Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Bosonization in $R$-paraparticle Luttinger models

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The one-dimensional R-parafermion Luttinger model bosonizes only when the particles obey Pauli exclusion; density waves are always bosonic, flavor waves only for a subclass.

desk verdict A timely but flawed application of bosonization to R-paraparticles: the density-wave results are plausible, but the p=1-only restriction is not established by the partition function comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20429 v5 pith:J2Z7EHZW submitted 2025-08-28 cond-mat.str-el quant-ph

Dennis F. Salinel , Kristian Hauser A. Villegas This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords R-paraparticlesR-parafermionsbosonizationLuttingermodelflavor-chargeseparationexclusionstatisticspartitionfunctionsone-dimensionalsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the Luttinger model, the standard solvable description of interacting one-dimensional electrons, still works when the particles are R-parafermions, excitations governed by generalized commutation relations that can obey exclusion principles beyond Pauli's. The authors show that density waves of every R-parafermion are bosonic and commute with flavor waves, so flavor-charge separation is generic in these one-dimensional systems. Flavor waves, however, are bosonic only for certain R-parafermion species. Comparing partition functions in the R-paraparticle and boson bases, the spectra coincide at low temperature only for order-1 R-parafermions, the ones obeying Pauli exclusion; for higher orders the partition function diverges and bosonization fails. This matters because it predicts how emergent R-paraparticles could be detected in one-dimensional conductors: through distinct flavor and charge dispersions even when ordinary spin excitations are absent.

What carries the argument

The machinery has three parts. First is the R-paraparticle operator algebra: creation and annihilation operators obey generalized commutation relations determined by a four-tensor $R$ that satisfies unitarity ($M^2=1$, $M=M^\dagger$) and the constant Yang-Baxter equation. Second is the contracted bilinear operator $\hat{e}_{ij}=\sum_a \hat{\psi}^\dagger_{i,a}\hat{\psi}_{j,a}$, whose commutators with the branch density operators give $[\hat{\rho}_r(-q),\hat{\rho}_{r'}(q')]=r\,\delta_{rr'}\delta_{qq'}\,n' q L/2\pi$, the bosonic normalization that licenses the mapping to $b_q$ and $b_q^\dagger$. Third is the partition-function comparison: the paper evaluates the R-parafermion partition function $z_{\mathrm{PF}}(y)=\prod_n\big(\sum_{j=0}^{p} y^{-2(2n-1)(j-1)}\sum_{j=0}^{p} y^{2(2n-1)j}\big)^4$ and compares it with the boson partition function $Z_B$ built from the elliptic $\theta$ identity; the low-temperature match for $p=1$ and the divergence for $p>1$ are what restrict bosonization to Pauli-exclusion R-parafermions.

What would settle it

Compute the occupation coefficients $d_n$ for the order-2 example $M_4$ (Eq. (13d)) directly from the generalized commutation relations, reconstruct the single-mode partition function, and compare with Eq. (27); any mismatch invalidates the divergence argument for $p>1$ and with it the claim that only $p=1$ R-parafermions bosonize. A second check is to evaluate the difference between Eqs. (28a) and (29) at finite small $y$, since the claimed low-temperature coincidence is asymptotic, not an exact identity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that bosonization of the R-parafermionic Luttinger model holds only for $p=1$ R-parafermions, those satisfying Pauli exclusion. In the paper's terms, the spectrum of the free Luttinger model is equivalent in the R-paraparticle and boson operator bases only under that condition, and bosonization is not applicable for $p>1$. Density-wave excitations are bosonic for all R-parafermions, and they decouple from flavor waves, producing flavor-charge separation; flavor waves are bosonic only when the R-tensor satisfies a specific reduction condition, which the paper verifies for the $p=1$ examples of Eqs. (13a), (13b), and (13d) with $\beta^2=1$ but not for the other listed cases. The authors also propose that flavor-charge separation with separate parabolic dispersions could be observed in one-dimensional systems hosting emergent R-paraparticles, citing the analogous observation of separate spin and charge Fermi seas.

Load-bearing premise

The central restriction to Pauli-exclusion R-parafermions rests on the asserted partition-function formula in Eq. (27), which the paper presents without derivation; if that formula is wrong, the $p=1$-only conclusion loses its support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Density waves of any R-parafermionic Luttinger model are bosonic and propagate independently of flavor waves, so flavor-charge separation is a generic feature of one-dimensional R-parafermion systems.
  • Flavor waves are bosonic only for R-parafermions whose R-tensor satisfies the reduction condition (21); for other species the flavor waves are not bosonic and the full bosonization procedure is unavailable.
  • The spectrum equivalence between the R-paraparticle and boson bases holds only at low temperature and only for $p=1$; for $p>1$ the partition function diverges and the Luttinger model is likely inappropriate for the system.
  • An experimental system hosting emergent order-1 R-parafermions in a one-dimensional conductor should display two separate parabolic dispersions, one for charge and one for flavor, even when ordinary spin or magnon excitations are absent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not derive the partition-function formula (27) from the generalized commutation relations; if that formula is not the correct state count, the restriction of bosonization to $p=1$ would need to be re-examined.
  • The flavor-wave criterion is tested only for $m=2$ with the specific ansatz $\alpha_1=-1$, $\alpha_2=+1$; whether a different flavor operator definition could make more R-tensors bosonic is an open question.
  • Because order-2 R-parafermions are excluded from bosonization, the paper leaves open what the correct low-energy theory of interacting higher-order R-parafermions is; a natural next step is a non-bosonic collective-mode description or a different soluble model.
  • A testable extension: engineer a fully spin-polarized one-dimensional system with gapped spin excitations and look for two separate dispersions, since the paper predicts flavor-charge separation without magnon modes in such a setting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a Luttinger-model generalization in which the electron operators are replaced by R-paraparticle operators obeying generalized commutation relations fixed by a four-tensor R. It proposes to classify R-paraparticles as R-parafermions or R-parabosons according to whether the single-mode Hilbert space truncates at a finite maximum occupancy, redefines p-order as the maximum number of same-flavor particles per mode, and then analyzes density and flavor wave operators. The main claims are that density waves are always bosonic, flavor waves are bosonic only for a subclass of R-tensors, flavor-charge separation occurs generically, and a partition-function comparison shows that full bosonization is valid only for p=1 R-parafermions. The paper closes with a schematic experimental proposal based on observing flavor-charge separation in the absence of spin-wave excitations.

Significance. Should the claims hold, the paper would provide a concrete extension of bosonization beyond standard fermions and identify observable signatures of R-parastatistics in one-dimensional conductors, which is a timely topic given recent constructions of emergent R-paraparticles. The paper has some strengths: the commutator algebra in Sec. 3.1 is explicit, the example M-matrices in Sec. 2.2 give concreteness, and the flavor-charge separation statement follows from a short derivation. However, the decisive spectrum comparison in Sec. 3.3 is mathematically incorrect as written, and the flavor-wave condition in Sec. 3.2 is asserted rather than checked for the stated examples. These omissions affect the central claims, so the significance is currently not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (27)] Equation (27) is the sole basis for the p=1 restriction and is introduced without a derivation from the GCRs. Its p=1 specialization, Eq. (28a), is z_PF = ∏_n (1+y^{4n-2})^8, whereas Eq. (29) together with the theta identity gives Z_B = ∏_n (1+y^{2n-1})^8/(1+y^{2n})^4. These two power series differ already at order y: Z_B has a coefficient 8 coming from (1+y^{2n-1})^8 at n=1, while z_PF has zero linear term. The statement that both tend to 1 as y→0 does not establish spectral equivalence, since this is true of any system with a unique ground state. The claimed equivalence of spectra is therefore unsupported.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (28b)] For p=2, Eq. (28b) contains the factor y^{-2(2n-1)}, which diverges as y→0. A partition function for positive-energy excitations should have only nonnegative powers of y. This divergence is a strong indication that Eq. (27) does not correctly count the p-ordered R-parafermion states, and since the p>1 failure of bosonization is inferred from this formula, the central conclusion that bosonization is not applicable for p>1 is not established.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (21)] The condition (21) for bosonic flavor waves is stated without an explicit evaluation for the example R-tensors M2, M3, and M4, although the text asserts that M1, M2, and M4 with β^2=1 satisfy it and that M3 and M4 with β^2≠1 do not. Without showing the reduction of the four-point term in Eq. (20) for these concrete tensors, the subsequent classification of flavor waves as bosonic or non-bosonic is an unsupported assertion.
  4. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (12)] The definition of p-order in Eq. (12), which restricts same-flavor occupancy, does not determine the total per-mode occupancy n' used in the density commutator (17) and in Eq. (27), and the paper never states how p enters the state counting for the example with m=2 internal flavors. This ambiguity matters because Eq. (27) is written only in terms of p, while the bosonization mapping (18) depends only on n'; the consistency of these two parameters is not demonstrated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, heading] The word 'wethere' should be 'whether'.
  2. [Appendix A, Sec. 5] There are typographical errors: 'definiton' in Appendix A and 'singatures' in Sec. 5 should be 'definition' and 'signatures', respectively.
  3. [Eqs. (14b), (15b)] The notation in Eqs. (14b) and (15b) is not fully defined; the arguments such as 'k-m' and the role of the factor m in Eq. (15b) should be clarified, along with the normal-ordering constants θ(rk-kF).
  4. [Sec. 3.3, after Eq. (29)] The claim that bosonization 'applies only to low-temperature systems' is never quantified; the paper gives no bound on y or on temperature for the alleged equivalence.
  5. [Sec. 3.3, Eqs. (27)-(29)] The partition-function comparison is performed only for the free model; the paper does not discuss how interactions modify the comparison, despite the abstract and introduction stating that bosonization is used to solve interacting R-paraparticle systems.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's derivations reduce to its stated GCR inputs rather than to their conclusions, and the flawed partition-function comparison is a correctness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The central derivations in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 are explicit computations from the R-paraparticle GCRs (Eqs. (2) and (5)) and from the R-parafermion occupation assumption (Eq. (11b)); no parameter is fitted to the target claims that density waves are bosonic or that flavor-charge separation occurs. The flavor-wave bosonization condition (Eq. (21)) is checked against explicit R-tensors, including non-bosonic counterexamples such as Eqs. (13c) and (13d) with beta^2 != 1, so the claim has independent negative content. The p=1-only bosonization restriction in Section 3.3 rests on the partition-function comparison. Equation (27) is introduced without derivation, and the comparison of Eq. (28a) with Eq. (29) is not exact: Z_B = prod_n (1+y^{2n-1})^8 / (1+y^{2n})^4 while the p=1 R-parafermion partition function is prod_n (1+y^{4n-2})^8, so the claimed low-temperature coincidence is only the trivial y -> 0 limit and does not by itself establish spectrum equivalence. This is a serious correctness or verification problem, but it is not circularity: Eq. (27) was not fitted so that p=1 would succeed, and the load-bearing R-paraparticle formulation is cited from external work [23], not from the present authors' prior results. Under the hard rule that only exhibited reductions count as circularity, no circular step can be identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the R-paraparticle operator algebra imported from [23] and on two new ad hoc postulates: the p-ordering partition function Eq. (27) and the specific flavor wave operator. No new physical entities are introduced; the continuous parameters in the example R-matrices are scanned to identify the bosonic subclass rather than fit to data.

free parameters (3)
  • n' (maximum occupancy per mode) = 1 or 2 in explicit examples; general n' in Z+
    Chosen by hand to define the exclusion statistics; enters the density commutation relation [ρ_r(-q), ρ_r'(q')] = r δ δ n' qL/(2π) in Eq. (17) and the Fermi-surface structure Eq. (11b).
  • p (order of R-parafermion) = 1 or 2 in examples (p=1 for Pauli-like, p=2 for highest-order case)
    Defines the exclusion principle via Eq. (12) and enters the partition function Eq. (27) and the bosonization condition. The central claim that only p=1 works depends directly on this integer.
  • R-tensor parameters α, β in example M-matrices = α, β ∈ C with α,β ≠ 0; e.g., α=1, β=±1 for bosonic flavor waves
    Continuous parameters in Eq. (13b) and (13d) that select specific R-paraparticle statistics; the test of whether flavor waves are bosonic is performed only for these selected values, not for a general R-tensor.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption R-paraparticle generalized commutation relations (Eq. 2) and R-tensor constraints (YBE and idempotence, Eq. 1)
    Borrowed wholesale from [23]; the entire many-body model is built on this operator algebra. Invoked throughout Sec. 2.
  • ad hoc to paper Classification d_{n>n'}=0 for R-parafermions, yielding the zero-temperature step-function occupancy Eq. (11b)
    The authors define R-parafermions by this property, analogous to Green's parafermions [5,14]. It is a postulate that such R-tensors exist and produce the exclusion behavior.
  • domain assumption The generalized Luttinger Hamiltonian Eq. (14) with linear dispersion and normal ordering for R-paraparticle operators
    Standard Luttinger model structure [25,26] extended by replacing fermionic operators with R-parafermion operators.
  • ad hoc to paper Single-mode partition function factorization leading to Eq. (27)
    The formula z_PF(y)=∏_n [Σ_{j=0}^p y^{-2(2n-1)(j-1)} Σ_{j=0}^p y^{2(2n-1)j}]^4 is stated without derivation; the degeneracies d_n for p-ordered R-parafermions are assumed to yield these sums.
  • ad hoc to paper Flavor wave operator definition Eq. (15d) with α_1=-1, α_2=+1 for m=2
    Introduced by analogy to spin waves in spin-1/2 systems; no derivation from the R-paraparticle formalism, and only valid for m=2.
  • standard math Jacobi theta product identity Eq. (30)
    Standard mathematical identity used to rewrite the boson partition function.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bosonization in $R$-paraparticle Luttinger models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J2Z7EHZW

@misc{pith2026250820429,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bosonization in $R$-paraparticle Luttinger models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J2Z7EHZW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20429}
}
abstract

Alternative theories of quantum statistics provide an avenue for exploring novel physics beyond bosons and fermions, yet experimental verification of their existence in nature proves a challenging task. Among these theories, it has recently been suggested that $R$ parastatistics can be realized as quasiparticle excitations in many-body systems. In this paper, we build on this idea by showing that signatures of $R$ parastatistics can be observed as flavor-charge separation in one-dimensional (1D) systems. We consider a generalized version of the Luttinger model (LM) and show that bosonization persists when the $R$ paraparticles have Fermi-surface-like structures. These $R$ parafermions can satisfy generalized exclusion principles beyond conventional Pauli's. We show that density waves of all $R$ parafermions can always be bosonized, but flavor waves act like bosons only for a certain subclass of $R$ parafermions. We derive the conditions for bosonization by analyzing the LM spectrum, showing that bosonization applies only to low-temperature systems. Signatures of flavor-charge separation then become apparent as distinct dispersion profiles when we turn on interparticle interactions. This points to potential observations of flavor-charge separation in 1D systems that host emergent $R$ paraparticles.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block =

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 'af...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Wilczek, Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin particles, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 957 (1982), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.957

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.957 1982

  4. [4]

    Wilczek, Magnetic flux, angular momentum, and statistics, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Magnetic flux, angular momentum, and statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1144 (1982), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1144

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1144 1982

  5. [5]

    Nakamura, S

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner and M. J. Manfra, Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics, Nat. Phys. 16(9), 931–936 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41567-020-1019-1

    doi:10.1038/s41567-020-1019-1 2020

  6. [6]

    Bartolomei, M

    H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Plaçais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser, Y. Jin and G. Fève, Fractional statistics in anyon collisions, Science 368(6487), 173–177 (2020), doi:10.1126/science.aaz5601

    doi:10.1126/science.aaz5601 2020

  7. [7]

    H. S. Green, A generalized method of field quantization, Phys. Rev. 90, 270 (1953), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.90.270

    doi:10.1103/physrev.90.270 1953

  8. [8]

    Wang, Parastatistics and a secret communication challenge, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13360

    Z. Wang, Parastatistics and a secret communication challenge, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13360

    work page arXiv

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Mekonnen, T

    M. Mekonnen, T. D. Galley and M. P. Mueller, Invariance under quantum permutations rules out parastatistics, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17576

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Toppan, On the detectability of paraparticles beyond bosons and fermions, Int

    F. Toppan, On the detectability of paraparticles beyond bosons and fermions, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. p. 2540042 (2025), doi:10.1142/s0219887825400420

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    O. W. Greenberg and A. M. L. Messiah, Selection rules for parafields and the absence of para particles in nature, Phys. Rev. 138, B1155 (1965), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.138.B1155

    1965 doi

  4. [12]

    Doplicher, R

    S. Doplicher, R. Haag and J. Roberts, Local observables and particle statistics I , Commun. Math. Phys. 23, 199–230 (1971), doi:10.1007/BF01877742

    1971 doi

  5. [13]

    Doplicher, R

    S. Doplicher, R. Haag and J. Roberts, Local observables and particle statistics II , Commun. Math. Phys. 35, 49–85 (1974), doi:10.1007/BF01646454

    1974 doi

  6. [14]

    Araki, On the connection of spin and commutation relations between different fields, J

    H. Araki, On the connection of spin and commutation relations between different fields, J. Math. Phys. 2(3), 267 (1961), doi:10.1063/1.1703710

    1961 doi

  7. [15]

    Drühl, R

    K. Drühl, R. Haag and J. E. Roberts, On parastatistics, Commun. Math. Phys. 18, 204 (1970), doi:10.1007/BF01649433

    1970 doi

  8. [16]

    Stoilova and J

    N. Stoilova and J. Van der Jeugt, Partition functions and thermodynamic properties of paraboson and parafermion systems, Phys. Lett. A. 384(21), 126421 (2020), doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126421

    2020

  9. [17]

    Zhang, Noncommutative spaces for parafermions, J

    R. Zhang, Noncommutative spaces for parafermions, J. Geom. Phys. 201, 105192 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2024.105192

    2024

  10. [18]

    Ebadi, B

    Z. Ebadi, B. Mirza and H. Mohammadzadeh, Infinite statistics condensate as a model of dark matter, JCAP 2013(11), 057–057 (2013), doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/057

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    C. A. Nelson, M. Kraynova, C. S. Mera and A. M. Shapiro, Diagrams and parastatistical factors for cascade emission of a pair of paraparticles, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034039 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.034039

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    Kitabayashi and M

    T. Kitabayashi and M. Yasuè, Parafermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 98(4) (2018), doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043504

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    Huerta Alderete, L

    C. Huerta Alderete, L. Villanueva Vergara and B. M. Rodr\' guez-Lara, Nonclassical and semiclassical para-bose states, Phys. Rev. A 95, 043835 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.95.043835

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Huerta Alderete and B

    C. Huerta Alderete and B. M. Rodr\' guez-Lara, Quantum simulation of driven para-bose oscillators, Phys. Rev. A 95, 013820 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.95.013820

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    Huerta Alderete and B

    C. Huerta Alderete and B. M. Rodríguez-Lara, Simulating para-fermi oscillators, Sci. Rep. 8(1), 11572 (2018), doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29771-2

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    Huerta Alderete, A

    C. Huerta Alderete, A. M. Green, N. H. Nguyen, Y. Zhu, B. M. Rodríguez-Lara and N. M. Linke, Experimental realization of para-particle oscillators, https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05471

  17. [25]

    Wang and K

    Z. Wang and K. R. A. Hazzard, Particle exchange statistics beyond fermions and bosons, Nature 637(8045), 314–318 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08262-7

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko et al., Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025001 (2021), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys....

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    J. M. Luttinger, An exactly soluble model of a many‐fermion system, J. Math. Phys 4(9), 1154–1162 (1963), doi:10.1063/1.1704046

    1963 doi

  20. [28]

    F. D. M. Haldane, 'Luttinger liquid theory' of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Luttinger model and their extension to the general 1D interacting spinless Fermi gas , J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 14(19), 2585 (1981), doi:10.1088/0022-3719/14/19/010

    1981 doi

  21. [29]

    Voit, One-dimensional fermi liquids, Rep

    J. Voit, One-dimensional fermi liquids, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58(9), 977–1116 (1995), doi:10.1088/0034-4885/58/9/002

    1995 doi

  22. [30]

    H. J. Schulz, G. Cuniberti and P. Pieri, Fermi liquids and L uttinger liquids , https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9807366

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Mahan, Many-Particle Physics, Springer New York, New York, USA, second edn., ISBN 978-1-4612-8778-0, doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1469-1 (1990)

    G. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics, Springer New York, New York, USA, second edn., ISBN 978-1-4612-8778-0, doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1469-1 (1990)

    1990 doi

  24. [32]

    Sólyom, The fermi gas model of one-dimensional conductors, Adv

    J. Sólyom, The fermi gas model of one-dimensional conductors, Adv. Phys. 28(2), 201 (1979), doi:10.1080/00018737900101375

    1979 doi

  25. [33]

    P. M. T. Vianez, Y. Jin, M. Moreno, A. S. Anirban, A. Anthore, W. K. Tan, J. P. Griffiths, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, A. J. Schofield, O. Tsyplyatyev and C. J. B. Ford, Observing separate spin and charge fermi seas in a strongly correlated one-dimensional conductor, Sci. Adv. 8...

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Jompol, C

    Y. Jompol, C. J. B. Ford, J. P. Griffiths, I. Farrer, G. A. C. Jones, D. Anderson, D. A. Ritchie, T. W. Silk and A. J. Schofield, Probing spin-charge separation in a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid , Science 325(5940), 597–601 (2009), doi:10.1126/science.1171769

    2009 doi

  27. [35]

    C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Transmission through barriers and resonant tunneling in an interacting one-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 46, 15233 (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.46.15233

    1992 doi

  28. [36]

    C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Transport in a one-channel Luttinger liquid , Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1220 (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1220

    1992 doi

  29. [37]

    Furusaki and N

    A. Furusaki and N. Nagaosa, Single-barrier problem and anderson localization in a one-dimensional interacting electron system, Phys. Rev. B 47, 4631 (1993), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.47.4631

    1993 doi

  30. [38]

    Li, Note on the q=2 R -para-fermionic SYK model , https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23967

    T. Li, Note on the q=2 R -para-fermionic SYK model , https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23967

  31. [39]

    Li, Spectral form factor of quadratic R -para-particle SYK model with random matrix coupling , https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19159

    T. Li, Spectral form factor of quadratic R -para-particle SYK model with random matrix coupling , https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19159

  32. [40]

    Fendley, Parafermionic edge zero modes in Z _n -invariant spin chains , J

    P. Fendley, Parafermionic edge zero modes in Z _n -invariant spin chains , J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2012(11), P11020 (2012), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2012/11/p11020

    2012 doi

  33. [41]

    Fendley, Free parafermions, J

    P. Fendley, Free parafermions, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 47(7), 075001 (2014), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/7/075001

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    Alicea and P

    J. Alicea and P. Fendley, Topological phases with parafermions: Theory and blueprints, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 7(1), 119–139 (2016), doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031115-011336

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    T. L. Schmidt, Bosonization for fermions and parafermions, EPJ ST 229(4), 621–636 (2020), doi:10.1140/epjst/e2019-900112-y

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Fukuhara, P

    T. Fukuhara, P. Schauß, M. Endres, S. Hild, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch and C. Gross, Microscopic observation of magnon bound states and their dynamics, Nature 502(7469), 76–79 (2013), doi:10.1038/nature12541

    2013 doi

  37. [45]

    V. G. Turaev, The Yang-Baxter equation and invariants of links , Invent. Math. 92, 527 (1988), doi:10.1007/BF01393746

    1988 doi

  38. [46]

    Majid, Quasitriangular Hopf algebras and Yang-Baxter equations , Int

    S. Majid, Quasitriangular Hopf algebras and Yang-Baxter equations , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 05(01), 1 (1990), doi:10.1142/S0217751X90000027

    1990 doi

  39. [47]

    Etingof, T

    P. Etingof, T. Schedler and A. Soloviev, Set-theoretical solutions to the quantum Yang-Baxter equation , Duke Math. J. 100, 169 (1999), doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-99-10007-X

    1999 doi

  40. [48]

    T. L. Schmidt, A. Imambekov and L. I. Glazman, Fate of 1d spin-charge separation away from fermi points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 116403 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.116403

    2010 doi

  41. [49]

    Bockrath, D

    M. Bockrath, D. H. Cobden, J. Lu, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley, L. Balents and P. L. McEuen, Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes, Nature 397, 598 (1999), doi:10.1038/17569

    1999 doi

  42. [50]

    B. Gao, A. Komnik, R. Egger, D. C. Glattli and A. Bachtold, Evidence for Luttinger -liquid behavior in crossed metallic single-wall nanotubes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 216804 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.216804

    2004 doi

  43. [51]

    E. Levy, A. Tsukernik, M. Karpovski, A. Palevski, B. Dwir, E. Pelucchi, A. Rudra, E. Kapon and Y. Oreg, Luttinger-liquid behavior in weakly disordered quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 196802 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.196802

    2006 doi

  44. [52]

    T. Li, P. Wang, H. Fu, L. Du, K. A. Schreiber, X. Mu, X. Liu, G. Sullivan, G. A. Cs\'athy, X. Lin and R.-R. Du, Observation of a helical L uttinger liquid in InAs/GaSb quantum spin hall edges , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 136804 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.136804

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    Yang, Y.-Y

    B. Yang, Y.-Y. Chen, Y.-G. Zheng, H. Sun, H.-N. Dai, X.-W. Guan, Z.-S. Yuan and J.-W. Pan, Quantum criticality and the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid in one-dimensional bose gases , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 165701 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.165701

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    Toppan, Z _2 Z _2 -graded parastatistics in multiparticle quantum H amiltonians , J

    F. Toppan, Z _2 Z _2 -graded parastatistics in multiparticle quantum H amiltonians , J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 54(11), 115203 (2021), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/abe2f2

    2021 doi

  47. [55]

    Toppan, Inequivalent quantizations from gradings and Z _2 Z _2 parabosons , J

    F. Toppan, Inequivalent quantizations from gradings and Z _2 Z _2 parabosons , J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 54(35), 355202 (2021), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac17a5

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    Balbino, I

    M. Balbino, I. de Freitas, R. Rana and F. Toppan, Inequivalent Z _2 -graded brackets, n-bit parastatistics and statistical transmutations of supersymmetric quantum mechanics , Nucl. Phys. B. 1009, 116729 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116729

    2024

  49. [57]

    Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, ISBN 978-0-471-41526-8 (2005)

    C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, ISBN 978-0-471-41526-8 (2005)

    2005

  50. [58]

    Sundar, B

    B. Sundar, B. Gadway and K. R. A. Hazzard, Synthetic dimensions in ultracold polar molecules, Sci. Rep. 8, 3422 (2018), doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21699-x

    2018 doi

  51. [59]

    Sundar, M

    B. Sundar, M. Thibodeau, Z. Wang, B. Gadway and K. R. A. Hazzard, Strings of ultracold molecules in a synthetic dimension, Phys. Rev. A 99, 013624 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.013624

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    Chapman and S

    A. Chapman and S. T. Flammia, Characterization of solvable spin models via graph invariants, Quantum 4, 278 (2020), doi:10.22331/q-2020-06-04-278

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    J. M. Leinaas, Luttinger liquids, fermi liquids, and fractional statistics, Phys. Rev. B 95, 155429 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.155429

    2017 doi

  54. [62]

    H. Wang, Y. Chen and X. Cui, Boson-anyon-fermion mapping and anyon construction in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L022075 (2025), doi:10.1103/np63-xnh8

    2025 doi

  55. [63]

    Imambekov and L

    A. Imambekov and L. I. Glazman, Universal theory of nonlinear L uttinger liquids , Science 323(5911), 228–231 (2009), doi:10.1126/science.1165403

    2009 doi

  56. [64]

    T. L. Schmidt, A. Imambekov and L. I. Glazman, Spin-charge separation in one-dimensional fermion systems beyond L uttinger liquid theory , Phys. Rev. B 82, 245104 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.245104

    2010 doi

  57. [65]

    Polishchuk and L

    A. Polishchuk and L. Positselski, Quadratic Algebras, American Mathematical Society, Providence, USA, ISBN 978-1-4704-2182-3, doi:10.1090/ulect/037 (2005)

    2005 doi

  58. [66]

    H. A. Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle. i. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette , Zeit. f \"u r Phys. 71 , 205 (1931), 10.1007\

    1931

  59. [67]

    Ginsparg, It was twenty years ago today

    P. Ginsparg, It was twenty years ago today... , http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2700

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.