Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Substrate-dependent thermally driven morphological evolution of Pt$_{0.9}$Ni$_{0.1}$ thin films on sapphire and langasite

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Sapphire promotes larger late-stage crystallites than langasite in Pt0.9Ni0.1 films annealed to 800 °C, while langasite shows the larger roughness peak at 600 °C.

desk verdict A careful, well-caveated experimental study; the descriptive morphology results are trustworthy, but the substrate-dependent mechanism claim is not fully separated from Zr/oxide interfacial chemistry. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09909 v1 pith:IUIXALAV submitted 2026-08-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords PtNithinfilmssapphiresubstratelangasitethermalcoarseningsolid-statedewettingatomicforcemicroscopythin-filmmorphologyhigh-temperaturestability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that 100-nm-thick Pt$_{0.9}$Ni$_{0.1}$ films with a 10-nm Zr adhesion layer follow different morphological paths on sapphire versus langasite when annealed identically from room temperature to 800 °C. Both films stay densely granular through 400 °C, then undergo a sharp coarsening transition between 400 and 600 °C, and finish as connected faceted crystallites at 800 °C. The quantitative outcome is substrate-controlled: the mean projected feature area grows to about $1.67\times 10^5$ nm$^2$ on sapphire but only $1.09\times 10^5$ nm$^2$ on langasite, while roughness peaks higher on langasite at 600 °C. The 400–600 °C window is identified as the dominant coarsening regime, and area histograms show the transition is a population replacement rather than a uniform enlargement of existing grains. This matters because the thermal stability of such films, used in high-temperature acoustic-wave devices and sensors, cannot be predicted from alloy composition alone.

What carries the argument

The central analytical device is an effective coarsening metric built from the mean projected feature area: each segmented feature is treated as a circle of radius $r$ with $A=\pi r^2$, so $\langle r^2\rangle=\langle A\rangle/\pi$. Plotting the stepwise increment $\Delta\langle r^2\rangle$ between annealing steps against $1000/T$ yields local effective slopes that locate the dominant coarsening window without claiming microscopic activation energies. This is combined with population-resolved area histograms, which show that the 400–600 °C transition is a population replacement rather than a uniform shift, and with vertical metrics (average height and RMS roughness) to separate lateral coarsening from vertical restructuring. The paper explicitly treats the exponent $n=2$ in the classical grain-growth law as an analytical convenience, not as a mechanistic claim.

What would settle it

Measure the chemical state and depth distribution of the zirconium layer after 400, 600, and 800 °C anneals on both substrates, for example by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiling or cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy, and compare them; if zirconium oxidizes or interdiffuses markedly differently on sapphire versus langasite in a way that tracks the morphology differences, the paper's attribution of those differences to substrate-dependent PtNi behavior is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central finding is that identical thermal histories produce substrate-selected morphologies in Pt$_{0.9}$Ni$_{0.1}$/Zr films. Both films occupy a dense granular state up to 400 °C, with only modest changes in mean projected area. Between 400 and 600 °C they undergo the dominant transformation: mean projected area jumps from about $1.1\times 10^3$ to $6.2\times 10^4$ nm$^2$ on langasite and from $1.3\times 10^3$ to $1.26\times 10^5$ nm$^2$ on sapphire, while average height and RMS roughness peak at 600 °C. The area distributions show that the low-temperature granular population is replaced, not uniformly shifted, by a new population of large crystallites. At 800 °C, both films partially smooth while continuing to coarsen laterally into faceted, connected crystallites, with sapphire reaching $\langle A\rangle = 1.67\times 10^5$ nm$^2$ versus $1.09\times 10^5$ nm$^2$ on langasite. An effective Arrhenius analysis based on $\Delta\langle r^2\rangle$ with $\langle r^2\rangle = \langle A\rangle/\pi$ assigns local effective coarsening energies of 1.79 eV (langasite) and 1.23 eV (sapphire) to the 400–600 °C step, and negative local slopes above 600 °C are interpreted as saturation or faceting-limited growth, not negative barriers.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 10-nm zirconium adhesion layer behaves the same way on both substrates, so the differing film morphologies can be attributed to the sapphire and langasite surfaces rather than to chemistry involving zirconium.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thermal stability of PtNi films is a property of the full PtNi/Zr/substrate stack, not of the alloy alone; substrate and adhesion layer must be part of any stability prediction.
  • The 400–600 °C window is the critical thermal budget risk: passing through or dwelling in this range triggers the main coarsening and roughening event.
  • Sapphire-supported films progress farther along the dewetting and coarsening pathway, producing larger connected faceted crystallites, while langasite retains smaller features but roughens more at intermediate temperature.
  • The 800 °C state is not simply rougher than the 600 °C state; it is partially smoothed by faceting-limited growth, so the worst roughness may occur before the highest operating temperature.
  • Area distributions imply that tracking only the average feature size is insufficient; the sudden appearance of a distinct large-crystallite population should be monitored separately.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the substrate effect is energetic in origin, analogous differences should appear for other noble-metal alloy films on sapphire versus langasite, and the same segmentation-based area metrics could screen for them.
  • Editorial inference: a control experiment with PtNi deposited directly on the oxides, or with a different adhesion metal, would determine how much of the substrate dependence is intrinsic to the PtNi/oxide interface rather than mediated by zirconium.
  • Editorial inference: the 600 °C roughness maximum suggests that device processing or operation that lingers near 600 °C may be the worst case for electrode quality, even though 800 °C appears smoother in the planar AFM metrics.
  • Editorial inference: because the annealing sequence is cumulative and stepwise, the quoted effective energies should be validated with fixed-temperature isothermal series before being used in kinetic models; the paper itself flags this limitation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an AFM-based study of the morphological evolution of 100-nm Pt0.9Ni0.1 films with a 10-nm Zr adhesion layer on sapphire and langasite substrates during sequential vacuum annealing from room temperature to 800 °C. The authors find that both films remain granular through 400 °C, undergo a large coarsening and roughening change between 400 and 600 °C, and form faceted crystallites by 800 °C. Mean projected feature areas increase from 784±17 to 108,529±4,362 nm2 on langasite and from 332±7 to 166,992±4,739 nm2 on sapphire, with height and roughness peaking at 600 °C and partially relaxing at 800 °C. Area distributions and shape descriptors indicate a population-level restructuring rather than uniform growth. An effective Arrhenius-type analysis based on stepwise increments of <r^2>=<A>/pi identifies the 400–600 °C interval as the dominant coarsening window. The paper concludes that the thermal stability of PtNi/Zr films is governed by the coupled influence of alloy mobility, interfacial energetics, and substrate-dependent morphological selection.

Significance. If the descriptive results hold, this is a useful quantitative dataset for the high-temperature SAW and thin-film electrode community, where the full PtNi/Zr/substrate stack rather than the alloy alone determines device stability. The study's strengths include a direct side-by-side comparison of two technological substrates, systematic manual segmentation with documented criteria, and explicit disclaimers that the effective coarsening energies are not microscopic diffusion barriers. The supplementary material provides per-temperature histograms and shape analyses that support the main morphological narrative. However, the causal interpretation—that the substrate differences arise from intrinsic PtNi/substrate energetic selection—is not established by the present data because of the Zr adhesion-layer confound and the absence of sample replication. The paper is honest about many of its limitations, but the abstract and conclusions overstate the mechanistic insight relative to what the measurements can support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV; Abstract; Section V] The causal attribution to substrate-dependent energetic selection is not supported by the data. In Section IV the authors list 'interfacial reactions involving the Zr layer and the oxide substrate' as a possible cause of the observed differences, and the Abstract and Section V conclude that thermal stability is 'governed by the coupled influence of alloy mobility, interfacial energetics, and substrate-dependent morphological selection.' However, no Zr XPS, post-anneal interface spectroscopy, or cross-sectional analysis is presented, and only one film pair was annealed. Because langasite is documented to react under high-temperature vacuum treatment (Ref. 14) and Zr is prone to oxidation and interdiffusion, the sapphire-versus-langasite differences could originate in the Zr/oxide interface or in the already different as-deposited states (Table I: RT mean areas 784 vs 332 nm2 and mean heights 3.02 vs 5.52 nm) rather than in intrinsic PtNi/substrate selection. The standard errors in Table I are feature-level, not sample-to-sample, so the substrate comparison lacks replication. This is a load-bearing point for the mechanistic interpretation, even though the descriptive substrate dependence is well documented. I recommend either adding interface chemical/structural data (e.g., Zr 3d XPS before and after annealing, cross-sectional TEM/EDS) or limiting the conclusions to full-stack, substrate-dependent behavior without claiming the dominant mechanism.
  2. [Section III, Table I and Fig. 2] The claim of a 'sharp coarsening transition between 400 and 600 °C' is inferred from only two temperature endpoints (400 and 600 °C) in a cumulative annealing sequence. No intermediate temperature or replicate sample is reported, and the high-temperature feature counts are small (N=70 and 28 on langasite; N=65 and 36 on sapphire). A monotonic increase in mobility with temperature would also produce a large area jump over this interval, so the current data support 'a large change between 400 and 600 °C' but not the word 'sharp' as a kinetic statement. Please add an intermediate annealing point or a second film pair, or revise the wording and state explicitly that the temperature resolution of the transition is limited to this single step.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 5 and Appendix A] The effective coarsening energies Q_eff=1.79 eV (langasite) and 1.23 eV (sapphire) are quoted without uncertainties. Because each value is a local slope between only two assigned points in Fig. 5, and because the underlying mean areas carry standard errors, the numerical comparison between substrates is not yet quantified. The paper's disclaimer that Q_eff is not a microscopic activation energy is appropriate, and I do not regard the analysis as circular given the explicit statement in Appendix A that n=2 is an analytical convenience. However, the two-significant-figure precision is not supported by the data. Either propagate the feature-level standard errors into the slopes or present Q_eff only as qualitative descriptors of the dominant coarsening interval.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II and Supplemental Fig. S1] The claim that XPS confirms a Pt:Ni ratio of approximately 90:10 is not backed by high-resolution peak fits or quantification details; the supplement shows only survey spectra. Please provide the fitting procedure and uncertainty for the composition.
  2. [Section II] The label 'effective Arrhenius-like analysis' may still suggest an Arrhenius rate law despite the disclaimers; a name such as 'local temperature-sensitivity slopes' would more accurately describe the plotted quantity.
  3. [Supplemental Fig. S3 caption] The caption contains the apparent typo 'overleaping' (likely 'overlapping'), and the statement that the rescaled distributions are 'broadly comparable' is not supported by a quantitative similarity test.
  4. [Table I] Circularity is reported without an uncertainty. Adding standard errors, or explicitly stating that the value is a mean without error, would aid comparison across temperatures.
  5. [Section III, first paragraph] The crack-like surface features are mentioned but not followed up; a sentence on whether these features persist after annealing or affect the segmentation results would clarify their role.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the substrate-dependent morphology claims are direct AFM measurements, and the effective Arrhenius analysis is explicitly descriptive rather than predictive.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are direct quantitative observations from AFM segmentation and height analysis: the mean projected areas, heights, roughness values, and distribution shapes are tabulated in Table I and plotted in Figs. 2-4, with no parameter fitted to a subset of data and then used to predict a closely related quantity. The effective Arrhenius analysis is built from measured area increments through the identity <r^2>=<A>/pi, and the paper explicitly disclaims microscopic meaning: 'we do not read these slopes as microscopic diffusion barriers' and 'the resulting Q_eff values are effective descriptors of temperature sensitivity, not rigorous microscopic diffusion barriers.' Therefore identifying the 400-600 C interval as the dominant coarsening window is a restatement of the measured area jump, not a circular prediction from a model. The paper also explicitly acknowledges that the annealing sequence is not a set of independent isothermal experiments, so no activation energy is claimed. Self-citations, such as refs. [1]-[4] and [13], are contextual or provide analogous prior results (e.g., Moulzolf et al. for ZrO2 precipitates), but they are not load-bearing for the central substrate comparison. The possible confounding role of the Zr adhesion layer is acknowledged in Section IV as one of several possible origins of the differences and does not turn an observation into a self-validating derivation. No step in the derivation chain reduces by construction to its inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims are direct observations of AFM-measured morphology. The interpretive layer, including the Arrhenius-like analysis and substrate mechanism, rests on a few assumptions: the chosen growth exponent n=2, the validity of Huttig/Tammann markers, the representativeness of manual segmentation, and the assumption that the Zr layer does not dominate substrate differences. No invented physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Growth exponent n = 2 (assumed, not fitted)
    Appendix A chooses n=2 as an analytical convenience to map area increments onto mean-square radius. Different n would change the interpretation of the Arrhenius-like slope.
  • Feature segmentation thresholds = manual, not reported numerically
    The ImageJ contour criteria are described qualitatively in the supplement. The choice of which features to segment affects all area statistics, and no automated or inter-observer validation is provided.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Grain growth kinetics D^n - D_0^n = K(T)t with n=2 (Burke-Turnbull normal grain growth)
    Invoked in Appendix A to convert measured area increments into an Arrhenius-like slope. The paper explicitly disclaims microscopic meaning, but the Q_eff values depend on this assumed relation.
  • domain assumption Huttig and Tammann temperature criteria are valid mobility indicators for the PtNi/Zr/substrate stack
    Used in Results and Discussion to interpret the 400 to 600 C transition as crossing mobility thresholds. The paper notes these are approximate, but the interpretation relies on them.
  • domain assumption Manual segmentation of AFM topographs provides unbiased feature statistics
    The entire quantitative analysis rests on ImageJ freehand contours. The paper states criteria were consistent, but no automated validation or inter-observer test is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The Zr adhesion layer has a similar stabilizing role on both substrates and does not dominate the observed differences
    The central substrate comparison assumes differences come from PtNi/substrate energetics, but the paper itself lists interfacial Zr reactions as a possible cause and does not measure Zr chemistry. This is a structural assumption for the main interpretation.
  • domain assumption Sequential annealing states can be treated as indicative of the kinetic regime at each temperature
    The paper acknowledges the sequence is not a set of independent isothermal experiments, yet it uses the stepwise increments to identify the dominant coarsening window.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Substrate-dependent thermally driven morphological evolution of Pt$_{0.9}$Ni$_{0.1}$ thin films on sapphire and langasite." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IUIXALAV

@misc{pith2026260809909,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Substrate-dependent thermally driven morphological evolution of Pt$_0.9$Ni$_0.1$ thin films on sapphire and langasite},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IUIXALAV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09909}
}
abstract

We examine the thermal evolution of 100-nm-thick Pt$_{0.9}$Ni$_{0.1}$ alloy films on sapphire and langasite substrates with a 10-nm Zr adhesion layer. Sequential vacuum annealing from room temperature to 800 $^\circ$C produces a substrate-dependent morphological pathway that is quantified by atomic force microscopy, image segmentation, height-distribution analysis, and effective coarsening metrics. Both types of films remain densely granular up to 400 $^\circ$C, undergo a sharp coarsening transition between 400 and 600 $^\circ$C, and evolve into coalesced faceted crystallites by 800 $^\circ$C. The mean projected feature area increases from $7.84 \times 10^2$ to $1.09 \times 10^5$ nm$^2$ on langasite and from $3.32 \times 10^2$ to $1.67 \times 10^5$ nm$^2$ on sapphire. Sapphire therefore develops the larger faceted crystallites, while langasite exhibits the larger roughness maximum at 600 $^\circ$C. Area distributions reveal that the 400-600 $^\circ$C transition does not uniformly shift the initial granular population but instead replaces it with a distinct large-feature ensemble. Height and roughness measurements show a pronounced maximum at 600 $^\circ$C, followed by partial smoothing at 800 $^\circ$C, consistent with rapid coalescence followed by faceting-limited growth. An effective Arrhenius analysis based on $\Delta\langle r^2\rangle$, with $\langle r^2\rangle = \langle A\rangle/\pi$, identifies the 400-600 $^\circ$C interval as the dominant coarsening window. These results show that the thermal stability of PtNi/Zr films on sapphire and langasite is governed by the coupled influence of alloy mobility, interfacial energetics, and substrate-dependent morphological selection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09909 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. As-deposited Pt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. AFM topography of Pt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temperature-dependent morphology metrics for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Local effective Arrhenius-like analysis using the step [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Top row: probability-density histograms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mauricio Pereira da Cunha, High-temperature harsh- environment SA W sensor technology, in2023 IEEE In- ternational Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)(2023) pp. 1– 10

  2. [2]

    Moonlight, R

    Mauricio Pereira da Cunha, T. Moonlight, R. Lad, D. Frankel, and G. Bernhard, High temperature sensing technology for applications up to 1000 ◦C, in2008 IEEE Sensors(2008) pp. 752–755

  3. [3]

    S. C. Moulzolf, D. J. Frankel, Mauricio Pereira da Cunha, and R. J. Lad, High temperature stability of electrically conductive Pt–Rh/ZrO2 and Pt–Rh/HfO 2 nanocompos- ite thin film electrodes, Microsyst. Technol.20, 523 (2014)

  4. [4]

    D. J. Frankel, S. C. Moulzolf, Mauricio Pereira da Cunha, and R. J. Lad, Influence of composition and multilayer architecture on electrical conductivity of high tempera- ture Pt-alloy films, Surf. Coat. Technol.284, 215 (2015)

  5. [5]

    C. V. Thompson, Solid-state dewetting of thin films, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.42, 399 (2012)

  6. [6]

    Galinski, T

    H. Galinski, T. Ryll, P. Elser, J. L. M. Rupp, A. Bieberle- H¨ utter, and L. J. Gauckler, Agglomeration of Pt thin films on dielectric substrates, Phys. Rev. B82, 235415 (2010)

  7. [7]

    Abadias, E

    G. Abadias, E. Chason, J. Keckes, M. Sebastiani, G. B. Thompson, E. Barthel, G. L. Doll, C. E. Murray, C. H. Stoessel, and L. Martinu, Stress in thin films and coat- ings: Current status, challenges, and prospects, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A36, 020801 (2018)

  8. [8]

    L. B. Freund and S. Suresh,Thin Film Materials: Stress, Defect Formation and Surface Evolution(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    K.-Y. Liu, Y. J. Yoon, S. H. Lee, and P.-C. Su, Sputtered nanoporous PtNi thin film cathodes with improved ther- mal stability for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells, Electrochim. Acta247, 558 (2017)

  2. [10]

    X. Wang, H. Huang, T. Holme, X. Tian, and F. B. Prinz, Thermal stabilities of nanoporous metallic electrodes at elevated temperatures, J. Power Sources175, 75 (2008)

  3. [11]

    Kovalenko, J

    O. Kovalenko, J. R. Greer, and E. Rabkin, Solid-state dewetting of thin iron films on sapphire substrates con- trolled by grain boundary diffusion, Acta Mater.61, 3148 (2013)

  4. [12]

    Rabkin, D

    E. Rabkin, D. Amram, and E. Alster, Solid state dewet- ting and stress relaxation in a thin single crystalline Ni film on sapphire, Acta Mater.74, 30 (2014)

  5. [13]

    Bardong, M

    J. Bardong, M. Schulz, M. Schmitt, I. Shrena, D. Eisele, E. Mayer, L. M. Reindl, and H. Fritze, Precise measure- ments of BA W and SA W properties of langasite in the temperature range from 25 ◦C to 1000 ◦C, in2008 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium(2008) pp. 326–331

  6. [14]

    Seifert, G

    M. Seifert, G. K. Rane, B. Kirbus, S. B. Menzel, and T. Gemming, Surface effects and challenges for applica- tion of piezoelectric langasite substrates in SA W devices caused by high temperature annealing under high vac- uum, Materials8, 8868 (2015)

  7. [15]

    S. N. Bonvicini, B. Fu, A. J. Fulton, Z. Jia, and Y. Shi, Formation of Au, Pt, and bimetallic Au–Pt nanostruc- tures from thermal dewetting of single-layer or bilayer thin films, Nanotechnology33, 235604 (2022)

  8. [16]

    Y. Dai, P. Lu, Z. Cao, C. T. Campbell, and Y. Xia, The physical chemistry and materials science behind sinter- resistant catalysts, Chemical Society Reviews47, 4314 (2018)

  9. [17]

    R. L. German,Sintering Theory and Practice(Wiley, New York, 1996)

  10. [18]

    J. Lif, I. Odenbrand, and M. Skoglundh, Sintering of alumina-supported nickel particles under amination con- ditions: Support effects, Applied Catalysis A: General 317, 62 (2007)

  11. [19]

    W. L. Winterbottom, Equilibrium shape of a small par- ticle in contact with a foreign substrate, Acta Metall.15, 303 (1967)

  12. [20]

    W. Bao, W. Jiang, D. J. Srolovitz, and Y. Wang, Stable equilibria of anisotropic particles on substrates: A gener- alized Winterbottom construction, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 77, 2093 (2017)

  13. [21]

    Horcas, R

    I. Horcas, R. Fern´ andez, J. M. G´ omez-Rodr ´ ıguez, J. Colchero, J. G´ omez-Herrero, and A. M. Baro, WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology, Rev. Sci. Instrum.78, 013705 (2007)

  14. [22]

    J. F. Moulder, W. F. Stickle, P. E. Sobol, and K. D. Bomben,Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Physical Electronics, Eden Prairie, MN, 1995)

  15. [23]

    NIST, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy database, stan- dard Reference Database 20, Version 4.1

  16. [24]

    C. A. Schneider, W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis, Nat. Meth- ods9, 671 (2012)

  17. [25]

    Sui, M.-Y

    M. Sui, M.-Y. Li, S. Kunwar, P. Pandey, Q. Zhang, and J. Lee, Effects of annealing temperature and duration on the morphological and optical evolution of self-assembled 8 Pt nanostructures on c-plane sapphire, PLoS ONE12, e0177048 (2017)

  18. [26]

    Aubert, O

    T. Aubert, O. Elmazria, B. Assouar, L. Bouvot, M. Hehn, S. Weber, M. Oudich, and D. Gen` eve, Behavior of plat- inum/tantalum as interdigital transducers for SA W de- vices in high-temperature environments, IEEE Trans. Ul- trason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control58, 603 (2011)

  19. [27]

    J. E. Burke and D. Turnbull, Recrystallization and grain growth, Prog. Met. Phys.3, 220 (1952)

  20. [28]

    H. V. Atkinson, Theories of normal grain growth in pure single phase systems, Acta Metall.36, 469 (1988)

  21. [29]

    Barmak, J

    K. Barmak, J. M. Rickman, and M. J. Patrick, Advances in experimental studies of grain growth in thin films, JOM76, 3622 (2024)

  22. [30]

    Backofen, K

    R. Backofen, K. Barmak, K. E. Elder, and A. Voigt, Cap- turing the complex physics behind universal grain size distributions in thin metallic films, Acta Mater.64, 72 (2014)

  23. [31]

    I. M. Lifshitz and V. V. Slyozov, The kinetics of pre- cipitation from supersaturated solid solutions, J. Phys. Chem. Solids19, 35 (1961)

  24. [32]

    Wagner, Theorie der Alterung von Niederschl¨ agen durch Uml¨ osen, Z

    C. Wagner, Theorie der Alterung von Niederschl¨ agen durch Uml¨ osen, Z. Elektrochem.65, 581 (1961). Substrate-dependent thermally driven morphological evolution of Pt 0.9Ni0.1 thin films on sapphire and langasite M. Awais Fiaz, 1,∗ M. Greenslit, 2 R. J. Lad, 2 Mauricio Pereir...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.