REVIEW 2 cited by
Do Perceptually Aligned Gradients Imply Adversarial Robustness?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Adversarially robust classifiers possess a trait that non-robust models do not -- Perceptually Aligned Gradients (PAG). Their gradients with respect to the input align well with human perception. Several works have identified PAG as a byproduct of robust training, but none have considered it as a standalone phenomenon nor studied its own implications. In this work, we focus on this trait and test whether \emph{Perceptually Aligned Gradients imply Robustness}. To this end, we develop a novel objective to directly promote PAG in training classifiers and examine whether models with such gradients are more robust to adversarial attacks. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets and architectures validate that models with aligned gradients exhibit significant robustness, exposing the surprising bidirectional connection between PAG and robustness. Lastly, we show that better gradient alignment leads to increased robustness and harness this observation to boost the robustness of existing adversarial training techniques.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Superposition
The paper argues that adversarial examples arise from superposition, and shows that changing superposition changes robustness and vice versa in toy models and ResNet18.
-
Evaluating the Robustness of the "Ensemble Everything Everywhere" Defense
Adaptive attacks reduce the robust accuracy of the 'Ensemble Everything Everywhere' defense to 11% on CIFAR-10 and 14% on CIFAR-100 under an l-infinity bound of 8/255.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.