) contains an additional factor X^{3ε/4}; the closing condition 3ε/4 < θ0/2 is incompatible with θ0=(1-3/d)ε1-(3/d)ε2>0 for d>3 and ε=ε1+ε2. Thus the proof cannot be completed without (6.20), and the paper currently supplies neither a proof nor a verification of this condition for actual solutions.
[Remark 1.2] The proposed justification of Assumption 3 is insufficient. For f with |f|_{∞,Ω}=1 and f∈C^{α,α/2}(Ω_t), the set {f≥1-ε} may have arbitrarily small measure; the C^{α,α/2} modulus alone does not control |A| from below unless the Hölder seminorm is bounded. The assertion that |A| can be chosen independent of t is not established; as t varies the superlevel set can move and shrink, so sup_t |f|_{d,Ω} need not be bounded below by a positive constant. A uniform-in-time lower bound on |v_φ|_{d,∞}/|v_φ|_{∞} therefore requires a separate argument, which is absent.
[Theorem 1.1 and Lemma 4.1] The statement d≥3 in Assumption 3 is inconsistent with the interpolation used later. In Lemma 4.1 the exponent θ0=(1-3/d)ε1-(3/d)ε2 must be positive and 1+ε2/ε1<d/3; both require d>3. For d=3, θ0=-ε2<0 and d/3=1, so the conditions cannot be satisfied. The theorem should state d>3, and all cross-references involving d should be checked accordingly.

minor comments (3)

[Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors and unprocessed LaTeX tokens, e.g., "Wies/suppress law" in the author line, "This meas that" on page 5, "Multiplpy", and "greaterorequalslant" in Theorem 1.1; these should be corrected in a careful revision.
[Lemma 6.3] Equation-number references in Lemma 6.3 need fixing: the estimate quoted as (6.11) for (6.24) appears to refer to Lemma 6.2/(6.17), and the reader cannot verify (6.25) from the displayed equations without additional computation.
[Section 7] The proof of Theorem 1.3 is only a sketch at the interpolation step used to eliminate ‖θ‖_{W^{1,1/2}_{10/3}(Ω_t)} between (7.25) and (7.26); the relevant interpolation inequality should be stated or cited precisely.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the conditional estimate is not forced by its own inputs; the unproved ratio condition (6.20) is an extra hypothesis, not a hidden re-statement of the conclusion.

full rationale

The central estimate (1.26) is derived by combining Lemmas 4.1, 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3. The only place where an assumption about the solution enters beyond the declared data is Lemma 6.3, where (6.21) is obtained under the non-degeneracy condition (6.20). Theorem 1.1 makes exactly this condition an explicit hypothesis, so the argument is conditional rather than circular: the ratio lower bound |v_phi|_{s,infinity,Omega_t}/|v_phi|_{infinity,Omega_t} >= c0 is not derived from, nor equivalent to, the conclusion X(t) <= phi(D1,...,D12,B1). The paper itself flags the status of this condition at the end of Section 6: "This is a motivation for (6.20). However, (6.20) is not proved." That is a serious completeness gap, but it is a missing hypothesis, not a reduction of the output to the input. The motivational Remark 1.2 also does not establish a uniform positive constant, since a Holder function can have arbitrarily small superlevel sets unless the Holder norm is controlled; again, this is a correctness issue, not circularity. The self-references in Lemmas 3.1 ([NZ]), 3.2 ([Z1]), and 5.1 ([OZ]) are accompanied by proofs in the present manuscript, so the derivation does not rest on unverified prior work. No estimate in the chain is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction. Consequently, no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central estimate rests on an unproved non-degeneracy assumption on the swirl, the constant c0, which the paper explicitly says is not proved. All other inputs are standard inequalities, elliptic estimates from the authors' prior work, and regularity assumptions on the solution.

free parameters (2)

c0
Assumed positive lower bound for |v_φ|_{d,∞,Ω_t}/|v_φ|_{∞,Ω_t} in Assumption 3. The paper admits (6.20) is not proved; the Hölder-regularity motivation in Remark 1.2 does not yield a uniform positive constant. The final bound depends on c0 through D12.
Interpolation exponents ε0, ε1, ε2 = Arbitrarily small positive constants satisfying θ0 = (1-3/d)ε1 - (3/d)ε2 > 0 and related constraints
Introduced ad hoc in Lemma 4.1 and Remark 4.3 to close the bootstrap with exponent 3ε0 + 2 - θ0/2 < 2. They are proof parameters, not data, but the central claim depends on their existence.

assumptions (5)

standard math Standard Sobolev, Hardy, and interpolation inequalities (Lemmas 2.7-2.9)
Used throughout the estimate chain; cited from [BIN].
domain assumption Liu-Wang expansions (1.20)-(1.24) hold for sufficiently regular v, ψ
Requires v,ψ ∈ W^{3,3/2}_2(Ω_T); invoked in Lemmas 3.1-3.3 and Section 5 for boundary regularity near the axis.
domain assumption Existence of a sufficiently regular solution and the boundary conditions (1.3)
The theorems are a priori estimates for smooth solutions; local existence is asserted in Lemma 7.1.
domain assumption g ≥ 0 and θ(0) ≥ θ* for the maximum principle
Used in Lemmas 2.1-2.2 to get two-sided bounds on θ.
ad hoc to paper Assumption 3: |v_φ|_{d,∞,Ω_t}/|v_φ|_{∞,Ω_t} ≥ c0 > 0
Unproved; the paper states at the end of Section 6 that (6.20) is not proved. Needed for Lemma 6.3 and the final bound (1.30).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The global estimate for regular axially-symmetric solutions to the Navier Stokes equations coupled with the heat conduction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ITKEUIR2

@misc{pith2026250118302,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The global estimate for regular axially-symmetric solutions to the Navier Stokes equations coupled with the heat conduction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ITKEUIR2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18302}
}

abstract

The axially-symmetric solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations coupled with the heat conduction are considered. in a bounded cylinder $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^3$. We assume that $v_r, v_{\varphi}, \omega_{\varphi}$ vanish on the lateral part $S_1$ of the boundary $\partial \Omega$ and $v_z, \omega_{\varphi}, \partial_z v_{\varphi}$ vanish on the top and bottom of the cylinder, where we used standard cylindrical coordinates and $\omega=\text{rot} v$ is the vorticity of the fluid. Moreover, vanishing of the heat flux through the boundary is imposed. Assuming existence of a sufficiently regular solution we derive a global a priori estimate in terms of data. The estimate is such that a global regular solutions can be proved. We prove the estimate because some reduction of nonlinearity are found.Moreover, deriving the global estimate for a local solution implies a possibility of its extension in time as long as the estimate holds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[1]

Besov, O.V.; Il'in, V.P.; Nikolskii, S.M.: Integral Representations of Functions and Imbedding Theorems, Nauka, Moscow 1975 (in Russian); English transl. vol. I. Scripta Series in Mathematics. V.H. Winston, New York (1978)

work page 1978
[2]

AN SSSR, Ser

Bugrov, Ya.S.: Function spaces with mixed norm, Izv. AN SSSR, Ser. Mat. 35 (1971), 1137--1158 (in Russian); English transl.: Math. USSR -- Izv., 5 (1971), 1145--1167

work page 1971
[3]

Pure Appl

Caffarelli, L.; Kohn, R.V.; Nirenberg, L.: Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 35 (1982), 771--831

work page 1982
[4]

Chen, H.; Fang, D.; Zhang, T.: Regularity of 3d axisymmetric Navier-Stokes equations, Disc. Cont. Dyn. Syst. 37 (4) (2017), 1923--1939

work page 2017
[5]

Golovkin, K.K.: On equivalent norms for fractional spaces, Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov 66 (1962), 364--383 (in Russian); English transl.: Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 81 (2) (1969), 257--280

1962
[6]

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A.: Unique global solvability of the three-dimensional Cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations in the presence of axial symmetry. Zap. Naučn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI), 7: 155–177, 1968. English transl., Sem. Math. V.A. Steklov Math. Inst. Leningrad, 7:70–79, 1970

work page 1968
[7]

Kreml, O.; Pokorny, M.: A regularity criterion for the angular velocity component in axisymmetric Navier-Stokes equations, Electronic J. Diff. Eq. vol 2007 (2007), No. 08, pp.1--10

work page 2007
[8]

Liu, J.G.; Wang, W.C.: Characterization and regularity for axisymmetric solenoidal vector fields with application to Navier-Stokes equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41 (2009), 1825--1850

work page 2009

Show all 18 references

[9]

Maremonti, P.; Solonnikov, V.A.: On the estimates of solutions of evolution Stokes problem in anisotropic Sobolev spaces with mixed norm, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. LOMI 223 (1994), 124--150

1994
[10]

Nowakowski, B.; Zaj a czkowski, W.M.: On weighted estimates for the stream function of axially symmetric solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations in a bounded cylinder, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2210.15729. Appl. Math. 50.2 (2023), 123--148, doi: 10.4064/am2488-1-2024

2023 doi arXiv
[11]

Nowakowski, B,; Zaj a czkowski, W.M.: Global regular axially-symmetric solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations with small swirl, J. Math. Fluid Mech. (2023), 25:73

2023
[12]

Neustupa, J.; Pokorny, M.: An interior regularity criterion for an axially symmetric suitable weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations, J. Math. Fluid Mech. 2 (2000), 381--399

2000
[13]

Bohemica 126 (2001), 469--481

Neustupa, J.; Pokorny, M.: Axisymmetric flow of Navier-Stokes fluid in the whole space with non-zero angular velocity component, Math. Bohemica 126 (2001), 469--481

2001
[14]

S.; Palasek, S.: Quantitative control of solutions to the axisymmetric Navier-Stokes equations in terms of the weak L^3 norm, Ann

O\.za\'nski, W. S.; Palasek, S.: Quantitative control of solutions to the axisymmetric Navier-Stokes equations in terms of the weak L^3 norm, Ann. PDE 9:15 (2023), 1--52

2023
[15]

Triebel, H.: Interpolation Theory, Functions Spaces, Differential Operators, North-Holand, Amsterdam (1978)

1978
[16]

Part 1, Mathematics 2023, 11(23), 4731, https//doi.org/10.3390/math11234731; also available at arXiv.2304.00856

Zaj a czkowski, W.M.: Global regular axially symmetric solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Part 1, Mathematics 2023, 11(23), 4731, https//doi.org/10.3390/math11234731; also available at arXiv.2304.00856

2023 arXiv
[17]

Part 2, Mathematics 2024, 12(2), 263, https//doi.org/10.3390/math12020263

Zaj a czkowski, W.M.: Global regular axially symmetric solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Part 2, Mathematics 2024, 12(2), 263, https//doi.org/10.3390/math12020263

2024 doi
[18]

thebibliography document

O\.za\'nski, W.S.; Zaj a czkowski W.M.: On the regularity of axially symmetric solutions to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equationsin a cylinder. thebibliography document

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Besov, O.V.; Il'in, V.P.; Nikolskii, S.M.: Integral Representations of Functions and Imbedding Theorems, Nauka, Moscow 1975 (in Russian); English transl. vol. I. Scripta Series in Mathematics. V.H. Winston, New York (1978)

work page 1978

[2] [2]

AN SSSR, Ser

Bugrov, Ya.S.: Function spaces with mixed norm, Izv. AN SSSR, Ser. Mat. 35 (1971), 1137--1158 (in Russian); English transl.: Math. USSR -- Izv., 5 (1971), 1145--1167

work page 1971

[3] [3]

Pure Appl

Caffarelli, L.; Kohn, R.V.; Nirenberg, L.: Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 35 (1982), 771--831

work page 1982

[4] [4]

Chen, H.; Fang, D.; Zhang, T.: Regularity of 3d axisymmetric Navier-Stokes equations, Disc. Cont. Dyn. Syst. 37 (4) (2017), 1923--1939

work page 2017

[5] [5]

Golovkin, K.K.: On equivalent norms for fractional spaces, Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov 66 (1962), 364--383 (in Russian); English transl.: Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 81 (2) (1969), 257--280

1962

[6] [6]

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A.: Unique global solvability of the three-dimensional Cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations in the presence of axial symmetry. Zap. Naučn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI), 7: 155–177, 1968. English transl., Sem. Math. V.A. Steklov Math. Inst. Leningrad, 7:70–79, 1970

work page 1968

[7] [7]

Kreml, O.; Pokorny, M.: A regularity criterion for the angular velocity component in axisymmetric Navier-Stokes equations, Electronic J. Diff. Eq. vol 2007 (2007), No. 08, pp.1--10

work page 2007

[8] [8]

Liu, J.G.; Wang, W.C.: Characterization and regularity for axisymmetric solenoidal vector fields with application to Navier-Stokes equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41 (2009), 1825--1850

work page 2009