Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Negative refraction of light in an atomic medium

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Atomic lattices, without any metamaterials, can bend transmitted light the wrong way, with an effective index near -0.5.

desk verdict A well-executed simulation study that makes a solid case for negative refraction in cold-atom arrays; the main caveat is that the finite-size verification for the flagship J=0 geometry is thinner than the rest of the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03622 v1 pith:IWQ4G35W submitted 2024-12-04 physics.optics cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phquant-ph

L. Ruks , K. E. Ballantine , J. Ruostekoski This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords negativerefractionatomicarrayscollectiveresonancescoupled-dipolesimulationopticallatticessubradianceeffectiverefractiveindexBlochbands
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that negative refraction—a beam bending the wrong way across an interface—can be produced by a plain periodic array of atoms, with no artificial metamaterial elements. Using essentially exact coupled-dipole simulations of light scattering, the authors find a transmitted beam displaced by about $-9\lambda$ through a 25-layer $J=0\to J'=1$ lattice, corresponding to an effective refractive index around $-0.5$ with roughly 80% transmission. They explain the effect through collective excitation bands whose in-plane group velocity is opposite to the excitation quasi-momentum, and they show the same physics persists for two-level atoms, across lattice constants, and under realistic disorder. If right, this gives a low-loss, naturally assembled medium for negative-index optics, with potential for subwavelength imaging and quantum-optical devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the collective excitation band structure of the stacked planar atomic lattice: for each in-plane quasi-momentum $q_\parallel$, a $3N_x\times 3N_x$ matrix $H(q_\parallel)$ (reduced to $N_x\times N_x$ for two-level atoms) yields collective line shifts $\delta^{(j)}(q_\parallel)$ and linewidths $\upsilon^{(j)}(q_\parallel)$. The transverse component of the group velocity, $-\nabla_\parallel \delta^{(j)}$, together with the linewidth $\upsilon^{(j)}$, gives the approximate lateral displacement $D\simeq -\partial_y \delta^{(j)}/\upsilon^{(j)}$; negative refraction appears when this group velocity is antiparallel to the excitation quasi-momentum. The momentum-space layer propagators, which include all recurrent scattering within and between layers and a high-momentum regularization, are what make the simulation tractable for large arrays.

What would settle it

Place a probe beam at incidence $\theta=0.2\pi$ and detuning $\Delta=0.73\gamma$ on a finite 3D cubic array of $J=0\to J'=1$ atoms (e.g., Sr or Yb) with lattice constant $a\simeq 0.45\lambda$ and at least five layers; if the transmitted beam's peak shifts toward positive $y$, or the transmission is far below about 0.8, the predicted band-folding negative refraction does not survive in a finite lattice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that cooperative light-mediated interactions in a subwavelength atomic lattice fold the dispersion of collective Bloch resonances so that the transverse group velocity is antiparallel to the excitation quasi-momentum; a beam tuned to such a band is deflected toward negative lateral displacement, the hallmark of negative refraction. For a 25-layer cubic array of $J=0\to J'=1$ atoms with lattice constant $a=0.45\lambda$, detuning $\Delta=0.73\gamma$, and incidence angle $\theta=0.2\pi$, the simulations yield lateral displacement $D\simeq -9\lambda$ and power transmission $T\simeq 0.8$, giving an effective group index $n'_{\rm eff}\simeq -0.5$ via a Snell-Descartes analogy. The authors also demonstrate negative refraction for a five-layer array of two-level atoms at Rb lattice spacing $a=0.68\lambda$, with $D\simeq -\lambda$ and $T\simeq 0.95$, and show that the displacement follows the simple formula $D\simeq -\partial_y \delta^{(j)}/\upsilon^{(j)}$ near resonance, making narrow (subradiant) modes produce the largest deflections.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the infinite-in-plane stacked-layer calculation describes a realistic finite atomic array; the finite-size check is done only for a five-layer two-level lattice, not for the 25-layer $J=0\to J'=1$ system behind the headline numbers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Atomic arrays become a designable negative-index medium at optical frequencies without fabricated resonators, with transmission high enough for practical imaging applications.
  • Negative refraction is generic to moderately subwavelength lattices: it appears for both $J=0\to J'=1$ and two-level transitions and for lattice constants $a\lesssim\lambda$, so it is not tied to one atomic species.
  • The effect survives realistic imperfections: with missing atoms and positional fluctuations at optical-lattice depths, negative beam displacement and transmission above about 0.3 persist across most of the transmission band.
  • Subradiant collective modes enhance the effective index and displacement, so engineering long-lived dark resonances can amplify the refraction.
  • The linear scaling of displacement with thickness connects the microscopic atom-by-atom response to a macroscopic bulk refractive index, consistent with Snell-Descartes behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to repeat the finite-size check for the $J=0\to J'=1$ system itself, since the paper's finite-size verification is performed only for a five-layer two-level array with Rb spacing.
  • The band-folding mechanism is not obviously limited to atoms; the same criterion of a Bloch band whose transverse group velocity is antiparallel to quasi-momentum could be sought in other resonant-scatterer arrays, such as cold Rydberg lattices or structured solid-state emitters, though losses and fabrication disorder would differ.
  • Because the displacement grows with the subradiant lifetime, time-resolved measurements of a transmitted short pulse's center position could directly probe the band linewidth $\upsilon^{(j)}$ and separate coherent displacement from incoherent background scattering.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports a theoretical and numerical study of light transmission through dense three-dimensional atomic arrays, modelled as stacks of infinite two-dimensional layers. For both a J=0→J'=1 transition with lattice constant a=0.45λ and a two-level cycling transition with a=0.68λ, essentially exact coupled-dipole simulations show a negative lateral displacement D of the transmitted beam for oblique incidence, which the authors interpret as negative refraction. In the central J=0 case with 25 layers they find D≈−9λ, an effective group refractive index n'_eff≈−0.5, and power transmission T≈0.8. The authors introduce a collective band-structure picture in which the displacement is approximated by D≈−∇∥δ^(j)/υ^(j), verified against exact infinite-layer simulations, and they study robustness to lattice imperfections using stochastic simulations and a phenomenological diminished-polarizability model. A finite-size check is performed for a 5×25×25 two-level array.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a significant advance: negative refraction without artificial metamaterial fabrication, in a naturally available atomic medium, with high transmission and tunability through level structure, lattice spacing, and subradiant resonances. The central numerical method (momentum-space solution of the coupled-dipole equations) is well established, and the band-structure formula provides a simple predictive tool that is checked against the exact simulations. The finite-size verification, however, is only for a different system than the main J=0 25-layer result, which limits the support for the claim that high-transmission negative refraction will survive in a realistic finite array of the size studied in Fig. 1. The imperfection analysis is careful and appropriately critical of the phenomenological model, noting its limitations explicitly.

major comments (2)
  1. [Fig. 1(b)–(e) and Fig. 4(a)] The main demonstration of high-transmission negative refraction (Fig. 1(b)–(e)) uses atomic layers that are infinite in the y and z directions (N_y=N_z=∞). The finite-size verification in Fig. 4(a) is for a 5×25×25 two-level array with a=0.68λ and Δ=−0.1γ, not for the J=0→J'=1, a=0.45λ, 25-layer system of Fig. 1. The text mentions that for a=0.45λ and the J=0 transition, negative refraction through five layers remains observable under position fluctuations, but it does not report the transmission and displacement magnitudes for that finite geometry, and five layers is not the 25-layer system of Fig. 1. Since the authors acknowledge that edge effects can alter the excitations and lead to scattering off sample boundaries, the claim that high-transmission negative refraction survives in a realistic finite array of the Fig. 1 system is not established. Please provide a finite-size simulation for the J=0 25-layer geometry or explicitly qualify the claim to the infinite-in-plane case.
  2. [Band-structure approximation (Fig. 3) and Abstract] The band-structure derivation of D≈−∇∥δ^(j)/υ^(j) and its numerical verification in Fig. 3(c,d) assume translational invariance in the in-plane directions. The agreement in Fig. 3 therefore does not test the effects of finite in-plane boundaries, which the authors argue are the only source of loss in the ideal system. The abstract's statement that the effect is achieved 'within the scope of currently realised experimental systems' requires either a finite-size simulation of the 25-layer J=0 case or a more cautious statement that the high-transmission result is for infinite in-plane layers, with finite-size support so far limited to a few-layer geometry. This distinction is load-bearing because the headline numbers T≈0.8 and D≈−9λ may be substantially altered by edge scattering in a finite lattice.
minor comments (4)
  1. [After Fig. 3] The approximation D≈Dtilde is stated to be 'remarkably accurate at resonance'; please state explicitly how the accuracy degrades away from resonance, since Fig. 1(c) presents D over a wide detuning range and the reader may otherwise infer that the approximation holds globally.
  2. [Eq. (A6)] The transmission T in Eq. (A6) is evaluated over a small collection surface in the plane x=a(Nx−1)+2λ, extending across −10λ≤y,z≤10λ. Please clarify whether this quantity includes diffuse scattering or only the coherent beam, especially because the text attributes an increase in T towards the edge of the transmission band to incoherent scattering.
  3. [General] There are several typographical artifacts in the text (e.g., 'e ffective', 'am-plitudes', 'cuto ff') that should be corrected in the published version.
  4. [Methods, momentum-space regularisation] The paper refers to the Supplemental Material for important regularisation details of the momentum-space sums; if the submission is intended to be self-contained, these details should be briefly summarised in the Methods.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Only mild definitional overlap: n'_eff is defined from the simulated displacement D, so n'_eff<0 restates D<0; the core D and band-structure comparison are independent simulation outputs and are not circular.

  1. self definitional [Results, definition of effective refractive index (paragraph after Fig. 1(b))]
    "To determine the effective group refractive index and quantify the beam’s deflection, we define the real part of the refractive index [44], n′eff, for each angle of incidence by analogy with the Snell-Descartes law, sinθ = n′eff sinθ′, where the effective deflection angle θ′ = arctan(D/[(Nx− 1)a]) is calculated using the beam displacement and medium thickness (Nx− 1)a."

    The paper presents n'_eff ≈ −0.5 as evidence of negative refraction, but n'_eff is defined directly from the simulated lateral displacement D via the Snell-Descartes relation. The statement 'n'_eff < 0' is therefore a restatement of 'D < 0' rather than an independent derivation or prediction. This does not undermine the primary D < 0 result, which is a genuine output of the coupled-dipole simulation, but the n'_eff claim carries no additional evidential weight beyond the D measurement. The band-structure approximation D ≈ D~ = v_g/υ is explicitly compared with the exact D and is not fitted to it, so no further circularity is present.

full rationale

The central demonstration of negative refraction rests on the simulated lateral beam displacement D ≈ −9λ and high transmission T ≈ 0.8 for the 25-layer J = 0 → J' = 1 array. This D value is an output of the essentially exact coupled-dipole equations, Eq. (1), and is not defined into existence by the paper's interpretation. The band-structure explanation introduces D~ = −∇δ/υ from collective mode eigenvalues and then compares it with the exact displacement in Fig. 3(c), finding good agreement; this is a genuine approximate explanatory relation, not a fitted input. The only definitional step is the conversion of D into an effective refractive index n'_eff via Snell's law, so n'_eff < 0 is equivalent to D < 0 by construction. That is a mild self-definitional presentation rather than a circular derivation. Self-citations to prior methodology [26,27] and to the experimental demonstrations [21,22] are used as support for the validity of the simulation framework, but the negative-refraction claim itself is not reduced to those citations. The finite-size validation uses a different 5-layer two-level system, but that is a completeness/robustness gap, not circularity. Overall, the paper's main physical result is self-contained, with only a minor definitional overlap concerning n'_eff.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters fitted to data; all simulation parameters are physical and varied. The main axioms are standard coupled-dipole electrodynamics, the low-intensity linear response, and the infinite-layer approximation, plus a qualitative imperfection model.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Low light intensity limit, so each atom responds linearly as a driven dipole oscillator (Eq. 1).
    The coupled-dipole model assumes weak driving and neglects saturation, which is standard and validated for the cited experiments.
  • domain assumption Atoms are fixed at perfect lattice sites with unit filling for the ideal case.
    The ideal simulations assume a perfect Bravais lattice with one atom per site, corresponding to Mott insulator states; imperfections are later introduced.
  • domain assumption For the main results, the lattice is infinite in the y and z directions, and the incident beam has k_z=0.
    The momentum-space layer method assumes translational invariance in y,z; finite-size effects are checked only for a 5x25x25 two-level lattice.
  • standard math The free-space dipole radiation kernel G(r) with a nonrelativistic high-momentum cutoff describes the light-matter interaction.
    This follows established coupled-dipole electrodynamics (Refs. [26-29]) and is not specific to this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The phenomenological model of diminished polarizability zeta approximates missing atoms and position fluctuations.
    The authors acknowledge this is only a qualitative estimate and show discrepancies vs exact stochastic simulations in Fig. 4(c).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Negative refraction of light in an atomic medium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IWQ4G35W

@misc{pith2026241203622,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Negative refraction of light in an atomic medium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IWQ4G35W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03622}
}
read the original abstract

The quest to manipulate light propagation in ways not possible with natural media has driven the development of artificially structured metamaterials. One of the most striking effects is negative refraction, where the light beam deflects away from the boundary normal. However, due to material characteristics, the applications of this phenomenon, such as lensing that surpasses the diffraction limit, have been constrained. Here, we demonstrate negative refraction of light in an atomic medium without the use of artificial metamaterials, employing essentially exact simulations of light propagation. High transmission negative refraction is achieved in atomic arrays for different level structures and lattice constants, within the scope of currently realised experimental systems. We introduce an intuitive description of negative refraction based on collective excitation bands, whose transverse group velocities are antiparallel to the excitation quasi-momenta. We also illustrate how this phenomenon is robust to lattice imperfections and can be significantly enhanced through subradiance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03622 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Effects of finite trapping on the decay, recoil, and decoherence of dark states of quantum emitter arrays

    physics.atom-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Finite trap strength makes subradiant atomic-array dark states decay faster over time, heat up, and lose fidelity; infidelity scales as (γ0η/ωt)^2 and is minimized with strong traps and perpendicular polarization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A detailed discussion of light-atom interactions may be found in the Supplementary Informa- tion

    Calculation of the scattered field Here, we expand upon the formalism enabling the cal- culation of induced dipoles and the scattered field for ar- rays of infinite extent. A detailed discussion of light-atom interactions may be found in the Supplementary Informa- tion. We substitute the Bloch wave representation P(ℓ, j) =P q∥ Pℓ(q∥)eiq∥·r∥ j into the mul...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (A1), can be cast in the form ˙b(q∥) = i[H(q∥) +δH]b(q∥) + f(q∥), (A7) with b3m−1+ν(q∥) = Pmν(q∥), f3m−1+ν = iˆe∗ ν· R+ m(q∥), whilst the diagonal matrix δH contains ∆

    Calculation of the excitation band structure The multiple scattering relation between atomic layers, Eq. (A1), can be cast in the form ˙b(q∥) = i[H(q∥) +δH]b(q∥) + f(q∥), (A7) with b3m−1+ν(q∥) = Pmν(q∥), f3m−1+ν = iˆe∗ ν· R+ m(q∥), whilst the diagonal matrix δH contains ∆. The collective excita- tion eigenmodes and the resulting band structure in the case...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This mean-field averaging approach can describe the impact of missing atoms on light transmission through atomic arrays for ζ ≃ 1, as numerically demonstrated in Ref

    Modelling imperfections through diminished atomic polarisation density We use diminished atomic polarisation density by a factor ofζ to phenomenologically represent fractional filling ζ <1. This mean-field averaging approach can describe the impact of missing atoms on light transmission through atomic arrays for ζ ≃ 1, as numerically demonstrated in Ref. ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    R. A. Shelby, D. R. Smith, and S. Schultz, Experimental verifi- cation of a negative index of refraction, Science292, 77 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Zhang, W

    S. Zhang, W. Fan, N. C. Panoiu, K. J. Malloy, R. M. Os- good, and S. R. J. Brueck, Experimental demonstration of near-infrared negative-index metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137404 (2005)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    C. M. Soukoulis, S. Linden, and M. Wegener, Negative refrac- tive index at optical wavelengths, Science 315, 47 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Valentine, S

    J. Valentine, S. Zhang, T. Zentgraf, E. Ulin-Avila, D. A. Genov, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, Three-dimensional optical metamate- rial with a negative refractive index, Nature 455, 376 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    A. N. Grigorenko, A. K. Geim, H. F. Gleeson, Y . Zhang, A. A. Firsov, I. Y . Khrushchev, and J. Petrovic, Nanofabricated media with negative permeability at visible frequencies, Nature 438, 335 (2005)

    work page 2005

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    V . M. Shalaev, Optical negative-index metamaterials, Nature Photonics 1, 41 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    D. R. Smith, J. B. Pendry, and M. C. K. Wiltshire, Metamateri- als and negative refractive index, Science 305, 788 (2004)

    2004

  3. [11]

    V . G. Veselago, Sov. Phys. Usp.10, 509 (1968)

    1968

  4. [12]

    J. B. Pendry, Negative refraction makes a perfect lens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000)

    2000

  5. [13]

    J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, Controlling electro- magnetic fields, Science 312, 1780 (2006)

    2006

  6. [14]

    Leonhardt, Optical conformal mapping, Science 312, 1777 (2006)

    U. Leonhardt, Optical conformal mapping, Science 312, 1777 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    Schurig, J

    D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, B. J. Justice, S. A. Cummer, J. B. Pendry, A. F. Starr, and D. R. Smith, Metamaterial electromag- netic cloak at microwave frequencies, Science314, 977 (2006)

    2006

  8. [16]

    T. Xu, A. Agrawal, M. Abashin, K. J. Chau, and H. J. Lezec, All-angle negative refraction and active flat lensing of ultravio- let light, Nature 497, 470 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    H. He, C. Qiu, L. Ye, X. Cai, X. Fan, M. Ke, F. Zhang, and Z. Liu, Topological negative refraction of surface acoustic waves in a weyl phononic crystal, Nature 560, 61 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Kaina, F

    N. Kaina, F. Lemoult, M. Fink, and G. Lerosey, Negative re- fractive index and acoustic superlens from multiple scattering in single negative metamaterials, Nature 525, 77 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    J. O. Dimmock, Losses in left-handed materials, Opt. Express 11, 2397 (2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, Optical metamateri- als—more bulky and less lossy, Science 330, 1633 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    Sukhovich, B

    A. Sukhovich, B. Merheb, K. Muralidharan, J. O. Vasseur, Y . Pennec, P. A. Deymier, and J. H. Page, Experimental and the- oretical evidence for subwavelength imaging in phononic crys- tals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 154301 (2009)

    2009

  14. [22]

    Notomi, Theory of light propagation in strongly modulated photonic crystals: Refractionlike behavior in the vicinity of the photonic band gap, Phys

    M. Notomi, Theory of light propagation in strongly modulated photonic crystals: Refractionlike behavior in the vicinity of the photonic band gap, Phys. Rev. B 62, 10696 (2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    Ruostekoski, Cooperative quantum-optical planar arrays of 9 atoms, Phys

    J. Ruostekoski, Cooperative quantum-optical planar arrays of 9 atoms, Phys. Rev. A 108, 030101 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    J. Rui, D. Wei, A. Rubio-Abadal, S. Hollerith, J. Zeiher, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, A subradiant optical mir- ror formed by a single structured atomic layer, Nature 583, 369 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Srakaew, P

    K. Srakaew, P. Weckesser, S. Hollerith, D. Wei, D. Adler, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, A subwavelength atomic array switched by a single rydberg atom, Nature Physics 19, 714 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    K ¨astel, M

    J. K ¨astel, M. Fleischhauer, S. F. Yelin, and R. L. Walsworth, Tunable negative refraction without absorption via electromag- neteically induced chirality, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 073602 (2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    M. O. Oktel and O. E. M ¨ustecaplıo˘glu, Electromagnetically in- duced left-handedness in a dense gas of three-level atoms, Phys. Rev. A 70, 053806 (2004)

    2004

  20. [28]

    N. R. Brewer, Z. N. Buckholtz, Z. J. Simmons, E. A. Mueller, and D. D. Yavuz, Coherent magnetic response at optical fre- quencies using atomic transitions, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011005 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Javanainen, J

    J. Javanainen, J. Ruostekoski, B. Vestergaard, and M. R. Fran- cis, One-dimensional modeling of light propagation in dense and degenerate samples, Phys. Rev. A 59, 649 (1999)

    1999

  22. [30]

    M. D. Lee, S. D. Jenkins, and J. Ruostekoski, Stochastic meth- ods for light propagation and recurrent scattering in saturated and nonsaturated atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063803 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Ruostekoski and J

    J. Ruostekoski and J. Javanainen, Quantum field theory of co- operative atom response: Low light intensity, Phys. Rev. A 55, 513 (1997)

    1997

  24. [32]

    J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    Antezza and Y

    M. Antezza and Y . Castin, Spectrum of light in a quantum fluc- tuating periodic structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 123903 (2009)

    2009

  26. [34]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V . Iorsh, A. V . Poshakinskiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collec- tive radiance and photon-photon correlations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 015002 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Facchinetti, S

    G. Facchinetti, S. D. Jenkins, and J. Ruostekoski, Storing light with subradiant correlations in arrays of atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 243601 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Facchinetti and J

    G. Facchinetti and J. Ruostekoski, Interaction of light with pla- nar lattices of atoms: Reflection, transmission, and cooperative magnetometry, Phys. Rev. A97, 023833 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Javanainen and R

    J. Javanainen and R. Rajapakse, Light propagation in systems involving two-dimensional atomic lattices, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013616 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    K. E. Ballantine and J. Ruostekoski, Optical magnetism and Huygens’ surfaces in arrays of atoms induced by cooperative responses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 143604 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Alaee, B

    R. Alaee, B. Gurlek, M. Albooyeh, D. Mart´ın-Cano, and V . San- doghdar, Quantum metamaterials with magnetic response at op- tical frequencies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 063601 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    M. T. Manzoni, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Asenjo-Garcia, J. V . Porto, A. V . Gorshkov, and D. E. Chang, Optimization of pho- ton storage fidelity in ordered atomic arrays, New J. Phys. 20, 083048 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Fukuhara, S

    T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, M. Sugimoto, S. Taie, and Y . Taka- hashi, Mott insulator of ultracold alkaline-earth-metal-like atoms, Phys. Rev. A 79, 041604 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    Stellmer, B

    S. Stellmer, B. Pasquiou, R. Grimm, and F. Schreck, Creation of ultracold sr 2 molecules in the electronic ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 115302 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Javanainen, J

    J. Javanainen, J. Ruostekoski, Y . Li, and S.-M. Yoo, Shifts of a resonance line in a dense atomic sample, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 113603 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Javanainen and J

    J. Javanainen and J. Ruostekoski, Light propagation beyond the mean-field theory of standard optics, Opt. Express 24, 993 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    S. D. Jenkins, J. Ruostekoski, J. Javanainen, R. Bourgain, S. Jennewein, Y . R. P. Sortais, and A. Browaeys, Optical res- onance shifts in the fluorescence of thermal and cold atomic gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 183601 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    Andreoli, M

    F. Andreoli, M. J. Gullans, A. A. High, A. Browaeys, and D. E. Chang, Maximum refractive index of an atomic medium, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011026 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, Past achievements and future challenges in the development of three-dimensional photonic metamaterials, Nature Photonics 5, 523 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    Shahmoon, D

    E. Shahmoon, D. S. Wild, M. D. Lukin, and S. F. Yelin, Co- operative resonances in light scattering from two-dimensional atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 113601 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    P. A. Belov and C. R. Simovski, Boundary conditions for in- terfaces of electromagnetic crystals and the generalized ewald- oseen extinction principle, Phys. Rev. B 73, 045102 (2006)

    2006

  42. [50]

    S. D. Jenkins and J. Ruostekoski, Controlled manipulation of light by cooperative response of atoms in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 86, 031602 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    Perczel, J

    J. Perczel, J. Borregaard, D. E. Chang, H. Pichler, S. F. Yelin, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Photonic band structure of two- dimensional atomic lattices, Phys. Rev. A 96, 063801 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    J. F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic mott insulator, Nature 467, 68 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    Bluvstein, H

    D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays, Nature 604, 451 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Ferioli, A

    G. Ferioli, A. Glicenstein, L. Henriet, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and A. Browaeys, Storage and release of subradiant excitations in a dense atomic cloud, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021031 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    B. J. Lester, N. Luick, A. M. Kaufman, C. M. Reynolds, and C. A. Regal, Rapid production of uniformly filled arrays of neu- tral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 073003 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V . Lienhard, S. de L ´es´eleuc, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Synthetic three-dimensional atomic structures as- sembled atom by atom, Nature 561, 79 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Ohl de Mello, D

    D. Ohl de Mello, D. Sch ¨affner, J. Werkmann, T. Preuscho ff, L. Kohfahl, M. Schlosser, and G. Birkl, Defect-free assembly of 2d clusters of more than 100 single-atom quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 203601 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    H. Kim, W. Lee, H.-g. Lee, H. Jo, Y . Song, and J. Ahn, In situ single-atom array synthesis using dynamic holographic optical tweezers, Nature Communications 7, 13317 (2016)

    2016

  51. [59]

    Cooper, J

    A. Cooper, J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, and M. Endres, Alkaline-earth atoms in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041055 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    A. S. Solntsev, G. S. Agarwal, and Y . S. Kivshar, Metasurfaces for quantum photonics, Nature Photonics 15, 327 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Bekenstein, I

    R. Bekenstein, I. Pikovski, H. Pichler, E. Shahmoon, S. F. Yelin, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum metasurfaces with atom arrays, Na- ture Physics 16, 676 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    R. J. Bettles, M. D. Lee, S. A. Gardiner, and J. Ruostekoski, Quantum and nonlinear effects in light transmitted through pla- nar atomic arrays, Communications Physics 3, 141 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Grankin, P

    A. Grankin, P. O. Guimond, D. V . Vasilyev, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, Free-space photonic quantum link and chiral quantum 10 optics, Phys. Rev. A 98, 043825 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    Lemoult, G

    F. Lemoult, G. Lerosey, J. de Rosny, and M. Fink, Resonant metalenses for breaking the diffraction barrier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 203901 (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    S. D. Jenkins, J. Ruostekoski, N. Papasimakis, S. Savo, and N. I. Zheludev, Many-body subradiant excitations in metamaterial arrays: Experiment and theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 053901 (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    Y . Liu, G. P. Wang, J. B. Pendry, and S. Zhang, All-angle re- flectionless negative refraction with ideal photonic weyl meta- materials, Light: Science & Applications 11, 276 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    J. B. Pendry, Time reversal and negative refraction, Science 322, 71 (2008)

    2008

  61. [69]

    Bacot, M

    V . Bacot, M. Labousse, A. Eddi, M. Fink, and E. Fort, Time re- versal and holography with spacetime transformations, Nature Physics 12, 972 (2016)

    2016

  62. [70]

    S. D. Jenkins and J. Ruostekoski, Metamaterial transparency induced by cooperative electromagnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 147401 (2013)

    2013

  63. [71]

    P. A. Belov and C. R. Simovski, Homogenization of electro- magnetic crystals formed by uniaxial resonant scatterers, Phys. Rev. E 72, 026615 (2005)

    2005

  64. [72]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    Guimond, A

    P.-O. Guimond, A. Grankin, D. V . Vasilyev, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, Subradiant Bell states in distant atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 093601 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.