pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23514 · v1 · pith:J3IPUISYnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🪐 quant-ph

Minimal Trade-off and Optimal Measurement for Multiparameter Quantum Estimation

Lingna Wang , Hongzhen Chen , Haidong Yuan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 04:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords multiparameter quantum estimationmeasurement incompatibilitytrade-off boundsoptimal measurementsquantum metrologyquantum radarArthurs-Kelly relationpure quantum states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tight analytical bounds on measurement trade-offs are derived for multiparameter quantum estimation in pure states, along with optimal measurements that achieve them.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to quantify the precision trade-offs that arise because no single measurement can be optimal for estimating all parameters at once. It restricts attention to an arbitrary number of parameters encoded in pure quantum states. A sympathetic reader would care because the work supplies explicit limits on simultaneous estimation performance and a method to reach those limits. The approach is illustrated by sharpening the Arthurs-Kelly relation that governs joint range and velocity estimation in quantum radar under arbitrary entanglement.

Core claim

For an arbitrary number of parameters encoded in pure quantum states, tight analytical bounds exist for the trade-offs induced by measurement incompatibility, and a systematic methodology exists to design optimal measurement strategies that saturate these limits. The framework is applied to quantum radar to obtain a refined Arthurs-Kelly relation characterizing ultimate performance for simultaneous range and velocity estimation with any given amount of entanglement.

What carries the argument

The approach that derives tight analytical bounds for trade-offs induced by measurement incompatibility and supplies a methodology for constructing saturating optimal measurements.

If this is right

  • The bounds hold for any number of parameters when the states are pure.
  • Optimal measurements can be constructed systematically to saturate the bounds.
  • The refined Arthurs-Kelly relation gives the ultimate joint precision for range and velocity under any entanglement.
  • The same construction applies to other multiparameter sensing tasks that use pure states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the construction to mixed states would require new technical steps not supplied here.
  • The same bounding technique could be tested in optical or atomic sensors that estimate several phases or fields at once.
  • Numerical checks on small-dimensional pure states could verify whether the derived bounds are attained by standard projective measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The states in which the parameters are encoded must be pure.

What would settle it

A concrete pure-state example with multiple parameters in which every possible measurement yields a worse trade-off than the derived analytical bound, or in which no measurement reaches the bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23514 by Haidong Yuan, Hongzhen Chen, Lingna Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Geometrical picture of the measurement incom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Radar sensing of target’s range and velocity using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A fundamental challenge in multiparameter quantum estimation arises from the incompatibility of optimal measurements for different parameters, leading to intricate precision trade-offs that obscure the understanding of ultimate quantum limits. Here, we present an approach that precisely quantifies these trade-offs for an arbitrary number of parameters encoded in pure quantum states. Our approach not only derives tight analytical bounds for the trade-offs induced by measurement incompatibility but also provides a systematic methodology to design optimal measurement strategies that saturate these limits. To demonstrate the practical significance of our findings, we apply our framework to quantum radar and obtain a refined Arthurs-Kelly relation that characterizes the ultimate performance for the simultaneous estimation of range and velocity with any given amount of entanglement. This showcases the transformative potential of our findings for a wide range of applications in quantum metrology, sensing, and beyond.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce a framework that derives tight analytical bounds on the precision trade-offs arising from measurement incompatibility in multiparameter quantum estimation for an arbitrary number of parameters encoded in pure states. It further asserts a systematic method to construct optimal measurements that saturate these bounds. The framework is illustrated by application to simultaneous range-velocity estimation in quantum radar, producing a refined Arthurs-Kelly relation that incorporates arbitrary entanglement.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would supply analytical tools for quantifying and achieving fundamental limits in multiparameter quantum metrology, with direct relevance to sensing applications such as quantum radar. The ability to handle arbitrary parameter counts in pure states and to design saturating measurements would constitute a useful advance over existing trade-off relations.

major comments (1)
  1. The abstract asserts that the derived bounds are tight and achievable for arbitrary numbers of parameters in pure states, yet the provided text contains no derivations, explicit bounds, or saturation conditions (e.g., no equations analogous to a multiparameter Cramér-Rao bound or incompatibility measure). Without these, the load-bearing claim that the bounds are both tight and saturated cannot be assessed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for raising this point. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The abstract asserts that the derived bounds are tight and achievable for arbitrary numbers of parameters in pure states, yet the provided text contains no derivations, explicit bounds, or saturation conditions (e.g., no equations analogous to a multiparameter Cramér-Rao bound or incompatibility measure). Without these, the load-bearing claim that the bounds are both tight and saturated cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The full manuscript contains the derivations of the tight analytical bounds, the explicit incompatibility measure for pure states, and the saturation conditions. These appear in the main text (Sections 2–4), including the generalized multiparameter trade-off bound (analogous to a Cramér-Rao form with incompatibility terms) and the constructive procedure for the optimal POVM that saturates it for any number of parameters. The equations and proofs were present in the submitted version. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

No equations, derivations, or self-citations are present in the supplied abstract, and the full manuscript text is not provided for inspection. Without any load-bearing steps, fitted parameters, or self-referential constructions visible, the derivation chain cannot be shown to reduce to its inputs by construction. The paper's claims about tight bounds for pure states therefore stand as self-contained against external benchmarks in the given context.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is supplied, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be identified or counted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5664 in / 1040 out tokens · 27733 ms · 2026-05-25T04:40:07.589709+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    TuPVBzN7aVwStAQbZPirBHEqTpQ=

    This is exactly the weak commutativity condition, Tr(ρx[Lj, Lk]) = 0,∀j, k, which is necessary and suffi- cient for the saturation of QCRB in the case of pure states [1, 20, 45]. Second, for the estimation of 2d−2 pa- rameters encoded in ad-dimensional pure state, all eigen- values ofF − 1 2 Q FImF − 1 2 Q satisfy|λ q|= 1,∀q= 1,· · ·,2d−2 (see [65] for de...

    work page

  2. [2]

    A. S. Holevo,Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982)

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    Helstrom,Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory(Academic Press, New York, 1976)

    Carl W. Helstrom,Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory(Academic Press, New York, 1976)

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Braunstein and Carlton M

    Samuel L. Braunstein and Carlton M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3439 (1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    Braunstein, Carlton M

    Samuel L. Braunstein, Carlton M. Caves, and G. J. Mil- burn, Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, exam- ples, and Lorentz invariance, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)247, 135 (1996)

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    Q. Liu, Z. Hu, H. Yuan, and Y. Yang, Optimal strategies of quantum metrology with a strict hierarchy, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 070803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Stanis law Kurdzia lek, Wojciech G´ orecki, Francesco Al- barelli, and Rafa l Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, Using adap- tiveness and causal superpositions against noise in quan- tum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 090801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Szczykulska, T

    M. Szczykulska, T. Baumgratz, and A. Datta, Multi- parameter quantum metrology, Adv. Phys.1, 621 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, W

    R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, W. G´ orecki, and M. Gut ¸˘ a, Multi-parameter estimation beyond quantum Fisher in- formation, J. Phys. A53, 363001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Albarelli, M

    F. Albarelli, M. Barbieri, M. G. Genoni, and I. Gianani, A perspective on multiparameter quantum metrology: From theoretical tools to applications in quantum imag- ing, Phys. Lett. A384, 126311 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    M. D. Vidrighin, G. Donati, M. G. Genoni, X.-M. Jin, W. S. Kolthammer, M. S. Kim, A. Datta, M. Barbieri, and I. A. Walmsley, Joint estimation of phase and phase diffusion for quantum metrology, Nat. Commun.5, 3532 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Philip J. D. Crowley, Animesh Datta, Marco Barbieri, and I. A. Walmsley, Tradeoff in simultaneous quantum- limited phase and loss estimation in interferometry, Phys. Rev. A89, 023845 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Yue, Y.-R

    J.-D. Yue, Y.-R. Zhang, and H. Fan, Quantum-enhanced metrology for multiple phase estimation with noise, Sci. Rep.4, 5933 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Y. R. Zhang and H. Fan, Quantum metrological bounds for vector parameters, Phys. Rev. A90, 043818 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Jun Suzuki, Explicit formula for the Holevo bound for two-parameter qubit-state estimation problem, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)57, 042201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Jing Liu, Haidong Yuan, Xiao-Ming Lu, and Xiaoguang Wang, Quantum Fisher information matrix and multipa- 6 rameter estimation, J. Phys. A53, 023001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Hongzhen Chen and Haidong Yuan, Optimal joint esti- mation of multiple Rabi frequencies, Phys. Rev. A99, 032122 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Z. Hou, Z. Zhang, G. Y. Xiang, C. F. Li, G. C. Guo, H. Chen, L. Liu, and H. Yuan, Minimal tradeoff and ul- timate precision limit of multiparameter quantum mag- netometry under the parallel scheme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 020501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Super- Heisenberg

    Z. Hou, Y. Jin, H. Chen, J. F. Tang, C. J. Huang, H. Yuan, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, “Super- Heisenberg” and Heisenberg scalings achieved simultane- ously in the estimation of a rotating field, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 070503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Phys.19, 063023 (2017)

    Yu Chen and Haidong Yuan, Maximal quantum Fisher information matrix, New J. Phys.19, 063023 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Pezz` e, M

    L. Pezz` e, M. A. Ciampini, N. Spagnolo, P. C. Humphreys, A. Datta, I. A. Walmsley, M. Barbieri, F. Sciarrino, and A. Smerzi, Optimal measurements for simultaneous quantum estimation of multiple phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 130504 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Sidhu and Pieter Kok, Geometric perspec- tive on quantum parameter estimation, AVS Quantum Sci.2, 014701 (2020)

    Jasminder S. Sidhu and Pieter Kok, Geometric perspec- tive on quantum parameter estimation, AVS Quantum Sci.2, 014701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Jing Liu and Haidong Yuan, Control-enhanced multipa- rameter quantum estimation, Phys. Rev. A96, 042114 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Genoni, and Marco Barbieri, Entangling measurements for multiparameter estimation with two qubits, Quantum Sci

    Emanuele Roccia, Ilaria Gianani, Luca Mancino, Marco Sbroscia, Fabrizia Somma, Marco G. Genoni, and Marco Barbieri, Entangling measurements for multiparameter estimation with two qubits, Quantum Sci. Technol.3, 01LT01 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Sholeh Razavian, Matteo G. A. Paris, and Marco G. Genoni, On the quantumness of multiparameter esti- mation problems for qubit systems, Entropy22, 1197 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Stoica and T

    P. Stoica and T. L. Marzetta, Parameter estimation prob- lems with singular information matrices, IEEE Trans. Signal Process.49, 87 (2001)

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    Jiayu He and Matteo G. A. Paris, Scrambling for pre- cision: Optimizing multiparameter qubit estimation in the face of sloppiness and incompatibility, J. Phys. A58, 325301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Massimo Frigerio and Matteo G. A. Paris, Overcoming sloppiness for enhanced metrology in continuous-variable quantum statistical models, Int. J. Quantum Inf.24, 2540001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Mitchell, Metrological symmetries in singular quantum multi-parameter estima- tion, Quantum Sci

    George Mihailescu, Saubhik Sarkar, Abolfazl Bayat, Steve Campbell, and Andrew K. Mitchell, Metrological symmetries in singular quantum multi-parameter estima- tion, Quantum Sci. Technol.11, 015006 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Y. Yang, V. Montenegro, and A. Bayat, Overcoming quantum metrology singularity through sequential mea- surements, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 010401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Hongzhen Chen, Yu Chen, and Haidong Yuan, Incompat- ibility measures in multiparameter quantum estimation under hierarchical quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A 105, 062442 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    H. Chen, Y. Chen, and H. Yuan, Information geome- try under hierarchical quantum measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 250502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    R. D. Gill and S. Massar, State estimation for large en- sembles, Phys. Rev. A61, 042312 (2000)

    work page 2000

  34. [34]

    Original Japanese version was published inSurikaiseki Kenkyusho Kokyuroku1055, 96–110 (1998)

    Masahito Hayashi and Keiji Matsumoto, Statistical model with measurement degree of freedom and quan- tum physics, inAsymptotic Theory of Quantum Sta- tistical Inference: Selected Papers, edited by Masahito Hayashi (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005). Original Japanese version was published inSurikaiseki Kenkyusho Kokyuroku1055, 96–110 (1998)

    work page 2005

  35. [35]

    Huangjun Zhu and Masahito Hayashi, Universally Fisher-symmetric informationally complete measure- ments, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 030404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Xiao-Ming Lu and Xiaoguang Wang, Incorporating Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle into quantum multipa- rameter estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 120503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    J. S. Sidhu, Y. Ouyang, E. T. Campbell, and P. Kok, Tight bounds on the simultaneous estimation of incom- patible parameters, Phys. Rev. X11, 011028 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    H. Nagaoka, A new approach to Cram´ er–Rao bounds for quantum state estimation, inAsymptotic Theory of Quantum Statistical Inference: Selected Papers, edited by Masahito Hayashi (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005). Originally published as IEICE Technical Reports No. 89, 228, IT 89–42, 9–14, 1989

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    H. Nagaoka, A generalization of the simultaneous di- agonalization of Hermitian matrices and its relation to quantum estimation theory, inAsymptotic Theory of Quantum Statistical Inference: Selected Papers, edited by Masahito Hayashi (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005)

    work page 2005

  40. [40]

    Conlon, Jun Suzuki, Ping Koy Lam, and Syed M

    Lorc´ an O. Conlon, Jun Suzuki, Ping Koy Lam, and Syed M. Assad, Efficient computation of the Nagaoka– Hayashi bound for multiparameter estimation with sep- arable measurements, npj Quantum Inf.7, 110 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    S. Ragy, M. Jarzyna, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, Compatibility in multiparameter quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A94, 052108 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Federico Belliardo and Vittorio Giovannetti, Incompat- ibility in quantum parameter estimation, New J. Phys. 23, 063055 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Dubkov, and Davide Valenti, On quantumness in multi- parameter quantum estimation, J

    Angelo Carollo, Bernardo Spagnolo, Alexander A. Dubkov, and Davide Valenti, On quantumness in multi- parameter quantum estimation, J. Stat. Mech. (2019) 094010

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Alessandro Candeloro, Matteo G. A. Paris, and Marco G. Genoni, On the properties of the asymptotic incompati- bility measure in multiparameter quantum estimation, J. Phys. A54, 485301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Keiji Matsumoto, A geometrical approach to quantum estimation theory, arXiv:2111.09667

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Matsumoto, A new approach to the Cram´ er–Rao- type bound of the pure-state model, J

    K. Matsumoto, A new approach to the Cram´ er–Rao- type bound of the pure-state model, J. Phys. A35, 3111 (2002)

    work page 2002

  47. [47]

    Gill, Quantum local asymptotic normality based on a new quantum likelihood ratio, Ann

    Koichi Yamagata, Akio Fujiwara, and Richard D. Gill, Quantum local asymptotic normality based on a new quantum likelihood ratio, Ann. Stat.41, 2197 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Jonas Kahn and M˘ ad˘ alin Gut ¸˘ a, Local asymptotic nor- mality for finite dimensional quantum systems, Commun. Math. Phys.289, 597 (2009)

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    Yuxiang Yang, Giulio Chiribella, and Masahito Hayashi, Attaining the ultimate precision limit in quantum state estimation, Commun. Math. Phys.368, 223 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Albarelli, J

    F. Albarelli, J. F. Friel, and A. Datta, Evaluating the Holevo Cram´ er–Rao bound for multiparameter quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 200503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Conlon, Tobias Vogl, Christian D

    Lorc´ an O. Conlon, Tobias Vogl, Christian D. Marciniak, Ivan Pogorelov, Simon K. Yung, Falk Eilenberger, Do- minic W. Berry, Fabiana S. Santana, Rainer Blatt, 7 Thomas Monz, Ping Koy Lam, and Syed M. Assad, Approaching optimal entangling collective measurements on quantum computing platforms, Nat. Phys.19, 351 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Hongzhen Chen, Lingna Wang, and Haidong Yuan, Si- multaneous measurement of multiple incompatible ob- servables and tradeoff in multiparameter quantum esti- mation, npj Quantum Inf.10, 98 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Harald Cram´ er,Mathematical Methods of Statistics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1946)

    work page 1946

  54. [54]

    Arthurs and J

    E. Arthurs and J. L. Kelly Jr., On the simultaneous mea- surement of a pair of conjugate observables, Bell Syst. Tech. J.44, 725 (1965)

    work page 1965

  55. [55]

    Arthurs and M

    E. Arthurs and M. S. Goodman, Quantum correlations: A generalized Heisenberg uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2447 (1988)

    work page 1988

  56. [56]

    Masanao Ozawa, Universally valid reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and distur- bance in measurement, Phys. Rev. A67, 042105 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Masanao Ozawa, Uncertainty relations for joint measure- ments of noncommuting observables, Phys. Lett. A320, 367 (2004)

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    Masanao Ozawa, Uncertainty relations for noise and dis- turbance in generalized quantum measurements, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam)311, 350 (2004)

    work page 2004

  59. [59]

    Masanao Ozawa, Physical content of Heisenberg’s un- certainty relation: Limitation and reformulation, Phys. Lett. A318, 21 (2003)

    work page 2003

  60. [60]

    Masanao Ozawa, Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation: Vio- lation and reformulation, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.504, 012024 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Michael J. W. Hall, Prior information: How to circum- vent the standard joint-measurement uncertainty rela- tion, Phys. Rev. A69, 052113 (2004)

    work page 2004

  62. [62]

    Cyril Branciard, Error-tradeoff and error-disturbance re- lations for incompatible quantum measurements, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110, 6742 (2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    Cyril Branciard, Deriving tight error-trade-off relations for approximate joint measurements of incompatible quantum observables, Phys. Rev. A89, 022124 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    Error-disturbance relations in mixed states

    M. Ozawa, Error-disturbance relations in mixed states, arXiv:1404.3388

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    X.-M. Lu, S. Yu, K. Fujikawa, and C. H. Oh, Improved error-tradeoff and error-disturbance relations in terms of measurement error components, Phys. Rev. A90, 042113 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    L. Wang, H. Chen, and H. Yuan, Tight trade-off relation and optimal measurement for multiparameter quantum estimation, arXiv:2504.09490

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  67. [67]

    Thus, without loss of gen- erality, we may assumec m ∈R

    Specifically, expressing|Ψ x⟩|ξ⟩= P m cm|m⟩withc m = ⟨m|Ψx⟩|ξ⟩, we note that ifc m =r meiϕm is complex, we can redefine the basis states as|˜m⟩=e iϕm |m⟩, where {|˜m⟩⟨˜m|}corresponds to the same projective measure- ment as{|m⟩⟨m|}and the state becomes|Ψ x⟩|ξ⟩=P m rm|˜m⟩, wherer m ∈R. Thus, without loss of gen- erality, we may assumec m ∈R

    work page

  68. [68]

    If ⟨m|Ψx⟩|ξ⟩= 0, then in the measurement basis them-th entries of|o j⟩= P m fj(m)|m⟩⟨m|Ψx⟩|ξ⟩,j= 1,· · ·, n, should also be zero

    Essentially|b 0⟩= (⟨1|Ψ x⟩|ξ⟩,· · ·,⟨m|Ψ x⟩|ξ⟩,· · ·) T is the representation of|Ψ x⟩|ξ⟩in the measurement basis. If ⟨m|Ψx⟩|ξ⟩= 0, then in the measurement basis them-th entries of|o j⟩= P m fj(m)|m⟩⟨m|Ψx⟩|ξ⟩,j= 1,· · ·, n, should also be zero

    work page

  69. [69]

    Kurdzia lek and R

    S. Kurdzia lek and R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, Measure- ment noise susceptibility in quantum estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 160802 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    BAQIS Quafu Group,https://quafu.baqis.ac.cn

    work page

  71. [71]

    Zhuang, Z

    Q. Zhuang, Z. Zhang, and J. H. Shapiro, Entanglement- enhanced lidars for simultaneous range and velocity mea- surements, Phys. Rev. A96, 040304(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Quntao Zhuang, Quantum ranging with Gaussian entan- glement, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 240501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Zhuang and J

    Q. Zhuang and J. H. Shapiro, Ultimate accuracy limit of quantum pulse-compression ranging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Zixin Huang, Cosmo Lupo, and Pieter Kok, Quantum- limited estimation of range and velocity, PRX Quantum 2, 030303 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    Ricardo Gallego Torrom´ e, Nadya Ben Bekhti-Winkel, and Peter Knott, Introduction to quantum radar, arXiv:2006.14238v3

    work page arXiv 2006

  76. [76]

    Lorenzo Maccone and Changliang Ren, Quantum radar, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 200503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    Win, and Mikel Sanz, Quantum-enhanced Doppler lidar, npj Quantum Inf.8, 147 (2022)

    Maximilian Reichert, Roberto Di Candia, Moe Z. Win, and Mikel Sanz, Quantum-enhanced Doppler lidar, npj Quantum Inf.8, 147 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Maximilian Reichert, Quntao Zhuang, and Mikel Sanz, Heisenberg-limited quantum lidar for joint range and ve- locity estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 130801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    Yongqiang Li and Changliang Ren, Entanglement- enhanced quantum strategies for accurate estimation of multibody-group motion and moving-object characteris- tics, Phys. Rev. A108, 062605 (2023)

    work page 2023