Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Performance Bounds for Policy-Based Average Reward Reinforcement Learning Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.01450 v3 pith:IWRLYYQT submitted 2023-02-02 cs.LG cs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.LGcs.SYeess.SY
keywords boundsperformancepolicyrewardalgorithmsaverageerrorhorizon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Many policy-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms can be viewed as instantiations of approximate policy iteration (PI), i.e., where policy improvement and policy evaluation are both performed approximately. In applications where the average reward objective is the meaningful performance metric, discounted reward formulations are often used with the discount factor being close to $1,$ which is equivalent to making the expected horizon very large. However, the corresponding theoretical bounds for error performance scale with the square of the horizon. Thus, even after dividing the total reward by the length of the horizon, the corresponding performance bounds for average reward problems go to infinity. Therefore, an open problem has been to obtain meaningful performance bounds for approximate PI and RL algorithms for the average-reward setting. In this paper, we solve this open problem by obtaining the first finite-time error bounds for average-reward MDPs, and show that the asymptotic error goes to zero in the limit as policy evaluation and policy improvement errors go to zero.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools