Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DRDT: Dynamic Reflection with Divergent Thinking for LLM-based Sequential Recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.11336 v1 pith:J6HIX6GM submitted 2023-12-18 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords sequentialuserllmsreasoningrecommendationacrossdatasetsdynamic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has sparked interest in their application to sequential recommendation tasks as they can provide supportive item information. However, due to the inherent complexities of sequential recommendation, such as sequential patterns across datasets, noise within sequences, and the temporal evolution of user preferences, existing LLM reasoning strategies, such as in-context learning and chain-of-thought are not fully effective. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel reasoning principle: Dynamic Reflection with Divergent Thinking within a retriever-reranker framework. Our approach starts with a collaborative in-context demonstration retriever, which collects sequences exhibiting collaborative behaviors as in-context examples. Following this, we abstract high-level user preferences across multiple aspects, providing a more nuanced understanding of user interests and circumventing the noise within the raw sequences. The cornerstone of our methodology is dynamic reflection, a process that emulates human learning through probing, critiquing, and reflecting, using user feedback to tailor the analysis more effectively to the target user in a temporal manner. We evaluate our approach on three datasets using six pre-trained LLMs. The superior performance observed across these models demonstrates the efficacy of our reasoning strategy, notably achieved without the need to fine-tune the LLMs. With our principle, we managed to outperform GPT-Turbo-3.5 on three datasets using 7b models e.g., Vicuna-7b and Openchat-7b on NDCG@10. This research not only highlights the potential of LLMs in enhancing sequential recommendation systems but also underscores the importance of developing tailored reasoning strategies to fully harness their capabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scalable, Symbiotic, AI and Non-AI Agent Based Parallel Discrete Event Simulations

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    PDES orchestration of small language models with non-AI verifier agents raises accuracy on four toy tasks from about 23 percent to 68 percent, with the verifiers supplying most of the correctness.

  2. A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper categorizes LLM-powered agents for recommender systems into recommender-oriented, interaction-oriented, and simulation-oriented paradigms and describes a common four-module agent architecture.

Pith tools