Masked Modulation: High-Throughput Half-Duplex ISAC Transmission Waveform Design

Jianhua Zhang; Junsheng Mu; Marco Lops; Shuangyang Li; Yifeng Xiong

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 35 references

Masked Modulation: High-Throughput Half-Duplex ISAC Transmission Waveform Design

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A half-duplex ISAC waveform can carry data at roughly 50% duty cycle while keeping the expected echo mainlobe exactly flat across every non-blind range bin, if the transmission mask is built from a cyclic difference set.

desk verdict Solid analytic paper on half-duplex ISAC mask design; the ideal-mask results are real, but practical claims outrun the idealized model. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08996 v2 pith:J3ZTI4AZ submitted 2025-02-13 cs.IT math.IT

Yifeng Xiong , Junsheng Mu , Shuangyang Li , Marco Lops , Jianhua Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.ITmath.IT MSC 94A1205B1051E20

keywords integratedsensingandcommunicationhalf-duplexwaveformdesigntransmissionmaskrangeglintintensitymainlobefluctuationcyclicdifferencesetsfiniteprojectivegeometrypeakexpectedsidelobe

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems that transmit and receive simultaneously suffer self-interference, while classical half-duplex pulse radars avoid it only by using small duty cycles that limit communication throughput and create sizable blind ranges. This paper proposes MASked Modulation (MASM), a half-duplex scheme in which a periodic binary transmission mask marks which symbol slots transmit data, and the complementary mask marks which slots listen for echoes, so that a system can run near a 50% duty cycle without self-interference. The paper introduces a range-blindness metric called mainlobe fluctuation, defined through the variance of expected mainlobe levels across range bins, and shows that designing a good mask is equivalent to flattening the power spectrum of the mask. It proves by explicit construction that masks arising from cyclic difference sets built from finite projective geometries are ideal: zero averaged range glint for constant-modulus constellations and the minimum possible peak expected sidelobe. If the paper is right, half-duplex ISAC becomes a principled high-throughput waveform family with a clean tradeoff between communication throughput (growing with duty cycle) and sensing dynamic range (degrading with $1-\rho$).

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the periodic binary transmission mask $\mathbf{m}_t\in\{0,1\}^N$ with duty cycle $\rho=\frac{1}{N}\mathbf{1}^T\mathbf{m}_t$, paired with the complementary reception mask $\mathbf{m}_r=1-\mathbf{m}_t$. All sensing metrics are functions of this mask: mainlobe levels are cross-correlations $a_k=(1-\mathbf{m}_t)^T\tilde{\mathbf{J}}^k\mathbf{m}_t$, the ARGI is their variance, and via the unitary DFT matrix $\mathbf{F}$ it reduces to minimizing $\|\mathbf{F}\mathbf{m}_t\|_4^4$, i.e. flattening the mask's power spectrum. Ideal masks are exactly the binary sequences with two-level periodic autocorrelation, equivalently cyclic difference sets; the construction used for the strongest result is the cyclic incidence matrix of points and hyperplanes in a finite projective geometry, whose intersection structure fixes all mainlobes to $q^{n-1}$ and all peak sidelobes to $q^{n-2}$.

What would settle it

Measure the expected mainlobe level over many constant-modulus data realizations for a finite-geometry ideal mask at, say, $\rho\approx 1/2$, while sweeping the target delay from $\tau_0=kT_c$ to $\tau_0=kT_c+\epsilon$ for $0<\epsilon<T_c$; if the variance of mainlobe levels across range bins grows noticeably with $\epsilon$, the zero-ARGI claim is limited to the sample-spaced model. Equivalently, insert a one-sample guard interval between transmit and receive slots and check whether the expected ARGI remains zero; a nonzero value would show the exact complementarity assumption is essential.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that range blindness in half-duplex ISAC can be removed, in expectation, by choosing transmission masks whose periodic autocorrelation has only two levels, and that the same masks can also achieve the ideal peak-sidelobe level. Concretely, for a mask $\mathbf{m}_t\in\{0,1\}^N$ with duty cycle $\rho$, the expected mainlobe in range bin $k$ is $a_k=(1-\mathbf{m}_t)^T\tilde{\mathbf{J}}^k\mathbf{m}_t$; the averaged range glint intensity is the variance of these values over $k>0$, and after a discrete Fourier transform it reduces to a function of $\|\mathbf{F}\mathbf{m}_t\|_4^4$. A mask with a two-level autocorrelation makes all $a_k$ equal, giving exactly zero expected ARGI for constant-modulus data. The paper further shows that the lower bound on peak expected sidelobe is attained by the cyclic incidence matrices between points and hyperplanes in the finite projective space $\mathrm{PG}(n,q)$, for which the duty cycle is $\rho=(q^n-1)/(q^{n+1}-1)$, the common mainlobe is $q^{n-1}$, and the peak expected sidelobe is $q^{n-2}$; this family includes all $m$-sequences and some Barker codes. A slow-time extension using piecewise-constant masks keeps these ideal properties up to first order while supporting blind ranges comparable to the sub-pulse length.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that transmit and receive can switch perfectly between consecutive symbol slots (so the receive mask is the exact complement of the transmit mask), that the pulse shape does not leak into neighboring symbol slots, and that target echoes arrive exactly on symbol-boundary delays; if any of these fail in hardware, even an ideal mask may show mainlobe fluctuation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At duty cycle $\rho=1/2$, the energy accumulation efficiency of a half-duplex ISAC system reaches its maximum of $1/4$, and ideal masks keep the expected mainlobe constant across all range bins $k>0$, so no range glint appears outside the single blind bin at $k=0$.
Because the average expected sidelobe level is independent of the mask, mask design can target the peak sidelobe; finite-geometry ideal masks attain the analytic PESL floor, so they leave no excess sidelobe spikes.
The asymptotic mainlobe-to-sidelobe ratio behaves as $(1-\rho)N+\mu_4+1$, which makes the throughput-dynamic-range tradeoff explicit: raising communication throughput by increasing $\rho$ costs sensing dynamic range, and at a 50% duty cycle the cost is about 3 dB relative to a full-duplex scheme.
Slow-time piecewise-constant masks inherit the ideality of their fast-time counterparts, so the same cyclic difference set constructions apply at frame level, with blind range set by the sub-pulse length and throughput $\rho LT$ symbols per PRI.
For generic constellations the expected ARGI is proportional to $\mu_4-1$, so constant-modulus constellations are optimal for sensing; random masks have ARGI-to-mainlobe ratio $O(1/N)$, whereas conventional pulse masks have a constant ratio.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If practical transceivers need guard intervals between transmit and receive slots, the exact complementarity $\mathbf{m}_r=1-\mathbf{m}_t$ is violated at boundaries; a natural extension would be to compute how ARGI and PESL degrade as a function of guard length and to design masks that remain near-ideal under the relaxed masks.
The equivalence between ideal masks and cyclic difference sets invites a broader search: other difference set families with density near $1/2$ could fill in $(N,\rho)$ configurations the finite-geometry construction misses, and the PESL lower bound gives a quick screening test for candidates.
The sample-spaced Nyquist assumption means fractional target delays fall outside the proof; testing MASM with oversampled reception or with fractional-delay echoes would show whether the constant-mainlobe property survives inter-symbol interference across mask transitions.
Because the ideal masks are point-hyperplane incidence structures, they can be reinterpreted as hopping or scheduling patterns, which may transfer the same flat-mainlobe and low-peak-sidelobe guarantees to MIMO radar or spectral-spreading ISAC designs.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a genuinely useful analytic paper. The new metric (RGI/ARGI) is a clean way to talk about mainlobe fluctuation in half-duplex ISAC, and the observation that minimizing expected ARGI reduces to flattening the mask's power spectrum is a nice bridge to classical sequence design. The proof that Singer CDS masks are both mainlobe-fluctuation-ideal and PESL-ideal is the real contribution; it's grounded in classical difference-set theory, not circular, and the numerical results line up with the formulas. The authors deserve credit for the closed-form expected ARGI expressions (Propositions 2, 3, 6, 7) and for carrying the analysis through slow-time operation.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. The analysis is expectation-only: there are no concentration or worst-case bounds for the ARGI of a given random data payload, so a specific frame could show more mainlobe variation than the average suggests. The larger gap is the model link. All the ideal-mask results rely on exactly complementary transmit/receive masks with sample-level switching and on delays that land exactly on integer symbol intervals with Nyquist pulses. The paper itself acknowledges in Section V that sample-level switching may be impractical and shifts to slow-time masks, which only moves the idealization. The simulations don't exercise either of these issues, so the headline claim about ~50% duty cycle with mild mainlobe fluctuation is a conditional statement about an idealized system, not a demonstrated hardware-feasible one.

That said, the internal math is sound and the ideal construction is concrete and checkable. The paper would benefit from a section quantifying the effects of guard intervals or fractional delay, and from variance bounds, but the core contribution stands. I'd take it seriously: this deserves peer review rather than a desk rejection. It's most useful for people working on half-duplex ISAC waveform design or on the sensing side of 6G systems, and I'd probably cite it when I write about range blindness or mask design in ISAC.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MASM, a half-duplex ISAC waveform scheme in which a periodic binary transmission mask selects symbol intervals for transmission and the complementary mask selects receive intervals. The central contributions are: (i) definitions of range glint intensity (RGI) and averaged range glint intensity (ARGI) as metrics for the delay-dependent mainlobe fluctuation of half-duplex sensing; (ii) closed-form expressions for the expected ARGI of conventional pulse radar, MASM with random masks, and MASM with data payload signals; (iii) a reduction of the mask-optimization problem to an ℓ4-norm minimization; (iv) a proof that masks derived from cyclic difference sets, in particular Singer CDSs, are simultaneously mainlobe-fluctuation-ideal and peak-expected-sidelobe-level (PESL) ideal in the fast-time model; and (v) an extension to slow-time coding with piecewise-constant masks. Numerical simulations verify the main analytical formulas.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper offers a principled alternative to conventional pulse radar and PRF-staggering for half-duplex ISAC, achieving around 50% duty cycle while keeping the expected mainlobe level constant outside the k=0 blind bin for constant-modulus constellations. The fast-time ideal-mask construction is elegant: it connects a communication-centric ISAC waveform design problem to established cyclic difference set theory, and the derivations of Propositions 2, 3, 6, and 7 are carefully executed, with simulations reproducing the closed-form expressions. The paper is also honest in defining expectation-based metrics rather than claiming deterministic guarantees for random data payloads. However, the slow-time extension contains a load-bearing claim about PESL-ideality that is not supported and, as shown below, is false for a concrete parameter choice; additionally, the practical claims depend on an idealized instantaneous-switching, integer-delay model that is not quantified.

major comments (3)

[V-B, after Corollary 2] The sentence "Singer CDSs are also ideal slow-time transmission masks in the sense detailed in Proposition 7" is not supported by Corollary 2 and appears to be false. For a slow-time mask mt = fmt ⊗ 1_T with fmt a Singer mask of length L, equation (54) gives interior sidelobe levels equal to T times the corresponding slow-time levels, so for the PG(4,2) Singer mask (L=31, ρ=15/31) and T=16 we have N=LT=496 and PESL = T·q^{n-2} = 16·4 = 64. The universal lower bound of Corollary 1 for this (N,ρ) is ceil(60.05)=61, since AESL = 14,684,160/244,530 ≈ 60.05. Thus the slow-time mask does not achieve the PESL lower bound, contradicting the claimed PESL-ideality. The authors should either prove a slow-time-specific PESL bound or remove this claim.
[II-B, equation for z_k(n)] The entire ideal-mask guarantee rests on the model z_k(n) = m_r(n) m_t(n-k) x_{n-k}, which requires exactly complementary instantaneous masks (m_r = 1 - m_t) and a target delay equal to an integer number of symbol intervals τ0 = kTc with Nyquist pulses. The paper itself concedes in Sec. V that sample-level switching may be impractical, and the slow-time variant still assumes no transition gaps and integer-delay echoes. No analysis or simulation is provided for fractional delays or switching transients, so the headline claim that MASM is a viable high-throughput half-duplex ISAC waveform is supported only inside this idealized model. The authors should either quantify the robustness of the constant-mainlobe and PESL properties under these non-idealities or explicitly restrict the applicability claims.
[III-C, Proposition 3 and Eq. (26)] The ideal-mask guarantees for data payload signals are statements about the expected ARGI. For non-constant-modulus constellations (e.g., 16QAM/64QAM), the actual range glint is random, and the paper does not provide any concentration or worst-case bound; Fig. 9 shows only empirical averages over 2000 instances. Since high-throughput communication with QAM constellations is part of the advertised operating regime, the authors should either provide high-probability bounds on RGI for ideal masks or explicitly state that the zero-fluctuation property holds only for constant-modulus constellations and, for general constellations, only in expectation.

minor comments (6)

[Corollary 2] The definition of the slow-time sidelobe level ea_{k,l} uses the summation limit N, but the slow-time mask has length L; the sum should run to L.
[Proposition 8] The cyclic difference d_k is written as ea_{(k+1) mod N} - ea_k, but since ea is of length L, the modulus should be L, not N.
[III-C, paragraph on two-level ACF sequences] The statement that Barker codes satisfy the "two-level ACF" condition is misleading: Barker codes have low aperiodic autocorrelation sidelobes, not a constant periodic autocorrelation sidelobe. The intended point about periodic two-level autocorrelation is correctly made by m-sequences and cyclic difference sets, so the Barker sentence should be revised or removed.
[Appendix III-A] In the proof of Proposition 8, the phrase "for 1 < l < T" should likely be "for 1 ≤ l < T" to cover the derived difference relation; the current wording omits l=1.
[Figure 3 caption] The caption contains a typo: "Trapezoidal rm's suffer from severe mainlobe fluctuation" should read "Trapezoidal r_m suffers" or "Trapezoidal r_m vectors suffer".
[Eq. (8)] The shift matrix eJ_k is defined for size 3N, but it is later used as an N×N shift matrix in Sec. II-C and elsewhere; the dimensions should be clarified to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: ideal-mask results derive from the stated model and classical Singer/CDS combinatorics; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The metrics RGI/ARGI are defined from the reception model in Eqs. (5), (10), (11), and (12), and the expected-ARGI expressions in Propositions 2-4 are obtained by direct calculation from mask correlations and constellation moments; no parameter is fitted to data and no target quantity is inserted into the derivation. The reduction of the design problem to minimizing ||F m_t||_4^4 follows algebraically from Propositions 2 and 3, not from an assumed solution. The ideal-mask results (Lemma 2, Sec. III-C, Proposition 7) invoke the classical theory of cyclic difference sets and Singer's theorem [33]; the two-level ACF condition is shown, not assumed, to imply zero RGI, and the PESL tightness follows from integrality of the entries [R]_{k,l} together with the mask-independent AESL bound of Proposition 6 and Corollary 1. Self-citations such as [11] and [14] are used for background and for a full-duplex benchmark comparison in Sec. IV-C, not as load-bearing support for the MASM derivations. The principal limitation is the idealized half-duplex model (instantaneous complementary masks, Nyquist pulses, integer-delay targets), which is a modeling assumption and a possible applicability gap, but it is not an input-output identity or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Hence no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted to data anywhere in the paper. The only design inputs are the mask length N and duty cycle rho, chosen by the system designer, and the threshold c_th used only to illustrate the blind-range definition. The central results rest on the standard statistical model for i.i.d. data symbols, the Nyquist/integer-delay sampling model, the ideal complementary switching assumption, and classical cyclic-difference-set theorems. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Communication symbols are i.i.d., unit-power, zero-mean, with zero pseudo-variance (Assumptions 1 and 2).
Used throughout for expectations over data payload; standard for symmetric constellations but excludes biased or skewed constellations.
domain assumption The pulse shaping filter satisfies the Nyquist criterion and the target delay is an integer multiple of the symbol interval, tau0 = k*Tc.
Sec. II-B: this gives the sampled model z_k(n)=m_r(n)m_t(n-k)x_{n-k}; non-integer delays are not analyzed.
domain assumption The receive mask is exactly complementary to the transmit mask, m_r = 1 - m_t, with no transition gaps or residual self-interference.
Sec. II-B: this defines half-duplex operation and is what eliminates self-interference, but assumes ideal switching.
standard math Known theorems on cyclic difference sets and finite projective geometry, including Singer's construction and hyperplane intersection counts.
Sec. III-C and Appendix II-C: the ideal-mask constructions and PESL-optimality proof rely on these classical results.
domain assumption The constellation fourth moment mu4 = E(|x_i|^4) exists and is finite.
Sec. III-B: the expected ARGI decomposition separates the mask-dependent term from the (mu4-1) term.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Masked Modulation: High-Throughput Half-Duplex ISAC Transmission Waveform Design." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J3ZTI4AZ

@misc{pith2026250208996,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Masked Modulation: High-Throughput Half-Duplex ISAC Transmission Waveform Design},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J3ZTI4AZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08996}
}

abstract

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) enables numerous innovative wireless applications. Communication-centric design is a practical choice for the construction of the sixth generation (6G) ISAC networks. Continuous-wave-based ISAC systems, with orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) being a representative example, suffer from the self-interference (SI) problem, and hence are less suitable for long-range sensing. On the other hand, pulse-based half-duplex ISAC systems are free of SI, but are also less favourable for high-throughput communication scenarios. In this treatise, we propose MASked Modulation (MASM), a half-duplex ISAC waveform design scheme, which minimises a range blindness metric, termed as "mainlobe fluctuation", given a duty cycle (proportional to communication throughput) constraint. In particular, MASM is capable of supporting high-throughput communication ($\sim$50% duty cycle) under mild mainlobe fluctuation. Moreover, MASM can be flexibly adapted to frame-level waveform designs by operating on the slow-time scale. In terms of optimal transmit mask design, a set of masks is shown to be ideal in the sense of sidelobe level and mainlobe fluctuation intensity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08996 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Illustration of the reception processing in ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Illustration of the mainlobe fluctuation effect of conventional pulse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The mainlobe fluctuation of MASM under PSK constellations and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The ARGI-to-mainlobe ratio of MASM under various constellations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The expected sidelobe levels of two different mainlobe-fluctuation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The mainlobe fluctuation of slow-time MASM compared with PRF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The averaged and expected partial RGI of MASM under different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The averaged and expected sidelobe level of MASM compared with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[1]

Draft New Recommendation ITU-R M. [IMT. Frame- work for 2030 and Beyond],

ITU-R WP5D, “Draft New Recommendation ITU-R M. [IMT. Frame- work for 2030 and Beyond],” 2023

2023
[2]

Twelve scientific challenges for 6G: Rethinking the foundations of communications the- ory,

M. Chafii, L. Bariah, S. Muhaidat, and M. Debbah, “Twelve scientific challenges for 6G: Rethinking the foundations of communications the- ory,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 868–904, 2nd quart. 2023

work page 2023
[3]

A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,

W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,” IEEE Netw., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 134–142, 2019

2019
[4]

Integrating sensing and communi- cations for ubiquitous IoT: Applications, trends, and challenges,

Y . Cui, F. Liu, X. Jing, and J. Mu, “Integrating sensing and communi- cations for ubiquitous IoT: Applications, trends, and challenges,” IEEE Netw., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 158–167, Sep. 2021

2021
[5]

Integrated human activity sensing and communications,

X. Li, Y . Cui, J. A. Zhang, F. Liu, D. Zhang, and L. Hanzo, “Integrated human activity sensing and communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 90–96, May 2023

work page 2023
[6]

Waveform design and signal processing aspects for fusion of wireless communications and radar sensing,

C. Sturm and W. Wiesbeck, “Waveform design and signal processing aspects for fusion of wireless communications and radar sensing,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1236–1259, Jul. 2011

2011
[7]

Code-division OFDM joint communication and sensing system for 6G machine-type communication,

X. Chen, Z. Feng, Z. Wei, P. Zhang, and X. Yuan, “Code-division OFDM joint communication and sensing system for 6G machine-type communication,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 12 093– 12 105, 2021

work page 2021
[8]

Joint radar-communication with cyclic prefixed single carrier waveforms,

Y . Zeng, Y . Ma, and S. Sun, “Joint radar-communication with cyclic prefixed single carrier waveforms,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 4069–4079, 2020

work page 2020

Show all 35 references

[9]

On the effective- ness of OTFS for joint radar parameter estimation and communication,

L. Gaudio, M. Kobayashi, G. Caire, and G. Colavolpe, “On the effective- ness of OTFS for joint radar parameter estimation and communication,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 5951–5965, 2020

2020
[10]

From OTFS to DD-ISAC: Integrating sensing and communica- tions in the delay doppler domain,

W. Yuan, L. Zhou, S. K. Dehkordi, S. Li, P. Fan, G. Caire, and H. V . Poor, “From OTFS to DD-ISAC: Integrating sensing and communica- tions in the delay doppler domain,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 152–160, Dec. 2024

2024
[11]

OFDM achieves the lowest ranging sidelobe under random ISAC signaling,

F. Liu, Y . Zhang, Y . Xiong et al., “OFDM achieves the lowest ranging sidelobe under random ISAC signaling,” arXiv preprint, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06691

2024 arXiv
[12]

IEEE 802.11ad-based radar: An approach to joint vehicular communication- radar system,

P. Kumari, J. Choi, N. Gonz ´alez-Prelcic, and R. W. Heath, “IEEE 802.11ad-based radar: An approach to joint vehicular communication- radar system,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 3012–3027, Apr. 2018

2018
[13]

On the performance improvements of data-aided joint sensing and communication,

N. Zhao, Q. Chang, Y . Wang, X. Shen, and Y . Shen, “On the performance improvements of data-aided joint sensing and communication,” in Proc. 2022 Int. Symp. Wireless Commun. Syst. (ISWCS) , Hangzhou, China, Oct. 2022, pp. 1–6

2022
[14]

On the fundamental tradeoff of integrated sensing and communications under Gaussian channels,

Y . Xiong, F. Liu, Y . Cui, W. Yuan, T. X. Han, and G. Caire, “On the fundamental tradeoff of integrated sensing and communications under Gaussian channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5723– 5751, Sep. 2023

2023
[15]

An information-theoretic approach to joint sensing and communication,

M. Ahmadipour, M. Kobayashi, M. Wigger, and G. Caire, “An information-theoretic approach to joint sensing and communication,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 1124–1146, 2024

2024
[16]

In-band full-duplex wireless: Challenges and opportuni- ties,

A. Sabharwal, P. Schniter, D. Guo, D. W. Bliss, S. Rangarajan, and R. Wichman, “In-band full-duplex wireless: Challenges and opportuni- ties,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1637–1652, 2014

2014
[17]

Resource allocation for IRS-assisted full-duplex cognitive radio systems,

D. Xu, X. Yu, Y . Sun, D. W. K. Ng, and R. Schober, “Resource allocation for IRS-assisted full-duplex cognitive radio systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 7376–7394, Dec. 2020

2020
[18]

Full duplex radio/radar technology: The enabler for advanced joint communication and sensing,

C. B. Barneto, S. D. Liyanaarachchi, M. Heino, T. Riihonen, and M. Valkama, “Full duplex radio/radar technology: The enabler for advanced joint communication and sensing,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 82–88, Jan. 2021

2021
[19]

Waveform design and performance analysis for full-duplex integrated sensing and communication,

Z. Xiao and Y . Zeng, “Waveform design and performance analysis for full-duplex integrated sensing and communication,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1823–1837, Jun. 2022

2022
[20]

Bidirectional integrated sensing and communication: Full-duplex or half-duplex?

Z. Wang, X. Mu, and Y . Liu, “Bidirectional integrated sensing and communication: Full-duplex or half-duplex?” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 8184–8199, Aug. 2024

2024
[21]

M. C. Budge and J. S. R. German, Basis Radar Analysis , 2nd ed. Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House, 2020

2020
[22]

The effect of staggered PRF’s on MTI signal detection,

R. McAulay, “The effect of staggered PRF’s on MTI signal detection,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. AES-9, no. 4, pp. 615–618, Apr. 1973

1973
[23]

A fast and improved dual-PRT Doppler technique for industrial flow metering,

F. R. Coutinho, A. L. Stakowian, and M. J. da Silva, “A fast and improved dual-PRT Doppler technique for industrial flow metering,” IEEE Sens. Lett. , vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1–4, Sep. 2023

2023
[24]

Staggered coprime pulse repetition frequencies synthetic aperture radar (SCopSAR),

A. Aldharrab and M. E. Davies, “Staggered coprime pulse repetition frequencies synthetic aperture radar (SCopSAR),” IEEE Trans. Geo. Remote Sens., vol. 60, pp. 1–11, 2022

2022
[25]

On the design of staggered moving target indicator filters,

M. Ispir and C. Candan, “On the design of staggered moving target indicator filters,” IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation , vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 205–215, Jan. 2016

2016
[26]

Capacity of Gaussian channels with duty cycle and power constraints,

L. Zhang, H. Li, and D. Guo, “Capacity of Gaussian channels with duty cycle and power constraints,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1615–1629, Mar. 2014

2014
[27]

Branch- and-bound algorithms: A survey of recent advances in searching, branch- ing, and pruning,

D. R. Morrison, S. H. Jacobson, J. J. Sauppe, and E. C. Sewell, “Branch- and-bound algorithms: A survey of recent advances in searching, branch- ing, and pruning,” Discrete Optimization, vol. 19, pp. 79–102, 2016

2016
[28]

New nonbinary sequences with ideal two- level autocorrelation,

T. Helleseth and G. Gong, “New nonbinary sequences with ideal two- level autocorrelation,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 2868–2872, Nov. 2002

2002
[29]

The merit factor of binary sequences related to difference sets,

J. Jensen, H. Jensen, and T. Hoholdt, “The merit factor of binary sequences related to difference sets,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 617–626, Mar. 1991

1991
[30]

La Jolla difference sets repository (1.1)

D. M. Gordon, “La Jolla difference sets repository (1.1).” [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13886556

doi
[31]

GMW sequences (corresp.),

R. Scholtz and L. Welch, “GMW sequences (corresp.),” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 548–553, Mar. 1984

1984
[32]

Partial difference sets with Paley parame- ters,

K. H. Leung and S. L. Ma, “Partial difference sets with Paley parame- ters,” Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society , vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 553–564, Nov. 1995

1995
[33]

A theorem in finite projective geometry and some applications to number theory,

J. Singer, “A theorem in finite projective geometry and some applications to number theory,” Trans. American Math. Soc., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 377– 385, 1938

1938
[34]

New cyclic difference sets with Singer parameters,

J. F. Dillon and H. Dobbertin, “New cyclic difference sets with Singer parameters,” Finite Fields and Their Applications , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 342–389, 2004

2004
[35]

M. I. Skolnik, Radar Handbook, 2nd ed. New York, USA: McGraw- Hill, New York, 1990

1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Draft New Recommendation ITU-R M. [IMT. Frame- work for 2030 and Beyond],

ITU-R WP5D, “Draft New Recommendation ITU-R M. [IMT. Frame- work for 2030 and Beyond],” 2023

2023

[2] [2]

Twelve scientific challenges for 6G: Rethinking the foundations of communications the- ory,

M. Chafii, L. Bariah, S. Muhaidat, and M. Debbah, “Twelve scientific challenges for 6G: Rethinking the foundations of communications the- ory,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 868–904, 2nd quart. 2023

work page 2023

[3] [3]

A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,

W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,” IEEE Netw., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 134–142, 2019

2019

[4] [4]

Integrating sensing and communi- cations for ubiquitous IoT: Applications, trends, and challenges,

Y . Cui, F. Liu, X. Jing, and J. Mu, “Integrating sensing and communi- cations for ubiquitous IoT: Applications, trends, and challenges,” IEEE Netw., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 158–167, Sep. 2021

2021

[5] [5]

Integrated human activity sensing and communications,

X. Li, Y . Cui, J. A. Zhang, F. Liu, D. Zhang, and L. Hanzo, “Integrated human activity sensing and communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 90–96, May 2023

work page 2023

[6] [6]

Waveform design and signal processing aspects for fusion of wireless communications and radar sensing,

C. Sturm and W. Wiesbeck, “Waveform design and signal processing aspects for fusion of wireless communications and radar sensing,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1236–1259, Jul. 2011

2011

[7] [7]

Code-division OFDM joint communication and sensing system for 6G machine-type communication,

X. Chen, Z. Feng, Z. Wei, P. Zhang, and X. Yuan, “Code-division OFDM joint communication and sensing system for 6G machine-type communication,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 12 093– 12 105, 2021

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Joint radar-communication with cyclic prefixed single carrier waveforms,

Y . Zeng, Y . Ma, and S. Sun, “Joint radar-communication with cyclic prefixed single carrier waveforms,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 4069–4079, 2020

work page 2020