Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Manifesto from Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 24452 -- Reframing Technical Debt

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.13009 v1 pith:J2UTARST submitted 2025-05-19 cs.SE

Paris Avgeriou , Ipek Ozkaya , Heiko Koziolek , Zadia Codabux , Neil Ernst This is my paper
classification cs.SE
keywords currentdebtmanifestotechnicalworkshopdagstuhllandscapeperspectives
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This is the Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 24452 manifesto on Reframing Technical Debt. The manifesto begins with a one-page summary of Values, Beliefs, and Principles. It then elaborates on each Value, Belief, and Principle to explain their rationale and clarify their meaning. Subsequently, the paper describes the current landscape of Technical Debt Management methods and tools and explains why the current practice is inadequate and where current research falls short. The current landscape is organized into five major topics: Technical Debt as Value-Creation, Tooling, Data Collection, the role of Architecture, and Socio-Technical Aspects. Finally, the paper outlines a roadmap to realize the stated principles, with concrete milestones to be addressed by researchers, software practitioners, and tool vendors. The manifesto is signed by the workshop participants.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reducing Labeling Effort in Architecture Technical Debt Detection through Active Learning and Explainable AI

    cs.SE 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combining keyword pre-filtering with Breaking-Ties active learning labels 51% of a Jira dataset to detect architecture technical debt at F1 0.72; domain experts prefer LIME over SHAP for explaining predictions.

Pith tools