REVIEW 1 cited by
Insiders and Outsiders in Research on Machine Learning and Society
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A subset of machine learning research intersects with societal issues, including fairness, accountability and transparency, as well as the use of machine learning for social good. In this work, we analyze the scholars contributing to this research at the intersection of machine learning and society through the lens of the sociology of science. By analyzing the authorship of all machine learning papers posted to arXiv, we show that compared to researchers from overrepresented backgrounds (defined by gender and race/ethnicity), researchers from underrepresented backgrounds are more likely to conduct research at this intersection than other kinds of machine learning research. This state of affairs leads to contention between two perspectives on insiders and outsiders in the scientific enterprise: outsiders being those outside the group being studied, and outsiders being those who have not participated as researchers in an area historically. This contention manifests as an epistemic question on the validity of knowledge derived from lived experience in machine learning research, and predicts boundary work that we see in a real-world example.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Adapting to LLMs: How Insiders and Outsiders Reshape Scientific Knowledge Production
Researchers outside core AI fields became markedly more application-oriented, transdisciplinary, and socially accountable in their LLM-era papers, while AI insiders mainly responded by diversifying collaborations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.