Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 65 references

Giant magnetoresistance amplifier for spin-orbit torque nano-oscillators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A spin Hall oscillator with a pinned ferromagnetic reference layer, read out via current-in-plane giant magnetoresistance, emits microwave power above 1 nW—nearly three orders of magnitude more than anisotropic magnetoresistance readout.

desk verdict GMR readout for spin Hall oscillators is a real device advance, but the headline 1000x power claim rests on comparing GMR at its optimum against AMR at a deliberately suboptimal angle. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11411 v1 pith:J3CVJ6WX submitted 2019-08-29 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.other

Jen-Ru Chen , Andrew Smith , Eric A. Montoya , Jia G. Lu , Ilya N. Krivorotov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.other
keywords spinHalloscillatorgiantmagnetoresistanceanisotropicspin-orbittorquemicrowaveemissionmagnetizationauto-oscillationexchangebiasnanowire
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper experimentally demonstrates that replacing the anisotropic-magnetoresistance (AMR) readout of a spin Hall oscillator with current-in-plane giant magnetoresistance (CIP GMR) raises the emitted microwave power from a few picowatts to above 1 nW, a gain the abstract puts at nearly three orders of magnitude and the conclusion at nearly two. The device remains a simple metallic nanowire, but adding a pinned ferromagnetic reference layer turns the free layer's magnetization oscillations into much larger resistance oscillations. The reason is both magnitude and angular symmetry: GMR is roughly fourteen times larger than AMR in these films, and its cosine angular dependence peaks exactly where spin Hall torque is most efficient, so power and low critical current are no longer in conflict. If the claim holds, the main practical drawback of spin Hall oscillators—weak output—can be removed without adopting the complex multilayer fabrication of magnetic tunnel junction oscillators.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the GMR transfer curve of an exchange-biased CIP spin valve. The free layer's precessing magnetization changes the relative angle between free and pinned layer magnetizations, and because the spin-valve resistance depends on that angle through $R = R_P + \Delta R_{\mathrm{GMR}}\cos(\varphi_M)$, the resistance oscillation amplitude $\delta R_{\mathrm{ac}} = -\Delta R_{\mathrm{GMR}}\sin(\varphi_M)\delta\varphi_{\mathrm{ac}}$ is proportional to the slope of the transfer curve. The paper uses this identity to show why the optimum operating angle is $\varphi_M=90^\circ$ and why the GMR device simultaneously minimizes critical current, unlike the AMR device with its $\sin(2\varphi_M)$ response. The pinned layer also does mechanical work: its stray field deepens the confining potential for the free-layer edge spin-wave mode, which is the mode that ends up radiating most of the power.

What would settle it

Sweep the applied-field angle for the same AMR SHO at H=800 Oe and compare its peak integrated power near $\varphi_H\approx70^\circ$ with the GMR SHO peak at $\varphi_H=90^\circ$ under matched bias current; if the AMR peak comes within an order of magnitude of the GMR peak, the claimed three-order enhancement does not survive a like-for-like comparison.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the low output power of spin Hall oscillators is not intrinsic to their spin-orbit torque operation but is a limitation of the AMR readout, and that CIP GMR removes the limit. In the demonstrated device, an exchange-biased IrMn/Co/Cu/Co/Py/Pt nanowire, the free Co/Py layer auto-oscillates under spin Hall torque from Pt, and the pinned Co layer provides a reference so that the oscillation modulates a GMR spin valve. Because CIP GMR in this structure follows $R(\varphi_M)=R_P + \Delta R_{\mathrm{GMR}}\cos(\varphi_M)$, a small angle oscillation $\delta\varphi$ produces $\delta R_{\mathrm{ac}} = -\Delta R_{\mathrm{GMR}}\sin(\varphi_M)\delta\varphi$, which is largest at $\varphi_M=90^\circ$, the same angle at which spin Hall antidamping is most effective. AMR, by contrast, follows a $\cos^2$ law and produces $\delta R_{\mathrm{ac}} \propto \sin(2\varphi_M)$, so its power maximum sits at $45^\circ/135^\circ$ while its critical current minimum sits at $90^\circ$, forcing a design trade-off. Measured on identical nanowire geometries at 4.2 K, the GMR device shows a 5.5% magnetoresistance ratio versus 0.4% for AMR, and its integrated power exceeds 1 nW at 6 mA and H=800 Oe. The dominant emission is from an edge spin-wave mode, in contrast to the bulk mode in the reference AMR device, which the paper attributes to the pinned layer's spatially inhomogeneous stray field.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim assumes that the AMR comparison oscillator was measured at a fair operating point: the headline gain is taken at $\varphi_H=85^\circ$ for the AMR device and $\varphi_H=90^\circ$ for the GMR device, rather than at the AMR device's own power-maximizing angle.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the result is replicated, spin Hall oscillators can deliver around 1 nW of microwave power while keeping their single-step-lithography structural simplicity, making them more viable for microwave-assisted magnetic recording, neuromorphic computing, and chip-to-chip links.
  • Because the GMR optimum angle coincides with the spin Hall torque optimum, GMR SHO design no longer requires choosing between low critical current and high output power.
  • The observed monotonic power increase up to 6 mA suggests the GMR device's useful operating range extends beyond that of the AMR comparison device, whose power peaks and then declines.
  • The dominant edge-mode emission implies that the pinned layer's stray field is an active control parameter for mode localization, not just a passive reference.
  • The 120 MHz linewidth of the dominant GMR mode is much broader than the 8 MHz linewidth of the AMR mode, so the power gain comes with a coherence cost that any application must budget for.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the headline gain of ~1000x depends on the comparison operating point. At H=500 Oe, where both devices were angle-scanned, the integrated GMR/AMR power ratio is about 8; measuring the AMR device at its own optimum near $\varphi_H\approx70^\circ$ at H=800 Oe could shrink the claimed enhancement substantially.
  • Editorial inference: because power and critical-current optima coincide for GMR SHOs, arrays of such oscillators can all be biased at the same high-power operating point, which should ease mutual synchronization; the paper does not test synchronization.
  • Editorial inference: the proposed mechanism for edge-mode enhancement by the pinned-layer stray field is testable by varying the pinned-layer material or thickness, or by replacing it with a synthetic antiferromagnet, and looking for the predicted change in the edge-mode power.
  • Editorial inference: if the linewidth broadening is mainly thermal, operating the GMR SHO at lower current or with better heat sinking should sharpen the spectrum without sacrificing the full GMR gain; this is a direct extension the paper does not explore.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a spin Hall oscillator (SHO) with an added ferromagnetic reference layer, enabling current-in-plane giant magnetoresistance (CIP GMR) readout. The authors claim that this GMR readout boosts the emitted microwave power to above 1 nW, which they state is nearly three orders of magnitude higher than conventional AMR-based SHOs (or nearly two orders in the conclusion). They provide device fabrication details, magnetoresistance measurements (GMR ratio 0.055, AMR ratio 0.004), microwave spectra, bias dependence at H = 800 Oe, and angular dependence at H = 500 Oe, along with a small-angle derivation of the angular dependence of resistance oscillations for GMR and AMR.

Significance. Demonstrating a power boost in spin Hall nano-oscillators is an important step for practical applications such as microwave-assisted recording and neuromorphic computing, and the simple angular-dependence derivation is a useful contribution. The experimental data are internally consistent and the direction of the effect (GMR improving output power) is plausible. However, the magnitude of the claimed enhancement is not supported by a fair comparison of the two devices, as detailed in the major comments. The paper's explicit derivations and measured MR values provide a useful framework, but the headline quantitative claim requires correction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Bias dependence of SHO emission (Fig. 3)] The central claim of a power enhancement of nearly three (abstract) or nearly two (conclusion) orders of magnitude compares the GMR SHO at its optimum readout angle (phi_H = 90°, H = 800 Oe, Idc = 6 mA) with the AMR SHO at phi_H = 85°, Idc = 3.65 mA. According to the paper's own derivation, the AMR sensitivity is proportional to sin(2*phi_M), which vanishes at phi_M = 90°; at phi_H = 85° the sensitivity is only about 17% of its maximum. Thus the AMR device is deliberately operated near a null of its readout sensitivity, while the GMR device is operated at its maximum. A fair comparison would place each device at or near its own optimum readout angle. The only angle-matched data reported, the H = 500 Oe angular sweeps in Fig. 4, show a GMR maximum of roughly 400 pW and an AMR maximum of roughly 60 pW, i.e., a ratio of about 7, not "nearly three orders of magnitude." The authors should either provide a matched comparison at the optimum of each device or substantially revise the claimed enhancement factor.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract states that the GMR SHO exceeds 1 nW, "nearly three orders of magnitude higher" than AMR SHOs, while the Conclusion states "nearly two orders of magnitude." These statements are mutually inconsistent. From the data in Fig. 3, the maximum GMR power is about 1.2 nW and the maximum AMR power is about 5 pW, giving a ratio of approximately 200, which is between two and three orders of magnitude; "nearly three" is an overstatement. The authors must make the headline claim consistent and align it with the data from a fair comparison.
  3. [Angular dependence derivation (Fig. 4 section)] The paper's derivation of the angular dependence of resistance oscillations is straightforward and correct for small oscillations, but it is used to justify the choice of phi_H = 90° for the GMR device while the AMR device is measured at phi_H = 85°. This asymmetric treatment is not justified by the derivation and is the root cause of the inflated enhancement ratio. The authors should show the power vs. angle data for both devices at the same field and bias conditions, and base their quantitative claims on those data rather than on a single advantageous operating point for GMR.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section header "Anglular dependence of SHO emission"] The word "Anglular" should be corrected to "Angular."
  2. [Fig. 4 derivation paragraph] The parenthetical "(57°)" after "assuming delta-phi_ac_M << 1" appears to be a typo or leftover; 57° is not a small angle. The approximation should be stated without this number, or with a proper justification of the small-angle limit.
  3. [Results, AMR SHO description] The sentence "For these measurements, we misalign the applied field direction from that perpendicular to the nanowire by 5° (phi_H = 85°) in order to achieve significant conversion efficiency" would be clearer if it noted that this misalignment places the device near a zero of the AMR sensitivity, since the sensitivity vanishes at exactly 90°.
  4. [Discussion] The sentence "Therefore, AMR SHO design considerations necessarily include a trade-off between low critical current and high output power" is a fair qualitative point, but it would be strengthened by referencing Fig. 4b and the observed power drop beyond phi_H = 70° and 110°.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the power enhancement is a measured comparison, and the angular-dependence model uses standard resistance forms with independently measured MR values, not fitted output.

full rationale

The central claim is an experimental comparison of integrated microwave power from a GMR SHO and an AMR SHO, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs. The angular-dependence analysis in the paper takes standard, externally established resistance forms — R = R_P + ΔR_GMR cos(φ_M) for CIP GMR and R = R_P − ΔR_AMR cos²(φ_M) for AMR — together with measured values (ΔR_GMR/R_P = 0.055 and AMR ratio 0.004), and then derives δR_ac and identifies the magnetization angle that maximizes output power. These inputs are not fitted to the emitted power, and no parameter is introduced that already contains the conclusion. The model is used post hoc to explain the observed angular maxima (GMR at φ_M = 90°, AMR near 70°/110°), which is explanatory rather than circular. The paper contains several self-citations, but none is load-bearing for the power-enhancement claim; the comparison rests on self-contained experimental data with independently characterized magnetoresistance. The abstract/conclusion inconsistency ('nearly three orders of magnitude' vs 'nearly two orders of magnitude') and the choice of the AMR operating point at φ_H = 85° rather than its own optimum are fairness and internal-consistency concerns, not circularity, and therefore do not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central explanation rests on standard GMR and AMR angular forms, small-angle linearization, and the assumption that the comparison device is equivalent except for the readout mechanism. No numbers are fitted to make the conclusion hold; the measured MR ratios are inputs.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption CIP GMR resistance in this spin valve follows R = R_P + Delta_R_GMR cos(phi_M).
    Invoked in the angular-dependence analysis to derive the optimum angle; the form is standard from refs. 23-25 but is assumed to hold for this exchange-biased multilayer at the operating fields.
  • domain assumption AMR resistance follows R = R_P - Delta_R_AMR cos^2(phi_M).
    Used in the same derivation for the comparison device; the form is standard for AMR in thin ferromagnetic films.
  • domain assumption The microwave output power is proportional to the square of the resistance oscillation amplitude delta_R_ac^2.
    Stated without derivation in the angular-dependence section; it is standard for magnetoresistive readout but treats the load impedance and bias as constant.
  • domain assumption The oscillation amplitude delta_phi_ac is small and approximately independent of the equilibrium angle phi_0.
    The linearization delta_R_ac = dR/dphi * delta_phi_ac assumes delta_phi_M << 1 and ignores any angle dependence of the oscillation amplitude, which could shift the power maximum.
  • domain assumption The pinned Co layer magnetization remains nearly parallel to the wire axis under the applied fields, so GMR depends on cos(phi_M) rather than cos(phi_M - phi_pinned).
    The analysis sets the pinned direction along the current axis; the text acknowledges the pinned layer retains a large component along the wire but does not quantify the small angular deviation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Giant magnetoresistance amplifier for spin-orbit torque nano-oscillators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J3CVJ6WX

@misc{pith2026190811411,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Giant magnetoresistance amplifier for spin-orbit torque nano-oscillators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J3CVJ6WX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11411}
}
read the original abstract

Spin-orbit torque nano-oscillators based on bilayers of ferromagnetic (FM) and nonmagnetic (NM) metals are ultra-compact current-controlled microwave signal sources. They serve as a convenient testbed for studies of spin-orbit torque physics and are attractive for practical applications such as microwave assisted magnetic recording, neuromorphic computing, and chip-to-chip wireless communications. However, a major drawback of these devices is low output microwave power arising from the relatively small anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) of the FM layer. Here we experimentally show that the output power of a spin-orbit torque nano-oscillator can be enhanced by nearly three orders of magnitude without compromising its structural simplicity. Addition of a FM reference layer to the oscillator allows us to employ current-in-plane giant magnetoresistance (CIP GMR) to boost the output power of the device. This enhancement of the output power is a result of both large magnitude of GMR compared to that of AMR and different angular dependences of GMR and AMR. Our results pave the way for practical applications of spin-orbit torque nano-oscillators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.11411 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Spectral power density (PSD, color scale on the right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a shows integrated microwave power emitted by the GMR SHO (φH = 90◦ ) and AMR SHO (φH = 85◦ ) devices measured at H = 800 Oe as a function of current bias Idc. The data in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dependence of the integrated microwave power genera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ando , author S

    author author K. Ando , author S. Takahashi , author K. Harii , author K. Sasage , author J. Ieda , author S. Maekawa , \ and\ author E. Saitoh ,\ title title Electric Manipulation of Spin Relaxation Using the Spin Hall Effect , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.036601 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 101 ,\ pages 036601 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.036601

  2. [2]

    author author Ioan Mihai \ Miron , author Kevin \ Garello , author Gilles \ Gaudin , author Pierre-Jean \ Zermatten , author Marius V. \ Costache , author St \'e phane \ Auffret , author S \'e bastien \ Bandiera , author Bernard \ Rodmacq , author Alain \ Schuhl , \ and\ author Pietro \ Gambardella ,\ title title Perpendicular switching of a single ferrom...

    doi:10.1038/nature10309

  3. [3]

    Liu , author C.-F

    author author L. Liu , author C.-F. \ Pai , author Y. Li , author H. W. \ Tseng , author D. C. \ Ralph , \ and\ author R. A. \ Buhrman ,\ title title Spin- Torque Switching with the Giant Spin Hall Effect of Tantalum , \ 10.1126/science.1218197 journal journal Science \ volume 336 ,\ pages 555--558 ( year 2012 a ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.1218197

  4. [4]

    author author Frances \ Hellman , author Axel \ Hoffmann , author Yaroslav \ Tserkovnyak , author Geoffrey S. D. \ Beach , author Eric E. \ Fullerton , author Chris \ Leighton , author Allan H. \ MacDonald , author Daniel C. \ Ralph , author Dario A. \ Arena , author Hermann A. \ D \"u rr , author Peter \ Fischer , author Julie \ Grollier , author Joseph ...

  5. [5]

    Manchon , author H

    author author A. Manchon , author H. C. \ Koo , author J. Nitta , author S. M. \ Frolov , \ and\ author R. A. \ Duine ,\ title title New perspectives for Rashba spin orbit coupling , \ 10.1038/nmat4360 journal journal Nature Materials \ volume 14 ,\ pages 871--882 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nmat4360

  6. [6]

    author author Frank \ Freimuth , author Stefan \ Bl \"u gel , \ and\ author Yuriy \ Mokrousov ,\ title title Spin-orbit torques in Co / Pt (111) and Mn / W (001) magnetic bilayers from first principles , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.174423 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 90 ,\ pages 174423 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.174423

  7. [7]

    author author K. D. \ Belashchenko , author Alexey A. \ Kovalev , \ and\ author M. van Schilfgaarde ,\ title title First-principles calculation of spin-orbit torque in a Co / Pt bilayer , \ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.011401 journal journal Physical Review Materials \ volume 3 ,\ pages 011401 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.011401

  8. [8]

    \ Tschudin , author Nathaniel \ Leitao , author Michel \ Pioro-Ladri \`e re , author Jack C

    author author Adrian \ Solyom , author Zackary \ Flansberry , author M \"a rta A. \ Tschudin , author Nathaniel \ Leitao , author Michel \ Pioro-Ladri \`e re , author Jack C. \ Sankey , \ and\ author Lilian I. \ Childress ,\ title title Probing a Spin Transfer Controlled Magnetic Nanowire with a Single Nitrogen - Vacancy Spin in Bulk Diamond , \ 10.1021/a...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03012

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    \ Valenzuela , author J

    author author Jairo \ Sinova , author Sergio O. \ Valenzuela , author J. Wunderlich , author C. H. \ Back , \ and\ author T. Jungwirth ,\ title title Spin Hall effects , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 87 ,\ pages 1213--1260 ( ye...

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author Shufeng \ Zhang ,\ title title Spin Hall Effect in the Presence of Spin Diffusion , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.393 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 85 ,\ pages 393--396 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author Axel \ Hoffmann ,\ title title Spin Hall Effects in Metals , \ 10.1109/TMAG.2013.2262947 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Magnetics \ volume 49 ,\ pages 5172--5193 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  4. [12]

    \ Chang , author Hari P

    author author Yongxi \ Ou , author Zhe \ Wang , author Celesta S. \ Chang , author Hari P. \ Nair , author Hanjong \ Paik , author Neal \ Reynolds , author Daniel C. \ Ralph , author David A. \ Muller , author Darrell G. \ Schlom , \ and\ author Robert A. \ Buhrman ,\ title ti...

    doi

  5. [13]

    \ Jothi , author Qiming \ Shao , author Mohammed \ Aldosary , author Tang \ Su , author Boniface P

    author author Mohammed \ Alghamdi , author Mark \ Lohmann , author Junxue \ Li , author Palani R. \ Jothi , author Qiming \ Shao , author Mohammed \ Aldosary , author Tang \ Su , author Boniface P. T. \ Fokwa , \ and\ author Jing \ Shi ,\ title title Highly Efficient Spin Orbi...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author Vladislav E. \ Demidov , author Sergei \ Urazhdin , author Henning \ Ulrichs , author Vasyl \ Tiberkevich , author Andrei \ Slavin , author Dietmar \ Baither , author Guido \ Schmitz , \ and\ author Sergej O. \ Demokritov ,\ title title Magnetic nano-oscillator d...

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author Luqiao \ Liu , author Chi-Feng \ Pai , author D. C. \ Ralph , \ and\ author R. A. \ Buhrman ,\ title title Magnetic Oscillations Driven by the Spin Hall Effect in 3- Terminal Magnetic Tunnel Junction Devices , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.186602 journal journal Phys...

    doi

  8. [16]

    \ Demidov , author Sergej O

    author author Zheng \ Duan , author Andrew \ Smith , author Liu \ Yang , author Brian \ Youngblood , author J \"u rgen \ Lindner , author Vladislav E. \ Demidov , author Sergej O. \ Demokritov , \ and\ author Ilya N. \ Krivorotov ,\ title title Nanowire spin torque oscillator ...

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author A. A. \ Awad , author P. D \"u rrenfeld , author A. Houshang , author M. Dvornik , author E. Iacocca , author R. K. \ Dumas , \ and\ author J. kerman ,\ title title Long-range mutual synchronization of spin Hall nano-oscillators , \ 10.1038/nphys3927 journal jour...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Collet , author X

    author author M. Collet , author X. de Milly , author O. d'Allivy Kelly , author V. V. \ Naletov , author R. Bernard , author P. Bortolotti , author J. Ben Youssef , author V. E. \ Demidov , author S. O. \ Demokritov , author J. L. \ Prieto , author M. Mu \ n oz , author V. Cr...

    doi

  11. [19]

    Safranski , author I

    author author C. Safranski , author I. Barsukov , author H. K. \ Lee , author T. Schneider , author A. A. \ Jara , author A. Smith , author H. Chang , author K. Lenz , author J. Lindner , author Y. Tserkovnyak , author M. Wu , \ and\ author I. N. \ Krivorotov ,\ title title Sp...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Tarequzzaman , author T

    author author M. Tarequzzaman , author T. B \"o hnert , author M. Decker , author J. D. \ Costa , author J. Borme , author B. Lacoste , author E. Paz , author A. S. \ Jenkins , author S. Serrano-Guisan , author C. H. \ Back , author R. Ferreira , \ and\ author P. P. \ Freitas ...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Chen , author R

    author author T. Chen , author R. K. \ Dumas , author A. Eklund , author P. K. \ Muduli , author A. Houshang , author A. A. \ Awad , author P. D \"u rrenfeld , author B. G. \ Malm , author A. Rusu , \ and\ author J. kerman ,\ title title Spin- Torque and Spin - Hall Nano - Osc...

  14. [22]

    author author R. H. \ Liu , author W. L. \ Lim , \ and\ author S. Urazhdin ,\ title title Spectral Characteristics of the Microwave Emission by the Spin Hall Nano - Oscillator , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.147601 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 110 ,\ pages 1476...

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author M. N. \ Baibich , author J. M. \ Broto , author A. Fert , author F. Nguyen \ Van Dau , author F. Petroff , author P. Etienne , author G. Creuzet , author A. Friederich , \ and\ author J. Chazelas ,\ title title Giant Magnetoresistance of (001) Fe /(001) Cr Magnet...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Binasch , author P

    author author G. Binasch , author P. Gr \"u nberg , author F. Saurenbach , \ and\ author W. Zinn ,\ title title Enhanced magnetoresistance in layered magnetic structures with antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.4828 journal journal Physical Review B \...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author R. E. \ Camley \ and\ author J. Barna \'s ,\ title title Theory of giant magnetoresistance effects in magnetic layered structures with antiferromagnetic coupling , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.664 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 63 ,\ pages 664--667 ...

    doi

  18. [26]

    author author Alina M. \ Deac , author Akio \ Fukushima , author Hitoshi \ Kubota , author Hiroki \ Maehara , author Yoshishige \ Suzuki , author Shinji \ Yuasa , author Yoshinori \ Nagamine , author Koji \ Tsunekawa , author David D. \ Djayaprawira , \ and\ author Naoki \ Wat...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Dussaux , author B

    author author A. Dussaux , author B. Georges , author J. Grollier , author V. Cros , author A.V. \ Khvalkovskiy , author A. Fukushima , author M. Konoto , author H. Kubota , author K. Yakushiji , author S. Yuasa , author K.A. \ Zvezdin , author K. Ando , \ and\ author A. Fert ...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Houssameddine , author S

    author author D. Houssameddine , author S. H. \ Florez , author J. A. \ Katine , author J.-P. \ Michel , author U. Ebels , author D. Mauri , author O. Ozatay , author B. Delaet , author B. Viala , author L. Folks , author B. D. \ Terris , \ and\ author M.-C. \ Cyrille ,\ title...

    doi

  21. [29]

    \ Katine , author Ilya N

    author author Zhongming \ Zeng , author Giovanni \ Finocchio , author Baoshun \ Zhang , author Pedram Khalili \ Amiri , author Jordan A. \ Katine , author Ilya N. \ Krivorotov , author Yiming \ Huai , author Juergen \ Langer , author Bruno \ Azzerboni , author Kang L. \ Wang ,...

    doi

  22. [30]

    \ Krivorotov , author Hui \ Zhao , author Giovanni \ Finocchio , author Jian-Ping \ Wang , author Jordan A

    author author Zhongming \ Zeng , author Pedram Khalili \ Amiri , author Ilya N. \ Krivorotov , author Hui \ Zhao , author Giovanni \ Finocchio , author Jian-Ping \ Wang , author Jordan A. \ Katine , author Yiming \ Huai , author Juergen \ Langer , author Kosmas \ Galatsis , au...

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author Witold \ Skowro \'n ski , author Tomasz \ Stobiecki , author Jerzy \ Wrona , author G \"u nter \ Reiss , \ and\ author Sebastiaan \ van Dijken ,\ title title Zero- Field Spin Torque Oscillator Based on Magnetic Tunnel Junctions with a Tilted CoFeB Free Layer , \ ...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Evelt , author C

    author author M. Evelt , author C. Safranski , author Mohammed \ Aldosary , author V. E. \ Demidov , author I. Barsukov , author A. P. \ Nosov , author A. B. \ Rinkevich , author K. Sobotkiewich , author Xiaoqin \ Li , author Jing \ Shi , author I. N. \ Krivorotov , \ and\ aut...

    doi

  25. [33]

    \ Montoya , \ and\ author Ilya N

    author author Christopher \ Safranski , author Eric A. \ Montoya , \ and\ author Ilya N. \ Krivorotov ,\ title title Spin orbit torque driven by a planar Hall current , \ 10.1038/s41565-018-0282-0 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 14 ,\ pages 27--30 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [34]

    \ Slavin , \ and\ author Ilya N

    author author Liu \ Yang , author Roman \ Verba , author Vasil \ Tiberkevich , author Tobias \ Schneider , author Andrew \ Smith , author Zheng \ Duan , author Brian \ Youngblood , author Kilian \ Lenz , author J \"u rgen \ Lindner , author Andrei N. \ Slavin , \ and\ author I...

    doi

  27. [35]

    u rgen \ Lindner , author J \

    author author Kai \ Wagner , author Andrew \ Smith , author Toni \ Hache , author Jen-Ru \ Chen , author Liu \ Yang , author Eric \ Montoya , author Katrin \ Schultheiss , author J \"u rgen \ Lindner , author J \"u rgen \ Fassbender , author Ilya \ Krivorotov , \ and\ author H...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author P M \ Braganca , author B A \ Gurney , author B A \ Wilson , author J A \ Katine , author S Maat , \ and\ author J R \ Childress ,\ title title Nanoscale magnetic field detection using a spin torque oscillator , \ 10.1088/0957-4484/21/23/235202 journal journal Na...

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author Jacob \ Torrejon , author Mathieu \ Riou , author Flavio Abreu \ Araujo , author Sumito \ Tsunegi , author Guru \ Khalsa , author Damien \ Querlioz , author Paolo \ Bortolotti , author Vincent \ Cros , author Kay \ Yakushiji , author Akio \ Fukushima , author Hit...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author Shankar \ Khanal , author Andrei \ Diaconu , author Jose M \ Vargas , author Denny R \ Lenormand , author Carlos \ Garcia , author C A \ Ross , \ and\ author Leonard \ Spinu ,\ title title Exchange bias in ( FeNi / IrMn ) n multilayer films evaluated by static an...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Ali , author C

    author author M. Ali , author C. H. \ Marrows , author M. Al-Jawad , author B. J. \ Hickey , author A. Misra , author U. Nowak , \ and\ author K. D. \ Usadel ,\ title title Antiferromagnetic layer thickness dependence of the IrMn / Co exchange-bias system , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB....

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author I. N. \ Krivorotov , author C. Leighton , author J. Nogu \'e s , author Ivan K. \ Schuller , \ and\ author E. Dan Dahlberg ,\ title title Origin of complex exchange anisotropy in Fe / MnF 2 bilayers , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.054430 journal journal Physical Review B...

    doi

  33. [41]

    author author S. I. \ Kiselev , author J. C. \ Sankey , author I. N. \ Krivorotov , author N. C. \ Emley , author R. J. \ Schoelkopf , author R. A. \ Buhrman , \ and\ author D. C. \ Ralph ,\ title title Microwave oscillations of a nanomagnet driven by a spin-polarized current ...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Rippard , author M

    author author W. Rippard , author M. Pufall , author S. Kaka , author S. E. \ Russek , \ and\ author T. J. \ Silva ,\ title title Direct- Current Induced Dynamics in Co 90 Fe 10 / Ni 80 Fe 20 Point Contacts , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.027201 journal journal Physical Review Lett...

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author I. N. \ Krivorotov , author N. C. \ Emley , author J. C. \ Sankey , author S. I. \ Kiselev , author D. C. \ Ralph , \ and\ author R. A. \ Buhrman ,\ title title Time- Domain Measurements of Nanomagnet Dynamics Driven by Spin - Transfer Torques , \ 10.1126/science...

    doi

  36. [44]

    author author S. S. P. \ Parkin ,\ title title Origin of enhanced magnetoresistance of magnetic multilayers: Spin -dependent scattering from magnetic interface states , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1641 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 71 ,\ pages 1641--1644 ( year...

    doi

  37. [45]

    author author Eric \ Montoya , author Tommy \ McKinnon , author Atieh \ Zamani , author Erol \ Girt , \ and\ author Bret \ Heinrich ,\ title title Broadband ferromagnetic resonance system and methods for ultrathin magnetic films , \ 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.12.032 journal journal J...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Jorzick , author S

    author author J. Jorzick , author S. O. \ Demokritov , author B. Hillebrands , author M. Bailleul , author C. Fermon , author K. Y. \ Guslienko , author A. N. \ Slavin , author D. V. \ Berkov , \ and\ author N. L. \ Gorn ,\ title title Spin Wave Wells in Nonellipsoidal Microme...

    doi

  39. [47]

    \ Krivorotov , author Rodrigo E

    author author Zheng \ Duan , author Ilya N. \ Krivorotov , author Rodrigo E. \ Arias , author Nathalie \ Reckers , author Sven \ Stienen , \ and\ author J \"u rgen \ Lindner ,\ title title Spin wave eigenmodes in transversely magnetized thin film ferromagnetic wires , \ 10.110...

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author Mykola \ Dvornik \ and\ author Johan \ kerman ,\ title title Anomalous nonlinearity of the magnonic edge mode , \ @noop journal journal arXiv:1804.01585 [cond-mat] \ ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Tshitoyan , author C

    author author V. Tshitoyan , author C. Ciccarelli , author A. P. \ Mihai , author M. Ali , author A. C. \ Irvine , author T. A. \ Moore , author T. Jungwirth , \ and\ author A. J. \ Ferguson ,\ title title Electrical manipulation of ferromagnetic NiFe by antiferromagnetic IrMn...

    doi

  42. [50]

    author author Weifeng \ Zhang , author Wei \ Han , author See-Hun \ Yang , author Yan \ Sun , author Yang \ Zhang , author Binghai \ Yan , \ and\ author Stuart S. P. \ Parkin ,\ title title Giant facet-dependent spin-orbit torque and spin Hall conductivity in the triangular an...

    doi

  43. [51]

    Carlos \ Rojas-Sanchez , author Sebastien \ Petit , author Michel \ Hehn , author Wei \ Zhang , author John E

    author author Hilal \ Saglam , author J. Carlos \ Rojas-Sanchez , author Sebastien \ Petit , author Michel \ Hehn , author Wei \ Zhang , author John E. \ Pearson , author Stephane \ Mangin , \ and\ author Axel \ Hoffmann ,\ title title Independence of spin-orbit torques from t...

    doi

  44. [52]

    author author Jing \ Zhou , author Xiao \ Wang , author Yaohua \ Liu , author Jihang \ Yu , author Huixia \ Fu , author Liang \ Liu , author Shaohai \ Chen , author Jinyu \ Deng , author Weinan \ Lin , author Xinyu \ Shu , author Herng Yau \ Yoong , author Tao \ Hong , author ...

  45. [53]

    Slavin \ and\ author V

    author author A. Slavin \ and\ author V. Tiberkevich ,\ title title Nonlinear Auto - Oscillator Theory of Microwave Generation by Spin - Polarized Current , \ 10.1109/TMAG.2008.2009935 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Magnetics \ volume 45 ,\ pages 1875--1918 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2008

  46. [54]

    author author J. C. \ Sankey , author I. N. \ Krivorotov , author S. I. \ Kiselev , author P. M. \ Braganca , author N. C. \ Emley , author R. A. \ Buhrman , \ and\ author D. C. \ Ralph ,\ title title Mechanisms limiting the coherence time of spontaneous magnetic oscillations ...

    doi

  47. [55]

    Boone , author J

    author author C. Boone , author J. A. \ Katine , author J. R. \ Childress , author J. Zhu , author X. Cheng , \ and\ author I. N. \ Krivorotov ,\ title title Experimental test of an analytical theory of spin-torque-oscillator dynamics , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.140404 journal jou...

    doi

  48. [56]

    author author I. N. \ Krivorotov , author N. C. \ Emley , author R. A. \ Buhrman , \ and\ author D. C. \ Ralph ,\ title title Time-domain studies of very-large-angle magnetization dynamics excited by spin transfer torques , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.054440 journal journal Physical...

    doi

  49. [57]

    author author Ezio \ Iacocca , author Olle \ Heinonen , author P. K. \ Muduli , \ and\ author Johan \ kerman ,\ title title Generation linewidth of mode-hopping spin torque oscillators , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.054402 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 89 ,\ pages 054402...

    doi

  50. [58]

    author author V. E. \ Demidov , author S. Urazhdin , author E. R. J. \ Edwards , author M. D. \ Stiles , author R. D. \ McMichael , \ and\ author S. O. \ Demokritov ,\ title title Control of Magnetic Fluctuations by Spin Current , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.107204 journal journ...

    doi

  51. [59]

    Grollier , \ and\ author M

    author author Tomohiro \ Taniguchi , author J. Grollier , \ and\ author M. D. \ Stiles ,\ title title Spin- Transfer Torques Generated by the Anomalous Hall Effect and Anisotropic Magnetoresistance , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.044001 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ v...

    doi

  52. [60]

    \ Gibbons , author David \ MacNeill , author Robert A

    author author Jonathan D. \ Gibbons , author David \ MacNeill , author Robert A. \ Buhrman , \ and\ author Daniel C. \ Ralph ,\ title title Reorientable Spin Direction for Spin Current Produced by the Anomalous Hall Effect , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.064033 journal journal Ph...

    doi

  53. [61]

    \ Baek , author Vivek P

    author author Seung-heon C. \ Baek , author Vivek P. \ Amin , author Young-Wan \ Oh , author Gyungchoon \ Go , author Seung-Jae \ Lee , author Geun-Hee \ Lee , author Kab-Jin \ Kim , author M. D. \ Stiles , author Byong-Guk \ Park , \ and\ author Kyung-Jin \ Lee ,\ title title...

    doi

  54. [62]

    author author V. P. \ Amin \ and\ author M. D. \ Stiles ,\ title title Spin transport at interfaces with spin-orbit coupling: Phenomenology , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.104420 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 104420 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  55. [63]

    author author Miguel \ Romera , author Philippe \ Talatchian , author Sumito \ Tsunegi , author Flavio \ Abreu Araujo , author Vincent \ Cros , author Paolo \ Bortolotti , author Juan \ Trastoy , author Kay \ Yakushiji , author Akio \ Fukushima , author Hitoshi \ Kubota , auth...

  56. [64]

    Markovi \'c , author N

    author author D. Markovi \'c , author N. Leroux , author M. Riou , author F. Abreu Araujo , author J. Torrejon , author D. Querlioz , author A. Fukushima , author S. Yuasa , author J. Trastoy , author P. Bortolotti , \ and\ author J. Grollier ,\ title title Reservoir computing...

    doi

  57. [65]

    author author H. S. \ Lee , author S. H. \ Kim , author T. H. \ Jang , author H. Park , author B. Min , author S. Park , \ and\ author C. S. \ Park ,\ title title Power- Efficient Spin - Torque Nano - Oscillator - Based Wireless Communication With CMOS High - Gain Low - Noise ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.