Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 82 references

Exploring the impact of Ti/Al on L12 nanoprecipitation and deformation behavior in CoNiFeAlTi multi-principal element alloys through atomistic simulations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the large stacking fault energy difference between L12 nanoprecipitates and the FCC matrix—not the tiny lattice mismatch of 0.139%—is what controls dislocation pinning in CoNiFeAlTi multi-principal element alloys…

desk verdict Solid new MEAM potential and L12 fraction data; the SFE-mismatch pinning claim is plausible but underdetermined by the shear simulations. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17984 v1 pith:IXV4ZJTH submitted 2025-06-22 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Amin Esfandiarpour , Anshul D. S. Parmar , Silvia Bonfanti , Pawel Sobkowicz , Byeong-Joo Lee , Mikko Alava This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords L12nanoprecipitateshybridmoleculardynamics/MonteCarlostackingfaultenergymismatchmulti-principalelementalloysdislocationpinning2NN-MEAMpotentialprecipitationstrengtheningCoNiFeAlTi
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what actually makes L12 nanoprecipitates strengthen CoNi-based multi-principal element alloys, and answers with a mechanism that has been overlooked: the stacking fault energy (SFE) contrast between precipitate and matrix, not the elastic misfit. Using a MEAM interatomic potential assembled for the CoNiFeAlTi system and hybrid molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo simulations, it shows that (CoNiFe)86(Al7Ti7) forms the highest fraction of L12 nanoparticles and that these precipitates raise the alloy's SFE. Shear simulations of an edge dislocation encountering 4–8 nm precipitates show cutting rather than Orowan looping, with depinning stress rising from 340 to 450 MPa as the precipitate grows; the lattice mismatch is just 0.139% while the SFE mismatch is about 118%. If the claim is right, the practical recipe for strong yet ductile MPEAs is to maximize SFE mismatch while keeping precipitates coherent.

What carries the argument

The central object is the stacking fault energy (SFE) mismatch between the L12-ordered precipitate and the FCC matrix, quantified by $\delta_{\mathrm{SFE}} = 2(\mathrm{SFE}_{\mathrm{L1_2}} - \mathrm{SFE}_{\mathrm{FCC}})/(\mathrm{SFE}_{\mathrm{L1_2}} + \mathrm{SFE}_{\mathrm{FCC}})$, which the paper computes as $1.178$ (i.e., about $118\%$). Because the equilibrium separation between Shockley partial dislocations is inversely proportional to the SFE, a precipitate with much higher SFE than the matrix constricts the dissociated dislocation as it enters, creating a pinning force that scales with the SFE contrast rather than with elastic coherency strain. The hybrid MD/MC swapping scheme (Metropolis exchange of atomic identities interleaved with MD relaxation) is the tool that generates the ordered L12 structures, and the assembled 2NN-MEAM potential is what supplies all the energies; the authors use $\delta = 2(a_{\mathrm{L1_2}} - a_{\mathrm{FCC}})/(a_{\mathrm{L1_2}} + a_{\mathrm{FCC}})$ to separately show that the lattice mismatch is only $0.139\%$.

What would settle it

Measure the generalized stacking fault energy of the L12 phase and the FCC matrix in (CoNiFe)86(Al7Ti7) by DFT or experiment and check whether the SFE mismatch is really about 118% while the lattice mismatch is 0.139%, and test a precipitate with large SFE mismatch but zero lattice mismatch and vice versa in shear simulations: if pinning does not track the SFE contrast, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the large stacking fault energy difference between the L12 nanoprecipitate and the chemically random FCC matrix controls dislocation pinning, even when the interface is nearly coherent. In (CoNiFe)86(Al7Ti7), the authors compute a lattice mismatch of $0.139\%$ but an SFE mismatch of roughly $118\%$—the L12 phase has $\mathrm{SFE} = 337.36 \pm 13.95$ mJ/m² while the random matrix has $25.53 \pm 4.35$ mJ/m². In shear-controlled simulations, a dissociated edge dislocation is constricted inside the high-SFE precipitate, the distance between its partial dislocations shrinks, and it shears through the precipitate without leaving Orowan loops; the depinning stress increases from about 340 MPa for 4 nm precipitates to about 450 MPa for 8 nm precipitates. The paper concludes that SFE mismatch, not lattice mismatch, is the load-bearing factor, and that low misfit plus high SFE contrast offers a route to increase strength without losing ductility.

Load-bearing premise

The entire ranking of L12 fractions and the claimed SFE-mismatch pinning mechanism rests on the accuracy of the assembled MEAM potential, but the screening parameters for the missing CoNiFeAlTi ternary systems were assigned by an averaging concept rather than fitted to data, so if those parameters misrepresent L12 stability, stacking fault energies, or interfacial behavior, the central conclusion would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Compositional screening of CoNi-based MPEAs should target maximum precipitate–matrix SFE contrast rather than maximum lattice mismatch, because even coherent precipitates with ~0.14% misfit produce strong pinning.
  • Since dislocations shear 4–8 nm L12 precipitates instead of looping, strengthening from these nanoparticles is expected to come without the ductility penalty classically associated with Orowan bypass.
  • The identified sweet spot for L12 volume fraction is (CoNiFe)86(Al7Ti7); moving toward higher Al (Al8Ti8) or lower Al/Ti (Al4Ti2) reduces L12 fraction and lowers flow stress.
  • Stacking fault energy after ordering can serve as a fast screening proxy for precipitate–matrix contrast, since L12 formation raises SFE and higher Al+Ti content raises it further.
  • The increased density of sessile stair-rod dislocations near L12 precipitates adds a flow-stress contribution that should be included in precipitation-strengthening models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if SFE contrast is the operative strengthening variable, then high-throughput screening could rank candidate precipitate compositions by computing SFE mismatch alone, holding misfit fixed, a test the present data make possible.
  • Inference: the same cutting-not-looping behavior in coherent γ/γ′ superalloys suggests SFE mismatch may be a general hardening variable across precipitate-strengthened FCC systems, not just MPEAs.
  • Inference: the averaging-based screening parameters could be validated or falsified by first-principles ternary formation energies; if they fail, absolute L12 fractions would change, though the relative role of SFE mismatch might survive.
  • Inference: the simulations imply a critical precipitate size beyond which Orowan looping should replace shearing; this transition could be mapped in larger-scale or high-temperature simulations, and it is a testable extension of the current 4–8 nm window.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper assembles a 2NN-MEAM interatomic potential for the CoNiFeAlTi quinary system, combining previously published unary, binary, and ternary potentials and assigning screening parameters for missing ternary systems by an averaging concept. Using hybrid MD/MC simulations, the authors study L12 nanoprecipitate formation in four alloys and find that (CoNiFe)86(Al7Ti7) has the highest L12 fraction. Tensile MD simulations show that the L12-containing ordered alloys have higher yield and flow stress than their random counterparts. Molecular statics calculations show that SFE increases with Al/Ti content and with L12 ordering. Shear simulations of a dissociated edge dislocation interacting with 4, 6, and 8 nm L12 precipitates show cutting rather than Orowan looping, with depinning stress increasing from ~340 to ~450 MPa. The central conclusion is that the large SFE mismatch (117.8%) between the L12 precipitate and the matrix, rather than the small lattice mismatch (0.139%), controls dislocation pinning.

Significance. If the SFE-mismatch mechanism is correct, the paper offers a concrete and potentially transferable design strategy for MPEAs: maximize stacking-fault-energy mismatch between precipitate and matrix while keeping lattice mismatch low. The work also provides a usable MEAM parameter set for CoNiFeAlTi, with SFE and elastic constants benchmarked against DFT for the L12 phase, and it reports systematic data on L12 fraction, SFE, and dislocation interaction across several compositions and precipitate sizes. These data are valuable for the community even before the mechanistic claim is fully settled. The main significance rests on the causal attribution of pinning to SFE mismatch, which is plausible but not yet directly demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.4] The central claim that SFE mismatch, not lattice mismatch, controls dislocation pinning is not isolated in the simulations. The study varies only precipitate size (4, 6, 8 nm) and compares with a precipitate-free CoNiFe reference; it does not include a control in which SFE mismatch is varied while lattice mismatch, elastic modulus mismatch, anti-phase boundary (APB) energy, and chemical ordering are held fixed. The reduced partial-dislocation spacing inside the precipitate is consistent with a high SFE, but it is not a direct measurement of the pinning force attributable to SFE mismatch. Coherent L12 precipitates are also known to strengthen through APB energy and modulus effects; neither is computed or controlled. The conclusion in the abstract and Section 3.4 ('the significant difference in SFE between the L12 nanoprecipitate and the matrix results in stronger dislocation pinning') therefore rests on a correlation, not on an isolated cause. The authors should either add simulations that directly compare systems with different SFE mismatch at fixed other parameters, or substantially soften the causal claim and present the result as evidence consistent with an SFE-mismatch contribution.
  2. [§2, §3.1, §3.4] The assembled MEAM potential assigns screening parameters for the missing CoNiFeAlTi ternary systems by an averaging concept rather than by fitting to data. The validation (Table S2) covers elastic constants and SFE of one L12 composition against DFT, but the hybrid MD/MC predictions of L12 fraction across four compositions, and the resulting SFE mismatch of 117.8%, depend directly on the unvalidated ternary parameters. There is no sensitivity analysis or check against experimental formation energies or lattice stabilities for the unary/binary/ternary combinations not previously published. Since the entire ranking of compositions and the central SFE-mismatch mechanism rest on this potential, the authors should provide additional validation (e.g., formation energies of relevant phases, lattice constants, or at least a test of the averaging assumption against any available DFT or experiment), or clearly state the limitation and discuss how it might affect the conclusions.
  3. [§3.4, Fig. 7] The depinning stresses (about 340 MPa for 4 nm, 450 MPa for 8 nm) are reported without any statistical uncertainty. The text does not state that multiple independent shear simulations were performed for each precipitate size, and no error bars are shown in Fig. 7a. If these values come from a single trajectory per size, the claimed 110 MPa increase with size cannot be distinguished from thermal or configurational scatter, especially at 5 K Langevin dynamics. The authors should either provide replicate runs and error bars, or explicitly state that the values are single measurements and temper the quantitative claim accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2, §3.1, Fig. 1] The text and abstract state that hybrid MD/MC simulations were performed at 300 K and 1100 K, but Fig. 1d and the Section 3.1 text refer to results at 1000 K. Please reconcile this temperature discrepancy.
  2. [§2] There is a typo in '14 milion swap attempts'; it should be 'million'.
  3. [§2] The sentence 'Within this sphere, 32% of Ni atoms were substituted with Co, 12% with Fe, and the remainder kept as Ni (56%)' is immediately repeated with slightly different wording. Please remove the duplication.
  4. [Data availability] The potential parameters are said to be provided as supplementary information, but the data availability statement only says 'Data will be made available on request.' Please clarify how readers can access the LAMMPS-format potential files.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the L12-fraction, SFE, and dislocation-pinning results are generated from an independently validated assembled MEAM potential, not from fitted target data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is simulation-based and self-contained. The assembled 2NN-MEAM potential uses published unary/binary potentials and assigns missing ternary screening parameters by an averaging rule, which is a modeling assumption but not a fit to the paper's target outcomes; validation against independent DFT values for L12 elastic constants and SFE provides external grounding. L12 volume fractions, SFE values, tensile curves, and depinning stresses are all outputs of hybrid MD/MC and MD runs, not quantities used to adjust the potential. The central SFE-mismatch claim is computed from independently calculated GSFE curves for the random matrix and the L12 composition (SFE_L12 = 337.36 mJ/m2, SFE_FCC = 25.53 mJ/m2), so the mismatch is not defined in terms of the pinning result. The partial-separation contrast inside versus outside the NP is used as corroborating evidence consistent with the computed SFE difference, and the mechanistic ranking (SFE mismatch vs. lattice mismatch) is underdetermined because no control isolates SFE mismatch from APB energy, modulus mismatch, and chemical ordering; that is a correctness/underdetermination concern, not a circularity. Self-citations to prior work on SRO and dislocation depinning are context citations and are not load-bearing in the present derivation. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results depend on the interatomic potential, whose missing ternary screening parameters are assigned by averaging rather than fitted to target data. This is a source of uncertainty but not circular with respect to the predicted L12 fractions or SFE mismatch.

free parameters (1)
  • Ternary MEAM screening parameters (Cmin, Cmax) for missing CoNiFeAlTi ternary systems = assigned by averaging (values in Table S1, not reproduced in preprint)
    These parameters complete the quinary MEAM potential; they are chosen by hand via an averaging scheme rather than fitted to experimental or DFT target data, yet they affect all simulated L12 fractions and SFE values.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption 2NN-MEAM formalism with the assembled parameters describes the energetic landscape of CoNiFeAlTi, including L12 stability and generalized stacking fault energies.
    All simulated results inherit potential accuracy; validation is only for L12 elastic constants and SFE against DFT (Table S2).
  • domain assumption Hybrid MD/MC with Metropolis swap acceptance samples equilibrium chemical ordering at the target temperature.
    Standard simulation method; the paper reports 14 million swap attempts and converged potential energy, but the swap path may not guarantee global equilibrium.
  • domain assumption Polyhedral template matching classification with Al/Ti versus Co/Ni/Fe groups identifies L12 atoms.
    The L12 fraction is defined by this grouping; a different grouping would change the reported percentages.
  • ad hoc to paper The averaging concept for screening parameters is transferable from the Choi et al. approach to the missing ternary systems.
    No independent validation for each newly derived ternary screening parameter; the paper relies on the success of the global potential tests.
  • standard math GSFE calculation via incremental rigid displacement and constrained relaxation yields the intrinsic stacking fault energy.
    Common approach for computing SFE in atomistic simulations; results are compared to DFT for the L12 phase.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the impact of Ti/Al on L12 nanoprecipitation and deformation behavior in CoNiFeAlTi multi-principal element alloys through atomistic simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IXV4ZJTH

@misc{pith2026250617984,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the impact of Ti/Al on L12 nanoprecipitation and deformation behavior in CoNiFeAlTi multi-principal element alloys through atomistic simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IXV4ZJTH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17984}
}
read the original abstract

Recent studies on CoNi-based multi-principal element alloys (MPEAs) have demonstrated high strength and ductility, attributed to the formation of stable L12 nanoscale precipitates. However, the fundamental mechanisms behind such impressive properties in these complex alloys are not well understood. In this work, we investigate the effects of Ti and Al concentrations on the formation of L12 precipitates in (CoNiFe)84(Al8Ti8), (CoNiFe)86(Al7Ti7), (CoNiFe)88(Al6Ti6), and (CoNiFe)94(Al4Ti2) MPEAs using hybrid molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo (MD/MC) simulations and a MEAM interatomic potential for the CoNiFeTiAl system. Additionally, we study the effect of L12 precipitation on the mechanical properties and stacking fault energy (SFE) of these MPEAs using MD. Our hybrid MD/MC simulations show that the (CoNiFe)86(Al7Ti7) alloy exhibits the highest amount of L12 nanoprecipitates. We find that L12 precipitation increases the SFE, with higher Al and Ti contents leading to greater increases. Tensile simulations reveal that L12 precipitates enhance yield strength, with alloys exhibiting higher precipitation showing increased flow stress. We also investigate dislocation-nanoprecipitate interactions with different precipitate sizes in the (CoNiFe)86(Al7Ti7) alloy. Larger nanoprecipitate sizes result in stronger dislocation pinning. Dislocations predominantly shear through 4-8 nm precipitates instead of looping around them (Orowan mechanism), enhancing strength while maintaining good ductility. Although the lattice mismatch between the L12 nanoprecipitate and the matrix is low (0.139%), the significant difference in SFE between the L12 nanoprecipitate and the matrix results in stronger dislocation pinning. This understanding can guide the design of MPEAs with tailored properties by controlling nanoscale precipitation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17984 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hybrid MD/MC simulation outcomes for four CoNiFeAlTi alloys, based on 14 million swap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Uniaxial tensile loading, stress-strain curves, and strain-dislocation length curves for (CoNiFe)86(Al7Ti7) at 300K (a) Schematic of the simulation setup. (b-c) Stress-strain curves for Al7Ti7-O and Al7Ti7-R (mean values and standard deviations) under two strain rates. (d-e) Total dislocation length vs. strain for Al7Ti7-O and Al7Ti7-R (mean values and standard deviations) under two strain rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a-b) Comparison of Shockley dislocation lengths and Stair-rod dislocations during loading for Al7Ti7-O and Al7Ti7-R alloys (c) Visualization of dislocations at 𝜀 = 9.2 % for Al7Ti7-O and Al7Ti7-R alloys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Schematic of the simulation box showing the Y coordinate of the moving plane within the range of [-20, 20] to examine the dependency of stacking fault energy (SFE) on the local environment. (b) GSFE curves for Al7Ti7-O and Al7Ti7-R, Al4Ti2-O, and Al4Ti2-R alloys fo…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic of the simulation box used for performing shear strain control loading to study dislocation-nanoprecipitate interaction in (CoNiFe)86Al7Ti7 alloy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gludovatz, A

    B. Gludovatz, A. Hohenwarter, D. Catoor, E.H. Chang, E.P. George, R.O. Ritchie, A fracture- resistant high-entropy alloy for cryogenic applications, Science (80-. ). 345 (2014) 1153–1158. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1254581

    doi:10.1126/science.1254581 2014

  2. [2]

    Y .F. Ye, Q. Wang, J. Lu, C.T. Liu, Y . Yang, High-entropy alloy: challenges and prospects, Mater. Today. 19 (2016) 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATTOD.2015.11.026

    doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.026 2016

  3. [3]

    Slobodyan, E

    M. Slobodyan, E. Pesterev, A. Markov, Recent advances and outstanding challenges for implementation of high entropy alloys as structural materials, Mater. Today Commun. 36 (2023) 106422. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2023.106422

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Park, D.C

    J.M. Park, D.C. Yang, H.J. Kim, D.G. Kim, S. Lee, H.S. Kim, S.S. Sohn, Ultra-strong and strain- hardenable ultrafine-grained medium-entropy alloy via enhanced grain-boundary strengthening, Mater. Res. Lett. 9 (2021) 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2021.1913768

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Senkov, G.B

    O.N. Senkov, G.B. Wilks, J.M. Scott, D.B. Miracle, Mechanical properties of Nb25Mo25Ta25W25 and V20Nb20Mo20Ta20W20 refractory high entropy alloys, Intermetallics. 19 (2011) 698–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTERMET.2011.01.004

    doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2011.01.004 2011

  6. [6]

    Y .K. Kim, S. Yang, K.A. Lee, Superior Temperature-Dependent Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behavior of Equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi High-Entropy Alloy Additively Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting, Sci. Reports 2020 101. 10 (2020) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65073-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65073-2 2020

  7. [7]

    Z. Luo, Q. Liu, J. Wei, X. Huang, Z. Gao, Z. Wang, X. Ma, Enhancing the strength-ductility synergy of dual-phase Al0.3CoCrFeNiTi0.3 high-entropy alloys through the regulation of B2 phase content, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 916 (2024) 147346. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2024.147346

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    H. Liu, T. Li, C. Chen, M. Wan, C. Huang, J. Li, Unraveling the fracture behavior of AlCoCrFeNi2.1 eutectic high-entropy alloy under impact loading, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 214 (2025) 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMST.2024.06.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2024.06.040 2025

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang, Z

    Q. Zhang, Z. Chen, Y . Dong, C. Li, Y . Wang, High strength and ductility eutectic high entropy alloy with unique core-shell structure, J. Alloys Compd. 976 (2024) 173141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2023.173141

    2024

  2. [10]

    Talluri, M

    G. Talluri, M. Nagini, D.A. Babu, Y . Palguna, K. Rajesh, B.S. Murty, R.S. Maurya, Designing a eutectic multi-principal element alloy for strength-ductility synergy, J. Alloys Compd. 976 (2024) 173278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2023.173278

    2024

  3. [11]

    Advanced Materials - 2018 - Sohn - Ultrastrong Medium‐Entropy Single‐Phase Alloys Designed via Severe Lattice Distortion.pdf, (n.d.)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Esfandiarpour, S

    A. Esfandiarpour, S. Papanikolaou, M. Alava, Edge dislocations in multicomponent solid solution alloys: Beyond traditional elastic depinning, Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L022043

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Esfandiarpour, R

    A. Esfandiarpour, R. Alvarez-Donado, S. Papanikolaou, M. Alava, Atomistic simulations of dislocation plasticity in concentrated VCoNi medium entropy alloys: Effects of lattice distortion and short range order, Front. Mater. 9 (2022) 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.1046291

    2022

  6. [14]

    K.Y . Xie, D. Yadav, B.L. Hackett, Y . Zhang, R. Patel, Y .C. Lai, G. Turner, I. Karaman, G.M. 16 Pharr, Weak strain-rate sensitivity of hardness in the VCoNi equi-atomic medium entropy alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 913 (2024) 147091. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2024.147091

    2024

  7. [15]

    D. Hua, Q. Zhou, Y . Shi, S. Li, K. Hua, H. Wang, S. Li, W. Liu, Revealing the deformation mechanisms of 〈110〉 symmetric tilt grain boundaries in CoCrNi medium-entropy alloy, Int. J. Plast. 171 (2023) 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2023.103832

    2023

  8. [16]

    D. Hua, Q. Xia, W. Wang, Q. Zhou, S. Li, D. Qian, J. Shi, H. Wang, Atomistic insights into the deformation mechanism of a CoCrNi medium entropy alloy under nanoindentation, Int. J. Plast. 142 (2021) 102997. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2021.102997

    2021

  9. [17]

    Naghdi, K

    A.H. Naghdi, K. Karimi, A.E. Poisvert, A. Esfandiarpour, R. Alvarez, P. Sobkowicz, M. Alava, S. Papanikolaou, Dislocation plasticity in equiatomic NiCoCr alloys: Effect of short-range order, Phys. Rev. B. 107 (2023) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.094109

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Jarlöv, W

    A. Jarlöv, W. Ji, R. Babicheva, Y . Tian, Z. Hu, H.L. Seet, L. Tan, F. Liu, Y . Liu, M.L.S. Nai, U. Ramamurty, K. Zhou, Tailoring short-range order and dislocation evolution in Cr–Co–Ni medium-entropy alloys: A molecular dynamics study, Mater. Des. 240 (2024) 112840. https://d...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Hagihara, Effect of short-range order on the high-temperature plastic deformation behavior of Ni–Cr–W, Ni–W, and Ni–Re single crystals, J

    K. Hagihara, Effect of short-range order on the high-temperature plastic deformation behavior of Ni–Cr–W, Ni–W, and Ni–Re single crystals, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 165 (2023) 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMST.2023.04.058

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    L. Xu, Y . Ma, Z. Zhang, M. Yang, P. Jiang, Y . Zhu, X. Wu, F. Yuan, Superior tensile properties induced by triple-level heterogeneous structures in the CoNiV-based medium-entropy alloy, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 214 (2025) 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMST.2024.07.020

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    Y . Liu, H. Zhang, Y . Yang, L. Sun, X. Zhao, H. Le Yan, Y . Shen, N. Jia, Chemical short-range order dependence of micromechanical behavior in CoCrNi medium-entropy alloy studied by atomic simulations, J. Alloys Compd. 968 (2023) 172002. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2023.172002

    2023

  14. [22]

    L. Han, F. Maccari, I.R. Souza Filho, N.J. Peter, Y . Wei, B. Gault, O. Gutfleisch, Z. Li, D. Raabe, A mechanically strong and ductile soft magnet with extremely low coercivity, Nat. 2022 6087922. 608 (2022) 310–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04935-3

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Y . Liu, T. Ye, Q. Zhou, Y . Wu, S. Duan, T. Fan, Z. Wang, P. Tang, High-throughput prediction of intrinsic properties of L12-(Nix1,Crx2,Cox3)3(Aly1,Tiy2) precipitates, Mater. Today Commun. 31 (2022) 103655. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.103655

    2022

  16. [24]

    W. Mao, L. Yang, F. Jiang, J. He, J. Luan, Z. Jiao, F. Ren, Achieving ultrahigh strength in oxide- dispersion-strengthened CoCrNi alloy via in situ formation of coherent Y-Ti-O nanoprecipitates, Mater. Des. 232 (2023) 112141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2023.112141

    2023

  17. [25]

    Zhao, Y .R

    Y .L. Zhao, Y .R. Li, G.M. Yeli, J.H. Luan, S.F. Liu, W.T. Lin, D. Chen, X.J. Liu, J.J. Kai, C.T. Liu, T. Yang, Anomalous precipitate-size-dependent ductility in multicomponent high-entropy alloys with dense nanoscale precipitates, Acta Mater. 223 (2022). https://doi.org/10.10...

    2022

  18. [26]

    Guo, B.C

    J.M. Guo, B.C. Zhou, S. Qiu, H.J. Kong, M.C. Niu, J.H. Luan, T.L. Zhang, H. Wu, Z.B. Jiao, Achieving ultrahigh strength and ductility in high-entropy alloys via dual precipitation, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 166 (2023) 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMST.2023.05.021

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Huang, Y

    K. Huang, Y . Zhang, Z. Zhang, Y . Yu, J. Li, J. Han, K. Dong, P.K. Liaw, I. Baker, L. Sun, Coupling precipitation strengthening and transformation induced plasticity to produce a superior combination of strength and ductility in a high entropy alloy, J. Alloys Compd. 929 (202...

    2022

  20. [28]

    Zhang, R

    W. Zhang, R. Tang, Z.B. Yang, C.H. Liu, H. Chang, J.J. Yang, J.L. Liao, Y .Y . Yang, N. Liu, Preparation, structure, and properties of high-entropy alloy multilayer coatings for nuclear fuel cladding: A case study of AlCrMoNbZr/(AlCrMoNbZr)N, J. Nucl. Mater. 512 (2018) 15–24. ...

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    Pandey, M

    P. Pandey, M. Heczko, N. Khatavkar, N. Mazumder, A. Sharma, A. Singh, M.J. Mills, K. Chattopadhyay, On the faulting and twinning mediated strengthening and plasticity in a γʹ strengthened CoNi-based superalloy at room temperature, Acta Mater. 252 (2023) 118928. https://doi.org...

    2023

  22. [30]

    L. Gao, Y . Wu, N. An, J. Chen, X. Liu, R. Bai, X. Hui, Nanoscale L12 phase precipitation induced superb ambient and high temperature mechanical properties in Ni–Co–Cr–Al system high-entropy superalloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 898 (2024) 145995. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2023.145995

    2024

  23. [31]

    L. Wang, L. Kong, Y . Li, Y . Wu, H. Su, Y . Su, B. Deng, G. Liu, Z. Han, Y . Zhang, J. Shen, G. Zhang, A novel (CoFeNi)82Ti5Al5V8 medium entropy alloy showing an ultra yield strength and a good ductility by L12 nanoparticles strengthening and dislocation strengthening, Mater....

    2024

  24. [32]

    fcc + L12

    L. Wang, X. Wu, Y . Wu, G. Liu, Z. Han, Y . Zhang, Y . Su, S. Kang, J. Shen, G. Zhang, Design and high-strength origin of novel (CoFeNi)80Ti5V15 medium entropy alloy with “fcc + L12” structure, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 149 (2023) 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMST.2023.01.002

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    K. Tu, B. Li, Z. Li, K. Ming, S. Zheng, Dual heterogeneous structure enabled ultrahigh strength and ductility across a broad temperature range in CrCoNi-based medium-entropy alloy, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 207 (2025) 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMST.2024.01.091

    2025 doi

  26. [34]

    Huang, W

    J. Huang, W. Li, T. Yang, T.H. Chou, R. Zhou, B. Liu, J.C. Huang, Y . Liu, An additively manufactured precipitation hardening medium entropy alloy with excellent strength-ductility synergy over a wide temperature range, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 197 (2024) 247–264. https://doi.o...

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    Y . Yang, J. Pang, Z. Zhang, Y . Wang, Y . Ji, Z. Zhu, L. Zhang, A. Wang, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, Strength-ductility synergy and superior strain-hardening ability of Ni38Co25Fe13Cr10Al7Ti7 multi principal element alloy through heterogeneous L12 structure modulation, J. Alloys Comp...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Z. Tai, X. Wang, X. Zong, X. Ding, J. Liu, F. Kong, Microstructure and mechanical properties of an elevated temperature L12-type Ni-Co-Cr-Al-Ti-V-B-based high-entropy intermetallic, J. Alloys Compd. 1010 (2025) 177262. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2024.177262

    2025

  29. [37]

    X. Zhu, Y . He, Q. Feng, N. Wang, C. Ge, Y . Xu, Deformation mechanism of L12-type multicomponent intermetallics: The generalized stacking fault energy and chemical bonds, Mater. Des. 228 (2023) 111824. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2023.111824

    2023

  30. [38]

    Huang, L

    X. Huang, L. Liu, X. Duan, W. Liao, J. Huang, H. Sun, C. Yu, Atomistic simulation of chemical short-range order in HfNbTaZr high entropy alloy based on a newly-developed interatomic potential, Mater. Des. 202 (2021) 109560. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2021.109560

    2021

  31. [39]

    Q.J. Li, H. Sheng, E. Ma, Strengthening in multi-principal element alloys with local-chemical- order roughened dislocation pathways, Nat. Commun. 2019 101. 10 (2019) 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11464-7

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Andreoli, A

    A.F. Andreoli, A. Fantin, S. Kasatikov, V .P. Bacurau, M. Widom, P. Gargarella, E.M. Mazzer, T.G. Woodcock, K. Nielsch, F.G. Coury, The impact of chemical short-range order on the thermophysical properties of medium- and high-entropy alloys, Mater. Des. 238 (2024) 112724. http...

    2024

  33. [41]

    Wyszkowska, C

    E. Wyszkowska, C. Mieszczynski, Kurpaska, A. Azarov, W. Chromiński, I. Jóźwik, A. Esfandiarpour, A. Kosińska, D. Kalita, R. Diduszko, J. Jagielski, S.T. Nori, M. Alava, The Fe addition as an effective treatment for improving the radiation resistance of fcc NixFe1-x single- cry...

    2023

  34. [42]

    L. Zhou, Q. Wang, J. Wang, X. Chen, P. Jiang, H. Zhou, F. Yuan, X. Wu, Z. Cheng, E. Ma, 18 Atomic-scale evidence of chemical short-range order in CrCoNi medium-entropy alloy, Acta Mater. 224 (2022) 117490. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2021.117490

    2022

  35. [43]

    Stukowski, V

    A. Stukowski, V . V . Bulatov, A. Arsenlis, Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20 (2012) 085007. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007

    2012 doi

  36. [44]

    Thompson, H.M

    A.P. Thompson, H.M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D.S. Bolintineanu, W.M. Brown, P.S. Crozier, P.J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S.G. Moore, T.D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M.J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S.J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling ...

    2022

  37. [45]

    J.S. Kim, D. Seol, B.J. Lee, Critical assessment of Pt surface energy – An atomistic study, Surf. Sci. 670 (2018) 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SUSC.2017.12.008

    2018 doi

  38. [46]

    Baskes, B.J

    M.I. Baskes, B.J. Lee, H. Kim, Y . Koo Cho, Second nearest-neighbor modified embedded atom method potentials for bcc transition metals, Phys. Rev. B. 64 (2001) 184102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.184102

    2001 doi

  39. [47]

    Lee, J.H

    B.J. Lee, J.H. Shim, I. Baskes, Semiempirical atomic potentials for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, Al, and Pb based on first and second nearest-neighbor modified embedded atom method, Phys. Rev. B. 68 (2003) 144112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.144112

    2003 doi

  40. [48]

    Kim, B.J

    Y .M. Kim, B.J. Lee, M.I. Baskes, Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for Ti and Zr, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 74 (2006) 014101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVB.74.014101

    2006 doi

  41. [49]

    Choi, Y .H

    W.M. Choi, Y .H. Jo, S.S. Sohn, S. Lee, B.J. Lee, Understanding the physical metallurgy of the CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy: an atomistic simulation study, Npj Comput. Mater. 2018 41. 4 (2018) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-017-0060-9

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    superlattices Yanli Zhang, G.-C

    M. superlattices Yanli Zhang, G.-C. Wang, T.-M. Lu, al -, Y .-K. Kim, W.-S. Jung, B.-J. Lee, Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Ni–Co binary and the Ni–Al–Co ternary systems, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 23 (2015) 055004. https://doi.org/10.1088/096...

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    S.H. Oh, D. Seol, B.J. Lee, Second nearest-neighbor modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Co-M (M = Ti, V) binary systems, Calphad. 70 (2020) 101791. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2020.101791

    2020

  44. [52]

    C. Wu, B.J. Lee, X. Su, Modified embedded-atom interatomic potential for Fe-Ni, Cr-Ni and Fe- Cr-Ni systems, Calphad. 57 (2017) 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2017.03.007

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    Kim, H.K

    Y .K. Kim, H.K. Kim, W.S. Jung, B.J. Lee, Development and application of Ni-Ti and Ni-Al-Ti 2NN-MEAM interatomic potentials for Ni-base superalloys, Comput. Mater. Sci. 139 (2017) 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2017.08.002

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    Lee, B.J

    E. Lee, B.J. Lee, Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potential for the Fe–Al system, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 22 (2010) 175702. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/22/17/175702

    2010 doi

  47. [55]

    I. Sa, B.J. Lee, Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Fe–Nb and Fe– Ti binary systems, Scr. Mater. 59 (2008) 595–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2008.05.007

    2008 doi

  48. [56]

    J. Wang, H. Kwon, H.S. Kim, B.J. Lee, A neural network model for high entropy alloy design, Npj Comput. Mater. 2023 91. 9 (2023) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01010-x

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. Ma, Y . Xiong, B. Xu, S. Zhao, Elemental partitions and deformation mechanisms of L12-type multicomponent intermetallics, Acta Mater. 219 (2021) 117238. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2021.117238

    2021

  50. [58]

    Larsen, Sø

    P.M. Larsen, Sø. Schmidt, J. SchiØtz, Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 24 (2016) 055007. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965- 0393/24/5/055007. 19

    2016 doi

  51. [59]

    Ball, K.C

    S.L. Ball, K.C. Alexander, C.A. Schuh, L. Yang, Z. Ma, A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 (2009) 015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012

    2009 doi

  52. [60]

    Yang, Y .L

    T. Yang, Y .L. Zhao, Y . Tong, Z.B. Jiao, J. Wei, J.X. Cai, X.D. Han, D. Chen, A. Hu, J.J. Kai, K. Lu, Y . Liu, C.T. Liu, Multicomponent intermetallic nanoparticles and superb mechanical behaviors of complex alloys, Science (80-. ). 362 (2018) 933–937. https://doi.org/10.1126/...

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    D. Chen, F. He, B. Han, Q. Wu, Y . Tong, Y . Zhao, Z. Wang, J. Wang, J. jung Kai, Synergistic effect of Ti and Al on L12-phase design in CoCrFeNi-based high entropy alloys, Intermetallics. 110 (2019) 106476. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTERMET.2019.106476

    2019

  54. [62]

    Ding, B.X

    Z.Y . Ding, B.X. Cao, J.H. Luan, Z.B. Jiao, Synergistic effects of Al and Ti on the oxidation behaviour and mechanical properties of L12-strengthened FeCoCrNi high-entropy alloys, Corros. Sci. 184 (2021) 109365. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CORSCI.2021.109365

    2021

  55. [63]

    Q. Gao, Y . Jiang, Z. Liu, H. Zhang, C. Jiang, X. Zhang, H. Li, Effects of alloying elements on microstructure and mechanical properties of Co–Ni–Al–Ti superalloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 779 (2020) 139139. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2020.139139

    2020

  56. [64]

    Stepanov, D.G

    N.D. Stepanov, D.G. Shaysultanov, R.S. Chernichenko, M.A. Tikhonovsky, S. V . Zherebtsov, Effect of Al on structure and mechanical properties of Fe-Mn-Cr-Ni-Al non-equiatomic high entropy alloys with high Fe content, J. Alloys Compd. 770 (2019) 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016...

    2019 doi

  57. [65]

    Z. Sun, C. Shi, C. Liu, H. Shi, J. Zhou, The effect of short-range order on mechanical properties of high entropy alloy Al0.3CoCrFeNi, Mater. Des. 223 (2022) 111214. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2022.111214

    2022

  58. [66]

    S. Shen, Y . Li, L. Hao, X. Zhang, X. Liu, J. Du, M. Song, T. Shen, E. Fu, Ultrastrong and ductile FeNi-based alloys through Pd-containing multicomponent L12-type precipitates, Mater. Des. 244 (2024) 113112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2024.113112

    2024

  59. [67]

    H. Xie, Z. Ma, W. Zhang, H. Zhao, L. Ren, Strengthening effect of high-entropy alloys endowed by monolayer graphene, Mater. Today Phys. 27 (2022) 100800. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTPHYS.2022.100800

    2022

  60. [68]

    X. Gao, J. Liu, W. Fu, Y . Huang, Z. Ning, Z. Zhang, J. Sun, W. Chen, Strong and ductile CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy microfibers at ambient and cryogenic temperatures, Mater. Des. 233 (2023) 112250. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2023.112250

    2023

  61. [69]

    Hirth, J

    J.P. Hirth, J. Lothe, T. Mura, Theory of Dislocations (2nd ed.), J. Appl. Mech. 50 (1983) 476–

    1983

  62. [70]

    Foreman, Dislocation energies in anisotropic crystals, Acta Metall

    A.J.E. Foreman, Dislocation energies in anisotropic crystals, Acta Metall. 3 (1955) 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(55)90036-5

    1955 doi

  63. [71]

    Savin, V .M

    M.M. Savin, V .M. Chernov, A.M. Strokova, Energy factor of dislocations in hexagonal crystals, Phys. Status Solidi. 35 (1976) 747–754. https://doi.org/10.1002/PSSA.2210350240

    1976 doi

  64. [72]

    N. Ali, J. Li, L. Zhang, C. Zhang, H. Zhou, D. Liu, K. Sanaullah, Y . Nian, J. Cheng, Break the strength and ductility trade-off in novel NbC reinforced Fe40.5(CoCr)25Mn17.5Ni10Si5 high entropy alloy, Mater. Des. 239 (2024) 112752. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MA TDES.2024.112752

    2024

  65. [73]

    Y . Zhao, H. Ma, L. Zhang, D. Zhang, S. Kou, B. Wang, W. Li, P.K. Liaw, Mn content optimum on microstructures and mechanical behavior of Fe-based medium entropy alloys, Mater. Des. 223 (2022) 111241. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2022.111241

    2022

  66. [74]

    Z. Pei, M. Eisenbach, P.K. Liaw, M. Chen, Nanoscale fluctuation of stacking fault energy strengthens multi-principal element alloys, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 158 (2023) 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMST.2023.01.042

    2023 doi

  67. [75]

    Chou, W.P

    T.H. Chou, W.P. Li, L.Y . Zhu, F. Zhu, X.C. Li, J. Huang, Y .X. Wang, R. Zhou, W.Y . Chen, J.H. Luan, Y .L. Zhao, Z.X. Wu, F.R. Chen, J.C. Huang, P.K. Liaw, X.L. Wang, T. Yang, Critical 20 impacts of thermodynamic instability and short-range order on deformation mechanisms of ...

    2024

  68. [76]

    Saeed-Akbari, J

    A. Saeed-Akbari, J. Imlau, U. Prahl, W. Bleck, Derivation and variation in composition- dependent stacking fault energy maps based on subregular solution model in high-manganese steels, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 40 (2009) 3076–3090. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2009 doi

  69. [77]

    Jeong, W

    J.S. Jeong, W. Woo, K.H. Oh, S.K. Kwon, Y .M. Koo, In situ neutron diffraction study of the microstructure and tensile deformation behavior in Al-added high manganese austenitic steels, Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 2290–2299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.043

    2012 doi

  70. [78]

    Y . Zeng, X. Cai, M. Koslowski, Effects of the stacking fault energy fluctuations on the strengthening of alloys, Acta Mater. 164 (2019) 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2018.09.066

    2019 doi

  71. [79]

    H. Li, H. Zong, S. Li, S. Jin, Y . Chen, M.J. Cabral, B. Chen, Q. Huang, Y . Chen, Y . Ren, K. Yu, S. Han, X. Ding, G. Sha, J. Lian, X. Liao, E. Ma, J. Sun, Uniting tensile ductility with ultrahigh strength via composition undulation, Nat. 2022 6047905. 604 (2022) 273–279. htt...

    2022 doi

  72. [80]

    Proville, B

    L. Proville, B. Bakó, Dislocation depinning from ordered nanophases in a model fcc crystal: From cutting mechanism to Orowan looping, Acta Mater. 58 (2010) 5565–5571. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2010.06.018

    2010 doi

  73. [81]

    E. V . Fomin, A.E. Mayer, V .S. Krasnikov, Prediction of shear strength of cluster-strengthened aluminum with multi-scale approach describing transition from cutting to bypass of precipitates by dislocations, Int. J. Plast. 146 (2021) 103095. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2...

    2021

  74. [477]

    https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3167075

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.