Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 86 references

This paper claims the LMC's low gamma-ray luminosity is caused by cosmic rays being advected away by the Milky Way's circumgalactic wind, not by a failure of cosmic-ray transport models.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 07:48 UTC pith:IVM4Y5CW

load-bearing objection Credible, useful paper, but the central claim that advection (rather than gas stripping) is the cause of the LMC's gamma-ray dimness is not directly tested, because all runs assume CRs advect with the gas. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21316 v1 pith:IVM4Y5CW submitted 2026-07-23 astro-ph.HE

Spirited Away: Advective Loss of Cosmic Rays into the Milky Way's Circumgalactic Medium Explains the Large Magellanic Cloud's Low Gamma-ray Luminosity

Taaseen Islam , Hilay Shah , Mark R. Krumholz , Roland Crocker This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords Large Magellanic Cloudgamma-ray luminositycosmic ray transportadvective escapecircumgalactic mediumram pressure strippinginverse Compton emissioncalorimetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to explain a long-standing puzzle: the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) is far dimmer in gamma rays than cosmic-ray transport models predict, even though the same models work for other galaxies. The authors combine magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the LMC falling into the Milky Way with a cosmic-ray transport calculation, and find that the wind of gas flowing past the infalling LMC advects cosmic rays out of the galaxy before they can collide and emit. Across six different diffusion models the wind runs reproduce the observed gamma-ray luminosity, while identical isolated runs overproduce it by roughly an order of magnitude. If right, this means the LMC's dimness is environmental—a stripping effect—rather than a sign that our understanding of cosmic-ray transport is generally wrong.

Core claim

The paper claims that the LMC's suppressed gamma-ray emission is caused by advective escape of cosmic rays driven by the LMC's motion through the Milky Way's circumgalactic medium. In the simulation that includes the surrounding wind, cosmic rays are carried away from the dense disk by the gas flow, so most of the injected proton energy simply leaves the galaxy instead of being lost to pion-producing collisions. This lowers the gamma-ray luminosity by about an order of magnitude and shifts the dominant emission process from hadronic pion decay to leptonic inverse Compton scattering. The result holds across all tested diffusion coefficients, while the control runs without the wind reproduce t

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is advective entrainment of cosmic rays in the circumgalactic wind. Cosmic rays are advected with the gas flow on top of momentum-dependent parallel diffusion (with a gyroradius-scale diffusion floor, no perpendicular diffusion, and no streaming). The wind strips gas off the LMC and carries cosmic rays into a low-density tail where hadronic collisions are rare; adiabatic expansion of the stripped material removes further energy. Emission spectra are computed by a stochastic cosmic-ray transport code that solves a Fokker-Planck equation for the particle distribution and evaluates pion decay, bremsstrahlung, inverse Compton, and synchrotron radiation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that cosmic rays are carried along with the gas flow (complete advective entrainment with only parallel diffusion); if GeV cosmic rays resist the wind through self-confinement streaming or perpendicular transport, the wind would strip them less efficiently and the predicted dimming would shrink.

What would settle it

A deep radio observation of the region behind the LMC at about 1.5 GHz: the model predicts a synchrotron tail with surface brightness around 0.05 microJy per square arcsecond, roughly 10% of the disk brightness. Finding no tail at that level, while still detecting cosmic rays in the disk at standard efficiency, would disprove advection-dominated escape; detecting the tail would be a strong confirmation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The observed gamma-ray flux of the LMC is matched at photon energies from 0.17 to 94.97 GeV across six diffusion prescriptions when the wind is included; isolated control runs overpredict by a factor of 5–10.
  • Most injected cosmic-ray energy escapes by advection: the calorimetric fraction drops from order unity in isolated runs to about 5–8% in wind runs.
  • The dominant gamma-ray mechanism changes from neutral-pion decay to inverse Compton emission in the wind runs, because the stripped tail is too diffuse for hadronic emission.
  • The predicted spectra agree with observed photon data below about 10 GeV but overestimate the flux at higher energies, suggesting either stronger energy-dependent diffusion or a steeper cosmic-ray injection spectrum.
  • A faint radio tail (roughly ten times fainter than the disk at 1.5 GHz) and an even fainter gamma-ray tail form behind the LMC; the radio tail is a possible but difficult observational test.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is general, other dwarf galaxies falling into the Milky Way's circumgalactic medium may lie below the infrared–gamma-ray correlation; the Small Magellanic Cloud's mild over-prediction at around 1 GeV may be a first hint of the same effect.
  • The high-energy spectral excess could be closed by a steeper injection spectrum or by a diffusion coefficient that grows with energy faster than the tested p^(1/3) scaling; this could be tested by modeling the LMC's spectrum with a break in the proton injection spectrum above about 1 TeV.
  • A future deep radio survey with sensitivity below roughly 0.05 microJy per square arcsecond at 1.5 GHz, perhaps with template-based foreground subtraction, could confirm or rule out the advective tail without needing gamma-ray angular resolution.
  • Because cosmic-ray back-pressure is not included in the transport runs, the adiabatic gains seen in the lowest-diffusion runs may be overestimated; including that pressure could change how efficiently the stripped tail drains cosmic-ray energy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper applies the CRIPTIC cosmic-ray transport code to two MHD simulations of the LMC from Shah et al. (2025): one isolated and one moving through the Milky Way's CGM (the "wind" case). For six choices of parallel diffusion coefficient and momentum-index, the wind simulations yield gamma-ray luminosities close to the Fermi 4FGL-DR4 measurements, while the isolated controls overproduce by roughly an order of magnitude. The authors attribute this suppression to advective escape of cosmic rays in the LMC's rest-frame headwind, and note that the wind spectra match the observed shape below ~10 GeV but overproduce above that energy. They also discuss adiabatic losses, proton calorimetry, and a faint radio tail as a possible observational test.

Significance. If the central attribution is correct, the paper resolves a long-standing anomaly in gamma-ray modeling of the LMC and provides a concrete example of advection dominating over diffusion as the cosmic-ray escape mechanism in a low-mass, interacting galaxy. The study builds on MHD simulations calibrated to Faraday-rotation measurements, tests a range of diffusion parameters, and is explicit about the >10 GeV discrepancy and about the unmodeled low-frequency radio electron population. These are genuine strengths. The main weakness is that the wind-versus-isolated contrast does not isolate the advection term from other wind-induced changes in the gas distribution and magnetic field, so the causal language in the abstract and conclusion is stronger than the numerical experiment supports.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3, Table 2, Figure 5] The central claim that the LMC's low gamma-ray luminosity is caused by advective escape is not directly tested. All runs in Table 2 share CRIPTIC's assumption that 'CRs are always advected along with the gas flow' (Section 2.3), and the wind and isolated simulations differ not only in advective transport but also in gas density, magnetic-field structure, and the presence of a stripped tail (Figure 1). Figure 5 and Table 3 demonstrate that, once advective entrainment is assumed, the diffusion coefficient is unimportant; they do not demonstrate that advection, rather than the modified gas background, is the reason the wind runs are dim. A control run with advection disabled on the same wind background, or a crossover run with the isolated background and a wind-like velocity field, would separate these effects. Without such a run the phrase 'the headwind the LMC experiences ... advects cosm
  2. [Section 4.2, Table 3] The calorimetric fractions eta ~ 0.06 reported for the wind simulations are computed inside the advective model and measure the fraction of injected energy lost to pp collisions under the assumption of full entrainment. They do not measure the counterfactual with advection switched off. The statement that 'most of the CR proton energy simply escapes the galaxy by advection' (Section 4.2) therefore rests on the same untested entrainment assumption as the main claim. A separate estimate of the hadronic loss that would occur if the same CR population were confined to the disk of the wind simulation would clarify how much of the suppression is due to advective removal rather than to the lower target-gas density in the stripped system.
  3. [Section 3.2, Figure 5] The claimed agreement with the observed gamma-ray spectrum is only valid below ~10 GeV; above this energy the wind models overproduce the Fermi flux by a factor of a few, as the authors acknowledge. The two suggested remedies—a more strongly energy-dependent diffusion coefficient or a steeper injection spectrum—are not tested. Because the spectral comparison is a central part of the paper's evidence, the authors should either quantify the high-energy tension in a more formal way (for example, a chi-square or likelihood comparison) or perform a sensitivity test varying the injection spectral index or cutoff energy. This would establish whether the discrepancy is a serious limitation or a minor tuning issue.
  4. [Section 2.1.3, Section 2.3] The statement that the result is 'independent of the CR transport model we adopt' is too broad. The six models vary only in the parallel diffusion coefficient and its momentum index; they all assume complete advective entrainment, no perpendicular diffusion, no streaming, no reacceleration, and no cosmic-ray back-reaction on the gas. In particular, self-confinement streaming could in principle reduce the efficiency with which GeV cosmic rays are carried away by the wind. The authors should soften the claim to 'independent of the parallel diffusion coefficient within the range tested' and discuss whether streaming is expected to be negligible in the stripped tail where the Alfvén speed may be low compared with the relative wind speed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.3] The sentence defining the run names says 'where i and w denote a wind and isolated simulation respectively.' From Table 2 and the rest of the text, i denotes isolated and w denotes wind; the wording should be reversed.
  2. [Table 2] The table header appears to contain an extra column ('Name Wind logD∥,0 q'); the column structure should be cleaned up so that it is clear that 'Name' is the run label and 'logD∥,0' and 'q' are the two varied parameters.
  3. [Section 2.2] The phrase 'our middle six γ-ray energies correspond to the central energies of the bins' is correct, but the list in the text should be cross-checked against the actual Fermi bin edges; the lowest and highest computed energies extend outside the Fermi band and are not used in the integrated flux comparison, which is fine but should be stated explicitly at the point of integration in Section 3.1.
  4. [Figure 5] The radio-panel x-axis labels in the figure appear to be labeled in GHz on a vertical axis in one of the panels; this is likely a typesetting issue. Please ensure all axes are labeled consistently with the gamma-ray panels.
  5. [Section 4.3] The statement that the predicted radio tail has a surface brightness of order 0.05 μJy arcsec^-2 is useful, but the detectability estimate would be more complete if it included a comparison with the Milky Way foreground at 1.5 GHz as well as the ASKAP noise estimate already given. The authors mention foreground confusion qualitatively; a quantitative or literature-based estimate would strengthen the observational-test section.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: gamma-ray data are not used to calibrate model inputs; the advection mechanism is a stated physical assumption, not a fitted output.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that advection of cosmic rays by the LMC's interaction with the Milky Way CGM lowers the gamma-ray luminosity. This is a forward-model prediction, not a fitted parameter: no gamma-ray data are used to set any model constant. The wind simulation W-2-6-M was selected for matching Faraday rotation measures, not gamma-ray luminosity (Section 2.1.1), and the diffusion coefficient is varied over a wide range (Table 2). The key assumptions are transparently stated, e.g. 'In a CRIPTIC calculation CRs are always advected along with the gas flow' (Section 2.3), and the paper's interpretation follows from the transport equation with this explicit term. The result that wind runs match observations while isolated controls overproduce is a genuine quantitative outcome, not an identity. The main caveat is an untested confound: the wind and isolated simulations differ both in advection and in the stripped gas/magnetic-field background, so the specific attribution to advective CR loss rather than gas stripping is not directly isolated. However, that is a robustness and experimental-design limitation, not a circularity. Some reliance on self-authored tools (CRIPTIC, S25, CONGRuENTS) is present, but these are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or as substitutes for the present calculation, and the result is externally testable against Fermi data. Thus no load-bearing circular step is identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the entrainment/advection assumption, the fidelity of the single S25 wind simulation, the fixed supernova CR injection luminosity and spectrum, and the radiation-field model. None of these are gamma-ray-calibrated, which keeps the core comparison non-circular, but each adds uncertainty to the quantitative match.

free parameters (7)
  • CR proton injection energy per supernova = 1e50 erg (L_src,p = 3.17e37 erg/s for 0.1 Myr)
    Directly normalizes the gamma-ray luminosity; adopted from supernova-remnant estimates, not fitted to LMC gamma-ray data.
  • CR electron injection energy per supernova = 1e49 erg (L_src,e = 3.17e36 erg/s for 0.1 Myr)
    Sets the electron/proton ratio and the relative strength of IC, bremsstrahlung, and synchrotron emission.
  • CR injection spectral index = p = 2.2 (dn/dp ∝ p^-2.2), 0.1-1e6 GeV
    Chosen from gamma-ray-bright supernova remnants; the paper acknowledges a steeper spectrum might resolve the >10 GeV overestimate.
  • Parallel diffusion normalization D∥,0 = 1e27-1e29 cm2/s
    Varied over the range inferred for the Milky Way and used in earlier LMC models; main conclusions are insensitive to this choice in wind runs.
  • Diffusion momentum index q = 0 and 1/3
    Two prescriptions spanning no energy dependence and Kolmogorov-type extrinsic turbulence; central result unchanged.
  • Radiation field dilution factors and dust temperature = T_dust = 28.1 K, W0 values in Table 1
    Derived from empirical DustPedia/Magnelli fits using observed LMC SFR and stellar mass; affects inverse Compton emission, which dominates in wind runs.
  • Free-free normalization at 24.2 GHz = normalized to match observed radio point
    Fitted to radio data, not to the gamma-ray central claim; used only to examine the radio diagnostic.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Cosmic rays are perfectly entrained in and advected with the gas flow; only parallel diffusion is included, with zero perpendicular diffusion and no streaming.
    Section 2.3: 'In a CRIPTIC calculation CRs are always advected along with the gas flow...' This is load-bearing for the advective-loss mechanism.
  • domain assumption Supernovae are the only significant CR accelerators in the LMC, with times/locations drawn by SLUG population synthesis within S25.
    Section 2.1.3: 'We assume supernovae are the only significant CR accelerators in the LMC...'
  • domain assumption The W-2-6-M simulation, chosen for matching Faraday rotation measures, faithfully represents the LMC's present interaction with the Milky Way CGM.
    Section 2.1.1: only one wind sim and one control are used; no ensemble over encounter geometries or CGM densities.
  • domain assumption The last 40 Myr of each simulation is representative of the present-day LMC and long enough for the gamma-ray-producing proton population to reach steady state.
    Sections 2.1.1 and 3.1: snapshots at t = 460-500 Myr are used; synchrotron-emitting electrons are explicitly not at steady state.
  • domain assumption Radiation fields can be approximated by a few dilute blackbodies plus CMB, with dust temperature and dilution factors from empirical galaxy fits; the far-UV component is omitted.
    Section 2.1.2: affects inverse Compton, which is the dominant gamma-ray mechanism in the wind runs. Far-UV contributes only ~3.5% of the energy budget.
  • ad hoc to paper CR diffusion obeys D_parallel ∝ p^q with a Bohm floor; CR back-reaction on the gas is neglected.
    Section 2.3 and Section 4.1: simplifying transport model; the paper itself caveats that neglected CR back-pressure may overestimate adiabatic gains in low-D runs.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19453 in / 13327 out tokens · 143231 ms · 2026-08-01T07:48:44.825197+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Models of galactic-scale cosmic ray production and transport have successfully reproduced the radio and $\gamma$-ray spectra of many galaxies; however, one notable exception is the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), where models that successfully fit other galaxies consistently overestimate its $\gamma$-ray flux. Here we investigate this discrepancy by applying the CRIPTIC cosmic ray transport code to recent magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the LMC's interactions with the Milky Way circumgalactic medium that accurately reproduce observations of the LMC's magnetic field structure. We recover a simulated $\gamma$-ray luminosity that is close to the observed luminosity for a wide range of cosmic ray transport models, while our control simulations of an isolated LMC not interacting with the Milky Way show the same over-prediction problem as previous investigations. Simulations including the CGM interaction yield lower $\gamma$-ray luminosities because in them cosmic rays escape the galaxy primarily via advection, significantly decreasing the emission from collisional processes and changing the dominant $\gamma$-ray emission mechanism from pion decay to inverse Compton emission. Comparisons of the detailed spectral shape show that our interacting LMC models match the observed $\gamma$-ray spectrum at photon energies below $\sim 10$ GeV, but still slightly overestimate the flux at higher energies, suggesting either more strongly energy-dependent transport than the models we have explored, or a cosmic ray injection spectrum steeper than the $p^{-2.2}$ that we adopt.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21316 by Hilay Shah, Mark R. Krumholz, Roland Crocker, Taaseen Islam.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: — Snapshots from the two LMC simulations from S25 that we use in this work at their final times, after 500 Myr of simulation time. The simulations have been translated and rotated such that the galaxy centers are at rest at the origin and the disk’s angular momentum is aligned with the z-axis. Colors show column density integrated over a 40 kpc-thick slab centered on the galaxy center. The left panel shows… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: — Energy-integrated non-thermal flux (multi band) as a function of time in the iD28Q0 (left) and wD28Q0 (right) simulations, where t = 0 corresponds to when we start following CR propagation and t = 40 Myr to the state of the LMC as it exists now. Black points show the total flux from all processes, while colored lines with points show the contribution from each emission process—pion decay, bremsstrahlung,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: — Radio and γ-ray spectra for the iD28Q0 (top) and wD28Q0 (bottom) simulations at the final time snapshot. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: — Specific γ-ray flux at 0.6 GeV from the iD28Q0 simulation (top row) and the wD28Q0 simulation (bottom row). The three columns show three different projections of the LMC disk: face-on (left), edge-on (middle), and as viewed from Earth (right). The white dashed arrows indicate the direction of the wind as seen by an observer comoving with the LMC. The white solid arrows indicate the direction of Earth. Fo… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: — Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: — Total energy loss rates (Γ) due to proton-proton collisions and adiabatic work for all proton packets within the q = 0 simulations. Each point sums up all particles that are younger than the t-axis age, so the rightmost points sum up all particles within the simulation. Each point is averaged over 2.5 Myr of simulation time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: — Predicted surface brightness at 1.5 GHz for the iD28Q0 and wD28Q0 cases as viewed from Earth. The field of view shown is 20 kpc × 20 kpc at the distance to the LMC. In order to generate this figure we have convolved the true surface brightness with a Gaussian kernel with with σ = 0.5 kpc, comparable to the expected resolution of single dish telescopes at LMC distances. For the isolated case we have scale… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0999-4 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0999-4 , eprint =

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0999-4

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1960 , journal =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1960

  3. [3]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Cosmic ray interstellar propagation tool using It \^o Calculus (CRIPTIC): software for simultaneous calculation of cosmic ray transport and observational signatures. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2712 , archivePrefix =. 2207.13838 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1374 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1374 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1374

  5. [5]

    arXiv , author =:2002.10282 , journal =

    doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00654-1 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2002.10282 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00141-2 , eid =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00141-2 , eid =

    doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00141-2

  7. [7]

    1975 , issue_date =

    Bentley, Jon Louis , title =. 1975 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/361002.361007 , journal =

    arXiv 1975

  8. [8]

    Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =

    Cosmic-Ray Propagation and Interactions in the Galaxy. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123011 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0701517 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  9. [9]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    A new class of accurate, mesh-free hydrodynamic simulation methods. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv195 , archivePrefix =. 1409.7395 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Bell , keywords =

    A.R. Bell , keywords =. Cosmic ray acceleration , journal =. 2013 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.022 , url =

    doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.022 2013

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    The acceleration of cosmic rays in shock fronts - I. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/182.2.147 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/182.2.147

  12. [12]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Cosmic Rays on Galaxy Scales: Progress and Pitfalls for CR-MHD Dynamical Models. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.07104 , archivePrefix =. 2509.07104 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.07104

  13. [13]

    The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=

    The Distribution of Ultrahigh-energy Cosmic Rays along the Supergalactic Plane Measured at the Pierre Auger Observatory , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. 2025 , month=May, pages=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbdc5 , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbdc5 2025

  14. [14]

    Physics Letters B , keywords =

    The Large Magellanic Cloud as a source of the highest energy cosmic rays. Physics Letters B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139903 , archivePrefix =. 2507.16378 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Particle acceleration by astrophysical shocks. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/182658 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/182658

  16. [16]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics Review , keywords =

    Cosmic ray feedback in galaxies and galaxy clusters. Astronomy & Astrophysics Review , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-023-00149-2 , archivePrefix =. 2306.03141 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Bonomi and P

    G. Bonomi and P. Checchia and M. D’Errico and D. Pagano and G. Saracino , keywords =. Applications of cosmic-ray muons , journal =. 2020 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103768 , url =

    arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    2025 , eprint=

    The diffusion coefficient in the Large Magellanic Cloud , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  19. [19]

    A predictive model for galactic non-thermal emission

    CONGRUENTS (COsmic ray, Neutrino, Gamma-ray, and Radio Non-Thermal Spectra) - I. A predictive model for galactic non-thermal emission. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1524 , archivePrefix =. 2212.09428 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Regularity and uniqueness of solutions for compressible non-newtonian MHD equations with variable electrical conductivity and energy effects. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad7ab7 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad7ab7

  21. [21]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Teraelectronvolt gamma-ray emission near globular cluster Terzan 5 as a probe of cosmic ray transport. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02337-1 , archivePrefix =. 2406.18160 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

    Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00023 , archivePrefix =. 1903.06714 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2180 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2180 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2180

  24. [24]

    Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

  25. [25]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Cosmic rays and non-thermal emission in simulated galaxies –. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1325 , number =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1325 2021

  26. [26]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Cosmic rays and non-thermal emission in simulated galaxies -. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2535 , abstract =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2535 2021

  27. [27]

    Science , author =

    The. Science , author =. 2005 , note =. doi:10.1126/science.1108832 , abstract =

    doi:10.1126/science.1108832 2005

  28. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Cosmic-. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7fa3 , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7fa3 2020

  29. [29]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    -ray/infrared luminosity correlation of star-forming galaxies , volume =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038428 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038428 2020

  30. [30]

    doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02337-1 , eprint =

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02337-1 , eprint =

    doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02337-1

  31. [31]

    arXiv , author =:1912.08491 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7237 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1912.08491 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  32. [32]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae932 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae932 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae932

  33. [33]

    and Di Mauro, M

    Recchia, S. and Di Mauro, M. and Aharonian, F. A. and Orusa, L. and Donato, F. and Gabici, S. and Manconi, S. , date-added =. Do the Geminga, Monogem and PSR J0622+3749. Phys. Rev. D , month =. 2021 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123017 , issue =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123017 2021

  34. [34]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1079 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1079 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1079

  35. [35]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2133 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2133 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2133

  36. [36]

    arXiv , author =:2402.18638 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/040 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2402.18638 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3692 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3692 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3692

  38. [38]

    arXiv , author =:1602.02243 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/16 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1602.02243 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3691 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3691 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3691

  40. [40]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2909 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2909 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2909

  41. [41]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1240 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1240 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1240

  42. [42]

    2017 , bdsk-file-1 =

    Physics of Plasmas , month =. 2017 , bdsk-file-1 =. doi:10.1063/1.4984017 , eid =

    doi:10.1063/1.4984017 2017

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1063/1.4807033 , journal =

    doi:10.1063/1.4807033

  44. [44]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3321 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3321 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3321

  45. [45]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab502 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab502 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab502

  46. [46]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Cosmic rays across the star-forming galaxy sequence -. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab148 , abstract =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab148 2021

  47. [47]

    Nature , author =

    The diffuse -ray background is dominated by star-forming galaxies , volume =. Nature , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03802-x , abstract =

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03802-x 2021

  48. [48]

    The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    The Calibration of Monochromatic Far-Infrared Star Formation Rate Indicators. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1256 , archivePrefix =. 1003.0961 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    and Bryan, Greg L

    Smith, Britton D. and Bryan, Greg L. and Glover, Simon C. O. and Goldbaum, Nathan J. and Turk, Matthew J. and Regan, John and Wise, John H. and Schive, Hsi-Yu and Abel, Tom and Emerick, Andrew and O’Shea, Brian W. and Anninos, Peter and Hummels, Cameron B. and Khochfar, Sadegh , year=. grackle: a chemistry and cooling library for astrophysics , volume=. M...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3291

  50. [50]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Wind of change: Faraday rotation in a simulated Large Magellanic Cloud. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1003 , archivePrefix =. 2503.06449 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    The -. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab86a6 , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab86a6 2020

  52. [52]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Cosmic ray transport in starburst galaxies , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa493 , abstract =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa493 2020

  53. [53]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement , author =

    The. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c 2020

  54. [54]

    2000 , pages =

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1086/317361 , abstract =

    doi:10.1086/317361 2000

  55. [55]

    Physical Review C , author =

    Parametrization of the nucleus-nucleus gamma-ray production cross sections below 100 GeV/nucleon: Subthreshold pions and hard photons , volume =. Physical Review C , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.064603 , number =

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.064603 2016

  56. [56]

    Evidence of

    Nakano, Satoya and Tachihara, Kengo and Tamashiro, Mao , month = apr, year =. Evidence of. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , publisher =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adb8de , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adb8de

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    Cosmicflows-2: The Data. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/86 , archivePrefix =. 1307.7213 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    , year =

    Longair, Malcolm S. , year =. High energy astrophysics , isbn =

  59. [59]

    Schwartz, Matthew D. , year=. Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model , publisher=

  60. [60]

    Physical Review D , author =

    Energy spectra of gamma rays, electrons, and neutrinos produced at proton-proton interactions in the very high energy regime , volume =. Physical Review D , author =. 2006 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.034018 , number =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.034018 2006

  61. [61]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    The. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad08f , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad08f 2018

  62. [62]

    , year = 1987, month = oct, volume =

    Particle acceleration at astrophysical shocks: A theory of cosmic ray origin. , year = 1987, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7 1987

  63. [63]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement , author =

    Incremental. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac6751 , language =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac6751 2022

  64. [64]

    The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071 , archivePrefix =. 0902.1089 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    21st International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC21) , year = 1990, series =

    Cosmic Ray Propagation in the Galaxy. 21st International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC21) , year = 1990, series =

    1990

  66. [66]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 4 (4FGL-DR4). arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2307.12546 , archivePrefix =. 2307.12546 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.12546

  67. [67]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Cosmic. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 1971 , note =. doi:10.1086/151210 , abstract =

    doi:10.1086/151210 1971

  68. [68]

    The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    The Star Formation History of the Large Magellanic Cloud. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243 , archivePrefix =. 0908.1422 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , author =

    Bremsstrahlung,. Reviews of Modern Physics , author =. 1970 , pages =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.42.237 , language =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.42.237 1970

  70. [70]

    Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) , author =

    On gamma-ray astronomy , volume =. Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) , author =. 1958 , pages =. doi:10.1007/BF02745590 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02745590 1955

  71. [71]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year = 2024, month = dec, volume =

    Magnetic fields in the Large Magellanic Cloud and their connection to the Magellanic System. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year = 2024, month = dec, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2416 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2416 2024

  72. [72]

    Science , keywords =

    Observation of high-energy neutrinos from the Galactic plane. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.adc9818 , archivePrefix =. 2307.04427 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  73. [73]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Old and young stellar populations in. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935118 , language =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935118 2019

  74. [74]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2663-4 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2663-4 , eprint =

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2663-4

  75. [75]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Erkal, D and Belokurov, V and Laporte, C F P and Koposov, S E and Li, T S and Grillmair, C J and Kallivayalil, N and Price-Whelan, A M and Evans, N W and Hawkins, K and Hendel, D and Mateu, C and Navarro, J F and del Pino, A and Slater, C T and Sohn, S T and (The OATs: Orphan Aspen Treasury Collaboration) , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomic...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1371 2019

  76. [76]

    Hess, Victor F. Phys. Z. 1912

    1912

  77. [77]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , keywords =

    Interstellar radiation field and dust temperatures in the diffuse interstellar medium and in giant molecular clouds. Astronomy & Astrophysics , keywords =

  78. [78]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Millisecond pulsars from accretion-induced collapse as the origin of the Galactic Centre gamma-ray excess signal. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01658-3 , archivePrefix =. 2106.00222 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    Astrophysics and Space Science , author =

    The. Astrophysics and Space Science , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1007/s10509-023-04184-4 , urldate =

    doi:10.1007/s10509-023-04184-4 2023

  80. [80]

    1949 , publisher=

    The Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields , author=. 1949 , publisher=

    1949

Showing first 80 references.