Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

A Supersymmetric $w_{1+\infty}$ Symmetry, the Extended Supergravity and the Celestial Holography

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the soft current algebra of N=4 SO(4) supergravity is exactly the N=4 supersymmetric $w^{2,2}_{1+\infty}[\lambda=1/4]$ algebra, with its 24 (anti)commutators and helicity assignments fixed by that identification.

desk verdict A careful algebraic construction whose central celestial-supergravity identification is an explicitly admitted ansatz, not a derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11471 v3 pith:J3UJI2LB submitted 2025-01-20 hep-th

Changhyun Ahn , Man Hea Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T4081T6083E5017B68
keywords supersymmetricW1+∞algebraN=4supergravitycelestialholographysoftcurrentSO(4)superconformalconformallysymmetriesextendedtruncations
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the soft-current algebra of N=4 supergravity with global SO(4) symmetry—the four-dimensional theory of a graviton, four gravitinos, six vectors, four Majorana fermions, and a scalar–pseudoscalar pair—is exactly the N=4 supersymmetric $w^{2,2}_{1+\infty}[\lambda=1/4]$ algebra. This would connect the 1977 Lagrangian of N=4 supergravity to a known infinite-dimensional symmetry of the celestial CFT, in the same way the simpler $w_{1+\infty}$ algebra appeared for gravity and Yang–Mills. The paper also claims that consistently truncating the fields of this algebra reproduces the soft-current algebras of N=3, N=2, N=1, and N=2 coupled to Abelian vector multiplets, so a single two-dimensional algebra organizes the soft charges of a whole family of extended supergravities. A sympathetic reader would care because it turns a list of soft charges into a closed algebraic structure with fixed structure constants.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the N=4 supersymmetric $w^{2,2}_{1+\infty}[\lambda=1/4]$ algebra, the zero-central-charge member of a family of $W_{1+\infty}$ algebras built from (b,c) and (β,γ) free fields. The paper first realizes the N=4 SO(4) superconformal algebra in these free fields, then extends it to generic superspin and takes the lowest-order-in-q limit to obtain the w-algebra. The connection to supergravity is made by imposing the three-point helicity condition $s_1+s_2+s_3=2$ (the $d_V=5$ case) on the lowest-order terms, since the explicit celestial OPEs of N=4 supergravity are not yet known. The value $\lambda=1/4$ fixes the deformation parameter $\alpha=0$, which removes those terms in the anticommutator of two spin-3/2 currents and the commutator of a spin-3/2 with a spin-1 current that have no counterpart in the Lagrangian interactions.

What would settle it

Compute the actual celestial operator product of two gravitinos in the 1977 N=4 SO(4) supergravity Lagrangian and check the pole structure that (3.1) predicts: for instance, the anticommutator of two spin-3/2 currents with the same SO(4) index should have no second-order pole, and a non-vanishing pole there would falsify the algebra.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that the celestial soft current algebra in N=4 SO(4) supergravity is the set of 24 (anti)commutators written in (3.1), with the helicity assignments of (3.2) putting each Lagrangian field into the algebra: the graviton, gravitinos, vectors, Majoranas, and scalar/pseudoscalar are identified with generators of spins 2, 3/2, 1, 1/2, and 0 and helicities ±2, ±3/2, ±1, ±1/2, and ±0. The couplings inside these (anti)commutators are fixed by the Jacobi identity and reduce to eight independent constants. The same algebra, under the consistent truncations described in the 1977 paper, yields the soft current algebras of the lower-$\mathcal{N}$ theories. The value $\lambda=1/4$ is singled out because it is the only point at which the deformation terms absent from the Lagrangian disappear.

Load-bearing premise

The identification assumes that the N=4 supergravity soft-current algebra follows the same three-point-helicity and collinear rules as N=8 supergravity, because the paper states the N=4 celestial OPEs are not known and imposes the $d_V=5$ condition directly rather than deriving it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 24 (anti)commutators of (3.1), with couplings fixed by the Jacobi identity, are the complete soft current algebra of N=4 SO(4) supergravity.
  • Truncating the N=4 fields reproduces the soft current algebras of N=3 and N=2 supergravity, N=2 supergravity coupled to Abelian vector multiplets, and N=1 Maxwell–Einstein theory.
  • The value $\lambda=1/4$ is forced by the requirement that no deformation term survives without a corresponding Lagrangian interaction.
  • The same N=2 soft algebra is obtained independently from the N=2 supersymmetric $w^{K,K}_{1+\infty}[\lambda=0]$ algebra, providing a cross-check of the truncation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the identification holds, the known N=8 supergravity soft algebra should contain an N=4 SO(4) subsector that reduces to (3.1) after truncating the extra fields; the paper does not perform this reduction, so it is a testable consequence.
  • The construction suggests that other extended supergravities, such as the SU(4) version, might correspond to special values of the deformation parameter $\lambda$ in the same family of W algebras, since only $\lambda=1/4$ and $\lambda=0$ are treated here.
  • Because the paper fixes the soft algebra by hand rather than from the N=4 celestial OPEs, a direct computation of those OPEs from the 1977 Lagrangian would provide an independent check of every one of the 24 (anti)commutators.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a two-dimensional N=4 supersymmetric W_{1+∞}^{2,2}[λ=1/4] algebra as an extension of the N=4 SO(4) superconformal algebra with vanishing central charge, using a free-field realization inherited from a previous construction. It then defines a 'soft current algebra' (equations 3.1) by dressing the abstract w_{1+∞} algebra (2.14) with helicity labels and imposing the selection rule s_1+s_2+s_3=2, and claims that this algebra is the celestial soft current algebra of the N=4 SO(4) supergravity found by Das. The paper further claims that consistent truncations of this algebra give soft current algebras for N=3, N=2, N=1 supergravities and matter-coupled cases, and that the N=2 case can also be obtained from an N=2 supersymmetric W_{1+∞}^{K,K}[λ=0] algebra. The central claim is that (3.1) describes the soft symmetry algebra of N=4 SO(4) supergravity.

Significance. If the central identification were established, the paper would provide a concrete infinite-dimensional symmetry algebra for N=4 supergravity in the celestial holography framework, generalizing the known N=8 and N=1 results and organizing the soft symmetries of lower-N supergravities through truncations. The explicit free-field construction of the N=4 supersymmetric W_{1+∞} algebra is a useful technical contribution, and the authors are transparent about the scope of their Jacobi checks. However, the main physical claim is not derived from the N=4 supergravity amplitudes or OPEs; the paper itself states (footnote 20) that the relevant N=4 celestial OPEs are not known. The identification is therefore an ansatz whose consistency is checked only partially and whose couplings are left as free parameters. The paper does not provide an independent computation—from amplitudes, OPEs, or a truncation of the known N=8 soft algebra—that would fix the structure constants to the N=4 supergravity values. As a result, the significance of the paper rests on the credibility of an unproven correspondence.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, footnote 20] The central claim that the algebra (3.1) is 'the celestial soft current algebra in the N=4 supergravity theory' is not derived. Footnote 20 explicitly states that the OPEs with Euler beta functions for N=4 SO(4) supergravity 'are not known so far', and that the helicity condition s1+s2+s3=2 is imposed directly on the abstract w_{1+∞} algebra (2.14). This is an input assumption, not a computed consequence. A derivation from amplitudes, from a known OPE, or from a consistent truncation of the known N=8 celestial algebra is required to support the identification; none is provided.
  2. [§3.1, (3.1)–(3.5)] The structure constants κ_{s1,s2,−s3} are not fixed by any computation from N=4 supergravity. The Jacobi identities (3.5) reduce sixteen couplings to eight arbitrary ones, but no amplitude or Lagrangian calculation determines these eight values. The matching to Das's Lagrangian is built into the construction: the 'additional thirteen terms' are introduced so that the algebra contains operators corresponding to that Lagrangian. This makes the identification circular rather than predictive. The eight free parameters undermine the claim that (3.1) is uniquely the soft algebra of N=4 SO(4) supergravity.
  3. [§3.1 and §2.6] The Jacobi checks are incomplete in a way that is load-bearing for the claim that (3.1) is a closed algebra. The text states that Jacobi identities were checked for 1≤h1,h2≤6 (Section 3.1), but no general proof is given. For the underlying full algebra (A.3), Section 2.6 states 'we did not do it' and Section 6 states 'we expect that the Jacobi identity is satisfied'. Since the algebra is infinite-dimensional in the spins, a check up to h=6 is insufficient to establish closure, especially because the subleading terms in q in (A.6) are shown to violate the Jacobi identity at orders q^6, q^7 and q^8 (Appendix A.4).
  4. [§1, footnote 5; §3.1] The paper does not perform the decisive cross-check available from N=8 supergravity. As the authors note (footnote 5), N=8 SO(8) supergravity contains all SO(N) extended supergravities with N<8, and the N=8 celestial soft algebra is known [59]. Since N=4 is a consistent truncation of N=8, one can truncate the known N=8 soft algebra and compare the result with (3.1). This would fix the numerical couplings and the SO(4) epsilon/delta structure, or falsify the identification. The absence of this test leaves the central claim unsubstantiated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors and notational inconsistencies, for example 'w2,2' and 'W 2,2' are used interchangeably, and the helicity labels ±0 appear without a consistent convention for the complex scalar/pseudoscalar pair. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [§3.3 (split factors)] The list of split factors in (3.3) is introduced without defining the notation Split_{−(h+\tilde h)}^{SG}(1^{h_1+\tilde h_1},2^{h_2+\tilde h_2}) in the text; it is only described by reference to [58,59]. The reader should be told what the subscripts and superscripts denote.
  3. [§3.1, (3.5)] The sentence 'The three minus signs appearing on the right hand sides of (3.5) imply that the simplest solution ... is given by κ_{3/2,−3/2,+2}=−1' is unclear: the right hand sides of (3.5) are expressions, not signs. Please clarify the intended logic.
  4. [§2.6] The statement 'In principle we can check the Jacobi identity from the various (anti)commutators presented in (A.3) although we did not do it' conflicts with the later claim in Section 3.1 that Jacobi identities were checked. The manuscript should distinguish clearly between the Jacobi checks for the abstract w-algebra (2.14)/(A.3) and those for the soft algebra (3.1).

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The N=4 soft algebra (3.1) is a fitted ansatz: λ=1/4 is chosen to delete terms absent from Das's N=4 Lagrangian, the helicity condition is imposed because the N=4 celestial OPEs are unknown, and the claimed identification is the construction restated.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 1, paragraph beginning 'By looking at the interaction between the gravitinos...'; see also Section 2.3]
    "Therefore, it is necessary to put the above λ dependent coefficients (1 − 4λ) should vanish because there are no such interactions of the N = 4 supergravity theory. Therefore, the parameter λ should be equal to λ = 1 4 ."

    The value λ=1/4 is not derived from N=4 amplitude data or celestial OPEs; it is fixed by requiring the (1−4λ) terms to vanish because Das's N=4 SO(4) supergravity Lagrangian has no such epsilon/delta interactions. The resulting λ=1/4 algebra is then presented as 'determined' and identified with that same Lagrangian. The identification is therefore an input chosen to make the algebra match the target theory, not an output of an independent prediction.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.1, footnote 20 and the construction of (3.1)]
    "the explicit OPEs having the above Euler beta function from the collinear singularities of the amplitudes between the particles in the N = 4 SO(4) supergravity are not known so far, although they are known in the N = 8 SO(8) supergravity [59]. Instead of following the above procedures, we use the above condition for the helicities directly to determine the soft current algebra (3.1) from (2.14) obtained in the two dimensional conformal field theory."

    The claimed N=4 supergravity soft algebra (3.1) is defined as the algebra obtained by imposing the helicity condition s1+s2+s3=2 on the abstract w_{1+∞} algebra (2.14), precisely because the N=4 celestial OPEs are not computed. Section 3.2 then 'reads off' the same commutators from each of the thirteen Lagrangian terms using the same helicity rule. The match of (3.1) to Das's Lagrangian is built into the selection rule that defines (3.1), so the statement that the N=4 soft current algebra 'is described by (3.1)' is the ansatz restated as a result.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2.6]
    "By considering all the other terms in (2.14), we present the complete N = 4 supersymmetric W 2,2 1+∞[λ = 1 4 ] algebra in (A.3) with (A.4) and (A.5) which can be obtained from the results in [57] after inserting the particular value for λ = 1 4 ."

    The central algebra (2.14)/(A.3), from which the soft algebra (3.1) is obtained by imposing helicities, is imported from [57], a prior paper by the same authors (C. Ahn and M.H. Kim, JHEP 02 (2024) 006). The present paper does not independently derive those structure constants; its Jacobi verification is partial ('In principle we can check ... although we did not do it'). Because the N=4 supergravity identification inherits this unverified self-cited input, the self-citation is load-bearing rather than incidental.

full rationale

The paper's genuinely new mathematical object, the N=4 supersymmetric W_{1+∞}^{2,2}[λ=1/4] algebra, is a specialization of the authors' earlier [57] construction and is not the problem. The circularity lies in the application to celestial holography. The value λ=1/4 is fixed by deleting precisely those (1−4λ) terms that Das's N=4 Lagrangian lacks, so the matching of the algebra's SO(4) structure to the supergravity interactions is imposed before the identification is announced. Likewise, the soft algebra (3.1) is not derived from N=4 supergravity amplitudes or OPEs; footnote 20 concedes the N=4 OPEs are unknown and the helicity condition is imposed directly on (2.14). The subsequent section-by-section 'analysis' of the thirteen Lagrangian terms uses the same helicity selection rule to recover the commutators that were put into (3.1), so the central claim reduces largely to its own construction. There is also a load-bearing self-citation: (A.3) and (2.14) are taken from [57] by the same authors, with only a partial Jacobi check here. The strongest checkable alternative, truncating the known N=8 soft algebra [59] to N=4 and comparing the numerical couplings, is not performed. These features make the central identification partially circular and underdetermined rather than fully circular; the underlying W algebra has independent content, so a score of 6 rather than 8 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction rests on a fitted deformation parameter, an auxiliary expansion parameter, and eight undetermined structure constants. The algebra is inherited from a prior free-field construction, while the celestial identification adds assumptions about uncomputed OPEs and unproved closure for general spins.

free parameters (3)
  • λ (deformation parameter) = 1/4
    Fixed to λ=1/4 to set (1-4λ)=0 because N=4 SO(4) supergravity has no corresponding interactions; this is a fit to the target theory, not a derivation (Section 2.3 and Section 3).
  • q (small nonzero expansion parameter) = small but nonzero
    Introduced in (2.13) to organize leading terms; higher-order q terms are ignored in (2.14) and in Jacobi checks (A.4), so the truncated algebra's closure depends on this choice.
  • Structure constants κ_{s1,s2,-s3} = 8 arbitrary couplings; simplest solution sets κ=±1
    The 24 (anti)commutators of (3.1) contain 16 couplings expressible via Jacobi in terms of 8 free constants (3.5); paper does not determine them from amplitudes, so the proposed algebra is a one-parameter family.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The free field realization of N=4 linear W∞[λ] from [57] (via (β,γ) and (b,c) systems) is a consistent vertex-operator algebra satisfying Jacobi identities.
    Section 2.6 and Appendix A inherit the algebra from [57] and state 'by construction' Jacobi holds; the paper does not re-derive or fully check it.
  • domain assumption The celestial OPEs for N=4 SO(4) supergravity have the same Euler beta function structure as N=8 supergravity and the dV=5 helicity condition s1+s2+s3=2 determines the soft algebra.
    Footnote 20 states these OPEs are not known; the paper instead imposes helicity conditions directly to build (3.1).
  • ad hoc to paper The soft current algebra closes for all h1,h2 with the given structure constants.
    Jacobi identities are checked only for 1≤h1,h2≤6 (Section 3.1) and up to q4 in Appendix A.4; the general case is expected but unproved.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Supersymmetric $w_{1+\infty}$ Symmetry, the Extended Supergravity and the Celestial Holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J3UJI2LB

@misc{pith2026250111471,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Supersymmetric $w_1+\infty$ Symmetry, the Extended Supergravity and the Celestial Holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J3UJI2LB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11471}
}
abstract

We determine the ${\cal N}=4$ supersymmetric $W_{1+\infty}^{2,2}[\lambda=\frac{1}{4}]$ algebra which is an extension of ${\cal N}=4$ $SO(4)$ superconformal algebra with vanishing central charge. We identify the soft current algebra between the graviton, the gravitinos, the vectors, the Majorana fermions, the scalar or the pseudoscalar, from the ${\cal N}=4$ supersymmetric $w_{1+\infty}^{2,2}[\lambda=\frac{1}{4}]$ algebra, in two dimensions with the ${\cal N}=4$ supergravity theory with $SO(4)$ global symmetry in four dimensions found by Das (at Stony Brook in 1977), via celestial holography. Furthermore, the truncations of ${\cal N}=4$ supersymmetric soft current algebra provide the soft current algebras for the ${\cal N}=2,3$ supergravity theories, the ${\cal N}=2$ supergravity coupled to its Abelian vector multiplet and the ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetric Maxwell Einstein theory. For the ${\cal N}=2$ supergravity theory, the soft current algebra can be also realized from the ${\cal N}=2$ supersymmetric $w_{1+\infty}^{K,K}[\lambda=0]$ algebra.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Particle Contributions to the Celestial Algebra in the ${\cal N}=8$ Supergravity

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Multi-particle OPEs of single-particle celestial operators with two-particle operators in N=8 supergravity yield ninety-five (anti)commutators of the soft current algebra plus amplitude relations.

  2. Gauge Invariant and Generic Formulation of Magnetic Translations and so(3,1) Curtright-Zachos Generators

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Gauge-invariant magnetic translation operators, built from a gauge-covariant pseudo-momentum P, reproduce Curtright-Zachos generators through a rotation-dilatation duality.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [59]

    Asymptotic symmetry algebra of N=8 supergravity,

    N. Banerjee, T. Rahnuma and R. K. Singh, “Asymptotic symmetry algebra of N=8 supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.4, 046010 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.046010 [arXiv:2212.12133 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Subsidiary conditions and ghosts in dual resonance models,

    M. A. Virasoro, “Subsidiary conditions and ghosts in dual resonance models,” Phys. Rev. D 1, 2933-2936 (1970) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2933

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.1.2933 1970

  3. [2]

    Algebraic treatment of subsidiary conditions in dual reso- nance models,

    S. Fubini and G. Veneziano, “Algebraic treatment of subsidiary conditions in dual reso- nance models,” Annals Phys. 63, 12-27 (1971) doi:10.1016/0003-4916(71)90295-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(71)90295-8 1971

  4. [3]

    Factorizable dual model of pions,

    A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz, “Factorizable dual model of pions,” Nucl. Phys. B 31, 86-112 (1971) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(71)90448-2

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(71)90448-2 1971

  5. [4]

    Dual Theory for Free Fermions,

    P. Ramond, “Dual Theory for Free Fermions,” Phys. Rev. D 3, 2415-2418 (1971) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2415

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.3.2415 1971

  6. [6]

    Supersymmetric Strings and Color Confinement,

    M. Ademollo, L. Brink, A. D’Adda, R. D’Auria, E. Napolitano, S. Sciuto, E. Del Giudice, P. Di Vecchia, S. Ferrara and F. Gliozzi, et al. “Supersymmetric Strings and Color Confinement,” Phys. Lett. B 62, 105-110 (1976) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90061-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90061-7 1976

  7. [7]

    Dual String with U(1) Color Symmetry,

    M. Ademollo, L. Brink, A. D’Adda, R. D’Auria, E. Napolitano, S. Sciuto, E. Del Giudice, P. Di Vecchia, S. Ferrara and F. Gliozzi, et al.“Dual String with U(1) Color Symmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B 111, 77-110 (1976) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90483-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90483-1 1976

  8. [8]

    Classification of Dual Model Gauge Algebras,

    P. Ramond and J. H. Schwarz, “Classification of Dual Model Gauge Algebras,” Phys. Lett. B 64, 75-77 (1976) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90361-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90361-0 1976

Show all 114 references
  1. [9]

    O(n) Extended Superconformal Field Theory in Superspace,

    K. Schoutens, “O(n) Extended Superconformal Field Theory in Superspace,” Nucl. Phys. B 295, 634-652 (1988) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90539-1

    1988 doi

  2. [10]

    Superconformal Algebras in Two-Dimensions with N=4,

    A. Sevrin, W. Troost and A. Van Proeyen, “Superconformal Algebras in Two-Dimensions with N=4,” Phys. Lett. B 208, 447-450 (1988) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90645-4

    1988 doi

  3. [11]

    Area preserving diffeomorphisms, w(infinity) algebras and w(infinity) grav- ity,

    E. Sezgin, “Area preserving diffeomorphisms, w(infinity) algebras and w(infinity) grav- ity,” [arXiv:hep-th/9202086 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Central Extensions of Area Preserving Membrane Algebras,

    I. Bars, C. N. Pope and E. Sezgin, “Central Extensions of Area Preserving Membrane Algebras,” Phys. Lett. B 210, 85-91 (1988) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90354-1 86

    1988 doi

  5. [14]

    New Realizations of the Virasoro Algebra as Membrane Symmetries,

    I. Antoniadis, P. Ditsas, E. Floratos and J. Iliopoulos, “New Realizations of the Virasoro Algebra as Membrane Symmetries,” Nucl. Phys. B300, 549-558 (1988) doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(88)90612-8

    1988 doi

  6. [15]

    The Large n Limit of Extended Conformal Symmetries,

    I. Bakas, “The Large n Limit of Extended Conformal Symmetries,” Phys. Lett. B 228, 57 (1989) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90525-X

    1989 doi

  7. [16]

    The Complete Structure of W(Infinity),

    C. N. Pope, L. J. Romans and X. Shen, “The Complete Structure of W(Infinity),” Phys. Lett. B 236, 173-178 (1990) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90822-N

    1990 doi

  8. [17]

    Trigonometric Structure Constants for New Infinite Algebras,

    D. B. Fairlie, P. Fletcher and C. K. Zachos, “Trigonometric Structure Constants for New Infinite Algebras,” Phys. Lett. B 218, 203-206 (1989) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91418-4

    1989 doi

  9. [18]

    Magneto-roton theory of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect,

    S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald and P. M. Platzman, “Magneto-roton theory of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect,” Phys. Rev. B 33, 2481-2494 (1986) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.33.2481

    1986 doi

  10. [19]

    Infinite symmetry in the quan- tum Hall effect,

    A. Cappelli, C. A. Trugenberger and G. R. Zemba, “Infinite symmetry in the quan- tum Hall effect,” Nucl. Phys. B 396, 465-490 (1993) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90660-H [arXiv:hep-th/9206027 [hep-th]]

    1993 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Large N limit in the quantum Hall Ef- fect,

    A. Cappelli, C. A. Trugenberger and G. R. Zemba, “Large N limit in the quantum Hall Ef- fect,” Phys. Lett. B 306, 100-107 (1993) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91144-C [arXiv:hep- th/9303030 [hep-th]]

    1993

  12. [21]

    Fermions in the lowest Landau level: Bosoniza- tion, W infinity algebra, droplets, chiral bosons,

    S. Iso, D. Karabali and B. Sakita, “Fermions in the lowest Landau level: Bosoniza- tion, W infinity algebra, droplets, chiral bosons,” Phys. Lett. B 296, 143-150 (1992) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90816-M [arXiv:hep-th/9209003 [hep-th]]

    1992 arXiv

  13. [22]

    W-infinity Symmetry in the Quantum Hall Effect Beyond the Edge,

    A. Cappelli and L. Maffi, “W-infinity Symmetry in the Quantum Hall Effect Beyond the Edge,” JHEP 05, 120 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)120 [arXiv:2103.04163 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [23]

    GAUGE THEORIES OF INFINITE DIMENSIONAL HAMILTONIAN SU- PERALGEBRAS,

    E. Sezgin, “GAUGE THEORIES OF INFINITE DIMENSIONAL HAMILTONIAN SU- PERALGEBRAS,” IC/89/108

  15. [24]

    Higher Spin Theories, W (infinity) Algebras and Their Su- perextensions,

    C. N. Pope and X. Shen, “Higher Spin Theories, W (infinity) Algebras and Their Su- perextensions,” Phys. Lett. B 236, 21-26 (1990) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90588-W 87

    1990 doi

  16. [25]

    Aspects of W(infinity) symmetry,

    E. Sezgin, “Aspects of W(infinity) symmetry,” [arXiv:hep-th/9112025 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  17. [26]

    Two index generalizations of superconformal algebras,

    D. B. Fairlie and J. Nuyts, “Two index generalizations of superconformal algebras,” J. Phys. A 29, L511-L516 (1996) doi:10.1088/0305-4470/29/20/002 [arXiv:hep-th/9608001 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Quantization and cocycles on the supertorus and large N limits for the classical Lie superalgebras,

    E. S. Fradkin and V. Y. Linetsky, “Quantization and cocycles on the supertorus and large N limits for the classical Lie superalgebras,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 217-224 (1991) doi:10.1142/S021773239100018X

    1991 doi

  19. [28]

    Deformations and Renormalizations of W (infinity),

    D. B. Fairlie and J. Nuyts, “Deformations and Renormalizations of W (infinity),” Com- mun. Math. Phys. 134, 413-420 (1990) doi:10.1007/BF02097709

    1990 doi

  20. [29]

    Progress Toward a Theory of Supergravity,

    D. Z. Freedman, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and S. Ferrara, “Progress Toward a Theory of Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 13, 3214-3218 (1976) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.3214

    1976 doi

  21. [30]

    SO(4) Invariant Extended Supergravity,

    A. K. Das, “SO(4) Invariant Extended Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2805 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2805

    1977 doi

  22. [31]

    Modified Interaction of the Scalar Multiplet Coupled to Supergravity,

    E. Cremmer and J. Scherk, “Modified Interaction of the Scalar Multiplet Coupled to Supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B 69, 97-100 (1977) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90142-3

    1977 doi

  23. [32]

    Algebraic Simplifications in Supergravity Theories,

    E. Cremmer and J. Scherk, “Algebraic Simplifications in Supergravity Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 127, 259-268 (1977) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90214-0

    1977 doi

  24. [33]

    SU(4) Invariant Supergravity Theory,

    E. Cremmer, J. Scherk and S. Ferrara, “SU(4) Invariant Supergravity Theory,” Phys. Lett. B 74, 61-64 (1978) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90060-6

    1978 doi

  25. [34]

    Supergravity and Local Extended Supersymme- try,

    S. Ferrara, J. Scherk and B. Zumino, “Supergravity and Local Extended Supersymme- try,” Phys. Lett. B 66, 35-38 (1977) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90607-4

    1977 doi

  26. [35]

    SO(3) Invariant Extended Supergravity,

    D. Z. Freedman, “SO(3) Invariant Extended Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 105 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.105

    1977 doi

  27. [36]

    Consistent Supergravity with Complex Spin 3/2 Gauge Fields,

    S. Ferrara and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Consistent Supergravity with Complex Spin 3/2 Gauge Fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1669 (1976) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1669

    1976 doi

  28. [37]

    Coupling of O(2) Supergravity with Several Vector Multiplets,

    J. F. Luciani, “Coupling of O(2) Supergravity with Several Vector Multiplets,” Nucl. Phys. B 132, 325-332 (1978) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90123-2

    1978 doi

  29. [38]

    Locally Supersymmetric Maxwell- Einstein Theory,

    S. Ferrara, J. Scherk and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Locally Supersymmetric Maxwell- Einstein Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1035 (1976) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1035 88

    1976 doi

  30. [39]

    On SO(8) Extended Supergravity,

    B. de Wit and D. Z. Freedman, “On SO(8) Extended Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 130, 105-113 (1977) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90395-9

    1977 doi

  31. [40]

    Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,

    A. Strominger, “Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,” [arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  32. [41]

    Lectures on Celestial Holography,

    A. M. Raclariu, “Lectures on Celestial Holography,” [arXiv:2107.02075 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  33. [42]

    Lectures on celestial amplitudes,

    S. Pasterski, “Lectures on celestial amplitudes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, no.12, 1062 (2021) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09846-7 [arXiv:2108.04801 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Celestial Holography,

    S. Pasterski, M. Pate and A. M. Raclariu, “Celestial Holography,” [arXiv:2111.11392 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  35. [44]

    Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective,

    L. Donnay, “Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective,” Phys. Rept. 1073, 1-41 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.04.003 [arXiv:2310.12922 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [45]

    w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Gravi- ton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,

    A. Strominger, “ w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Gravi- ton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, no.22, 221601 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.221601 [arXiv:2105.14346 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Holographic symmetry alge- bras for gauge theory and gravity,

    A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate and A. Strominger, “Holographic symmetry alge- bras for gauge theory and gravity,” JHEP 11, 152 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)152 [arXiv:2103.03961 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and Conformal Correlators,

    W. Fan, A. Fotopoulos and T. R. Taylor, “Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and Conformal Correlators,” JHEP 05, 121 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)121 [arXiv:1903.01676 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Celestial operator products of gluons and gravitons,

    M. Pate, A. M. Raclariu, A. Strominger and E. Y. Yuan, “Celestial operator products of gluons and gravitons,” Rev. Math. Phys. 33, no.09, 2140003 (2021) doi:10.1142/S0129055X21400031 [arXiv:1910.07424 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Extended Super BMS Algebra of Celestial CFT,

    A. Fotopoulos, S. Stieberger, T. R. Taylor and B. Zhu, “Extended Super BMS Algebra of Celestial CFT,” JHEP 09, 198 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)198 [arXiv:2007.03785 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Towards a supersymmetric w1+ ∞ symmetry in the celestial conformal field theory,

    C. Ahn, “Towards a supersymmetric w1+ ∞ symmetry in the celestial conformal field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.8, 086028 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.086028 [arXiv:2111.04268 [hep-th]]. 89

    2022 arXiv

  42. [51]

    A deformed supersymmetric w1+∞ symmetry in the celestial conformal field theory,

    C. Ahn, “A deformed supersymmetric w1+∞ symmetry in the celestial conformal field theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.7, 630 (2022) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10582-9 [arXiv:2202.02949 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Novel supersymmetric extension of BMS symmetries at null infinity,

    K. Prabhu, “Novel supersymmetric extension of BMS symmetries at null infinity,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.6, 064054 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.064054 [arXiv:2112.07186 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Superconformal Invariance in Two-Dimensions and the Tricritical Ising Model,

    D. Friedan, Z. a. Qiu and S. H. Shenker, “Superconformal Invariance in Two-Dimensions and the Tricritical Ising Model,” Phys. Lett. B 151, 37-43 (1985) doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(85)90819-6

    1985 doi

  45. [54]

    Superconformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensions,

    M. A. Bershadsky, V. G. Knizhnik and M. G. Teitelman, “Superconformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 151, 31-36 (1985) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90818-4

    1985 doi

  46. [55]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269, 21-52 (1962) doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0161

    1962

  47. [56]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,

    R. K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 270, 103-126 (1962) doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0206

    1962

  48. [57]

    The N = 2, 4 supersymmetric linear W∞[λ] algebras for generic λ parameter,

    C. Ahn and M. H. Kim, “The N = 2, 4 supersymmetric linear W∞[λ] algebras for generic λ parameter,” JHEP 02, 006 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)006 [arXiv:2309.01537 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Soft and collinear limits in N = 8 supergrav- ity using double copy formalism,

    N. Banerjee, T. Rahnuma and R. K. Singh, “Soft and collinear limits in N = 8 supergrav- ity using double copy formalism,” JHEP 04, 126 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)126 [arXiv:2212.11480 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [60]

    A supersymmetric extension of w 1+∞ algebra in the celes- tial holography,

    C. Ahn and M. H. Kim, “A supersymmetric extension of w 1+∞ algebra in the celes- tial holography,” JHEP 09, 081 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)081 [arXiv:2407.05601 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [61]

    Consistent Supergravity,

    S. Deser and B. Zumino, “Consistent Supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B 62, 335 (1976) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90089-7 90

    1976 doi

  52. [62]

    Scalar Multiplet Coupled to Supergravity,

    S. Ferrara, D. Z. Freedman, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, P. Breitenlohner, F. Gliozzi and J. Scherk, “Scalar Multiplet Coupled to Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 1013 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1013

    1977 doi

  53. [63]

    Multileg one loop gravity amplitudes from gauge theory,

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, M. Perelstein and J. S. Rozowsky, “Multileg one loop gravity amplitudes from gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 546, 423-479 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(99)00029-2 [arXiv:hep-th/9811140 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  54. [64]

    N >= 4 Supergravity Am- plitudes from Gauge Theory at One Loop,

    Z. Bern, C. Boucher-Veronneau and H. Johansson, “N >= 4 Supergravity Am- plitudes from Gauge Theory at One Loop,” Phys. Rev. D 84, 105035 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.105035 [arXiv:1107.1935 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  55. [65]

    Gravitino Interactions from Yang-Mills The- ory,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr and O. T. Engelund, “Gravitino Interactions from Yang-Mills The- ory,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 105009 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.105009 [arXiv:1002.2279 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  56. [66]

    Symmetries and Interactions of N = 1 SUGRA: from Constructive and BCFW to KLT formulations,

    D. Chakraborty, J. L. D ´ ıaz-Cruz, J. Reyes P´ erez and P. O. Ruiz, “Symmetries and Interactions of N = 1 SUGRA: from Constructive and BCFW to KLT formulations,” doi:10.1142/s0217751x2450177x [arXiv:2406.11001 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  57. [67]

    Supersymmetric Soft Theorems,

    A. Tropper, “Supersymmetric Soft Theorems,” [arXiv:2404.03717 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  58. [68]

    A Mathematica package for computing operator product expansions,

    K. Thielemans, “A Mathematica package for computing operator product expansions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 2, 787-798 (1991) doi:10.1142/S0129183191001001

    1991 doi

  59. [69]

    Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 13.0.0, Champaign, IL (2021)

    2021

  60. [70]

    CONFORMAL SUPERGRA V- ITY, TWISTORS AND THE SUPER BMS GROUP,

    M. A. Awada, G. W. Gibbons and W. T. Shaw, “CONFORMAL SUPERGRA V- ITY, TWISTORS AND THE SUPER BMS GROUP,” Annals Phys. 171, 52 (1986) doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(86)80023-9

    1986 doi

  61. [71]

    Residual Local Supersymmetry and the Soft Grav- itino,

    S. G. Avery and B. U. W. Schwab, “Residual Local Supersymmetry and the Soft Grav- itino,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no.17, 171601 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.171601 [arXiv:1512.02657 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  62. [72]

    Asymptotic Fermionic Symmetry From Soft Gravitino Theorem,

    V. Lysov, “Asymptotic Fermionic Symmetry From Soft Gravitino Theorem,” [arXiv:1512.03015 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  63. [73]

    Leading soft theorem for multiple gravitini,

    D. Jain and A. Rudra, “Leading soft theorem for multiple gravitini,” JHEP 06, 004 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2019)004 [arXiv:1811.01804 [hep-th]]. 91

    2019 arXiv

  64. [74]

    Asymptotic realization of the super- BMS algebra at spatial infinity,

    M. Henneaux, J. Matulich and T. Neogi, “Asymptotic realization of the super- BMS algebra at spatial infinity,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.12, 126016 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.126016 [arXiv:2004.07299 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [75]

    Massive Celestial Fermions,

    S. A. Narayanan, “Massive Celestial Fermions,” JHEP 12, 074 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2020)074 [arXiv:2009.03883 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [76]

    Celestial super- amplitudes,

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, J. Gowdy, B. Spence and G. Travaglini, “Celestial super- amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.4, 045016 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.045016 [arXiv:2105.10263 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [77]

    Celestial superamplitude in N = 4 SYM theory,

    H. Jiang, m“Celestial superamplitude in N = 4 SYM theory,” JHEP 08, 031 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)031 [arXiv:2105.10269 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [78]

    The Grassmannian for celestial superamplitudes,

    L. Ferro and R. Moerman, “The Grassmannian for celestial superamplitudes,” JHEP 11, 187 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)187 [arXiv:2107.07496 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [79]

    Local supersym- metry and the square roots of Bondi-Metzner-Sachs supertranslations,

    O. Fuentealba, M. Henneaux, S. Majumdar, J. Matulich and T. Neogi, “Local supersym- metry and the square roots of Bondi-Metzner-Sachs supertranslations,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.12, L121702 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L121702 [arXiv:2108.07825 [hep- th]]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [80]

    Holographic chiral algebra: supersymmetry, infinite Ward identities, and EFTs,

    H. Jiang, “Holographic chiral algebra: supersymmetry, infinite Ward identities, and EFTs,” JHEP 01, 113 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)113 [arXiv:2108.08799 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [81]

    Conformally soft fermions,

    Y. Pano, S. Pasterski and A. Puhm, “Conformally soft fermions,” JHEP 12, 166 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)166 [arXiv:2108.11422 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [82]

    Supersymmetric celestial OPEs and soft algebras from the ambitwistor string worldsheet,

    W. Bu, “Supersymmetric celestial OPEs and soft algebras from the ambitwistor string worldsheet,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.12, 126029 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.126029 [arXiv:2111.15584 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  73. [83]

    Supersymmetrization of deformed BMS algebras,

    N. Banerjee, A. Mitra, D. Mukherjee and H. R. Safari, “Supersymmetrization of deformed BMS algebras,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, no.1, 3 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11036-y [arXiv:2201.09853 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  74. [84]

    Carrollian superconformal theories and super BMS,

    A. Bagchi, D. Grumiller and P. Nandi, “Carrollian superconformal theories and super BMS,” JHEP 05, 044 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)044 [arXiv:2202.01172 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  75. [85]

    Celestial Supersymmetry,

    T. R. Taylor and B. Zhu, “Celestial Supersymmetry,” JHEP 06, 210 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)210 [arXiv:2302.12830 [hep-th]]. 92

    2023 arXiv

  76. [86]

    Structure of deformed w1+ ∞ symmetry and topo- logical generalization in Celestial CFT,

    P. Drozdov and T. Kimura, “Structure of deformed w1+ ∞ symmetry and topo- logical generalization in Celestial CFT,” Phys. Lett. B 847, 138272 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138272 [arXiv:2306.11693 [math-ph]]

    2023

  77. [87]

    Fermionic asymptotic symmetries in massless QED,

    A. Agriela and M. Campiglia, “Fermionic asymptotic symmetries in massless QED,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.6, 065011 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.065011 [arXiv:2307.11171 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [88]

    Supersymmetry and the celestial Jacobi identity,

    A. Ball, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant and A. Volovich, “Supersymmetry and the celestial Jacobi identity,” JHEP 04, 099 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)099 [arXiv:2311.01364 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [89]

    Conformal boundaries of Minkowski su- perspace and their super cuts,

    N. Boulanger, Y. Herfray and N. Parrini, “Conformal boundaries of Minkowski su- perspace and their super cuts,” JHEP 02, 177 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)177 [arXiv:2312.11222 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [90]

    Chiral Soft Algebras for N = 2 Gauge Theory,

    E. Crawley, A. Strominger and A. Tropper, “Chiral Soft Algebras for N = 2 Gauge Theory,” [arXiv:2407.16752 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  81. [91]

    Curtright-Zachos Supersymmetric Deformations of the Virasoro algebra in Quantum Superspace and Bloch Electron Systems,

    H. T. Sato, “Curtright-Zachos Supersymmetric Deformations of the Virasoro algebra in Quantum Superspace and Bloch Electron Systems,” [arXiv:2411.04886 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  82. [92]

    Celestial sw1+∞ algebra in Einstein-Yang- Mills theory,

    S. Agrawal, P. Charalambous and L. Donnay, “Celestial sw1+∞ algebra in Einstein-Yang- Mills theory,” [arXiv:2412.01647 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  83. [93]

    Symmetries of the Celestial Supersphere,

    A. Tropper, “Symmetries of the Celestial Supersphere,” [arXiv:2412.13113 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  84. [94]

    Quantum Superspace and Bloch Electron Systems with Zeeman Effects: *-Bracket Formalism for Super Curtright-Zachos Algebras,

    H. T. Sato, “Quantum Superspace and Bloch Electron Systems with Zeeman Effects: *-Bracket Formalism for Super Curtright-Zachos Algebras,” [arXiv:2412.17030 [hep-th]]

  85. [95]

    Comments on Minitwistors and the Celestial Supersphere,

    I. Mol, “Comments on Minitwistors and the Celestial Supersphere,” [arXiv:2501.09371 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  86. [96]

    Extended higher spin holography and Grass- mannian models,

    T. Creutzig, Y. Hikida and P. B. Ronne, “Extended higher spin holography and Grass- mannian models,” JHEP 11, 038 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)038 [arXiv:1306.0466 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  87. [97]

    The N = 2 supersymmetric w 1+∞ symmetry in the two-dimensional SYK models,

    C. Ahn, “The N = 2 supersymmetric w 1+∞ symmetry in the two-dimensional SYK models,” JHEP 05, 115 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)115 [arXiv:2203.03105 [hep- th]]. 93

    2022 arXiv

  88. [98]

    The SuperW(infinity) (lambda) algebra,

    E. Bergshoeff, M. A. Vasiliev and B. de Wit, “The SuperW(infinity) (lambda) algebra,” Phys. Lett. B 256, 199-205 (1991) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90673-E

    1991 doi

  89. [99]

    The Structure of the superW(infinity) (lambda) algebra,

    E. Bergshoeff, B. de Wit and M. A. Vasiliev, “The Structure of the superW(infinity) (lambda) algebra,” Nucl. Phys. B 366, 315-346 (1991) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90005- I

    1991 doi

  90. [100]

    N=4 supersymmetric linear W∞[λ] algebra,

    C. Ahn, “N=4 supersymmetric linear W∞[λ] algebra,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.2, 026008 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.026008 [arXiv:2205.04024 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  91. [101]

    The structure of the N = 4 supersymmetric linear W∞[λ] algebra,

    C. Ahn, “The structure of the N = 4 supersymmetric linear W∞[λ] algebra,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, no.7, 615 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11752-z [arXiv:2208.07000 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [102]

    The large N = 4 superconformal W∞ algebra,

    M. Beccaria, C. Candu and M. R. Gaberdiel, “The large N = 4 superconformal W∞ algebra,” JHEP 06, 117 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2014)117 [arXiv:1404.1694 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  93. [103]

    The operator product expansion between the 16 lowest higher spin currents in the N = 4 superspace,

    C. Ahn and M. H. Kim, “The operator product expansion between the 16 lowest higher spin currents in the N = 4 superspace,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76, no.7, 389 (2016) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4234-2 [arXiv:1509.01908 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  94. [104]

    W symmetry in conformal field theory,

    P. Bouwknegt and K. Schoutens, “W symmetry in conformal field theory,” Phys. Rept. 223, 183-276 (1993) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(93)90111-P [arXiv:hep-th/9210010 [hep-th]]

    1993 arXiv

  95. [105]

    Celestial operator product expansions and w1+∞ symmetry for all spins,

    E. Himwich, M. Pate and K. Singh, “Celestial operator product expansions and w1+∞ symmetry for all spins,” JHEP 01, 080 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)080 [arXiv:2108.07763 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  96. [106]

    Celestial w1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space,

    T. Adamo, L. Mason and A. Sharma, “Celestial w1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space,” SIGMA 18, 016 (2022) doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2022.016 [arXiv:2110.06066 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  97. [107]

    Deformed w1+∞ Algebras in the Celestial CFT,

    J. Mago, L. Ren, A. Y. Srikant and A. Volovich, “Deformed w1+∞ Algebras in the Celestial CFT,” SIGMA 19, 044 (2023) doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2023.044 [arXiv:2111.11356 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  98. [108]

    Canceling the U(1) Anomaly in the S Matrix of N =4 Supergravity,

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez and R. Roiban, “Canceling the U(1) Anomaly in the S Matrix of N =4 Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no.10, 101604 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.101604 [arXiv:1712.03928 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  99. [109]

    Quantum Theory of Gravity. III. Applications of the Covariant Theory,

    Bryce S. DeWitt, “Quantum Theory of Gravity. III. Applications of the Covariant Theory,” Phys. Rev. 162, no.5, 1239 (1967) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.162.1239 94

    1967 doi

  100. [110]

    On the High-Energy Behavior in Quantum Gravity,

    F. A. Berends and R. Gastmans, “On the High-Energy Behavior in Quantum Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 88, 99-108 (1975) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90528-3

    1975 doi

  101. [111]

    The Vierbein Is Irrelevant in Perturbation Theory,

    R. P. Woodard, “The Vierbein Is Irrelevant in Perturbation Theory,” Phys. Lett. B 148, 440-444 (1984) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)90734-2

    1984 doi

  102. [112]

    Factorization and polarization in linearized gravity,

    S. Y. Choi, J. S. Shim and H. S. Song, “Factorization and polarization in linearized gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 51, 2751-2769 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2751 [arXiv:hep- th/9411092 [hep-th]]

    1995

  103. [113]

    Supergravity,

    D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, “Supergravity,” Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012, ISBN 978-1-139-36806-3, 978-0-521-19401-3 doi:10.1017/CBO9781139026833

    2012 doi

  104. [114]

    Supergravity,

    P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, “Supergravity,” Phys. Rept. 68, 189-398 (1981) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(81)90157-5

    1981 doi

  105. [115]

    The SuperW (infinity) Algebra,

    E. Bergshoeff, C. N. Pope, L. J. Romans, E. Sezgin and X. Shen, “The SuperW (infinity) Algebra,” Phys. Lett. B 245, 447-452 (1990) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90672-S

    1990 doi

  106. [116]

    W (infinity) and the Racah-wigner Algebra,

    C. N. Pope, L. J. Romans and X. Shen, “ W (infinity) and the Racah-wigner Algebra,” Nucl. Phys. B 339, 191-221 (1990) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90539-P 95

    1990 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.