Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Foundation Models for 3D Vision: How Close Are We?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.10799 v2 pith:ITZ76GVV submitted 2024-10-14 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords visionmodelshumanfoundationuniqa-3dvisualalignclosely
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Building a foundation model for 3D vision is a complex challenge that remains unsolved. Towards that goal, it is important to understand the 3D reasoning capabilities of current models as well as identify the gaps between these models and humans. Therefore, we construct a new 3D visual understanding benchmark named UniQA-3D. UniQA-3D covers fundamental 3D vision tasks in the Visual Question Answering (VQA) format. We evaluate state-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs), specialized models, and human subjects on it. Our results show that VLMs generally perform poorly, while the specialized models are accurate but not robust, failing under geometric perturbations. In contrast, human vision continues to be the most reliable 3D visual system. We further demonstrate that neural networks align more closely with human 3D vision mechanisms compared to classical computer vision methods, and Transformer-based networks such as ViT align more closely with human 3D vision mechanisms than CNNs. We hope our study will benefit the future development of foundation models for 3D vision. Code is available at https://github.com/princeton-vl/UniQA-3D .

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BenchDepth: Are We on the Right Way to Evaluate Depth Foundation Models?

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BenchDepth evaluates eight depth foundation models by their performance on five downstream tasks, finding Depth Anything V2's relative version to be the most practically useful.

Pith tools