Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Image Quality Assessment: From Human to Machine Preference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.10078 v1 pith:J2B7U7PS submitted 2025-03-13 cs.CV cs.MMeess.IV

classification cs.CVcs.MMeess.IV
keywords machinehumanimagepreferencesassessmentmachinespreferencequality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Image Quality Assessment (IQA) based on human subjective preferences has undergone extensive research in the past decades. However, with the development of communication protocols, the visual data consumption volume of machines has gradually surpassed that of humans. For machines, the preference depends on downstream tasks such as segmentation and detection, rather than visual appeal. Considering the huge gap between human and machine visual systems, this paper proposes the topic: Image Quality Assessment for Machine Vision for the first time. Specifically, we (1) defined the subjective preferences of machines, including downstream tasks, test models, and evaluation metrics; (2) established the Machine Preference Database (MPD), which contains 2.25M fine-grained annotations and 30k reference/distorted image pair instances; (3) verified the performance of mainstream IQA algorithms on MPD. Experiments show that current IQA metrics are human-centric and cannot accurately characterize machine preferences. We sincerely hope that MPD can promote the evolution of IQA from human to machine preferences. Project page is on: https://github.com/lcysyzxdxc/MPD.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Image Quality Assessment for Machines: Paradigm, Large-scale Database, and Models

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 2.5-million-image machine-centric quality database and a region-aware model show that human-perception metrics poorly predict machine vision performance under degradations.

  2. RGC-VQA: An Exploration Database for Robotic-Generated Video Quality Assessment

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 2,100-video database with human opinions shows that current video quality models underperform on robot-generated content, motivating a new VQA subfield.

  3. NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge: Methods and Results

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    All 19 valid entries in the NTIRE 2025 XGC quality assessment challenge outperformed their track baselines at predicting human quality scores for user-generated video, AI-generated video, and talking heads.

Pith tools