Intrinsic origin of interfacial second-order magnetic anisotropy in ferromagnet/normal metal heterostructures

Hyeon-Jong Park; Hyung Keun Gweon; Kyoung-Whan Kim; Kyung-Jin Lee; Sang Ho Lim

arxiv: 1906.08450 · v1 · pith:J65YKQASnew · submitted 2019-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Intrinsic origin of interfacial second-order magnetic anisotropy in ferromagnet/normal metal heterostructures

Hyung Keun Gweon , Hyeon-Jong Park , Kyoung-Whan Kim , Kyung-Jin Lee , Sang Ho Lim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 20:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords second-order magnetic anisotropyinterfacial anisotropywork function differenceinversion asymmetryeasy-cone statePt/Co/X heterostructuresferromagnet/normal metal

0 comments

The pith

K2 scales almost linearly with the work-function difference between Co and X layers in Pt/Co/X heterostructures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to find the intrinsic origin of the second-order interfacial anisotropy K2. It shows experimentally that K2 varies nearly linearly with the work-function difference across the Co/X interface when X is changed among seven metals. This scaling identifies interfacial inversion asymmetry as the main driver of K2. The result matters because a sufficiently large K2 can stabilize the easy-cone magnetization state needed for certain spintronic devices and spin textures. Earlier models left some experimental trends unexplained.

Core claim

In Pt/Co/X heterostructures with X equal to Pd, Cu, Pt, Mo, Ru, W, or Ta, the second-order anisotropy K2 scales almost linearly with the work-function difference between the Co and X layers. The authors conclude that this linear dependence demonstrates the central role of inversion asymmetry at the interface in producing K2.

What carries the argument

Linear scaling of K2 with the Co-X work-function difference, taken as a direct indicator of interfacial inversion asymmetry.

If this is right

Selecting an X layer with a larger work-function mismatch to Co increases K2.
The relation supplies a materials-selection rule for reaching the easy-cone state.
Devices that rely on spin superfluids or easy-cone domain walls become more feasible.
Nonvolatile magnetic applications can be designed around controlled inversion asymmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same linear dependence may appear in other ferromagnet/normal-metal stacks once work-function differences are measured.
Interface design could treat work-function mismatch as an independent tuning parameter for higher-order anisotropies.
Models of perpendicular anisotropy might be simplified by focusing on electrostatic asymmetry rather than detailed orbital hybridization.

Load-bearing premise

The work-function difference serves as a faithful proxy for the strength of interfacial inversion asymmetry and is not dominated by other uncontrolled interface variables such as roughness or orbital overlap.

What would settle it

K2 measurements on a fresh series of Pt/Co/X samples in which interface quality is held fixed while work-function differences are varied; the linear scaling must hold or the proposed origin fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.08450 by Hyeon-Jong Park, Hyung Keun Gweon, Kyoung-Whan Kim, Kyung-Jin Lee, Sang Ho Lim.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Hyung Keun Gweon et al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Interfacial perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, which is characterized by the first-order (K1) and second-order (K2) anisotropies, is the core phenomenon for nonvolatile magnetic devices. A sizable K2 satisfying a specific condition stabilizes the easy-cone state, where equilibrium magnetization forms at an angle from the film normal. The easy-cone state offers intriguing possibilities for advanced spintronic devices and unique spin textures, such as spin superfluids and easy-cone domain walls. Experimental realization of the easy-cone state requires understanding the origin of K2, thereby enhancing K2. However, previously proposed origins of K2 cannot fully account for experimental results. Here we show experimentally that K2 scales almost linearly with the work-function difference between the Co and X layers in Pt/Co/X heterostructures (X = Pd, Cu, Pt, Mo, Ru, W, and Ta), suggesting the central role of the inversion asymmetry in K2. Our result provides a guideline for enhancing K2 and realizing magnetic applications based on the easy-cone state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The reported linear scaling of K2 with work-function difference is the concrete new observation, but it does not cleanly single out inversion asymmetry because other interface variables likely co-vary with the choice of X.

read the letter

The main result is that K2 in these Pt/Co/X stacks tracks roughly linearly with the work-function difference between Co and the X layer across Pd, Cu, Pt, Mo, Ru, W, and Ta. The authors present this as evidence that interfacial inversion asymmetry is the main driver of K2, after noting that earlier proposed mechanisms fall short. That correlation is the fresh experimental piece; it was not previously established for this material set and gives a simple material-selection rule for increasing K2 toward easy-cone conditions. The work is useful in that narrow sense for people already working on Co-based heterostructures and easy-cone devices. The data appear to come from standard anisotropy measurements on a series of samples, which is straightforward enough to be reproducible if the growth and characterization details hold up. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress test. Different X layers change lattice mismatch, chemical bonding, and possible intermixing at the Co/X interface in addition to the electrostatic offset captured by work function. Those factors are known to affect magnetic anisotropy independently, and nothing in the abstract indicates the authors held them constant or measured them across the series. If any of them scale with work-function difference, the observed linearity is consistent with several mechanisms at once and does not isolate inversion asymmetry. Without controls or discussion of those variables, the mechanistic claim rests on an assumption rather than a direct test. This paper is for spintronics groups focused on interfacial anisotropy tuning. The correlation itself is worth a look if you are growing similar stacks, but the interpretation needs more scrutiny before it can be taken as a design rule. It deserves peer review because the experimental trend is specific and falsifiable, even though the central explanation is under-supported as written.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental measurements on Pt/Co/X heterostructures (X = Pd, Cu, Pt, Mo, Ru, W, Ta) demonstrating that the second-order interfacial anisotropy K2 scales nearly linearly with the work-function difference Δφ between Co and X. This correlation is interpreted as evidence that interfacial inversion asymmetry is the dominant origin of K2, providing a materials-design guideline for stabilizing easy-cone states.

Significance. If the scaling relation is shown to be robust against confounding interface variables, the result would offer a simple, experimentally accessible handle for tuning K2 in ferromagnet/normal-metal stacks. This could accelerate realization of easy-cone-based spintronic devices, though the current evidence leaves open whether Δφ uniquely isolates inversion asymmetry.

major comments (2)

[Results] Results section (scaling of K2 vs. Δφ): the near-linear trend is presented across seven X species, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative assessment or controls for co-varying interface parameters (lattice mismatch, electronegativity, or intermixing) that also change systematically with X and are known to affect interfacial anisotropy independently of electrostatic asymmetry.
[Discussion] Discussion of mechanism: the claim that the observed scaling singles out inversion asymmetry as the central origin requires explicit argument that alternative K2 contributions (orbital overlap, strain) remain either constant or uncorrelated with Δφ; no such analysis or supporting data (e.g., XPS or TEM interface characterization) is supplied.

minor comments (1)

[Methods] Experimental methods: expand the description of how K2 is extracted from torque or magnetization data, including fitting procedures, error propagation, and sample-to-sample statistics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results] Results section (scaling of K2 vs. Δφ): the near-linear trend is presented across seven X species, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative assessment or controls for co-varying interface parameters (lattice mismatch, electronegativity, or intermixing) that also change systematically with X and are known to affect interfacial anisotropy independently of electrostatic asymmetry.

Authors: We agree that a quantitative assessment of co-varying parameters would strengthen the presentation. While the primary evidence remains the observed linear scaling of K2 with Δφ, we will add a supplementary analysis in the revised manuscript that compares the correlation of K2 with Δφ against correlations with lattice mismatch and electronegativity using the existing dataset, to demonstrate that the Δφ trend is the strongest. revision: partial
Referee: [Discussion] Discussion of mechanism: the claim that the observed scaling singles out inversion asymmetry as the central origin requires explicit argument that alternative K2 contributions (orbital overlap, strain) remain either constant or uncorrelated with Δφ; no such analysis or supporting data (e.g., XPS or TEM interface characterization) is supplied.

Authors: We will revise the discussion section to include an explicit argument that alternative contributions such as orbital overlap and strain do not follow the same linear dependence on the choice of X, given that the seven materials span a wide range of these properties yet K2 tracks Δφ. We note that XPS or TEM characterization was not performed in this study. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Provision of XPS or TEM interface characterization data, as these measurements were not included in the original experimental work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental correlation between independently measured quantities

full rationale

The paper's central result is an experimental observation that K2 scales nearly linearly with the work-function difference Δφ across Pt/Co/X stacks (X = Pd, Cu, Pt, Mo, Ru, W, Ta). This is presented as a direct measurement of two separate quantities (magnetic anisotropy from magnetometry and work functions from literature or separate characterization) without any derivation chain, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-referential definition. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's equations to its own inputs, and the claim does not rely on self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems from the authors' prior work. The result is self-contained as an empirical correlation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the experimental correlation and the domain assumption that work-function difference faithfully indexes interfacial inversion asymmetry; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Work-function difference between Co and X accurately captures the strength of interfacial inversion asymmetry
The abstract directly links the observed K2 trend to this quantity as the indicator of asymmetry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1301 out tokens · 26328 ms · 2026-05-25T20:00:07.504448+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

& Kirschner, J

Millev, Y. & Kirschner, J. Reorientation transitions in ultrathin ferromagnetic films by thickness - and temperature-driven anisotropy flows. Phys. Rev. B 54, 4137-4145 (1996)

work page 1996
[2]

& Chshiev, M

Dieny, B. & Chshiev, M. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal/oxide interfaces and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025008 (2017)

work page 2017
[3]

Ikeda, S. et al. A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction. Nat. Mater. 9, 721-724 (2010)

work page 2010
[4]

& Imamura, H

Matsumoto, R., Arai, H., Yuasa, S. & Imamura, H. Spin-transfer-torque switching in a spin- valve nanopillar with a conically magnetized free layer. Appl. Phys. Express 8, 063007 (2015)

work page 2015
[5]

Strelkov, N. et al . Stability phase diagram of a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction in noncollinear geometry. Phys. Rev. B 95, 184409 (2017)

work page 2017
[6]

Bultynck, O. et al . Instant -on spin torque in noncollinear magnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054028 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

& Lee, K.- J

Jang, P.- H., Lee, S.- W. & Lee, K.- J. Spin- transfer-torque-induced zero -field microwave oscillator using a magnetic easy cone state. Curr. Appl. Phys. 16, 1550-1553 (2016). 16

work page 2016
[8]

Sonin, E. B. Spin currents and spin superfluidity. Adv. Phys. 59, 181-255 (2010)

work page 2010
[9]

Kim, S. K. & Tserkovnyak, Y. Interaction between a domain wall and spin supercurrent in easy-cone magnets. Phys. Rev. B 94, 220404 (2016)

work page 2016
[10]

Jang, P.-H., Oh, S.-H., Kim, S. K. & Lee, K.- J. Domain wall dynamics in easy - cone magnets. Phys. Rev. B 99, 024424 (2019)

work page 2019
[11]

Timopheev, A. A. et al . Inhomogeneous free layer in perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions and its impact on the effective anisotropies and spin transfer torque switching efficiency. Phys. Rev. B 96, 14412 (2017)

work page 2017
[12]

Teixeira, B. M. S. et al . Ion irradiation-induced easy-cone anisotropy in double- MgO free layers for perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 202403 (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

Tight -binding approach to the orbital magnetic moment and magnetocrystalline anisotropy of transition -metal monolayers

Bruno, P. Tight -binding approach to the orbital magnetic moment and magnetocrystalline anisotropy of transition -metal monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 39, 865(R) (1989)

work page 1989
[14]

Nakamura, K. et al. Giant modification of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy in transition-metal monolayers by an external electric field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 187201 (2009). 17

work page 2009
[15]

E., Ieda, J

Barnes, S. E., Ieda, J. & Maekawa, S. Rashba spin- orbit anisotropy and the electric field control of magnetism. Sci. Rep. 4, 4105 (2014)

work page 2014
[16]

-W., Lee, K.- J., Lee, H.- W

Kim, K. -W., Lee, K.- J., Lee, H.- W. & Stiles, M. D. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of two- dimensional Rashba ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 94, 184402 (2016)

work page 2016
[17]

Pradipto, A.- M. et al . Enhanced perpendicular magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy in an artificial magnetic material with bulk spin -momentum coupling. arXiv:1809.00801 (2018)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[18]

& Vedyayev, A

Dieny, B. & Vedyayev, A. Crossover from easy -plane to perpendicular anisotropy in magnetic thin films: canted anisotropy due to partial coverage or interfacial roughness. Europhys. Lett. 25, 723-728 (1994)

work page 1994
[19]

Sun, J. Z. Consequences of an interface -concentrated perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in ultrathin CoFeB films used in magnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B 91, 174429 (2015)

work page 2015
[20]

& Kaczér, J

Tomáš, I., Murtinová, L. & Kaczér, J. Easy magnetization axes in materials with combined cubic and uniaxial anisotropies. Phys. Stat. Sol. A 75, 121-127 (1983). 18

work page 1983
[21]

Fritzsche, H., Kohlhepp, J., Elmers, H. J. & Gradmann, U. Angular dependence of perpendicular magnetic surface anisotropy and the spin-reorientation transition. Phys. Rev. B 49, 15665 (1994)

work page 1994
[22]

P., Speckmann, M., Millev, Y

Oepen H. P., Speckmann, M., Millev, Y. & Kirschner, J. Unified approach to thickness-driven magnetic reorientation transitions. Phys. Rev. B 55, 2752 (1997)

work page 1997
[23]

& Dieny, B

Rodmacq, B., Manchon, A., Ducruet, C., Auffret, S. & Dieny, B. Influence of thermal annealing on the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of Pt/Co/AlOx trilayers. Phys. Rev. B 79, 024423 (2009)

work page 2009
[24]

Yang, Y. et al . Unveiling the role of Co- O-Mg bond in magnetic anisotropy of Pt/Co/MgO using atomically controlled deposition and in situ electrical measurement. Phys. Rev. B 95, 094417 (2017)

work page 2017
[25]

K., Yun, S

Gweon, H. K., Yun, S. J. & Lim, S. H. A very l arge perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Pt/Co/MgO trilayers fabricated by controlling the MgO sputtering power and its thickness. Sci. Rep. 8, 1266 (2018)

work page 2018
[26]

& Thompson, J

Sucksmith, W. & Thompson, J. E. The magnetic anisotropy of cobalt. Proc. Royal Soc. A 225, 362 (1954). 19

work page 1954
[27]

Park, Y.- K. et al . Experimental observation of the correlation between the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction and work function in metallic magnetic trilayers. NPG Asia Mater. 10, 995-1001 (2018)

work page 2018
[28]

E., Keiter, E

Huheey, J. E., Keiter, E. A. & Keiter, R. L. Inorganic Chemistry. 4th edn, (Harper- Collins College Publishers, NY, USA, 1993)

work page 1993
[29]

& Gandofi, M

Montalti, M., Credi, A., Prodi, L. & Gandofi, M. T., Handbook of Photochemistry. 3rd edn (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA 2006)

work page 2006
[30]

& Hedegård, P

Petersen, L. & Hedegård, P. A simple tight-binding model of spin-orbit splitting of sp-derived surface states. Surf. Sci. 459, 49-56 (2000)

work page 2000
[31]

Krupin, O. et al . Rashba effect at magnetic metal surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 71, 201403(R) (2005)

work page 2005
[32]

Tsai, H. et al. Clear variation of spin splitting by changing electron distribution at non-magnetic metal/Bi2O3 interface. Sci. Rep. 8, 5564 (2018)

work page 2018
[33]

Miedema, A. R. The electronegativity parameter for transition metals: Heat of formation and charge transfer in alloys. J. Less-Common Metals 32, 117 (1973). 20 Figure captions Figure 1 | Phase diagram showing various magnetic states and inverse thickness dependences of K1 and K2. a , Magnetic phase diagram as function s of eff 1K and K2, showing four diff...

work page 1973

[1] [1]

& Kirschner, J

Millev, Y. & Kirschner, J. Reorientation transitions in ultrathin ferromagnetic films by thickness - and temperature-driven anisotropy flows. Phys. Rev. B 54, 4137-4145 (1996)

work page 1996

[2] [2]

& Chshiev, M

Dieny, B. & Chshiev, M. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal/oxide interfaces and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025008 (2017)

work page 2017

[3] [3]

Ikeda, S. et al. A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction. Nat. Mater. 9, 721-724 (2010)

work page 2010

[4] [4]

& Imamura, H

Matsumoto, R., Arai, H., Yuasa, S. & Imamura, H. Spin-transfer-torque switching in a spin- valve nanopillar with a conically magnetized free layer. Appl. Phys. Express 8, 063007 (2015)

work page 2015

[5] [5]

Strelkov, N. et al . Stability phase diagram of a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction in noncollinear geometry. Phys. Rev. B 95, 184409 (2017)

work page 2017

[6] [6]

Bultynck, O. et al . Instant -on spin torque in noncollinear magnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054028 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

& Lee, K.- J

Jang, P.- H., Lee, S.- W. & Lee, K.- J. Spin- transfer-torque-induced zero -field microwave oscillator using a magnetic easy cone state. Curr. Appl. Phys. 16, 1550-1553 (2016). 16

work page 2016

[8] [8]

Sonin, E. B. Spin currents and spin superfluidity. Adv. Phys. 59, 181-255 (2010)

work page 2010

[9] [9]

Kim, S. K. & Tserkovnyak, Y. Interaction between a domain wall and spin supercurrent in easy-cone magnets. Phys. Rev. B 94, 220404 (2016)

work page 2016

[10] [10]

Jang, P.-H., Oh, S.-H., Kim, S. K. & Lee, K.- J. Domain wall dynamics in easy - cone magnets. Phys. Rev. B 99, 024424 (2019)

work page 2019

[11] [11]

Timopheev, A. A. et al . Inhomogeneous free layer in perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions and its impact on the effective anisotropies and spin transfer torque switching efficiency. Phys. Rev. B 96, 14412 (2017)

work page 2017

[12] [12]

Teixeira, B. M. S. et al . Ion irradiation-induced easy-cone anisotropy in double- MgO free layers for perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 202403 (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [13]

Tight -binding approach to the orbital magnetic moment and magnetocrystalline anisotropy of transition -metal monolayers

Bruno, P. Tight -binding approach to the orbital magnetic moment and magnetocrystalline anisotropy of transition -metal monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 39, 865(R) (1989)

work page 1989

[14] [14]

Nakamura, K. et al. Giant modification of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy in transition-metal monolayers by an external electric field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 187201 (2009). 17

work page 2009

[15] [15]

E., Ieda, J

Barnes, S. E., Ieda, J. & Maekawa, S. Rashba spin- orbit anisotropy and the electric field control of magnetism. Sci. Rep. 4, 4105 (2014)

work page 2014

[16] [16]

-W., Lee, K.- J., Lee, H.- W

Kim, K. -W., Lee, K.- J., Lee, H.- W. & Stiles, M. D. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of two- dimensional Rashba ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 94, 184402 (2016)

work page 2016

[17] [17]

Pradipto, A.- M. et al . Enhanced perpendicular magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy in an artificial magnetic material with bulk spin -momentum coupling. arXiv:1809.00801 (2018)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[18] [18]

& Vedyayev, A

Dieny, B. & Vedyayev, A. Crossover from easy -plane to perpendicular anisotropy in magnetic thin films: canted anisotropy due to partial coverage or interfacial roughness. Europhys. Lett. 25, 723-728 (1994)

work page 1994

[19] [19]

Sun, J. Z. Consequences of an interface -concentrated perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in ultrathin CoFeB films used in magnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B 91, 174429 (2015)

work page 2015

[20] [20]

& Kaczér, J

Tomáš, I., Murtinová, L. & Kaczér, J. Easy magnetization axes in materials with combined cubic and uniaxial anisotropies. Phys. Stat. Sol. A 75, 121-127 (1983). 18

work page 1983

[21] [21]

Fritzsche, H., Kohlhepp, J., Elmers, H. J. & Gradmann, U. Angular dependence of perpendicular magnetic surface anisotropy and the spin-reorientation transition. Phys. Rev. B 49, 15665 (1994)

work page 1994

[22] [22]

P., Speckmann, M., Millev, Y

Oepen H. P., Speckmann, M., Millev, Y. & Kirschner, J. Unified approach to thickness-driven magnetic reorientation transitions. Phys. Rev. B 55, 2752 (1997)

work page 1997

[23] [23]

& Dieny, B

Rodmacq, B., Manchon, A., Ducruet, C., Auffret, S. & Dieny, B. Influence of thermal annealing on the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of Pt/Co/AlOx trilayers. Phys. Rev. B 79, 024423 (2009)

work page 2009

[24] [24]

Yang, Y. et al . Unveiling the role of Co- O-Mg bond in magnetic anisotropy of Pt/Co/MgO using atomically controlled deposition and in situ electrical measurement. Phys. Rev. B 95, 094417 (2017)

work page 2017

[25] [25]

K., Yun, S

Gweon, H. K., Yun, S. J. & Lim, S. H. A very l arge perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Pt/Co/MgO trilayers fabricated by controlling the MgO sputtering power and its thickness. Sci. Rep. 8, 1266 (2018)

work page 2018

[26] [26]

& Thompson, J

Sucksmith, W. & Thompson, J. E. The magnetic anisotropy of cobalt. Proc. Royal Soc. A 225, 362 (1954). 19

work page 1954

[27] [27]

Park, Y.- K. et al . Experimental observation of the correlation between the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction and work function in metallic magnetic trilayers. NPG Asia Mater. 10, 995-1001 (2018)

work page 2018

[28] [28]

E., Keiter, E

Huheey, J. E., Keiter, E. A. & Keiter, R. L. Inorganic Chemistry. 4th edn, (Harper- Collins College Publishers, NY, USA, 1993)

work page 1993

[29] [29]

& Gandofi, M

Montalti, M., Credi, A., Prodi, L. & Gandofi, M. T., Handbook of Photochemistry. 3rd edn (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA 2006)

work page 2006

[30] [30]

& Hedegård, P

Petersen, L. & Hedegård, P. A simple tight-binding model of spin-orbit splitting of sp-derived surface states. Surf. Sci. 459, 49-56 (2000)

work page 2000

[31] [31]

Krupin, O. et al . Rashba effect at magnetic metal surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 71, 201403(R) (2005)

work page 2005

[32] [32]

Tsai, H. et al. Clear variation of spin splitting by changing electron distribution at non-magnetic metal/Bi2O3 interface. Sci. Rep. 8, 5564 (2018)

work page 2018

[33] [33]

Miedema, A. R. The electronegativity parameter for transition metals: Heat of formation and charge transfer in alloys. J. Less-Common Metals 32, 117 (1973). 20 Figure captions Figure 1 | Phase diagram showing various magnetic states and inverse thickness dependences of K1 and K2. a , Magnetic phase diagram as function s of eff 1K and K2, showing four diff...

work page 1973