Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 201 references

Status of the W boson mass and the future of the electroweak fit in the next decades

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The W boson mass now matches the Standard Model, and the paper argues this marks the twilight of model-independent electroweak discovery at the LHC.

desk verdict A solid review with a genuinely new preliminary mW combination and a provocative 'twilight' argument that is conditional on treating CDF as an outlier. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01887 v1 pith:ITV2WP6M submitted 2025-06-02 hep-ph hep-ex

Giuseppe Bozzi , Matthias Schott This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords WbosonmassStandardModelelectroweakfithadroncolliderprecisionmeasurementsCDFanomalyglobaleffectivefieldtheoryconstraintsLHCprospects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper assembles the current state of W boson mass measurements from LEP, the Tevatron, and the LHC and argues that the field has reached a pivotal point: a preliminary combination of the most recent D0, LHCb, ATLAS, and CMS values gives $m_W = 80361 \pm 8$ MeV, in agreement with the Standard Model expectation of $80354 \pm 6$ MeV. The only measurement that breaks this pattern is the CDF value of $80433 \pm 9$ MeV, which is in $3.6\sigma$ tension with other hadron-collider results and is excluded from the average. On this basis the paper concludes that the global electroweak fit is nearing its twilight as a model-independent discovery tool: any future LHC measurement of $m_W$, $m_{\rm top}$, or $\sin^2\theta_{\rm eff}$ that deviates significantly from the Standard Model would also be in tension with the existing world average. The remaining role for precision electroweak measurements, the paper argues, lies in constraining new physics indirectly through effective field theory, and in the revived fit that would come with future electron-positron colliders.

What carries the argument

Two linked pieces of machinery carry the argument. The first is the master relation $m_W^2(1-m_W^2/m_Z^2)=\pi\alpha/(\sqrt{2}G_F)(1+\Delta r)$, which ties the W mass to the well-measured $Z$ mass, Fermi constant, and fine-structure constant through the radiative-correction term $\Delta r$; an iterative solution of this relation, with $\Delta r$ computed to high loop order, turns any measurement of $m_W$ into a global test of the electroweak sector. The second is the template-fitting and global-fit apparatus that converts hadron-collider measurements into a single number: calibrating lepton momentum and energy scales on $Z$ and $J/\psi$ events, modelling Drell-Yan production with resummed QCD and parton distribution functions (PDFs), and then combining experiments after extrapolating them to a common PDF set such as CT18. The compatibility study behind that extrapolation is what identifies CDF as the lone outlier, and the global fit is what converts the resulting world average into the statement that no $5\sigma$ deviation can appear without a matching tension to existing data.

What would settle it

A future high-precision measurement of $m_W$—or a full reanalysis of the CDF data—that reproduces the CDF central value of 80433 MeV would move the world average upward, removing the agreement with the SM expectation of $80354 \pm 6$ MeV and restoring the fit as a discovery tool.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that precision electroweak tests at the LHC have moved from discovery mode to consistency-check mode. Using a compatibility study that extrapolates D0, CDF, LHCb, and ATLAS measurements to a common PDF and modelling framework, the paper finds that CDF disagrees with the Standard Model at $4.6\sigma$ and with all other hadron-collider measurements at $3.6\sigma$; a combination of LHCb, D0, and ATLAS gives $80369 \pm 13$ MeV, and adding LEP gives $80370 \pm 12$ MeV. The paper's own preliminary combination of the most recent CMS, ATLAS, LHCb, and D0 results, using a best-linear-unbiased-estimate combination with approximate correlations for profiled PDF uncertainties, yields $m_W^{\rm Average} = 80361 \pm 8$ MeV, matching the SM expectation. The paper then projects the tension between any hypothetical future measurement and both the Standard Model and the current world average, for $m_W$, $m_Z$, $\sin^2\theta_{\rm eff}$, and $m_{\rm top}$, and argues that a future measurement reaching a $5\sigma$ deviation from the SM would necessarily show $2$--$3\sigma$ tension with existing averages, leaving no room for a clean model-independent discovery. The constructive conclusion is that the fit's future lies in EFT constraints, where a 10 MeV measurement of $m_W$ already bounds the Wilson coefficient $C_{\Phi WB}$ below about $0.0025/{\rm TeV}^2$ and thereby implies a new-physics scale above roughly 20 TeV for order-one coefficients.

Load-bearing premise

The twilight conclusion depends on treating the CDF measurement of $80433 \pm 9$ MeV as an outlier; if that measurement is correct, the world average would move upward, the Standard Model agreement would disappear, and the electroweak fit would become a discovery tool again.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A future LHC measurement of $m_W$, $m_{\rm top}$, or $\sin^2\theta_{\rm eff}$ that reaches $5\sigma$ away from the Standard Model would, under current world-average constraints, necessarily sit $2$--$3\sigma$ away from existing measurements, so it would read as a consistency problem rather than a clean discovery.
  • The W boson mass becomes an EFT probe rather than a discovery observable: with 10 MeV precision, $m_W$ alone bounds $C_{\Phi WB}$ to about $0.0025/{\rm TeV}^2$, and the implied new-physics scale for order-one Wilson coefficients is about 20 TeV.
  • Planned lepton colliders such as FCC-ee or CEPC, with projected uncertainties of $\Delta m_W<0.3$ MeV and $\Delta m_Z<0.1$ MeV, would restore the electroweak fit as a discovery tool only if theoretical uncertainties in $\Delta r$ and PDFs are reduced to match.
  • The paper's proposed mandatory consistency tests—separate fits in lepton charge, pseudo-rapidity, pile-up regime, decay channel, and $p_T$- versus $m_T$-based templates—would make future $m_W$ results robust enough to combine into a world average.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if CDF's value is correct rather than an outlier, the twilight scenario reverses: the world average would shift upward, the Standard Model agreement would disappear, and the electroweak fit would again become a discovery tool; the paper's own projection depends on excluding CDF.
  • Editorial inference: the same compatibility logic could be applied to the top-quark mass and $\sin^2\theta_{\rm eff}$, where the fit expectation and direct measurements already differ at the 1--2$\sigma$ level; a future precise measurement could sharpen either an emerging tension or the twilight claim.
  • Editorial inference: the EFT reinterpretation suggests a testable program: if the upcoming HL-LHC $m_W$ measurement reaches 5--6 MeV uncertainty, the combination of $m_W$ with $m_Z$ and $\sin^2\theta_{\rm eff}$ in a global EFT fit should yield correlated constraints on $C_{\Phi WB}$, $C_{\Phi D}$, and $C_{\Phi l}$ that are stronger than any single observable alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reviews the current status of W boson mass measurements at LEP, Tevatron, and LHC, together with the perturbative and non-perturbative theory ingredients entering the predictions. It presents a preliminary combination of the most recent D0, LHCb, ATLAS, and CMS measurements (excluding CDF), yielding mW = 80361 ± 8 MeV in agreement with the SM expectation of 80354 ± 6 MeV, and uses this as the "current world average" to project the future sensitivity of the electroweak fit. The main claim is that the model-independent discovery potential of precision electroweak tests may be nearing its twilight: a future LHC measurement of mW, mtop, or sin²θeff that is significantly discrepant from the SM would also be in tension with the existing world average. The paper closes with a discussion of EFT-based indirect searches and the role of future e+e- colliders.

Significance. If the central assumption holds, this is a timely and valuable synthesis: it collects the experimental and theoretical state of the art, exposes the key systematics (PDFs, QED, pT(W) modelling), and makes a sharp, falsifiable projection about the future of electroweak precision tests. Strengths include the transparent treatment of the template and profile-likelihood methods, the explicit caveats attached to the preliminary combination, and the clear Figure 6 that can be reproduced from Table 4. The twilight thesis is important for the community because it reframes the role of the HL-LHC electroweak programme. However, the quantitative argument is not self-contained: the projection inherits the paper's own CDF-excluding world average and hand-picked correlations, so the significance of the result currently rests on assumptions that the paper itself labels preliminary.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3 and 4.2] The central conclusion that precision electroweak tests are nearing their twilight is conditional on excluding the CDF measurement, yet the paper does not establish that exclusion. The world average of 80361 ± 8 MeV in Section 4 is built from D0, LHCb, ATLAS, and CMS, omitting CDF (80433 ± 9 MeV, Table 3), on the basis of the compatibility study [190]; the footnote in Section 3.3 explicitly concedes that the common-modelling argument "does not hold for the modelling of the background". If CDF is treated as a valid measurement, an inverse-variance combination with the paper's average gives roughly 80391 ± 6 MeV, about 4.4σ from the SM expectation of 80354 ± 6 MeV, and the Figure 6 curves would shift qualitatively. The twilight projection in Section 4.2 is therefore a statement about the paper's assumed world average, not a model-independent fact. Please provide an explicit sensitivity test (for example, redraw Figure 6 with CDF included) or a statistical justification for the exclusion that goes beyond citing [190].
  2. [Section 4] The quoted combined uncertainty of ±8 MeV for mW^Average rests on hand-picked correlation coefficients: 0.7–0.9 between ATLAS and CMS, 0.6–0.8 for other pairs, with statistical uncertainties treated as uncorrelated and PDF uncertainties combined only approximately because of profiling. The paper itself labels this combination preliminary, but the subsequent twilight argument and the numerical thresholds in Figure 6 and Table 4 are calibrated to this specific average and its uncertainty. No error budget or correlation-robustness study is presented to support the assertion that the final result will be "only slightly different". A quantitative stability check (e.g., varying the correlation coefficients over a plausible range and reporting the resulting world-average uncertainties and tension significances) is needed before the quantitative projections can be considered robust.
  3. [Section 4.2 and Table 4] The "current world average" used for mW in Figure 6 and Table 4 is the paper's own preliminary combination, not an established external average such as the PDG value. As a result, the projection conflates two distinct questions: whether a hypothetical future measurement is consistent with the paper's assumed average, and whether it is consistent with the SM. In addition, the expected values from Gfitter carry a theory uncertainty that the paper acknowledges may be underestimated; the statement that the conclusion is "expected to remain largely stable" is an assertion, not a demonstrated result. Please separate these ingredients: present the tension with an independent world average (or explicitly label the curves as conditional on the preliminary combination), and quantify the sensitivity of the twilight conclusion to an inflation of the theory uncertainty.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1, Eq. (3)] The coefficients ci are referenced to [42] but not listed; since Eq. (3) is used to discuss parametric uncertainties, a reader cannot verify the quoted 5 MeV without consulting the original paper. Please include the numerical values or an explicit reference to the table.
  2. [Section 3.3, footnote 3] The main text quotes a 4.6σ tension between CDF and the SM expectation while the footnote quotes 7.2σ under "published uncertainties"; the relation between these two numbers and the assumptions behind each should be stated in one place.
  3. [Figure 6] The curves in Figure 6 are difficult to read in grayscale; please use distinct line styles and provide numerical values for the crossing points.
  4. [Table 4] The mZ expectation of 91192 ± 6 MeV with a central value above the measurement may surprise readers; please include the correlation assumptions used in Gfitter for mZ.
  5. [Section 4.3] The relation ΔmW = (v²/Λ²)(...) GeV mixes units: v is in GeV while the coefficients appear in TeV⁻²; please state the units of Λ and the Wilson coefficients explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mW agreement is an external fit prediction, the world average is a transparent data combination, and the twilight projection is arithmetic from those inputs.

full rationale

Section 3.3 presents a preliminary combination, mAverage_W = 80361 ± 8 MeV, built with the Blue package from CMS, ATLAS, LHCb and D0 measurements; this is a data combination, not a parameter fitted to produce the Section 4.2 conclusion. The SM expectation used in the tension curves, mSM_W = 80.354 ± 0.006 GeV, comes from HEPfit/Gfitter global fits, and Table 4 states the expectations are computed 'with the respective observable excluded from the fit', so the agreement between average and SM prediction is not enforced by construction. Figure 6's 'current world average' for mW is indeed the paper's own preliminary average, but it is labeled as such; the twilight statement that a future 5σ-from-SM measurement would also be in tension with existing data is a direct arithmetic consequence of the two reference values being 7 MeV apart, not a prediction derived from itself. The exclusion of CDF is based on an external compatibility study [190] and is a standard robustness judgment; the paper is transparent about this dependence and even flags the caveat that the common-modelling argument 'does not hold for the modelling of the background'. That dependence is a fragility/correctness concern, not circularity. No claimed prediction reduces to its input by definition or by fit.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the preliminary combination, which assumes correlation coefficients and excludes CDF, and on the Gfitter prediction of mW with its uncertainty, which is assumed to be reliable. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • correlation_coefficients_ATLAS_CMS = 0.7 to 0.9
    Hand-assumed in Section 4 for the BLUE combination; not determined from data and the paper states the combination is preliminary.
  • correlation_coefficients_other_experiments = 0.6 to 0.8
    Hand-assumed correlations between ATLAS/CMS and D0/LHCb in the same BLUE combination.
  • future_precision_hypotheses = mW ±5 MeV, mZ ±1 MeV, sin2θeff ±0.00007, mtop ±0.15 GeV
    Table 4 lists assumed future experimental precisions used for the projections in Fig. 6; they are hypothetical inputs, not measured values.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The SM prediction uncertainty of 6 MeV on mW from the global electroweak fit is not severely underestimated.
    Section 4.2 uses the Gfitter expectation 80354 ± 6 MeV in the tension curves; if the true theory uncertainty is larger, the projected tension bands change.
  • ad hoc to paper The CDF measurement is an outlier and should be excluded from the current world average.
    The combination in Section 4 and the resulting world average used in Fig. 6 omit CDF based on the compatibility study [190]; the twilight conclusion fails if CDF is correct.
  • domain assumption The factorization framework and the Drell-Yan modeling used in the reviewed measurements are valid.
    All experimental results and the SM predictions rely on collinear factorization, PDFs, and resummation as summarized in Section 3.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Status of the W boson mass and the future of the electroweak fit in the next decades." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ITV2WP6M

@misc{pith2026250601887,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Status of the W boson mass and the future of the electroweak fit in the next decades},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ITV2WP6M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01887}
}
read the original abstract

A precise determination of the W boson mass is an essential test for the Standard Model of particle physics: the comparison of experimental value and theoretical prediction allows to probe the internal consistency of the electroweak sector and could possibly highlight signals of New Physics. We provide a concise and up-to-date summary of past and recent measurements at lepton and hadron colliders, a discussion of the known perturbative and non-perturbative theoretical ingredients used to provide predictions for the relevant observables, and an overview of future prospects to reduce systematic uncertainties and to compare different measurements in a consistent way. We conclude with a brief discussion on the relevance of the global electroweak fit at present and future colliders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01887 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. χ 2 distribution of the global electroweak fit using the Gfitter program [50] for varying values of mW . Theoretical uncertainties are indicated by the filled blue areas. mW . Secondly, the kinematics of the decay products can be reconstructed at higher center of mass energies, where the dependence of the cross-section is weaker, but the constraint that all reconstructed energies in the detector must match the cente… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. illustrates examples of p l T and mT templates for three different assumed mW masses at recon￾struction level of a generic LHC detector. Given the poor experimental resolution, the Emiss T observable is typically not used for mW determinations or have only a minor influence of the final result. These distri￾butions rely on different aspects of the detector response and the underlying physics modelling, enabling part… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dilepton mass distributions for selected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Missing transverse energy distributions after all corrections in the muon decay channels for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Summary of W Boson Measurements using the CT18 PDF set. The central values and uncertainties [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dependence of the tension between the SM expectation and the current world average and a future [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

201 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [190]

    Compatibility and combination of world W-boson mass measurements

    Simone Amoroso et al. Compatibility and combination of world W-boson mass measurements. arXiv:2308.09417, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    D. M. Webber et al. Measurement of the Positive Muon Lifetime and Determination of the Fermi Constant to Part-per-Million Precision. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:041803, 2011

    2011

  3. [2]

    Hanneke, S

    D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell, and G. Gabrielse. New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:120801, 2008

    2008

  4. [3]

    Schael et al

    S. Schael et al. Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance. Phys. Rept., 427:257–454, 2006. 15

    2006

  5. [4]

    Radiative corrections to decay processes

    RE Behrends, RJ Finkelstein, and A Sirlin. Radiative corrections to decay processes. Physical Review, 101(2):866, 1956

    1956

  6. [5]

    Radiative corrections to muon and neutron decay

    Sam M Berman. Radiative corrections to muon and neutron decay. Physical Review, 112(1):267, 1958

    1958

  7. [6]

    Radiative corrections to fermi interactions

    Toichiro Kinoshita and Alberto Sirlin. Radiative corrections to fermi interactions. Physical Review, 113(6):1652, 1959

    1959

  8. [7]

    Complete 2-loop quantum electrodynamic contributions to the muon lifetime in the fermi model

    Timo van Ritbergen and Robin G Stuart. Complete 2-loop quantum electrodynamic contributions to the muon lifetime in the fermi model. Physical Review Letters, 82(3):488, 1999

    1999

Show all 201 references
  1. [8]

    On the precise determination of the fermi coupling constant from the muon lifetime

    Timo van Ritbergen and Robin G Stuart. On the precise determination of the fermi coupling constant from the muon lifetime. Nuclear Physics B, 564(3):343–390, 2000

    2000

  2. [9]

    Second order corrections to the muon lifetime and the semileptonic b decay

    T Seidensticker and M Steinhauser. Second order corrections to the muon lifetime and the semileptonic b decay. Physics Letters B, 467(3-4):271–278, 1999

    1999

  3. [10]

    A. Sirlin. Radiative Corrections in the SU (2)L × U (1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework. Phys. Rev. D, 22:971–981, 1980

    1980

  4. [11]

    W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin. Radiative Corrections to Neutrino Induced Neutral Current Phenomena in the SU (2)L × U (1) Theory. Phys. Rev. D, 22:2695, 1980. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 31, 213 (1985)]

    1985

  5. [12]

    Sirlin and W

    A. Sirlin and W. J. Marciano. Radiative Corrections to νµ + N → µ− + X and their Effect on the Determination of ρ2 and sin2 θW . Nucl. Phys. B, 189:442–460, 1981

    1981

  6. [13]

    Weak mixing angle and grand unified gauge theories

    William J Marciano. Weak mixing angle and grand unified gauge theories. Physical Review D, 20(1):274, 1979

    1979

  7. [14]

    A. Sirlin. On the O(α2) Corrections to τµ, mW , mZ in the SU (2)L × U (1) Theory. Phys. Rev. D, 29:89, 1984

    1984

  8. [15]

    The effect of the top quark on the mw- mz interdependence and possible decoupling of heavy fermions from low energy physics

    M Consoli, W Hollik, and F Jegerlehner. The effect of the top quark on the mw- mz interdependence and possible decoupling of heavy fermions from low energy physics. Physics Letters B, 227(1):167–170, 1989

    1989

  9. [16]

    Djouadi and C

    A. Djouadi and C. Verzegnassi. Virtual Very Heavy Top Effects in LEP / SLC Precision Measurements. Phys. Lett. B, 195:265–271, 1987

    1987

  10. [17]

    Avdeev, J

    L. Avdeev, J. Fleischer, S. Mikhailov, and O. Tarasov. O(αα2 s) correction to the electroweak ρ param- eter. Phys. Lett. B, 336:560–566, 1994. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 349, 597–598 (1995)]

    1995

  11. [18]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, Johann H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser. Corrections of order O(GF M 2 t α2 s) to the ρ parameter. Phys. Lett. B, 351:331–338, 1995

    1995

  12. [19]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, Johann H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser. QCD corrections from top quark to relations between electroweak parameters to order α2 s. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75:3394–3397, 1995

    1995

  13. [20]

    Three-loop polarization function and o (αs2) corrections to the production of heavy quarks

    KG Chetyrkin, JH K¨ uhn, and M Steinhauser. Three-loop polarization function and o (αs2) corrections to the production of heavy quarks. Nuclear Physics B, 482(1-2):213–240, 1996

    1996

  14. [21]

    J. J. van der Bij and F. Hoogeveen. Two Loop Correction to Weak Interaction Parameters Due to a Heavy Fermion Doublet. Nucl. Phys. B, 283:477–492, 1987

    1987

  15. [22]

    Radiative correction effects of a very heavy top

    Riccardo Barbieri, Matteo Beccaria, Paolo Ciafaloni, Giuseppe Curci, and Andrea Vicere. Radiative correction effects of a very heavy top. Phys. Lett. B, 288:95–98, 1992. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 312, 511–511 (1993)]

    1993

  16. [23]

    Two loop heavy top effects in the Standard Model

    Riccardo Barbieri, Matteo Beccaria, Paolo Ciafaloni, Giuseppe Curci, and Andrea Vicere. Two loop heavy top effects in the Standard Model. Nucl. Phys. B, 409:105–127, 1993

    1993

  17. [24]

    Fleischer, O

    J. Fleischer, O. V. Tarasov, and F. Jegerlehner. Two loop heavy top corrections to the rho parameter: A Simple formula valid for arbitrary Higgs mass. Phys. Lett. B, 319:249–256, 1993

    1993

  18. [25]

    Degrassi, P

    G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, and A. Vicini. Two loop heavy top effects on the mZ − mW interdependence. Phys. Lett. B, 383:219–226, 1996. 16

    1996

  19. [26]

    Precise calculation of MW , sin2 ˆθW (MZ) and sin2 ˆθlept ef f

    Giuseppe Degrassi, Paolo Gambino, and Alberto Sirlin. Precise calculation of MW , sin2 ˆθW (MZ) and sin2 ˆθlept ef f. Phys. Lett. B, 394:188–194, 1997

    1997

  20. [27]

    A. Djouadi. O(alpha alpha-s) Vacuum Polarization Functions of the Standard Model Gauge Bosons. Nuovo Cim. A, 100:357, 1988

    1988

  21. [28]

    Bernd A. Kniehl. Two Loop Corrections to the Vacuum Polarizations in Perturbative QCD. Nucl. Phys. B, 347:86–104, 1990

    1990

  22. [29]

    Djouadi and P

    A. Djouadi and P. Gambino. Electroweak gauge bosons self-energies: Complete QCD corrections. Phys. Rev. D, 49:3499–3511, 1994. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 53, 4111 (1996)]

    1996

  23. [30]

    Francis Halzen and Bernd A. Kniehl. ∆ r beyond one loop. Nucl. Phys. B, 353:567–590, 1991

    1991

  24. [31]

    Freitas, W

    A. Freitas, W. Hollik, W. Walter, and G. Weiglein. Complete fermionic two loop results for the MW − MZ interdependence. Phys. Lett. B, 495:338–346, 2000. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 570, 265 (2003)]

    2003

  25. [32]

    Hollik, W

    Ayres Freitas, W. Hollik, W. Walter, and Georg Weiglein. Electroweak two loop corrections to the MW − MZ mass correlation in the standard model. Nucl. Phys. B, 632:189–218, 2002. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 666, 305–307 (2003)]

    2003

  26. [33]

    Awramik and M

    M. Awramik and M. Czakon. Complete two loop electroweak contributions to the muon lifetime in the standard model. Phys. Lett. B, 568:48–54, 2003

    2003

  27. [34]

    Awramik and M

    M. Awramik and M. Czakon. Complete two loop bosonic contributions to the muon lifetime in the standard model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:241801, 2002

    2002

  28. [35]

    Onishchenko and O

    A. Onishchenko and O. Veretin. Two loop bosonic electroweak corrections to the muon lifetime and MZ − MW interdependence. Phys. Lett. B, 551:111–114, 2003

    2003

  29. [36]

    Awramik, M

    M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Onishchenko, and O. Veretin. Bosonic corrections to ∆ r at the two loop level. Phys. Rev. D, 68:053004, 2003

    2003

  30. [37]

    J. J. van der Bij, K. G. Chetyrkin, M. Faisst, G. Jikia, and T. Seidensticker. Three loop leading top mass contributions to the rho parameter. Phys. Lett. B, 498:156–162, 2001

    2001

  31. [38]

    Faisst, Johann H

    M. Faisst, Johann H. Kuhn, T. Seidensticker, and O. Veretin. Three loop top quark contributions to the rho parameter. Nucl. Phys. B, 665:649–662, 2003

    2003

  32. [39]

    Four-loop singlet contribution to the electroweak ρ parameter

    York Schr¨ oder and M Steinhauser. Four-loop singlet contribution to the electroweak ρ parameter. Physics Letters B, 622(1-2):124–130, 2005

    2005

  33. [40]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, M. Faisst, Johann H. Kuhn, P. Maierhofer, and Christian Sturm. Four-Loop QCD Corrections to the Rho Parameter. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:102003, 2006

    2006

  34. [41]

    Boughezal and M

    R. Boughezal and M. Czakon. Single scale tadpoles and O(GF m2 t α3 s) corrections to the rho parameter. Nucl. Phys. B, 755:221–238, 2006

    2006

  35. [42]

    Awramik, M

    M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Freitas, and G. Weiglein. Precise prediction for the W boson mass in the standard model. Phys. Rev. D, 69:053006, 2004

    2004

  36. [43]

    The mW − mZ interdependence in the Standard Model: a new scrutiny

    Giuseppe Degrassi, Paolo Gambino, and Pier Paolo Giardino. The mW − mZ interdependence in the Standard Model: a new scrutiny. JHEP, 05:154, 2015

    2015

  37. [44]

    Updates on fits to electroweak parameters

    Marco Ciuchini, Jorge de Blas, Enrico Franco, Diptimoy Ghosh, Satoshi Mishima, Maurizio Pierini, Laura Reina, and Luca Silvestrini. Updates on fits to electroweak parameters. PoS, LeptonPho- ton2015:013, 2016

    2016

  38. [45]

    Electroweak precision constraints at present and future colliders

    Jorge de Blas, Marco Ciuchini, Enrico Franco, Satoshi Mishima, Maurizio Pierini, Laura Reina, and Luca Silvestrini. Electroweak precision constraints at present and future colliders. PoS, ICHEP2016:690, 2017

    2017

  39. [46]

    The Global Electroweak and Higgs Fits in the LHC era

    Jorge de Blas, Marco Ciuchini, Enrico Franco, Satoshi Mishima, Maurizio Pierini, Laura Reina, and Luca Silvestrini. The Global Electroweak and Higgs Fits in the LHC era. PoS, EPS-HEP2017:467, 2017. 17

    2017

  40. [47]

    de Blas, M

    J. de Blas, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, A. Goncalves, S. Mishima, M. Pierini, L. Reina, and L. Silvestrini. Global analysis of electroweak data in the standard model. Phys. Rev. D, 106:033003, Aug 2022

    2022

  41. [48]

    de Blas, M

    J. de Blas, M. Pierini, L. Reina, and L. Silvestrini. Impact of the Recent Measurements of the Top- Quark and W-Boson Masses on Electroweak Precision Fits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129(27):271801, 2022

    2022

  42. [49]

    Electroweak Precision Tests of the Standard Model after the Discovery of the Higgs Boson

    Jens Erler and Matthias Schott. Electroweak Precision Tests of the Standard Model after the Discovery of the Higgs Boson. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 106:68–119, 2019

    2019

  43. [50]

    Revisiting the Global Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model and Beyond with Gfitter

    Henning Flacher, Martin Goebel, Johannes Haller, Andreas Hocker, Klaus Monig, and Joerg Stelzer. Revisiting the Global Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model and Beyond with Gfitter. Eur. Phys. J. C, 60:543–583, 2009. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 71, 1718 (2011)]

    2011

  44. [51]

    Update of the global electroweak fit and constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models

    Johannes Haller, Andreas Hoecker, Roman Kogler, Klaus M¨ onig, Thomas Peiffer, and J¨ org Stelzer. Update of the global electroweak fit and constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models. Eur. Phys. J. C, 78(8):675, 2018

    2018

  45. [52]

    R. L. Workman et al. Review of Particle Physics. PTEP, 2022:083C01, 2022

    2022

  46. [53]

    Arnison et al

    G. Arnison et al. Experimental Observation of Isolated Large Transverse Energy Electrons with Associated Missing Energy at √s = 540 GeV. Phys. Lett. B, 122:103–116, 1983

    1983

  47. [54]

    Banner et al

    M. Banner et al. Observation of Single Isolated Electrons of High Transverse Momentum in Events with Missing Transverse Energy at the CERN anti-p p Collider. Phys. Lett. B, 122:476–485, 1983

    1983

  48. [55]

    Schael et al

    S. Schael et al. Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP. Phys. Rept., 532:119–244, 2013

    2013

  49. [56]

    Torbjorn Sjostrand, Stephen Mrenna, and Peter Z. Skands. A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1. Comput. Phys. Commun., 178:852–867, 2008

    2008

  50. [57]

    de Favereau, C

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lema ˆ ıtre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi. DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment. JHEP, 02:057, 2014

    2014

  51. [58]

    M. Baak, G. J. Besjes, D. Cˆ ote, A. Koutsman, J. Lorenz, and D. Short. HistFitter software framework for statistical data analysis. Eur. Phys. J. C, 75:153, 2015

    2015

  52. [59]

    Measurement of the W -boson mass in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Morad Aaboud et al. Measurement of the W -boson mass in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C, 78(2):110, 2018. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 78, 898 (2018)]

    2018

  53. [60]

    Measurement of the W boson mass

    Roel Aaij et al. Measurement of the W boson mass. JHEP, 01:036, 2022

    2022

  54. [61]

    Aaltonen et al

    T. Aaltonen et al. High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector. Science, 376(6589):170–176, 2022

    2022

  55. [62]

    S. D. Drell and Tung-Mow Yan. Massive Lepton Pair Production in Hadron-Hadron Collisions at High-Energies. Phys. Rev. Lett., 25:316–320, 1970. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 25, 902 (1970)]

    1970

  56. [63]

    J. H. Christenson, G. S. Hicks, L. M. Lederman, P. J. Limon, B. G. Pope, and E. Zavattini. Observation of massive muon pairs in hadron collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 25:1523–1526, 1970

    1970

  57. [64]

    Keith Ellis, and G

    Guido Altarelli, R. Keith Ellis, and G. Martinelli. Large Perturbative Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process in QCD. Nucl. Phys. B, 157:461–497, 1979

    1979

  58. [65]

    Hamberg, W

    R. Hamberg, W. L. van Neerven, and T. Matsuura. A complete calculation of the orderα−s2 correction to the Drell-Yan K factor. Nucl. Phys. B, 359:343–405, 1991. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 644, 403–404 (2002)]

    2002

  59. [66]

    Harlander and William B

    Robert V. Harlander and William B. Kilgore. Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88:201801, 2002

    2002

  60. [67]

    Dixon, Kirill Melnikov, and Frank Petriello

    Charalampos Anastasiou, Lance J. Dixon, Kirill Melnikov, and Frank Petriello. High precision QCD at hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at NNLO. Phys. Rev. D, 69:094008, 2004

    2004

  61. [68]

    The W boson production cross section at the LHC through O(α2 s)

    Kirill Melnikov and Frank Petriello. The W boson production cross section at the LHC through O(α2 s). Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:231803, 2006. 18

    2006

  62. [69]

    Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through O(α2 s)

    Kirill Melnikov and Frank Petriello. Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through O(α2 s). Phys. Rev. D, 74:114017, 2006

    2006

  63. [70]

    Vector boson production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO

    Stefano Catani, Leandro Cieri, Giancarlo Ferrera, Daniel de Florian, and Massimiliano Grazzini. Vector boson production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:082001, 2009

    2009

  64. [71]

    W Boson Production at Hadron Col- liders: The Lepton Charge Asymmetry in NNLO QCD

    Stefano Catani, Giancarlo Ferrera, and Massimiliano Grazzini. W Boson Production at Hadron Col- liders: The Lepton Charge Asymmetry in NNLO QCD. JHEP, 05:006, 2010

    2010

  65. [72]

    Drell-Yan Cross Section to Third Order in the Strong Coupling Constant

    Claude Duhr, Falko Dulat, and Bernhard Mistlberger. Drell-Yan Cross Section to Third Order in the Strong Coupling Constant. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(17):172001, 2020

    2020

  66. [73]

    Charged current Drell-Yan production at N3LO

    Claude Duhr, Falko Dulat, and Bernhard Mistlberger. Charged current Drell-Yan production at N3LO. JHEP, 11:143, 2020

    2020

  67. [74]

    Lepton-pair production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD

    Claude Duhr and Bernhard Mistlberger. Lepton-pair production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD. JHEP, 03:116, 2022

    2022

  68. [75]

    U. Baur, O. Brein, W. Hollik, C. Schappacher, and D. Wackeroth. Electroweak radiative corrections to neutral current Drell-Yan processes at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D, 65:033007, 2002

    2002

  69. [76]

    Electroweak radiative corrections to W boson production at hadron colliders

    Stefan Dittmaier and Michael Kr¨ amer. Electroweak radiative corrections to W boson production at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D, 65:073007, 2002

    2002

  70. [77]

    Baur and D

    U. Baur and D. Wackeroth. Electroweak radiative corrections to p¯p → W ± → ℓ±ν beyond the pole approximation. Phys. Rev. D, 70:073015, 2004

    2004

  71. [78]

    V. A. Zykunov. Radiative corrections to the Drell-Yan process at large dilepton invariant masses. Phys. Atom. Nucl., 69:1522, 2006

    2006

  72. [79]

    C. M. Carloni Calame, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini, and A. Vicini. Precision electroweak calculation of the charged current Drell-Yan process. JHEP, 12:016, 2006

    2006

  73. [80]

    V. A. Zykunov. Weak radiative corrections to Drell-Yan process for large invariant mass of di-lepton pair. Phys. Rev. D, 75:073019, 2007

    2007

  74. [81]

    C. M. Carloni Calame, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini, and A. Vicini. Precision electroweak calculation of the production of a high transverse-momentum lepton pair at hadron colliders. JHEP, 10:109, 2007

    2007

  75. [82]

    Arbuzov, D

    A. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, S. Bondarenko, P. Christova, L. Kalinovskaya, G. Nanava, and R. Sadykov. One-loop corrections to the Drell–Yan process in SANC. (II). The Neutral current case. Eur. Phys. J. C, 54:451–460, 2008

    2008

  76. [83]

    Kotikov, Johann H

    A. Kotikov, Johann H. Kuhn, and O. Veretin. Two-Loop Formfactors in Theories with Mass Gap and Z-Boson Production. Nucl. Phys. B, 788:47–62, 2008

    2008

  77. [84]

    Kilgore and Christian Sturm

    William B. Kilgore and Christian Sturm. Two-Loop Virtual Corrections to Drell-Yan Production at order αsα3. Phys. Rev. D, 85:033005, 2012

    2012

  78. [85]

    Mixed QCD-electroweakO(αsα) corrections to Drell-Yan processes in the resonance region: pole approximation and non-factorizable corrections

    Stefan Dittmaier, Alexander Huss, and Christian Schwinn. Mixed QCD-electroweakO(αsα) corrections to Drell-Yan processes in the resonance region: pole approximation and non-factorizable corrections. Nucl. Phys. B, 885:318–372, 2014

    2014

  79. [86]

    Double-real corrections at O(ααs) to single gauge boson production

    Roberto Bonciani, Federico Buccioni, Roberto Mondini, and Alessandro Vicini. Double-real corrections at O(ααs) to single gauge boson production. Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(3):187, 2017

    2017

  80. [87]

    NNLO QCD×EW corrections to Z production in the q ¯q channel

    Roberto Bonciani, Federico Buccioni, Narayan Rana, Ilario Triscari, and Alessandro Vicini. NNLO QCD×EW corrections to Z production in the q ¯q channel. Phys. Rev. D, 101(3):031301, 2020

    2020

  81. [88]

    Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Mixed QCD-Electroweak Corrections to on-Shell Z Production.Phys

    Roberto Bonciani, Federico Buccioni, Narayan Rana, and Alessandro Vicini. Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Mixed QCD-Electroweak Corrections to on-Shell Z Production.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(23):232004, 2020

    2020

  82. [89]

    Leandro Cieri, Giancarlo Ferrera, and German F. R. Sborlini. Combining QED and QCD transverse- momentum resummation for Z boson production at hadron colliders. JHEP, 08:165, 2018. 19

    2018

  83. [90]

    QCD ⊕QED NNLO corrections to Drell Yan production

    Daniel de Florian, Manuel Der, and Ignacio Fabre. QCD ⊕QED NNLO corrections to Drell Yan production. Phys. Rev. D, 98(9):094008, 2018

    2018

  84. [91]

    Mixed QCD ⊗QED correc- tions to on-shell Z boson production at the LHC

    Maximilian Delto, Matthieu Jaquier, Kirill Melnikov, and Raoul R¨ ontsch. Mixed QCD ⊗QED correc- tions to on-shell Z boson production at the LHC. JHEP, 01:043, 2020

    2020

  85. [92]

    Mixed QCD ⊗QED corrections to exclusive Drell Yan production using the q T -subtraction method

    Leandro Cieri, Daniel de Florian, Manuel Der, and Javier Mazzitelli. Mixed QCD ⊗QED corrections to exclusive Drell Yan production using the q T -subtraction method. JHEP, 09:155, 2020

    2020

  86. [93]

    Mixed QCD-EW corrections to pp → ℓνℓ +X at the LHC

    Luca Buonocore, Massimiliano Grazzini, Stefan Kallweit, Chiara Savoini, and Francesco Tramontano. Mixed QCD-EW corrections to pp → ℓνℓ +X at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D, 103:114012, 2021

    2021

  87. [94]

    Mixed Strong-Electroweak Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process

    Roberto Bonciani, Luca Buonocore, Massimiliano Grazzini, Stefan Kallweit, Narayan Rana, Francesco Tramontano, and Alessandro Vicini. Mixed Strong-Electroweak Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128(1):012002, 2022

    2022

  88. [95]

    Two- loop mixed QCD-EW corrections to neutral current Drell-Yan

    Tommaso Armadillo, Roberto Bonciani, Simone Devoto, Narayan Rana, and Alessandro Vicini. Two- loop mixed QCD-EW corrections to neutral current Drell-Yan. JHEP, 05:072, 2022

    2022

  89. [96]

    Chawdhry, Federica Devoto, Matthias Heller, An- dreas von Manteuffel, Kirill Melnikov, Raoul R¨ ontsch, and Chiara Signorile-Signorile

    Federico Buccioni, Fabrizio Caola, Herschel A. Chawdhry, Federica Devoto, Matthias Heller, An- dreas von Manteuffel, Kirill Melnikov, Raoul R¨ ontsch, and Chiara Signorile-Signorile. Mixed QCD- electroweak corrections to dilepton production at the LHC in the high invariant mas...

    2022

  90. [97]

    Arbuzov, D

    A. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, S. Bondarenko, P. Christova, L. Kalinovskaya, G. Nanava, and R. Sadykov. One-loop corrections to the Drell-Yan process in SANC. I. The Charged current case. Eur. Phys. J. C, 46:407–412, 2006. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 50, 505 (2007)]

    2007

  91. [98]

    P laczek, S

    W. P laczek, S. Jadach, and M. W. Krasny. Drell-Yan processes with WINHAC. Acta Phys. Polon. B, 44(11):2171–2178, 2013

    2013

  92. [99]

    Implementation of electroweak corrections in the POWHEG BOX: single W production

    Luca Barze, Guido Montagna, Paolo Nason, Oreste Nicrosini, and Fulvio Piccinini. Implementation of electroweak corrections in the POWHEG BOX: single W production. JHEP, 04:037, 2012

    2012

  93. [100]

    Bernaciak and D

    C. Bernaciak and D. Wackeroth. Combining NLO QCD and Electroweak Radiative Corrections to W boson Production at Hadron Colliders in the POWHEG Framework. Phys. Rev. D, 85:093003, 2012

    2012

  94. [101]

    Resonace-improved parton-shower matching for the Drell-Yan process including electroweak corrections

    Alexander M¨ uck and Lennart Oymanns. Resonace-improved parton-shower matching for the Drell-Yan process including electroweak corrections. JHEP, 05:090, 2017

    2017

  95. [102]

    Bozzi, J

    G. Bozzi, J. Rojo, and A. Vicini. The Impact of PDF uncertainties on the measurement of the W boson mass at the Tevatron and the LHC. Phys. Rev. D, 83:113008, 2011

    2011

  96. [103]

    Parton density function uncertainties on the W boson mass measurement from the lepton transverse momentum distribution

    Giuseppe Bozzi, Luca Citelli, and Alessandro Vicini. Parton density function uncertainties on the W boson mass measurement from the lepton transverse momentum distribution. Phys. Rev. D, 91(11):113005, 2015

    2015

  97. [104]

    Keith Ellis, G

    R. Keith Ellis, G. Martinelli, and R. Petronzio. Lepton Pair Production at Large Transverse Momentum in Second Order QCD. Nucl. Phys. B, 211:106–138, 1983

    1983

  98. [105]

    Hall Reno

    Peter Brockway Arnold and M. Hall Reno. The Complete Computation of HighpT W and Z Production in 2nd Order QCD. Nucl. Phys. B, 319:37–71, 1989. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 330, 284–284 (1990)]

    1990

  99. [106]

    Gonsalves, Jerzy Pawlowski, and Chung-Fai Wai

    Richard J. Gonsalves, Jerzy Pawlowski, and Chung-Fai Wai. QCD Radiative Corrections to Elec- troweak Boson Production at Large Transverse Momentum in Hadron Collisions.Phys. Rev. D, 40:2245, 1989

    1989

  100. [107]

    E. Mirkes. Angular decay distribution of leptons from W bosons at NLO in hadronic collisions. Nucl. Phys. B, 387:3–85, 1992

    1992

  101. [108]

    Mirkes and J

    E. Mirkes and J. Ohnemus. Angular distributions of Drell-Yan lepton pairs at the Tevatron: Order α − s2 corrections and Monte Carlo studies. Phys. Rev. D, 51:4891–4904, 1995

    1995

  102. [109]

    W -boson production in associa- tion with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD

    Radja Boughezal, Christfried Focke, Xiaohui Liu, and Frank Petriello. W -boson production in associa- tion with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(6):062002, 2015. 20

    2015

  103. [110]

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, T

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss, and T. A. Morgan. Precise QCD predictions for the production of a Z boson in association with a hadronic jet. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117(2):022001, 2016

    2016

  104. [111]

    Campbell, R

    Radja Boughezal, John M. Campbell, R. Keith Ellis, Christfried Focke, Walter T. Giele, Xiaohui Liu, and Frank Petriello. Z-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(15):152001, 2016

    2016

  105. [112]

    W-boson plus jet differential distributions at NNLO in QCD

    Radja Boughezal, Xiaohui Liu, and Frank Petriello. W-boson plus jet differential distributions at NNLO in QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 94(11):113009, 2016

    2016

  106. [113]

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, T

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss, and D. M. Walker. Next-to-Next- to-Leading-Order QCD Corrections to the Transverse Momentum Distribution of Weak Gauge Bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(12):122001, 2018

    2018

  107. [114]

    Dokshitzer, Dmitri Diakonov, and S

    Yuri L. Dokshitzer, Dmitri Diakonov, and S. I. Troian. On the Transverse Momentum Distribution of Massive Lepton Pairs. Phys. Lett. B, 79:269–272, 1978

    1978

  108. [115]

    Parisi and R

    G. Parisi and R. Petronzio. Small Transverse Momentum Distributions in Hard Processes. Nucl. Phys. B, 154:427–440, 1979

    1979

  109. [116]

    Collins, Davison E

    John C. Collins, Davison E. Soper, and George F. Sterman. Transverse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production. Nucl. Phys. B, 250:199–224, 1985

    1985

  110. [117]

    Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC

    Giuseppe Bozzi, Stefano Catani, Daniel de Florian, and Massimiliano Grazzini. Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC. Nucl. Phys. B, 737:73–120, 2006

    2006

  111. [118]

    QCD transverse-momentum resummation in gluon fusion processes

    Stefano Catani and Massimiliano Grazzini. QCD transverse-momentum resummation in gluon fusion processes. Nucl. Phys. B, 845:297–323, 2011

    2011

  112. [119]

    Higgs Transverse-Momentum Resummation in Direct Space

    Pier Francesco Monni, Emanuele Re, and Paolo Torrielli. Higgs Transverse-Momentum Resummation in Direct Space. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(24):242001, 2016

    2016

  113. [120]

    Transverse-momentum resummation: A Perturbative study of Z production at the Tevatron

    Giuseppe Bozzi, Stefano Catani, Giancarlo Ferrera, Daniel de Florian, and Massimiliano Grazzini. Transverse-momentum resummation: A Perturbative study of Z production at the Tevatron. Nucl. Phys. B, 815:174–197, 2009

    2009

  114. [121]

    Production of Drell-Yan lepton pairs in hadron collisions: Transverse-momentum resummation at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy

    Giuseppe Bozzi, Stefano Catani, Giancarlo Ferrera, Daniel de Florian, and Massimiliano Grazzini. Production of Drell-Yan lepton pairs in hadron collisions: Transverse-momentum resummation at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy. Phys. Lett. B, 696:207–213, 2011

    2011

  115. [122]

    Predictions for Drell-Yan ϕ∗ and QT observables at the LHC

    Andrea Banfi, Mrinal Dasgupta, Simone Marzani, and Lee Tomlinson. Predictions for Drell-Yan ϕ∗ and QT observables at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B, 715:152–156, 2012

    2012

  116. [123]

    Nadolsky, and Bowen Wang

    Marco Guzzi, Pavel M. Nadolsky, and Bowen Wang. Nonperturbative contributions to a resummed leptonic angular distribution in inclusive neutral vector boson production. Phys. Rev. D, 90(1):014030, 2014

    2014

  117. [124]

    Vector boson pro- duction at hadron colliders: transverse-momentum resummation and leptonic decay

    Stefano Catani, Daniel de Florian, Giancarlo Ferrera, and Massimiliano Grazzini. Vector boson pro- duction at hadron colliders: transverse-momentum resummation and leptonic decay. JHEP, 12:047, 2015

    2015

  118. [125]

    reSolve — A transverse momentum resummation tool

    Francesco Coradeschi and Thomas Cridge. reSolve — A transverse momentum resummation tool. Comput. Phys. Commun., 238:262–294, 2019

    2019

  119. [126]

    Fiducial distributions in Higgs and Drell-Yan production at N 3LL+NNLO

    Wojciech Bizo´ n, Xuan Chen, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Thomas Gehrmann, Nigel Glover, Alexander Huss, Pier Francesco Monni, Emanuele Re, Luca Rottoli, and Paolo Torrielli. Fiducial distributions in Higgs and Drell-Yan production at N 3LL+NNLO. JHEP, 12:132, 2018

    2018

  120. [127]

    Wojciech Bizon, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Thomas Gehrmann, Nigel Glover, Alexander Huss, Pier Francesco Monni, Emanuele Re, Luca Rottoli, and Duncan M. Walker. The transverse momentum spectrum of weak gauge bosons at N 3 LL + NNLO. Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(10):868, 2019

    2019

  121. [128]

    Bauer, Alessandro Broggio, Alessandro Gavardi, Stefan Kallweit, Matthew A

    Simone Alioli, Christian W. Bauer, Alessandro Broggio, Alessandro Gavardi, Stefan Kallweit, Matthew A. Lim, Riccardo Nagar, Davide Napoletano, and Luca Rottoli. Matching NNLO predictions to parton showers using N3LL color-singlet transverse momentum resummation in geneva. Phys...

    2021

  122. [129]

    Drell–Yan lepton-pair production: qT re- summation at N3LL accuracy and fiducial cross sections at N3LO

    Stefano Camarda, Leandro Cieri, and Giancarlo Ferrera. Drell–Yan lepton-pair production: qT re- summation at N3LL accuracy and fiducial cross sections at N3LO. Phys. Rev. D, 104(11):L111503, 2021

    2021

  123. [130]

    Drell-Yan Production at Small qT , Transverse Parton Distri- butions and the Collinear Anomaly

    Thomas Becher and Matthias Neubert. Drell-Yan Production at Small qT , Transverse Parton Distri- butions and the Collinear Anomaly. Eur. Phys. J. C, 71:1665, 2011

    2011

  124. [131]

    Electroweak Gauge-Boson Production at Small qT : Infrared Safety from the Collinear Anomaly

    Thomas Becher, Matthias Neubert, and Daniel Wilhelm. Electroweak Gauge-Boson Production at Small qT : Infrared Safety from the Collinear Anomaly. JHEP, 02:124, 2012

    2012

  125. [132]

    Echevarria, Ahmad Idilbi, and Ignazio Scimemi

    Miguel G. Echevarria, Ahmad Idilbi, and Ignazio Scimemi. Factorization Theorem For Drell-Yan At Low qT And Transverse Momentum Distributions On-The-Light-Cone. JHEP, 07:002, 2012

    2012

  126. [133]

    Echevarr ´ ıa, Ahmad Idilbi, and Ignazio Scimemi

    Miguel G. Echevarr ´ ıa, Ahmad Idilbi, and Ignazio Scimemi. Soft and Collinear Factorization and Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distribution Functions. Phys. Lett. B, 726:795–801, 2013

    2013

  127. [134]

    Ebert and Frank J

    Markus A. Ebert and Frank J. Tackmann. Resummation of Transverse Momentum Distributions in Distribution Space. JHEP, 02:110, 2017

    2017

  128. [135]

    Event-Based Transverse Momentum Resummation

    Thomas Becher and Monika Hager. Event-Based Transverse Momentum Resummation. Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(8):665, 2019

    2019

  129. [136]

    Ebert, Johannes K

    Markus A. Ebert, Johannes K. L. Michel, Iain W. Stewart, and Frank J. Tackmann. Drell-Yan qT resummation of fiducial power corrections at N 3LL. JHEP, 04:102, 2021

    2021

  130. [137]

    Fiducial qT resummation of color-singlet processes at N3LL+NNLO

    Thomas Becher and Tobias Neumann. Fiducial qT resummation of color-singlet processes at N3LL+NNLO. JHEP, 03:199, 2021

    2021

  131. [138]

    Ebert, Johannes K

    Georgios Billis, Bahman Dehnadi, Markus A. Ebert, Johannes K. L. Michel, and Frank J. Tackmann. Higgs pT Spectrum and Total Cross Section with Fiducial Cuts at Third Resummed and Fixed Order in QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127(7):072001, 2021

    2021

  132. [139]

    The diphoton qT spectrum at N 3LL′ + NNLO

    Tobias Neumann. The diphoton qT spectrum at N 3LL′ + NNLO. Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(10):905, 2021

    2021

  133. [140]

    Foundations of Perturbative QCD, volume 32 of Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology

    John Collins. Foundations of Perturbative QCD, volume 32 of Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 7 2023

    2023

  134. [141]

    Collins and Ted C

    John C. Collins and Ted C. Rogers. Equality of Two Definitions for Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distribution Functions. Phys. Rev. D, 87(3):034018, 2013

    2013

  135. [142]

    Understanding the large-distance behavior of transverse-momentum- dependent parton densities and the Collins-Soper evolution kernel

    John Collins and Ted Rogers. Understanding the large-distance behavior of transverse-momentum- dependent parton densities and the Collins-Soper evolution kernel. Phys. Rev. D, 91(7):074020, 2015

    2015

  136. [143]

    Analysis of vector boson production within TMD factoriza- tion

    Ignazio Scimemi and Alexey Vladimirov. Analysis of vector boson production within TMD factoriza- tion. Eur. Phys. J. C, 78(2):89, 2018

    2018

  137. [144]

    Non-perturbative structure of semi-inclusive deep-inelastic and Drell-Yan scattering at small transverse momentum

    Ignazio Scimemi and Alexey Vladimirov. Non-perturbative structure of semi-inclusive deep-inelastic and Drell-Yan scattering at small transverse momentum. JHEP, 06:137, 2020

    2020

  138. [145]

    Extraction of unpolarized quark transverse momentum dependent parton distributions from Drell-Yan/Z-boson production

    Valerio Bertone, Ignazio Scimemi, and Alexey Vladimirov. Extraction of unpolarized quark transverse momentum dependent parton distributions from Drell-Yan/Z-boson production. JHEP, 06:028, 2019

    2019

  139. [146]

    Transverse-momentum-dependent parton distributions up to N 3LL from Drell-Yan data

    Alessandro Bacchetta, Valerio Bertone, Chiara Bissolotti, Giuseppe Bozzi, Filippo Delcarro, Fulvio Piacenza, and Marco Radici. Transverse-momentum-dependent parton distributions up to N 3LL from Drell-Yan data. JHEP, 07:117, 2020

    2020

  140. [147]

    Unpolarized transverse momentum distributions from a global fit of Drell-Yan and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering data

    Alessandro Bacchetta, Valerio Bertone, Chiara Bissolotti, Giuseppe Bozzi, Matteo Cerutti, Fulvio Piacenza, Marco Radici, and Andrea Signori. Unpolarized transverse momentum distributions from a global fit of Drell-Yan and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering data. JHEP, 10...

    2022

  141. [148]

    Drell–Yan lepton-pair production: qT re- summation at N4LL accuracy

    Stefano Camarda, Leandro Cieri, and Giancarlo Ferrera. Drell–Yan lepton-pair production: qT re- summation at N4LL accuracy. Phys. Lett. B, 845:138125, 2023

    2023

  142. [149]

    Fiducial Drell-Yan production at the LHC improved by transverse-momentum resummation at N4LLp+N3LO

    Tobias Neumann and John Campbell. Fiducial Drell-Yan production at the LHC improved by transverse-momentum resummation at N4LLp+N3LO. Phys. Rev. D, 107(1):L011506, 2023

    2023

  143. [150]

    Dominant mixed QCD-electroweak O( αsα) corrections to Drell–Yan processes in the resonance region

    Stefan Dittmaier, Alexander Huss, and Christian Schwinn. Dominant mixed QCD-electroweak O( αsα) corrections to Drell–Yan processes in the resonance region. Nucl. Phys. B, 904:216–252, 2016. 22

    2016

  144. [151]

    Precision Measurement of the W-Boson Mass: Theoretical Contributions and Uncertainties

    Carlo Michel Carloni Calame, Mauro Chiesa, Homero Martinez, Guido Montagna, Oreste Nicrosini, Fulvio Piccinini, and Alessandro Vicini. Precision Measurement of the W-Boson Mass: Theoretical Contributions and Uncertainties. Phys. Rev. D, 96(9):093005, 2017

    2017

  145. [152]

    Estimating the impact of mixed QCD-electroweak corrections on the W -mass determination at the LHC

    Arnd Behring, Federico Buccioni, Fabrizio Caola, Maximilian Delto, Matthieu Jaquier, Kirill Melnikov, and Raoul R¨ ontsch. Estimating the impact of mixed QCD-electroweak corrections on the W -mass determination at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D, 103(11):113002, 2021

    2021

  146. [153]

    Parton distributions and the W mass measurement

    Seth Quackenbush and Zack Sullivan. Parton distributions and the W mass measurement. Phys. Rev. D, 92(3):033008, 2015

    2015

  147. [154]

    A Study of the Role of the PDF Uncertainty on the LHC W -Boson Mass Measurement

    Moh’d Hussein, Joshua Isaacson, and Joey Huston. A Study of the Role of the PDF Uncertainty on the LHC W -Boson Mass Measurement. J. Phys. G, 46(9):095002, 2019

    2019

  148. [155]

    Understanding PDF uncertainty in W boson mass measure- ments*

    Jun Gao, DianYu Liu, and Keping Xie. Understanding PDF uncertainty in W boson mass measure- ments*. Chin. Phys. C, 46(12):123110, 2022

    2022

  149. [156]

    Prospects for improving the LHC W boson mass measurement with forward muons

    Giuseppe Bozzi, Luca Citelli, Mika Vesterinen, and Alessandro Vicini. Prospects for improving the LHC W boson mass measurement with forward muons. Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(12):601, 2015

    2015

  150. [157]

    Bagnaschi and A

    E. Bagnaschi and A. Vicini. Parton Density Uncertainties and the Determination of Electroweak Parameters at Hadron Colliders. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(4):041801, 2021

    2021

  151. [158]

    Lepton-pair production in association with a bb pair and the determination of the W boson mass

    Emanuele Bagnaschi, Fabio Maltoni, Alessandro Vicini, and Marco Zaro. Lepton-pair production in association with a bb pair and the determination of the W boson mass. JHEP, 07:101, 2018

    2018

  152. [159]

    Effect of Flavor-Dependent Partonic Transverse Momentum on the Determination of the W Boson Mass in Hadronic Collisions

    Alessandro Bacchetta, Giuseppe Bozzi, Marco Radici, Mathias Ritzmann, and Andrea Signori. Effect of Flavor-Dependent Partonic Transverse Momentum on the Determination of the W Boson Mass in Hadronic Collisions. Phys. Lett. B, 788:542–545, 2019

    2019

  153. [160]

    Nonperturbative Uncertainties on the Transverse Momentum Distribution of Electroweak Bosons and on the Determination of the Boson Mass at the LHC

    Giuseppe Bozzi and Andrea Signori. Nonperturbative Uncertainties on the Transverse Momentum Distribution of Electroweak Bosons and on the Determination of the Boson Mass at the LHC. Adv. High Energy Phys., 2019:2526897, 2019

    2019

  154. [161]

    Measurement of the W Boson Mass with the D0 Detector

    Victor Mukhamedovich Abazov et al. Measurement of the W Boson Mass with the D0 Detector. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:151804, 2012

    2012

  155. [162]

    Improved W boson Mass Measurement using 7 TeV Proton-Proton Collisions with the ATLAS Detector

    ATLAS Collaboration. Improved W boson Mass Measurement using 7 TeV Proton-Proton Collisions with the ATLAS Detector. ATLAS-CONF-2023-004, 2023

    2023

  156. [163]

    High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experi- ment at the LHC

    Vladimir Chekhovsky et al. High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experi- ment at the LHC. 12 2024

    2024

  157. [164]

    Bal´ azs and C.-P

    C. Bal´ azs and C.-P. Yuan. Soft gluon effects on lepton pairs at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D, 56:5558–5583, Nov 1997

    1997

  158. [165]

    PHOTOS Monte Carlo: A Precision tool for QED corrections in Z and W decays

    Piotr Golonka and Zbigniew Was. PHOTOS Monte Carlo: A Precision tool for QED corrections in Z and W decays. Eur. Phys. J. C, 45:97–107, 2006

    2006

  159. [166]

    Nadolsky, Hung-Liang Lai, Qing-Hong Cao, Joey Huston, Jon Pumplin, Daniel Stump, Wu- Ki Tung, and C.-P

    Pavel M. Nadolsky, Hung-Liang Lai, Qing-Hong Cao, Joey Huston, Jon Pumplin, Daniel Stump, Wu- Ki Tung, and C.-P. Yuan. Implications of cteq global analysis for collider observables. Phys. Rev. D, 78:013004, Jul 2008

    2008

  160. [167]

    U. Baur, S. Keller, and D. Wackeroth. Electroweak radiative corrections to w boson production in hadronic collisions. Phys. Rev. D, 59:013002, Nov 1998

    1998

  161. [168]

    U. Baur, O. Brein, W. Hollik, C. Schappacher, and D. Wackeroth. Electroweak radiative corrections to neutral-current drell-yan processes at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D, 65:033007, Jan 2002

    2002

  162. [169]

    Landry, R

    F. Landry, R. Brock, P. M. Nadolsky, and C.-P. Yuan. Fermilab tevatron run-1 z boson data and the collins-soper-sterman resummation formalism. Phys. Rev. D, 67:073016, Apr 2003

    2003

  163. [170]

    Carloni Calame, Guido Montagna, Oreste Nicrosini, and Alessandro Vicini

    Carlo M. Carloni Calame, Guido Montagna, Oreste Nicrosini, and Alessandro Vicini. Precision elec- troweak calculation of the production of a high transverse-momentum lepton pair at hadron colliders. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2007(10):109, oct 2007. 23

    2007

  164. [171]

    Production of drell–yan lepton pairs in hadron collisions: Transverse-momentum resummation at next- to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy

    Giuseppe Bozzi, Stefano Catani, Giancarlo Ferrera, Daniel de Florian, and Massimiliano Grazzini. Production of drell–yan lepton pairs in hadron collisions: Transverse-momentum resummation at next- to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy. Physics Letters B, 696(3):207–213, 2011

    2011

  165. [172]

    Transverse-momentum resummation: A perturbative study of z production at the tevatron

    Giuseppe Bozzi, Stefano Catani, Giancarlo Ferrera, Daniel de Florian, and Massimiliano Grazzini. Transverse-momentum resummation: A perturbative study of z production at the tevatron. Nuclear Physics B, 815(1):174–197, 2009

    2009

  166. [173]

    Alekhin, J

    S. Alekhin, J. Bl¨ umlein, S. Moch, and R. Plaˇ cakyt˙ e. Parton distribution functions,αs, and heavy-quark masses for lhc run ii. Phys. Rev. D, 96:014011, Jul 2017

    2017

  167. [174]

    Accardi, L

    A. Accardi, L. T. Brady, W. Melnitchouk, J. F. Owens, and N. Sato. Constraints on large- x parton distributions from new weak boson production and deep-inelastic scattering data. Phys. Rev. D, 93:114017, Jun 2016

    2016

  168. [175]

    Tie-Jiun Hou, Jun Gao, T. J. Hobbs, Keping Xie, Sayipjamal Dulat, Marco Guzzi, Joey Huston, Pavel Nadolsky, Jon Pumplin, Carl Schmidt, Ibrahim Sitiwaldi, Daniel Stump, and C.-P. Yuan. New cteq global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the lhc. Phy...

    2021

  169. [176]

    A., Martin, A

    Harland-Lang, L. A., Martin, A. D., Motylinski, P., and Thorne, R. S. Parton distributions in the lhc era: Mmht 2014 pdfs. Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(5):204, 2015

    2014

  170. [177]

    Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

    The NNPDF Collaboration, Richard Ball, Valerio Bertone, Stefano Carrazza, Luigi Del Debbio, Stefano Forte, Patrick Groth-Merrild, Alberto Guffanti, Nathan Hartland, Zahari Kassabov, Jos´ e Latorre, Emanuele Nocera, Juan Rojo, Luca Rottoli, Emma Slade, and Maria Ubiali. Parton ...

    2017

  171. [178]

    NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG

    Simone Alioli, Paolo Nason, Carlo Oleari, and Emanuele Re. NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG. JHEP, 07:060, 2008

    2008

  172. [179]

    Christiansen, Richard Corke, Nishita Desai, Philip Ilten, Stephen Mrenna, Stefan Prestel, Christine O

    Torbj¨ orn Sj¨ ostrand, Stefan Ask, Jesper R. Christiansen, Richard Corke, Nishita Desai, Philip Ilten, Stephen Mrenna, Stefan Prestel, Christine O. Rasmussen, and Peter Z. Skands. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2. Comput. Phys. Commun., 191:159–177, 2015

    2015

  173. [180]

    Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note

    Johannes Bellm et al. Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note. Eur. Phys. J. C, 76(4):196, 2016

    2016

  174. [181]

    DYTurbo: Fast predictions for Drell-Yan processes

    Stefano Camarda et al. DYTurbo: Fast predictions for Drell-Yan processes. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(3):251,

  175. [182]

    Bailey, T

    S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, and R. S. Thorne. Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs. Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(4):341, 2021

    2021

  176. [183]

    Pumplin, D

    J. Pumplin, D. Stump, R. Brock, D. Casey, J. Huston, J. Kalk, H. L. Lai, and W. K. Tung. Uncertainties of predictions from parton distribution functions. 2. The Hessian method. Phys. Rev. D, 65:014013, 2001

    2001

  177. [184]

    Technical report, CERN, Geneva, 2014

    Studies of theoretical uncertainties on the measurement of the mass of the W boson at the LHC. Technical report, CERN, Geneva, 2014

    2014

  178. [185]

    Measurement of the angular coefficients in Z-boson events using electron and muon pairs from data taken at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Georges Aad et al. Measurement of the angular coefficients in Z-boson events using electron and muon pairs from data taken at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector. JHEP, 08:159, 2016

    2016

  179. [186]

    MiNNLOP S: a new method to match NNLO QCD to parton showers

    Pier Francesco Monni, Paolo Nason, Emanuele Re, Marius Wiesemann, and Giulia Zanderighi. MiNNLOP S: a new method to match NNLO QCD to parton showers. JHEP, 05:143, 2020. [Er- ratum: JHEP 02, 031 (2022)]

    2022

  180. [187]

    MiNNLO PS: optimizing 2 → 1 hadronic processes

    Pier Francesco Monni, Emanuele Re, and Marius Wiesemann. MiNNLO PS: optimizing 2 → 1 hadronic processes. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(11):1075, 2020

    2020

  181. [188]

    Ebert, Johannes K

    Georgios Billis, Markus A. Ebert, Johannes K. L. Michel, and Frank J. Tackmann. A toolbox for qT and 0-jettiness subtractions at N 3LO. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136(2):214, 2021

    2021

  182. [189]

    Measurement of the W boson mass

    Victor Mukhamedovich Abazov et al. Measurement of the W boson mass. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:141801, 2009. 24

    2009

  183. [191]

    BLUE: combining correlated estimates of physics observables within ROOT using the Best Linear Unbiased Estimate method

    Richard Nisius. BLUE: combining correlated estimates of physics observables within ROOT using the Best Linear Unbiased Estimate method. 1 2020

    2020

  184. [192]

    Aaltonen et al

    T. Aaltonen et al. Precise measurement of the W -boson mass with the CDF II detector. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:151803, 2012

    2012

  185. [193]

    Precise measurements of W and Z transverse momentum spectra with the ATLAS detector at √s = 5.02 TeV and 13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration. Precise measurements of W and Z transverse momentum spectra with the ATLAS detector at √s = 5.02 TeV and 13 TeV. ATLAS-CONF-2023-028, 2023

    2023

  186. [194]

    Determination of the W-boson mass at hadron colliders

    Luca Rottoli, Paolo Torrielli, and Alessandro Vicini. Determination of the W-boson mass at hadron colliders. Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(10):948, 2023

    2023

  187. [195]

    Re- evaluation of the LHC potential for the measurement of Mw

    Nathalie Besson, Maarten Boonekamp, Esben Klinkby, Troels Petersen, and Sascha Mehlhase. Re- evaluation of the LHC potential for the measurement of Mw. Eur. Phys. J. C, 57:627–651, 2008

    2008

  188. [196]

    Status of the global electroweak fit with Gfitter in the light of new precision measurements

    Johannes Haller, Andreas Hoecker, Roman Kogler, Klaus M¨ onig, and J¨ org Stelzer. Status of the global electroweak fit with Gfitter in the light of new precision measurements. PoS, ICHEP2022:897, 11 2022

    2022

  189. [197]

    Electroweak and QCD corrections to Z and W pole observables in the standard model EFT

    Sally Dawson and Pier Paolo Giardino. Electroweak and QCD corrections to Z and W pole observables in the standard model EFT. Phys. Rev. D, 101(1):013001, 2020

    2020

  190. [198]

    FCC-ee overview: new opportunities create new challenges

    Alain Blondel and Patrick Janot. FCC-ee overview: new opportunities create new challenges. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137(1):92, 2022

    2022

  191. [199]

    CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector

    Mingyi Dong et al. CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector. 11 2018

    2018

  192. [200]

    Physics case of FCC-ee

    David d’Enterria. Physics case of FCC-ee. Frascati Phys. Ser., 61:17, 2016. 25

    2016

  193. [2020]

    [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 80, 440 (2020)]

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.