Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 42 references

Charged Kerr--Levi-Civita geometries in Einstein--Maxwell and low-energy heterotic string theory

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Charge tames the Kerr ring; heterotic charge builds a wall

desk verdict A careful exact-solutions paper with real new content in the heterotic branch and a clean positivity proof for KNLC; the global-domain caveat is real but the paper states it honestly. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08550 v1 pith:J55TEOCH submitted 2026-08-09 gr-qc

Haryanto M. Siahaan This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C2083C2283C5783E30
keywords exactsolutionsErnstequationsLevi-CivitaspacetimeKerr–Levi-CivitaEinstein–MaxwelltheoryheteroticstringHassan–Sentransformationclosedtimelikecurves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs two exact charged rotating extensions of the Kerr–Levi-Civita spacetime and compares their global behaviour. The Einstein–Maxwell version is obtained by inverting the Ernst pair of a charged rotating seed; the paper proves this inversion is an exact symmetry of the coupled equations and that, when the solution is subextreme, a shared denominator factorizes so that it stays positive over the whole exterior. As a result, the exterior contains neither a zero of the complex Ernst potential nor azimuthal closed timelike curves, and the former Kerr ring has finite curvature. The heterotic string version, built with the Hassan–Sen map, instead acquires a real dilaton that changes sign at finite radius, forcing the spacetime to terminate at a curvature singularity before any Levi-Civita-style infinity is reached. The upshot is a sharp split: local exact solution generation works in both theories, but only the Einstein–Maxwell branch yields a regular exterior.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Ernst-potential inversion of the Einstein–Maxwell system and the Hassan–Sen transformation of low-energy heterotic string theory. Inversion sends a seed pair $(E_0,\Phi_0)$ to $(1/E_0,\Phi_0/E_0)$ and preserves the coupled Ernst equations; it converts a constant electromagnetic gauge shift into a Harrison-type deformation, so the seeding representative must be fixed before inverting. The load-bearing algebraic object is the shared denominator $W=\Sigma H$: once $H$ is shown positive in the subextreme exterior, the KNLC line element has no Ernst zero and $g_{\phi\phi}>0$ there. The Hassan–Sen map builds the heterotic branch from the vacuum KLC metric through $\Lambda=1+s^2(1+g_{tt})$, where the sign of $\Lambda$ controls whether the dilaton is real; the same factor appears in the Kretschmann denominator and its vanishing marks the singular wall.

What would settle it

Take the Einstein–Maxwell line element (32) into its canonical Weyl–Lewis–Papapetrou coordinates and test for distributional stress-energy at the edge of the present chart; any hidden annular source inside the claimed exterior would falsify the regularity conclusion. Separately, evaluate the full off-axis Kretschmann scalar of the heterotic branch on a generic ray where $\Lambda=0$; finite curvature there would falsify the claim that the wall is a curvature singularity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that charging the rotated Levi-Civita spacetime does not restore the Kerr ring singularity in Einstein–Maxwell theory, yet charging it through the heterotic string action produces a new finite-radius obstruction. In the Einstein–Maxwell branch the exact identity $W=\Sigma H$, with $H>0$ outside the outer horizon, makes every metric component rational and pole-free there: the Ernst denominator never vanishes and $g_{\phi\phi}>0$ except on the axis. At the former Kerr ring $r=x=0$ the metric is analytic and the Kretschmann scalar takes the finite value quoted in Eq. (82), although charge creates a small interior zone where the azimuthal orbits are timelike, i.e. closed timelike curves. In the heterotic branch the Hassan–Sen parameter enters the metric, Maxwell, dilaton, and Kalb–Ramond fields; a real dilaton requires $\Lambda>0$, but at any fixed off-axis direction $\Lambda$ becomes negative at large radius, so the branch connected to the regular horizon ends at a $\Lambda=0$ wall. Exact slice factorizations in the string frame and independent Einstein-frame calculations show the wall is a genuine curvature singularity, and both families are generically Petrov type I.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the displayed $(r,x)$ coordinate patch covers the whole exterior region described, with no hidden thin sheet of matter at its boundary; the field equations are verified pointwise in this patch, but no global coordinate analysis, junction condition, or maximal extension is supplied.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the subextreme Einstein–Maxwell exterior, the proof that $H>0$ rules out two specific pathologies — Ernst zeros and azimuthal closed timelike curves — even though geodesic completeness is not established.
  • Adding Maxwell charge does not restore the Kerr ring singularity; the former ring has finite curvature, but its azimuthal orbits become timelike, so curvature regularity and causal regularity are distinct.
  • At fixed off-axis latitude, both the vacuum and charged Einstein–Maxwell far fields share the same leading Kretschmann law, $K\sim 192/[(1-x^2)^6 r^{12}]$, with charge appearing only in subleading terms.
  • The heterotic branch has a regular local Killing horizon with $(1+s^2)$ rescalings of angular velocity, area, and surface gravity, but it cannot be extended past the $\Lambda=0$ wall, so it is a local exact geometry rather than a completed black-hole exterior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the exterior-regularity proof holds, the natural next test is the same inversion in nonlinear electrodynamic extensions such as ModMax: ring cancellation may depend on the quadratic Maxwell form of the Ernst equations, and a failure there would show the mechanism is theory-specific.
  • The combination of a strictly causal exterior and an interior azimuthal closed-timelike-curve zone suggests the inner horizon may be a causal boundary; a geodesic or trapped-surface analysis could make that precise.
  • The noncommuting static/quotient limit — the regular azimuthal period collapses as $q\to 0$ — implies that any thermodynamic comparison of charged and uncharged Levi-Civita spacetimes must fix the azimuthal quotient first, so quasilocal charges are a prerequisite.
  • For the heterotic branch, the finite-radius wall hints that a globally regular 'dilatonic Levi-Civita' environment cannot be reached by this charging route; other dilaton-axion symmetries of the heterotic sector may still admit full Levi-Civita ends.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs two charged rotating generalizations of the Kerr--Levi-Civita metric. In the Einstein--Maxwell sector, the author inverts a magnetic Kerr--Newman Ernst pair, proves that the inversion is a symmetry of the coupled Ernst equations (Proposition 1), fixes the seed-gauge and ordering issue through the conjugacy I ∘ H_c = D_c ∘ I, and presents the resulting local line element (32) with rational potentials, integrable quadratures, and a field-equation verification. In the heterotic sector, the Hassan--Sen map is applied to the vacuum KLC seed, producing the metric together with Maxwell, dilaton, and Kalb--Ramond fields (Eq. 49). The main technical results are the factorization W = ΣH (Eq. 70), Proposition 2 excluding Ernst zeros and azimuthal closed timelike curves in the exterior chart, the curvature-regular former Kerr ring with an interior CTC region, the finite-radius Λ = 0 wall of the heterotic branch, and the Kretschmann, asymptotic, and Petrov-type analyses. The paper explicitly separates local exact solutions from global completions and acknowledges that Weyl/rod, junction, and distributional-source analyses remain open.

Significance. If the results stand, the paper provides a clear and well-documented pair of exact charged rotating LC geometries in two different matter models, with a sharp qualitative contrast: the Einstein--Maxwell inversion regularizes the former Kerr ring and preserves an exterior positivity property, whereas the Hassan--Sen image terminates at a singular wall. The verification record is a genuine strength: GRTensor worksheet checks, an independent exact-rational 2-jet engine, symbolic identities for general parameters, explicit static controls, and comparison with Astorino's independent representative. The paper is also unusually disciplined about what it does not claim: no maximal extension, no canonical Weyl/rod analysis, no first law. These features make the manuscript a solid contribution to the exact-solutions literature even though the global picture remains conditional.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 7] The abstract's 'subextreme exterior contains neither Ernst zeros nor azimuthal closed timelike curves' and the analogous wording in Section 7 should be explicitly tied to the coordinate domain r ≥ r+, |x| ≤ 1, with a sentence noting that the global exterior of a completed spacetime is not yet established pending the Weyl/rod and junction analysis.
  2. [Eq. (27)] The symbol N is reused for two different polynomials: N = (r² + a²)² − a² Δr Δx in Eq. (24) and N = −2ax[...] in Eq. (27), which makes Section 3.3 and Appendix C difficult to follow; please rename one of them.
  3. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (31)] The temporal gauge potential At is defined through the quadratures (30) and the unprinted polynomial PA, but since the paper advertises compact explicit potentials, please provide PA in an ancillary file or supplementary material so that the Maxwell field can be verified without recomputing the quadratures.
  4. [Sec. 6.4, Eq. (88)] The Einstein-frame wall exponents K^E ∝ Λ^{-6} and R^E ∝ Λ^{-3} are numerical results over three decades rather than proven symbolic identities; the main text should state this more prominently, as Appendix B already does.
  5. [Introduction, page 2] There are minor typos: 'donotclaim' and 'avacuumstationary' should be 'do not claim' and 'a vacuum stationary', and 'Keywords:exact' is missing a space.
  6. [Fig. 1 caption] The axis label 'm4| |' appears incomplete; it should read m^4|K| or similar.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the constructions are self-contained algebraic derivations checked against independent external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The Einstein–Maxwell branch starts from the standard Kerr–Newman Ernst pair (Eq. 25) and applies an explicit inversion rule (Eq. 12), whose validity is proven in Proposition 1 and Appendix A. The dragging and electric-potential quadratures (29)–(30) are stated with integrability conditions that vanish identically, and the resulting metric (32) is verified against the field equations; no parameter is fitted to any target output. The key structural claims are polynomial identities: the factorization W = ΣH (Eq. 70), the positivity proof of Proposition 2, the former-ring value (82), and the asymptotic laws (84)–(85) are all explicit and independently checkable from the displayed polynomials in Appendix C. The heterotic branch is likewise obtained by substituting the vacuum KLC seed into the standard Hassan–Sen map (46)–(48), with the seed and transformation both taken from external literature (Refs. [29,30]); the field equations are then checked directly. The author's own prior papers appear only as contextual or substitutive references, not as the foundation of the target claims: Refs. [32,33] are cited for the Hassan–Sen image substitution, but the paper independently verifies the full field-equation record, and Ref. [16] is merely a related earlier construction. The paper explicitly disclaims priority for the Einstein–Maxwell local metric and credits Astorino's independent strong-field construction (Ref. [24]); this is an external benchmark, not a self-citation. There is no fitted quantity relabeled as a prediction, no imported uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz smuggled in through citation. The acknowledged limitation—absence of a canonical Weyl/rod analysis, junction conditions, and maximal extension—bears on global completeness and possible distributional sources, as warned by Ref. [35], but it is a correctness or scope risk, not circularity of the local derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction uses standard Ernst and Hassan-Sen transformations and standard field content: Maxwell, dilaton, and Kalb-Ramond fields. No parameters are fitted to observations, and no new particle, force, or dimension is introduced; m, a, q, and s are generating parameters of the solutions, and ell is a normalization scale.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The coupled Ernst equations (11) with J=grad E + 2 eps arPhi grad Phi and eps=+/-1 correctly govern stationary axisymmetric electrovacuum, and inversion (12) preserves them.
    Section 3.1 and Appendix A; this is the standard Ernst formulation from Refs. [3,4].
  • domain assumption The metric is orthogonally transitive and takes the magnetic WLP form (2) in the charts used.
    Section 2.1; standard for stationary axisymmetric spacetimes, but restricts claims to the displayed coordinate domain.
  • domain assumption The low-energy heterotic action (40) with F=dA and H including the Chern-Simons term (41), together with the Hassan-Sen map (46)-(48), generates exact string-frame solutions from vacuum seeds.
    Section 4.1; defines the theory and the generating map following Refs. [28-30].
  • domain assumption The private GRTensor worksheets and the exact-rational jet engine correctly certify the reported residual vanishings and polynomial identities.
    Appendix B; no code or commit hash is shipped, so the verification record cannot be independently re-run.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charged Kerr--Levi-Civita geometries in Einstein--Maxwell and low-energy heterotic string theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J55TEOCH

@misc{pith2026260808550,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charged Kerr--Levi-Civita geometries in Einstein--Maxwell and low-energy heterotic string theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J55TEOCH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08550}
}
abstract

We construct and compare two charged rotating extensions of the Kerr--Levi-Civita geometry. In Einstein--Maxwell theory, a fixed magnetic Kerr--Newman Ernst representative is inverted, and covariance of the coupled Ernst equations, integrability of the dragging and electric-potential quadratures, and the field equations are verified. The resulting local line element agrees with a strong-field representative obtained independently, but no global equivalence of the azimuthal quotients is assumed. In low-energy heterotic string theory, the Hassan--Sen map is instead applied after the vacuum Kerr--Levi-Civita inversion, generating Maxwell, dilaton, and Kalb--Ramond fields. Both branches possess regular local Killing horizons. For the Einstein--Maxwell branch, an exact denominator factorization proves that the subextreme exterior contains neither Ernst zeros nor azimuthal closed timelike curves. The former Kerr ring has finite curvature, although it lies inside an interior region of timelike azimuthal orbits. Its Kretschmann scalar has the form $8\mathcal P_{\rm N}/\mathcal H^6$ and approaches a parameter-independent Levi-Civita law at fixed off-axis latitude. The heterotic branch is qualitatively different: the real component connected to the horizon terminates at a finite-radius $\Lambda=0$ surface. Exact string-frame slice factorizations and independent Einstein-frame calculations show that this surface is a curvature singularity rather than a conformal-frame artifact. Both families are generically Petrov type I. The results distinguish exact local solution generation from the unresolved construction of complete global spacetimes and the identification of possible distributional sources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08550 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Equatorial Kretschmann profiles for charge families at fixed seed ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The charged–vacuum Kretschmann gap in the Einstein–Maxwell branch at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro and J. P. A. Novo,Vacuum, ma non troppo: Hidden matter distribution in symmetry-transformed electrovacuum spacetimes, arXiv:2605.18967 [gr-qc] (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  2. [1]

    R. P. Kerr,Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

    work page 1963

  3. [2]

    E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash and R. Torrence,Metric of a rotating, charged mass, J. Math. Phys.6, 918 (1965)

    work page 1965

  4. [3]

    F. J. Ernst,New formulation of the axially symmetric gravitational field problem, Phys. Rev. 167, 1175 (1968)

    work page 1968

  5. [4]

    F. J. Ernst,New formulation of the axially symmetric gravitational field problem. II, Phys. Rev. 168, 1415 (1968). 20

    work page 1968

  6. [5]

    J. Ehlers,Transformations of static exterior solutions of Einstein ’s gravitational field equations into different solutions by means of conformal mapping, inLes Th´ eories Relativistes de la Gravitation, Colloq. Int. CNRS91, 275 (1962)

    work page 1962

  7. [6]

    B. K. Harrison,New solutions of the Einstein–Maxwell equations from old, J. Math. Phys.9, 1744 (1968)

    work page 1968

  8. [7]

    R. P. Geroch,A method for generating solutions of Einstein ’s equations, J. Math. Phys.12, 918 (1971)

    work page 1971

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Kinnersley,Generation of stationary Einstein–Maxwell fields, J

    W. Kinnersley,Generation of stationary Einstein–Maxwell fields, J. Math. Phys.14, 651 (1973)

    1973

  2. [9]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers and E. Herlt,Exact Solutions of Einstein ’s Field Equations, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    2003

  3. [10]

    Levi-Civita,ds 2 einsteiniani in campi newtoniani, Rend

    T. Levi-Civita,ds 2 einsteiniani in campi newtoniani, Rend. Accad. Lincei28, 101 (1919)

    1919

  4. [11]

    H. A. Buchdahl,Reciprocal static solutions of the equations Gµν = 0, Q. J. Math.5, 116 (1954)

    1954

  5. [12]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine and J. Oliva,Revisiting Buchdahl transformations: New static and rotating black holes in vacuum, double copy, and hairy extensions, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1011 (2024), arXiv:2404.12194 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    S. H. Mazharimousavi,Schwarzschild–Levi-Civita black hole, Phys. Lett. B861, 139234 (2025), arXiv:2403.02365 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Amirabi,On the Schwarzschild–Levi-Civita metric, Annals Phys.482, 170204 (2025)

    Z. Amirabi,On the Schwarzschild–Levi-Civita metric, Annals Phys.482, 170204 (2025)

    2025

  8. [15]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, K. M¨ uller and K. Pallikaris,A new exact rotating spacetime in vacuum: The Kerr–Levi-Civita spacetime, Phys. Lett. B871, 140035 (2025), arXiv:2506.07166 [gr-qc]

    2025

  9. [16]

    H. M. Siahaan,Kerr–NUT–Levi-Civita geometries from Ernst inversion: Axis structure, curva- ture singularities, and the Manko–Ruiz parameter, arXiv:2607.22046 [gr-qc] (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  10. [17]

    M. A. Melvin,Pure magnetic and electric geons, Phys. Lett.8, 65 (1964)

    1964

  11. [18]

    F. J. Ernst,Black holes in a magnetic universe, J. Math. Phys.17, 54 (1976)

    1976

  12. [19]

    G. W. Gibbons, A. H. Mujtaba and C. N. Pope,Ergoregions in magnetised black hole spacetimes, Class. Quantum Grav.30, 125008 (2013), arXiv:1301.3927 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Astorino, R

    M. Astorino, R. Martelli and A. Vigan` o,Black holes in a swirling universe, Phys. Rev. D106, 064014 (2022), arXiv:2205.13548 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    magnetic

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, I. Kol´ aˇ r, K. M¨ uller, M. Oyarzo and K. Pallikaris,Mixing “magnetic” and “electric” Ehlers–Harrison transformations: The electromagnetic swirling spacetime and novel type-I backgrounds, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 724 (2024), arXiv:2401.02924 [gr-qc]

    2024

  15. [22]

    Di Pinto, S

    A. Di Pinto, S. Klemm and A. Vigan` o,Kerr–Newman black hole in a Melvin-swirling universe, JHEP06, 150 (2025), arXiv:2503.07780 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Astorino,Black holes in the external Bertotti–Robinson–Bonnor–Melvin electromagnetic field, Phys

    M. Astorino,Black holes in the external Bertotti–Robinson–Bonnor–Melvin electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. D112, 104077 (2025), arXiv:2508.12908 [gr-qc]. 21

    2025

  17. [24]

    Astorino,Black holes in rotating, electromagnetic backgrounds and topological Kerr–Newman– NUT spacetimes, arXiv:2604.05017 [gr-qc] (2026)

    M. Astorino,Black holes in rotating, electromagnetic backgrounds and topological Kerr–Newman– NUT spacetimes, arXiv:2604.05017 [gr-qc] (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, A. D ´ ıaz and K. M¨ uller,From Bertotti–Robinson to vacuum: New exact solutions in general relativity via Harrison and inversion symmetries, arXiv:2602.17581 [gr-qc] (2026)

    2026

  19. [26]

    G. W. Gibbons and K. Maeda,Black holes and membranes in higher-dimensional theories with dilaton fields, Nucl. Phys. B298, 741 (1988)

    1988

  20. [27]

    Garfinkle, G

    D. Garfinkle, G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger,Charged black holes in string theory, Phys. Rev. D43, 3140 (1991); Erratum Phys. Rev. D45, 3888 (1992)

    1991

  21. [28]

    Kalb and P

    M. Kalb and P. Ramond,Classical direct interstring action, Phys. Rev. D9, 2273 (1974)

    1974

  22. [29]

    S. F. Hassan and A. Sen,Twisting classical solutions in heterotic string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 375, 103 (1992)

    1992

  23. [30]

    Sen,Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory, Phys

    A. Sen,Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1006 (1992)

    1992

  24. [31]

    D. V. Gal’tsov and O. V. Kechkin,Ehlers–Harrison-type transformations in dilaton–axion gravity, Phys. Rev. D50, 7394 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9407155

    1994 arXiv

  25. [32]

    H. M. Siahaan,Accelerating black holes in the low energy heterotic string theory, Phys. Lett. B 782, 594 (2018)

    2018

  26. [33]

    H. M. Siahaan,Accelerating Kerr–Taub–NUT spacetime in the low energy limit of heterotic string theory, Nucl. Phys. B1008, 116704 (2024)

    2024

  27. [34]

    S. H. Mazharimousavi,Charged Schwarzschild–Levi-Civita black hole via the Hassan–Sen transformation in heterotic string theory, Fortschr. Phys.74, e70121 (2026)

    2026

  28. [36]

    Carter,Killing horizons and orthogonally transitive groups in space-time, J

    B. Carter,Killing horizons and orthogonally transitive groups in space-time, J. Math. Phys.10, 70 (1969)

    1969

  29. [37]

    Astorino,Removal of conical singularities from rotating C-metrics and dual CFT entropy, JHEP10, 074 (2022), arXiv:2207.14305 [gr-qc]

    M. Astorino,Removal of conical singularities from rotating C-metrics and dual CFT entropy, JHEP10, 074 (2022), arXiv:2207.14305 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Baker and M

    J. Baker and M. Campanelli,Making use of geometrical invariants in black hole collisions, Phys. Rev. D62, 127501 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0003031

    2000 arXiv

  31. [39]

    R. M. Wald,Black hole entropy is Noether charge, Phys. Rev. D48, R3427 (1993), arXiv:gr- qc/9307038

    1993

  32. [40]

    Iyer and R

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald,Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D50, 846 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9403028

    1994 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bokuli´ c and C

    A. Bokuli´ c and C. A. R. Herdeiro,Generalised Harrison transformations and black diholes in Einstein–ModMax, JHEP10, 091 (2025), arXiv:2507.16926 [gr-qc]. 22

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Capobianco, B

    R. Capobianco, B. Hartmann, N. Vas, J. Kunz and J. Novo,Photon rings and shadows of Kerr black holes immersed in a swirling universe, Phys. Rev. D113, 064053 (2026), arXiv:2510.01937 [gr-qc]. 23

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.