Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Demystifying ResNet

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1611.01186 v2 pith:IV3DTRGT submitted 2016-11-03 cs.NE cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.NEcs.LGstat.ML
keywords shortcutnumbershortcutstrainingdepthlayerslosspoint
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Residual Network (ResNet), proposed in He et al. (2015), utilized shortcut connections to significantly reduce the difficulty of training, which resulted in great performance boosts in terms of both training and generalization error. It was empirically observed in He et al. (2015) that stacking more layers of residual blocks with shortcut 2 results in smaller training error, while it is not true for shortcut of length 1 or 3. We provide a theoretical explanation for the uniqueness of shortcut 2. We show that with or without nonlinearities, by adding shortcuts that have depth two, the condition number of the Hessian of the loss function at the zero initial point is depth-invariant, which makes training very deep models no more difficult than shallow ones. Shortcuts of higher depth result in an extremely flat (high-order) stationary point initially, from which the optimization algorithm is hard to escape. The shortcut 1, however, is essentially equivalent to no shortcuts, which has a condition number exploding to infinity as the number of layers grows. We further argue that as the number of layers tends to infinity, it suffices to only look at the loss function at the zero initial point. Extensive experiments are provided accompanying our theoretical results. We show that initializing the network to small weights with shortcut 2 achieves significantly better results than random Gaussian (Xavier) initialization, orthogonal initialization, and shortcuts of deeper depth, from various perspectives ranging from final loss, learning dynamics and stability, to the behavior of the Hessian along the learning process.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hierarchical Maximum Entropy via the Renormalization Group

    cs.IT 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A hierarchical Gibbs/Donsker-Varadhan variational identity is claimed, but it drops accumulated weight factors on partition functions, invalidating the resulting max-entropy solutions and λ* formulas.

  2. Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: The Electric Load Case

    cs.LG 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Compares feedforward, recurrent, sequence-to-sequence and temporal convolutional neural networks for short-term electric load forecasting through experiments on two real datasets.

Pith tools