pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.10136 · v2 · pith:J2TVJONFnew · submitted 2026-02-08 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · physics.ao-ph· physics.data-an

Collective and nonlinear structure of wind power correlations

Samy E. Lakhal , J. E. Sardonia , M. M. Bandi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn physics.ao-phphysics.data-an
keywords wind powercorrelationsintermittencypersistencynonlinearwind farmscaling transitionturbulence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Universal collective nonlinear correlations in wind turbine outputs drive excess persistency and intermittency in farm-aggregated power.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the correlation structure of power fluctuations from 80 wind turbines sampled over five years. It identifies a transition in scaling behavior from local independence to turbulence-like correlations at larger distances, which smooths out fluctuations across the farm. Additionally, non-Gaussian aspects of the power output show long-range correlations that become amplified when the outputs are summed together. These collective nonlinear effects account for the greater persistence and burstiness observed in the total farm power compared to what would be expected from independent turbines. The findings suggest new ways to characterize variability for better grid management and wind energy integration.

Core claim

The central claim is that wind power fluctuations exhibit universal, collective, and nonlinear correlations that are responsible for the excess persistency and intermittency of the aggregated power output from the entire wind farm.

What carries the argument

Cross-correlation analysis revealing a dynamical scaling transition from local decoherence to large-scale turbulence-driven scaling, together with bivariate analysis showing long-range correlation of non-Gaussian features.

Load-bearing premise

The observed correlations are truly nonlinear and collective in origin, arising from interactions within the wind field rather than from unaccounted factors such as weather patterns or measurement artifacts.

What would settle it

Simulate power time series for 80 independent turbines that match the individual statistics of the real turbines, then check whether the aggregated output lacks the measured excess persistency and intermittency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.10136 by J. E. Sardonia, M. M. Bandi, Samy E. Lakhal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) that such finite difference renders the signal stationary, and now evolves around a clearly defined av￾erage. The envelopes of the increments, (|δτ v|, |δτP|), themselves fluctuate over larger correlation scales, dis￾playing alternating phases of weak local activity peri￾ods and intermittent bursts [46, 54]. These stationary yet intermittent variations give rise to time-aggregated non-Gaussian jump sta… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Intermittency analysis of wind speed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Wind power increments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Cross-structure analysis of wind turbines. (Upper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Copula analysis and spatial correlations. (a) and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We describe the correlation structure of wind power fluctuations in a farm of 80 turbines, sampled over 5 years. We report the presence of universal, collective, and nonlinear correlations, responsible for the excess persistency and intermittency of farm-aggregated power output. A first cross-correlation analysis of turbine production reveals a dynamical scaling transition (\`a la Family-Vicszek) from local decoherence to large-scale turbulence-driven scaling, and responsible for the geographical smoothing effect, previously reported beyond farm scale [M. M. Bandi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 028301 (2017)]. A second bivariate analysis shows the long-range correlation of non-Gaussian features, responsible for their amplification in total farm output. These findings provide a new perspective on wind power variability, highlighting the importance of nonlinear correlations in power production dynamics. By better characterising these fluctuations, our results can inform strategies for grid management, storage optimization, and wind farm design, ultimately improving the integration of wind energy into modern power systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes wind power fluctuations from an 80-turbine farm sampled over 5 years. It reports universal, collective, and nonlinear correlations identified via cross-correlation analysis that exhibits a dynamical scaling transition (à la Family-Vicsek) from local decoherence to large-scale turbulence-driven scaling, and via bivariate analysis of non-Gaussian features whose long-range correlations amplify in the aggregated farm output. These correlations are claimed to explain the excess persistency and intermittency of farm-aggregated power, providing a perspective on variability beyond prior geographical smoothing results.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated with appropriate controls, the work supplies a useful empirical characterization of scaling and nonlinear correlation structure in real wind-farm data. The reported transition to turbulence-driven scaling and the amplification of non-Gaussian features upon aggregation could help refine models of aggregated output variability, with direct relevance to grid management, storage sizing, and farm layout optimization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central attribution of excess persistency and intermittency to 'nonlinear correlations' is load-bearing yet unsupported by any described surrogate-data test that preserves the linear power spectrum while destroying higher-order correlations, or by an explicit comparison of the aggregate against the output of a linearized power curve applied to the same wind speeds.
  2. [Bivariate analysis] Bivariate analysis: without quantitative details on the non-Gaussian feature extraction, error bars on the reported long-range correlations, or data-processing steps (e.g., detrending, windowing, or significance testing), the claim that these correlations are 'universal, collective, and nonlinear' and directly responsible for amplification cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'dynamical scaling transition (à la Family-Vicsek)' would benefit from a one-sentence reminder of the scaling form or a citation to the original Family-Vicsek work for readers outside the turbulence community.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to the manuscript to strengthen the supporting evidence and provide additional methodological details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central attribution of excess persistency and intermittency to 'nonlinear correlations' is load-bearing yet unsupported by any described surrogate-data test that preserves the linear power spectrum while destroying higher-order correlations, or by an explicit comparison of the aggregate against the output of a linearized power curve applied to the same wind speeds.

    Authors: We agree that the central attribution requires stronger empirical support. In the revised manuscript we have added a surrogate-data test based on phase randomization that preserves the linear power spectrum while destroying higher-order correlations; direct comparison of aggregated statistics between the original and surrogate series shows that the excess persistency and intermittency are substantially reduced in the surrogates. We have also included an explicit comparison of farm-aggregated output against the result of applying a linearized power curve to the same wind-speed records, isolating the contribution of the nonlinear power curve. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Bivariate analysis] Bivariate analysis: without quantitative details on the non-Gaussian feature extraction, error bars on the reported long-range correlations, or data-processing steps (e.g., detrending, windowing, or significance testing), the claim that these correlations are 'universal, collective, and nonlinear' and directly responsible for amplification cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting the missing quantitative details. The revised manuscript now contains an expanded Methods section that specifies the non-Gaussian feature extraction procedure, reports error bars on all long-range correlation functions (obtained via bootstrap resampling), and fully documents the data-processing pipeline, including the detrending method, windowing parameters, overlap, and significance testing against phase-randomized surrogates. These additions allow the reader to evaluate the universality, collectivity, and nonlinearity of the reported correlations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Empirical analysis of wind power correlations with one minor self-citation

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "A first cross-correlation analysis of turbine production reveals a dynamical scaling transition (`a la Family-Vicszek) from local decoherence to large-scale turbulence-driven scaling, and responsible for the geographical smoothing effect, previously reported beyond farm scale [M. M. Bandi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 028301 (2017)]."

    The scaling transition is attributed to a geographical smoothing effect via citation to prior work by co-author M. M. Bandi. While not reducing the main nonlinear correlation claims to this citation, it represents a minor self-citation that supports part of the interpretation without independent verification in the present manuscript.

full rationale

The paper presents observational results from 5 years of turbine data, including cross-correlation scaling and bivariate non-Gaussian feature analysis, without any derivations, predictions, or first-principles equations that reduce to fitted inputs or self-referential definitions. The sole self-citation references a previously reported smoothing effect and is not load-bearing for the central claims on nonlinear collective correlations, which rest on the current dataset's empirical patterns. This qualifies as a minor self-citation (score 2) rather than circularity, as the work remains self-contained against external data benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work is presented as data-driven analysis without new postulated constructs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1071 out tokens · 43948 ms · 2026-05-16T06:54:37.234194+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. M. Bandi, Spectrum of wind power fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 028301 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Wiser, Z

    R. Wiser, Z. Yang, M. Hand, O. Hohmeyer, D. In- field, P. E. H. Jensen, V. Nikolaev, M. O’Malley, G. Sinden, and A. Zervos, Wind energy, inIPCC Spe- cial Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation, edited by O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs- Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kad- ner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Sch...

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Peinke, S

    J. Peinke, S. Barth, F. B¨ ottcher, D. Heinemann, and B. Lange, Turbulence, a challenging problem for wind energy, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Appli- cations338, 187 (2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    J. F. Manwell, J. G. McGowan, and A. L. Rogers,Wind energy explained: theory, design and application(John Wiley & Sons, 2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Klima, J

    K. Klima, J. Apt, M. Bandi, P. Happy, C. Loutan, and R. Young, Geographic smoothing of solar photovoltaic electric power production in the western usa, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy10, 053504 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Bel and M

    G. Bel and M. M. Bandi, Geographic dependence of the solar irradiance spectrum at intermediate to high fre- quencies, Phys. Rev. Appl.12, 024032 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Bel and M

    G. Bel and M. Bandi, Spectral analysis of solar-irradiance fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 034019 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    P. J. Menck, J. Heitzig, J. Kurths, and H. Joachim Schellnhuber, How dead ends under- mine power grid stability, Nature Communications5, 3969 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Rohden, A

    M. Rohden, A. Sorge, M. Timme, and D. Witthaut, Self- organized synchronization in decentralized power grids, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 064101 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Apt and P

    J. Apt and P. Jaramillo,Variable renewable energy and the electricity grid(Routledge, 2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    G. Bel, C. P. Connaughton, M. Toots, and M. M. Bandi, Grid-scale fluctuations and forecast error in wind power, New Journal of Physics18, 023015 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Tavner, Y

    P. Tavner, Y. Qiu, A. Korogiannos, and Y. Feng, The correlation between wind turbine turbulence and pitch failure, Proceedings of EWEA2011(2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Schmietendorf, J

    K. Schmietendorf, J. Peinke, and O. Kamps, The impact of turbulent renewable energy production on power grid stability and quality, The European Physical Journal B 90, 222 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    X. Hu, J. Jarait˙ e, and A. Kaˇ zukauskas, The effects of wind power on electricity markets: A case study of the swedish intraday market, Energy Economics96, 105159 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Brancucci Martinez-Anido, G

    C. Brancucci Martinez-Anido, G. Brinkman, and B.-M. Hodge, The impact of wind power on electricity prices, Renewable Energy94, 474 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Veers, K

    P. Veers, K. Dykes, E. Lantz, S. Barth, C. L. Bot- tasso, O. Carlson, A. Clifton, J. Green, P. Green, H. Holttinen, D. Laird, V. Lehtom¨ aki, J. K. Lundquist, J. Manwell, M. Marquis, C. Meneveau, P. Mori- arty, X. Munduate, M. Muskulus, J. Naughton, L. Pao, J. Paquette, J. Peinke, A. Robertson, J. S. Rodrigo, A. M. Sempreviva, J. C. Smith, A. Tuohy, and R...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aau2027 2019

  17. [17]

    Van Kuik, J

    G. Van Kuik, J. Peinke, R. Nijssen, D. Lekou, J. Mann, J. N. Sørensen, C. Ferreira, J.-W. van Wingerden, D. Schlipf, P. Gebraad,et al., Long-term research chal- lenges in wind energy–a research agenda by the european academy of wind energy, Wind energy science1, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    , 67 (2024)

    Peinke, Joachim and Fuchs, Andr´ e, L’´ energie ´ eolienne, du point de vue de la physique, Reflets phys. , 67 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Apt, The spectrum of power from wind turbines, Jour- nal of Power Sources169, 369 (2007)

    J. Apt, The spectrum of power from wind turbines, Jour- nal of Power Sources169, 369 (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    M. M. Bandi and J. Apt, Variability of the wind turbine power curve, Applied Sciences6, 10.3390/app6090262 (2016)

    work page doi:10.3390/app6090262 2016

  21. [21]

    Bossuyt, C

    J. Bossuyt, C. Meneveau, and J. Meyers, Wind farm power fluctuations and spatial sampling of turbulent boundary layers, Journal of Fluid Mechanics823, 329 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Nanahara, M

    T. Nanahara, M. Asari, T. Sato, K. Yamaguchi, M. Shi- bata, and T. Maejima, Smoothing effects of distributed wind turbines. part 1. coherence and smoothing effects at a wind farm, Wind Energy7, 61 (2004)

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Haehne, J

    H. Haehne, J. Schottler, M. Waechter, J. Peinke, and O. Kamps, The footprint of atmospheric turbulence in power grid frequency measurements, Europhysics Letters 121, 30001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Anvari, G

    M. Anvari, G. Lohmann, M. W¨ achter, P. Milan, E. Lorenz, D. Heinemann, M. R. R. Tabar, and J. Peinke, Short term fluctuations of wind and solar power systems, New Journal of Physics18, 063027 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Liu and F

    L. Liu and F. Hu, Cascade-like and scaling behavior of wind velocity increments in the atmospheric surface layer, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applica- tions392, 5808 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    C. Beck, E. G. D. Cohen, and S. Rizzo, Atmospheric turbulence and superstatistics, Europhysics News36, 189 (2005)

    work page 2005

  27. [27]

    J.-F. m. c. Muzy, R. Ba¨ ıle, and P. Poggi, Intermittency of surface-layer wind velocity series in the mesoscale range, Phys. Rev. E81, 056308 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Ba¨ ıle and J.-F

    R. Ba¨ ıle and J.-F. m. c. Muzy, Spatial intermittency of surface layer wind fluctuations at mesoscale range, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 254501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    Calif, F

    R. Calif, F. G. Schmitt, and Y. Huang, Multifractal de- scription of wind power fluctuations using arbitrary order hilbert spectral analysis, Physica A: Statistical Mechan- ics and its Applications392, 4106 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    Calif and F

    R. Calif and F. G. Schmitt, Multiscaling and joint mul- tiscaling description of the atmospheric wind speed and the aggregate power output from a wind farm, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics21, 379 (2014). 10

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    N. Ali, A. Fuchs, I. Neunaber, J. Peinke, and R. B. Cal, Multi-scale/fractal processes in the wake of a wind tur- bine array boundary layer, Journal of Turbulence20, 93 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2019.1590584

    work page doi:10.1080/14685248.2019.1590584 2019

  32. [32]

    Milan, M

    P. Milan, M. W¨ achter, and J. Peinke, Turbulent character of wind energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 138701 (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    IEC,Wind energy generation systems – Part 12-1: Power performance measurements of electricity producing wind turbines, Tech. Rep. IEC 61400-12-1:2017 (Interna- tional Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzer- land, 2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    M. M. Amiri, M. Shadman, and S. F. Estefen, A re- view of physical and numerical modeling techniques for horizontal-axis wind turbine wakes, Renewable and Sus- tainable Energy Reviews193, 114279 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    N. Ali, H. F. Kadum, and R. B. Cal, Focused-based mul- tifractal analysis of the wake in a wind turbine array uti- lizing proper orthogonal decomposition, Journal of Re- newable and Sustainable Energy8, 063306 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Bachant and M

    P. Bachant and M. Wosnik, Characterising the near-wake of a cross-flow turbine, Journal of Turbulence16, 392 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Ali and R

    N. Ali and R. B. Cal, Scale evolution, intermittency and fluctuation relations in the near-wake of a wind turbine array, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals119, 215 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    See Supplemental Material [url] for: (I) detailed turbine specifications; (II) informations on the cleaning proce- dure applied to wind-power time series; (III) a compari- son of scaling properties across turbines; (IV) a compari- son of standardized structure functions for individual and aggregated wind power; and (V) a copula-based analysis of wind-powe...

    work page

  39. [39]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large reynolds num- bers, Proceedings: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 434, 9 (1991)

    work page 1991

  40. [40]

    Frisch,Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge university press, 1995)

    U. Frisch,Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge university press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  41. [41]

    Friedrich, D

    J. Friedrich, D. Moreno, M. Sinhuber, M. W¨ achter, and J. Peinke, Superstatistical wind fields from pointwise atmospheric turbulence measurements, PRX Energy1, 023006 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Castaing, Y

    B. Castaing, Y. Gagne, and E. Hopfinger, Velocity prob- ability density functions of high reynolds number turbu- lence, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena46, 177 (1990)

    work page 1990

  43. [43]

    Chevillard, S

    L. Chevillard, S. G. Roux, E. L´ evˆ eque, N. Mordant, J.-F. Pinton, and A. Arn´ eodo, Intermittency of velocity time increments in turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 064501 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    R. M. Pereira, L. Moriconi, and L. Chevillard, A multi- fractal model for the velocity gradient dynamics in tur- bulent flows, Journal of Fluid Mechanics839, 430 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Bacry, J

    E. Bacry, J. Delour, and J. F. Muzy, Multifractal random walk, Phys. Rev. E64, 026103 (2001)

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    Lakhal, L

    S. Lakhal, L. Ponson, M. Benzaquen, and J.-P. Bouchaud, Wrapping and unwrapping multifractal fields: Application to fatigue and abrupt failure fracture sur- faces, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    He and P

    X. He and P. Tong, Kraichnan’s random sweeping hy- pothesis in homogeneous turbulent convection, Phys. Rev. E83, 037302 (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Kolmogorov’s hypotheses and eu- lerian turbulence theory, The Physics of Fluids 7, 1723 (1964), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pfl/article- pdf/7/11/1723/12277253/1723 1 online.pdf

    work page 1964

  49. [49]

    G. D. Nastrom, K. S. Gage, and W. H. Jasperson, Kinetic energy spectrum of large-and mesoscale atmospheric pro- cesses, Nature310, 36 (1984)

    work page 1984

  50. [50]

    He and J.-B

    G.-W. He and J.-B. Zhang, Elliptic model for space-time correlations in turbulent shear flows, Phys. Rev. E73, 055303 (2006)

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    Tennekes, Eulerian and lagrangian time microscales in isotropic turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics67, 561 (1975)

    H. Tennekes, Eulerian and lagrangian time microscales in isotropic turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics67, 561 (1975)

    work page 1975

  52. [52]

    L. Liu, S. N. Gadde, and R. J. A. M. Stevens, Univer- sal wind profile for conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layers, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 104502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Druault, B

    P. Druault, B. Gaurier, and G. Germain, Spatial integra- tion effect on velocity spectrum: Towards an interpreta- tion of the−11/3 power law observed in the spectra of turbine outputs, Renewable Energy181, 1062 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Vern` ede, L

    S. Vern` ede, L. Ponson, and J.-P. Bouchaud, Turbulent fracture surfaces: A footprint of damage percolation?, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 215501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    B. B. Mandelbrot, Multifractal measures, especially for the geophysicist, pure and applied geophysics131, 5 (1989)

    work page 1989

  56. [56]

    B. B. Mandelbrot, Possible refinement of the lognormal hypothesis concerning the distribution of energy dissipa- tion in intermittent turbulence, inStatistical Models and Turbulence, edited by M. Rosenblatt and C. Van Atta (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1972) pp. 333–351

    work page 1972

  57. [57]

    Chevillard, M

    L. Chevillard, M. Lagoin, and S. G. Roux, Multi- fractal fractional ornstein-uhlenbeck processes (2021), arXiv:2011.09503 [math.PR]

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    H. Liu, Y. Jin, N. Tobin, and L. P. Chamorro, Towards uncovering the structure of power fluctuations of wind farms, Phys. Rev. E96, 063117 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Chatterjee and Y

    T. Chatterjee and Y. T. Peet, Contribution of large scale coherence to wind turbine power: A large eddy simula- tion study in periodic wind farms, Phys. Rev. Fluids3, 034601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Singh and J

    J. Singh and J. M. Alam, Characterization of atmo- spheric and wind farm turbulence, Computers & Fluids 289, 106537 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Tobin and L

    N. Tobin and L. P. Chamorro, Turbulence coherence and its impact on wind-farm power fluctuations, Journal of Fluid Mechanics855, 1116 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Santucci, K

    S. Santucci, K. J. M˚ aløy, A. Delaplace, J. Mathiesen, A. Hansen, J. O. Haavig Bakke, J. Schmittbuhl, L. Vanel, and P. Ray, Statistics of fracture surfaces, Phys. Rev. E 75, 016104 (2007)

    work page 2007

  63. [63]

    Benzi, S

    R. Benzi, S. Ciliberto, R. Tripiccione, C. Baudet, F. Mas- saioli, and S. Succi, Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. E48, R29 (1993)

    work page 1993

  64. [64]

    Liu and R

    Y. Liu and R. J. A. M. Stevens, Turbulence coherence in wind farms: The role of turbines, Journal of Physics: Conference Series2767, 092108 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Zhou, C.-M

    Q. Zhou, C.-M. Li, Z.-M. Lu, and Y.-L. Liu, Experimen- tal investigation of longitudinal space–time correlations of the velocity field in turbulent rayleigh–b´ enard convec- tion, Journal of Fluid Mechanics683, 94 (2011)

    work page 2011

  66. [66]

    Rosenblatt, Remarks on some nonparametric esti- mates of a density function, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics27, 832 (1956)

    M. Rosenblatt, Remarks on some nonparametric esti- mates of a density function, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics27, 832 (1956)

    work page 1956

  67. [67]

    Silverman,Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis(Routledge, 2018)

    B. Silverman,Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis(Routledge, 2018). 11

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Chicheportiche and J.-P

    R. Chicheportiche and J.-P. Bouchaud, The joint distribution of distribution of stock returns is not elliptical, International Journal of Theoret- ical and Applied Finance15, 1250019 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024912500197

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219024912500197 2012

  69. [69]

    Katzenstein, E

    W. Katzenstein, E. Fertig, and J. Apt, The variability of interconnected wind plants, Energy Policy38, 4400 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    Behnken, M

    C. Behnken, M. W¨ achter, and J. Peinke, Multipoint re- construction of wind speeds, Wind Energy Science5, 1211 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Sattarhoff and T

    C. Sattarhoff and T. Lux, Forecasting the variability of stock index returns with the multifractal random walk model for realized volatilities, International Journal of Forecasting39, 1678 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    J.-F. Muzy, D. Sornette, J. delour, and A. Ar- neodo, Multifractal returns and hierarchical port- folio theory, Quantitative Finance1, 131 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1080/713665541

    work page doi:10.1080/713665541 2001

  73. [73]

    Bacry, J

    E. Bacry, J. Delour, and J. Muzy, Modelling financial time series using multifractal random walks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications299, 84 (2001), application of Physics in Economic Modelling

    work page 2001

  74. [74]

    Garnier-Brun, M

    J. Garnier-Brun, M. Benzaquen, S. Ciliberti, and J.-P. Bouchaud, A new spin on optimal portfolios and ecolog- ical equilibria, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2021, 093408 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    Bouchaud, A

    J.-P. Bouchaud, A. Matacz, and M. Potters, Leverage effect in financial markets: The retarded volatility model, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 228701 (2001)

    work page 2001

  76. [76]

    Aubrun, R

    C. Aubrun, R. Morel, M. Benzaquen, and J.-P. Bouchaud, Identifying new classes of financial price jumps with wavelets, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2409156121 (2025), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2409156121

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2409156121 2025

  77. [77]

    IEA Wind TCP Task 25,Design and Operation of En- ergy Systems with Large Amounts of Variable Gener- ation, Tech. Rep. (International Energy Agency Wind Technology Collaboration Programme, 2018) final sum- mary report

    work page 2018